Upload
YouTube Videos
Funny Pictures
Funny GIFs
Funny Text
Funny Movies
Channels
Search
Search
Login or register
Logout
Settings
I (
0
)
Subs (
0
)
Favs (
0
)
Friends (
0
)
Login or register
reset password
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter emailed to you
Captcha Code:
PMs (
0
)
Create Channel
overwatchtime
FJNN
pokemon
animemanga
dankwebms
trump
politics
aww
SVTFOE
vidyagaems
funny
occomicmakers
zawarldo
rwby
cuteasiangirls
Sabaton
twitter
dccomics
morbidchannel
fallout4
cringechannel
4chan
marvel
diychannel
skyrim
lewd
warhammer40k
gaming
zootopia
CartoonGoodness
alloc
military
monstergirls
futurama
stevenuniverse
erma
ponytime
campfire
elderscrolls
depressingstuff
music
humanityfyeah
TheLoudHouse
tumblr
morbid
lolchannel
loudhouse
honeybiscuit
Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to honeybiscuit
Block honeybiscuit
Unblock honeybiscuit
Invite honeybiscuit to be your friend
Last status update:

Gender:
male
Date Signed Up:
6/27/2011
Last Login:
8/25/2014
Stats
Comment Thumbs:
3429
total, 3814
, 385
Content Level Progress:
6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:
22% (22/100)
Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:
0
Total Comments Made:
848
FJ Points:
3743
It's like a regular biscuit, but with honey on it.
What people say about honeybiscuit
latest user's comments
#442
 That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And…
[+]
(4 replies)
04/01/2013 on
Math time
+1
#445

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
Okay, new question do you know how the equation
4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead.
#446

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined.
4x+3=2x+2x3
4x+3=4x3
4x 4x
3 ≠ 3
I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school.
#447

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points.
#448

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
And I said, I'd never use this stuff. I completely forgot to include talking to a random stranger on the internet 4 years after I've graduated. Seriously haven't done any substantial amount of math since school. The only math I really see now is IP and Binary math. And that's somewhat boring, and it makes me forget what I learned in school.
Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway).
pic unrelated.
#441
 The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way th…
04/01/2013 on
Math time
+1
#437
 Sure 6*3 = 18/2 = 9 But is that really right to left?…
[+]
(11 replies)
04/01/2013 on
Math time
+1
#438

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
If you do it correctly it works out right if you do it incorrectly it works out wrong...
#441

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way that you have rewritten it is because, you are only multiplying two numbers. The order of operations doesn't matter. In a situation like the OP's, where you are given 3 numbers, you multiply and divide from left to right following the order of operations, whether you like that or not.
Otherwise there are only a few situations where you can work from right to left, but it is the exception and not the rule. For example. 2/2(2) is 2 no matter how you do it.
6/2(3) is either 9 or 1. 9 is correct because you must work from left to right. And if you disagree with that outcome, ask a calculator, you are beyond help.
#439

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
If you were to start with putting the 3 and the 2 together you will notice that the 3 is 3/1 and the 2 is 1/2 so 3/2 = 1.5
1.5*6
9
#443

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Yes you can rewrite the problem multiple way to make it work, and always get the same answer, it's the nature of math. But you are taking the numbers as if you were reading from right to left, and then rewriting it to make it work, but the math that follows after you rewrite it, occurs left to right, even if you are isolating it two numbers where the order of operations doesn't matter.
#444

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
isolating the two numbers*
#442

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And you are still sort of going left to right. You doing the 2 and 3 still, but you are using dividing rather than doing the multiplication that is actually between them. There is no way to do it truly reading it from right to left. The only thing you can do is 2(3) if you are going from right to left and not changing anything. You aren't entirely wrong, but maybe you are misunderstanding me when I say right to left. No changes to make it "work" just looking at it and doing the math between the numbers from right to left as if you were reading backwards.
#445

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
Okay, new question do you know how the equation
4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead.
#446

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined.
4x+3=2x+2x3
4x+3=4x3
4x 4x
3 ≠ 3
I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school.
#447

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points.
#448

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
And I said, I'd never use this stuff. I completely forgot to include talking to a random stranger on the internet 4 years after I've graduated. Seriously haven't done any substantial amount of math since school. The only math I really see now is IP and Binary math. And that's somewhat boring, and it makes me forget what I learned in school.
Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway).
pic unrelated.
#440

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
I like having these real talk discussions. I have more topics if you wish to learn / discuss.
#426
 Tell ya what. Let's run it through a calculator. Google will d…
[+]
(13 replies)
03/30/2013 on
Math time
+1
#435

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
Okay, all I'm going to say is that left to right isn't a rule. e.g.
(8/2)(2)
8/2=4
4*2=
8
or
8*2=16
16/2=
8
If you do it correctly it never matters what order you go in while doing multiplication / division.
If you want I can do the equation given in the post and do it right to left to get nine.
#437

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Sure 6*3 = 18/2 = 9
But is that really right to left? Simply going from right to left would result in you multiplying the 3 by 2 then dividing by 6. Which is completely wrong.
3*2 = 6/6 = 1
You are still working from left to right.
#438

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
If you do it correctly it works out right if you do it incorrectly it works out wrong...
#441

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way that you have rewritten it is because, you are only multiplying two numbers. The order of operations doesn't matter. In a situation like the OP's, where you are given 3 numbers, you multiply and divide from left to right following the order of operations, whether you like that or not.
Otherwise there are only a few situations where you can work from right to left, but it is the exception and not the rule. For example. 2/2(2) is 2 no matter how you do it.
6/2(3) is either 9 or 1. 9 is correct because you must work from left to right. And if you disagree with that outcome, ask a calculator, you are beyond help.
#439

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
If you were to start with putting the 3 and the 2 together you will notice that the 3 is 3/1 and the 2 is 1/2 so 3/2 = 1.5
1.5*6
9
#443

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Yes you can rewrite the problem multiple way to make it work, and always get the same answer, it's the nature of math. But you are taking the numbers as if you were reading from right to left, and then rewriting it to make it work, but the math that follows after you rewrite it, occurs left to right, even if you are isolating it two numbers where the order of operations doesn't matter.
#444

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
isolating the two numbers*
#442

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And you are still sort of going left to right. You doing the 2 and 3 still, but you are using dividing rather than doing the multiplication that is actually between them. There is no way to do it truly reading it from right to left. The only thing you can do is 2(3) if you are going from right to left and not changing anything. You aren't entirely wrong, but maybe you are misunderstanding me when I say right to left. No changes to make it "work" just looking at it and doing the math between the numbers from right to left as if you were reading backwards.
#445

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
Okay, new question do you know how the equation
4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead.
#446

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined.
4x+3=2x+2x3
4x+3=4x3
4x 4x
3 ≠ 3
I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school.
#447

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points.
#448

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
And I said, I'd never use this stuff. I completely forgot to include talking to a random stranger on the internet 4 years after I've graduated. Seriously haven't done any substantial amount of math since school. The only math I really see now is IP and Binary math. And that's somewhat boring, and it makes me forget what I learned in school.
Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway).
pic unrelated.
#440

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
I like having these real talk discussions. I have more topics if you wish to learn / discuss.
#21
 Comment deleted
03/30/2013 on
Goku
0
#18
 Comment deleted
[+]
(1 reply)
03/30/2013 on
Goku
0
#21

honeybiscuit
Comment deleted by
#395
 God dammit, multiply and divide at the same time from left to …
[+]
(16 replies)
03/30/2013 on
Math time
+2
#413

bazingaman
(03/30/2013)
[]
You don't have to go from left to right, that isn't a rule they can be done in whatever order, but if you really want to go from left to right the division symbol never had an ending showing that everything after the division symbol is under it. So going from left to right.
(6/2)(1/3)=1
#436

bazingaman
has deleted their comment.
#426

honeybiscuit
(03/30/2013)
[]
Tell ya what. Let's run it through a calculator. Google will do it for us. And let me know what answer you see here. (Google rewrites the equation here, unlike you the answer remains the same). Go ahead and confirm that for yourself if you are so inclined.
You do have to do multiplication and division as you come across them starting from left to right. It actually IS a rule in the order of operations. Go ahead and Google that too while you're at it.
#435

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
Okay, all I'm going to say is that left to right isn't a rule. e.g.
(8/2)(2)
8/2=4
4*2=
8
or
8*2=16
16/2=
8
If you do it correctly it never matters what order you go in while doing multiplication / division.
If you want I can do the equation given in the post and do it right to left to get nine.
#437

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Sure 6*3 = 18/2 = 9
But is that really right to left? Simply going from right to left would result in you multiplying the 3 by 2 then dividing by 6. Which is completely wrong.
3*2 = 6/6 = 1
You are still working from left to right.
#438

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
If you do it correctly it works out right if you do it incorrectly it works out wrong...
#441

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way that you have rewritten it is because, you are only multiplying two numbers. The order of operations doesn't matter. In a situation like the OP's, where you are given 3 numbers, you multiply and divide from left to right following the order of operations, whether you like that or not.
Otherwise there are only a few situations where you can work from right to left, but it is the exception and not the rule. For example. 2/2(2) is 2 no matter how you do it.
6/2(3) is either 9 or 1. 9 is correct because you must work from left to right. And if you disagree with that outcome, ask a calculator, you are beyond help.
#439

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
If you were to start with putting the 3 and the 2 together you will notice that the 3 is 3/1 and the 2 is 1/2 so 3/2 = 1.5
1.5*6
9
#443

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Yes you can rewrite the problem multiple way to make it work, and always get the same answer, it's the nature of math. But you are taking the numbers as if you were reading from right to left, and then rewriting it to make it work, but the math that follows after you rewrite it, occurs left to right, even if you are isolating it two numbers where the order of operations doesn't matter.
#444

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
isolating the two numbers*
#442

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And you are still sort of going left to right. You doing the 2 and 3 still, but you are using dividing rather than doing the multiplication that is actually between them. There is no way to do it truly reading it from right to left. The only thing you can do is 2(3) if you are going from right to left and not changing anything. You aren't entirely wrong, but maybe you are misunderstanding me when I say right to left. No changes to make it "work" just looking at it and doing the math between the numbers from right to left as if you were reading backwards.
#445

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
Okay, new question do you know how the equation
4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead.
#446

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined.
4x+3=2x+2x3
4x+3=4x3
4x 4x
3 ≠ 3
I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school.
#447

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points.
#448

honeybiscuit
(04/01/2013)
[]
And I said, I'd never use this stuff. I completely forgot to include talking to a random stranger on the internet 4 years after I've graduated. Seriously haven't done any substantial amount of math since school. The only math I really see now is IP and Binary math. And that's somewhat boring, and it makes me forget what I learned in school.
Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway).
pic unrelated.
#440

bazingaman
(04/01/2013)
[]
I like having these real talk discussions. I have more topics if you wish to learn / discuss.
#393
 Seriously where the **** are you people from? I'm not joking. …
03/30/2013 on
Math time
0
#378
 Not really, division and multiplication happen at the same tim…
[+]
(1 reply)
03/30/2013 on
Math time
0
#424

khalidh
(03/30/2013)
[]
i was taught using the British System
We learnt it as BODMAS
#375
 **** you guys, Google that bitch. For some reason it rewrote t…
03/30/2013 on
Math time
+1
Prev
First
8
9
10
11
12
30
60
Last
Next
[
844
Total
]
Show Comments (0)