honeybiscuit
Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to honeybiscuit Block honeybiscuit Invite honeybiscuit to be your friend Last status update:  

 
Gender:  male 
Date Signed Up:  6/27/2011 
Last Login:  8/25/2014 
FunnyJunk Career Stats  
Comment Thumbs:  3429 total, 3814 , 385 
Content Level Progress:  6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here 
Comment Level Progress:  22% (22/100) Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz 
Subscribers:  0 
Total Comments Made:  848 
FJ Points:  3743 
It's like a regular biscuit, but with honey on it.
latest user's comments
#442  That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And… [+] (4 new replies)  04/01/2013 on Math time  +1 
#445 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] Okay, new question do you know how the equation 4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead. #446 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined. 4x+3=2x+2x3 4x+3=4x3 4x 4x 3 ≠ 3 I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school. #447 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points. #448 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway). pic unrelated.  
#441  The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way th…  04/01/2013 on Math time  +1 
#437  Sure 6*3 = 18/2 = 9 But is that really right to left?… [+] (11 new replies)  04/01/2013 on Math time  +1 
#441 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way that you have rewritten it is because, you are only multiplying two numbers. The order of operations doesn't matter. In a situation like the OP's, where you are given 3 numbers, you multiply and divide from left to right following the order of operations, whether you like that or not. Otherwise there are only a few situations where you can work from right to left, but it is the exception and not the rule. For example. 2/2(2) is 2 no matter how you do it. 6/2(3) is either 9 or 1. 9 is correct because you must work from left to right. And if you disagree with that outcome, ask a calculator, you are beyond help. #439 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] If you were to start with putting the 3 and the 2 together you will notice that the 3 is 3/1 and the 2 is 1/2 so 3/2 = 1.5 1.5*6 9 #443 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Yes you can rewrite the problem multiple way to make it work, and always get the same answer, it's the nature of math. But you are taking the numbers as if you were reading from right to left, and then rewriting it to make it work, but the math that follows after you rewrite it, occurs left to right, even if you are isolating it two numbers where the order of operations doesn't matter. #442 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And you are still sort of going left to right. You doing the 2 and 3 still, but you are using dividing rather than doing the multiplication that is actually between them. There is no way to do it truly reading it from right to left. The only thing you can do is 2(3) if you are going from right to left and not changing anything. You aren't entirely wrong, but maybe you are misunderstanding me when I say right to left. No changes to make it "work" just looking at it and doing the math between the numbers from right to left as if you were reading backwards. #445 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] Okay, new question do you know how the equation 4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead. #446 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined. 4x+3=2x+2x3 4x+3=4x3 4x 4x 3 ≠ 3 I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school. #447 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points. #448 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway). pic unrelated. #440 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] I like having these real talk discussions. I have more topics if you wish to learn / discuss.  
#426  Tell ya what. Let's run it through a calculator. Google will d… [+] (13 new replies)  03/30/2013 on Math time  +1 
#435 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] Okay, all I'm going to say is that left to right isn't a rule. e.g. (8/2)(2) 8/2=4 4*2= 8 or 8*2=16 16/2= 8 If you do it correctly it never matters what order you go in while doing multiplication / division. If you want I can do the equation given in the post and do it right to left to get nine. #437 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] But is that really right to left? Simply going from right to left would result in you multiplying the 3 by 2 then dividing by 6. Which is completely wrong. 3*2 = 6/6 = 1 You are still working from left to right. #441 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way that you have rewritten it is because, you are only multiplying two numbers. The order of operations doesn't matter. In a situation like the OP's, where you are given 3 numbers, you multiply and divide from left to right following the order of operations, whether you like that or not. Otherwise there are only a few situations where you can work from right to left, but it is the exception and not the rule. For example. 2/2(2) is 2 no matter how you do it. 6/2(3) is either 9 or 1. 9 is correct because you must work from left to right. And if you disagree with that outcome, ask a calculator, you are beyond help. #439 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] If you were to start with putting the 3 and the 2 together you will notice that the 3 is 3/1 and the 2 is 1/2 so 3/2 = 1.5 1.5*6 9 #443 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Yes you can rewrite the problem multiple way to make it work, and always get the same answer, it's the nature of math. But you are taking the numbers as if you were reading from right to left, and then rewriting it to make it work, but the math that follows after you rewrite it, occurs left to right, even if you are isolating it two numbers where the order of operations doesn't matter. #442 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And you are still sort of going left to right. You doing the 2 and 3 still, but you are using dividing rather than doing the multiplication that is actually between them. There is no way to do it truly reading it from right to left. The only thing you can do is 2(3) if you are going from right to left and not changing anything. You aren't entirely wrong, but maybe you are misunderstanding me when I say right to left. No changes to make it "work" just looking at it and doing the math between the numbers from right to left as if you were reading backwards. #445 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] Okay, new question do you know how the equation 4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead. #446 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined. 4x+3=2x+2x3 4x+3=4x3 4x 4x 3 ≠ 3 I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school. #447 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points. #448 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway). pic unrelated. #440 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] I like having these real talk discussions. I have more topics if you wish to learn / discuss.  
#21  Comment deleted  03/30/2013 on Goku  0 
#18  Comment deleted [+] (1 new reply)  03/30/2013 on Goku  0 
#21 
honeybiscuit Comment deleted by  
#395  God dammit, multiply and divide at the same time from left to … [+] (16 new replies)  03/30/2013 on Math time  +2 
#413 
bazingaman (03/30/2013) [] You don't have to go from left to right, that isn't a rule they can be done in whatever order, but if you really want to go from left to right the division symbol never had an ending showing that everything after the division symbol is under it. So going from left to right. (6/2)(1/3)=1 #426 
honeybiscuit (03/30/2013) [] Tell ya what. Let's run it through a calculator. Google will do it for us. And let me know what answer you see here. (Google rewrites the equation here, unlike you the answer remains the same). Go ahead and confirm that for yourself if you are so inclined. You do have to do multiplication and division as you come across them starting from left to right. It actually IS a rule in the order of operations. Go ahead and Google that too while you're at it. #435 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] Okay, all I'm going to say is that left to right isn't a rule. e.g. (8/2)(2) 8/2=4 4*2= 8 or 8*2=16 16/2= 8 If you do it correctly it never matters what order you go in while doing multiplication / division. If you want I can do the equation given in the post and do it right to left to get nine. #437 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] But is that really right to left? Simply going from right to left would result in you multiplying the 3 by 2 then dividing by 6. Which is completely wrong. 3*2 = 6/6 = 1 You are still working from left to right. #441 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] The only reason you can do it from right to left in the way that you have rewritten it is because, you are only multiplying two numbers. The order of operations doesn't matter. In a situation like the OP's, where you are given 3 numbers, you multiply and divide from left to right following the order of operations, whether you like that or not. Otherwise there are only a few situations where you can work from right to left, but it is the exception and not the rule. For example. 2/2(2) is 2 no matter how you do it. 6/2(3) is either 9 or 1. 9 is correct because you must work from left to right. And if you disagree with that outcome, ask a calculator, you are beyond help. #439 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] If you were to start with putting the 3 and the 2 together you will notice that the 3 is 3/1 and the 2 is 1/2 so 3/2 = 1.5 1.5*6 9 #443 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Yes you can rewrite the problem multiple way to make it work, and always get the same answer, it's the nature of math. But you are taking the numbers as if you were reading from right to left, and then rewriting it to make it work, but the math that follows after you rewrite it, occurs left to right, even if you are isolating it two numbers where the order of operations doesn't matter. #442 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] That's just so. . . pointless. It's right, but pointless. And you are still sort of going left to right. You doing the 2 and 3 still, but you are using dividing rather than doing the multiplication that is actually between them. There is no way to do it truly reading it from right to left. The only thing you can do is 2(3) if you are going from right to left and not changing anything. You aren't entirely wrong, but maybe you are misunderstanding me when I say right to left. No changes to make it "work" just looking at it and doing the math between the numbers from right to left as if you were reading backwards. #445 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] Okay, new question do you know how the equation 4x+3=2x+2x3 works? If you have anything math related you would like to talk about or teach me go ahead. #446 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Haha we must really be bored. I'm coming up with undefined. 4x+3=2x+2x3 4x+3=4x3 4x 4x 3 ≠ 3 I thought I'd be done with this shit when I finished school. #447 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] It doesn't work because its an equation that is asking at what point do these two lines intersect. They don't they have the same slope and start at different points. #448 
honeybiscuit (04/01/2013) [] Been a pleasure talking to ya, I should sleep, its almost 2am and I've got to get some sleep before work. If you seriously wish to continue discussing something it would have to wait until tomorrow (tonight I guess technically, for me anyway). pic unrelated. #440 
bazingaman (04/01/2013) [] I like having these real talk discussions. I have more topics if you wish to learn / discuss.  
#393  Seriously where the **** are you people from? I'm not joking. …  03/30/2013 on Math time  0 
#378  Not really, division and multiplication happen at the same tim… [+] (1 new reply)  03/30/2013 on Math time  0 
#375  **** you guys, Google that bitch. For some reason it rewrote t…  03/30/2013 on Math time  +1 