Upload
Login or register

hibyeman

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:11/17/2010
Last Login:10/01/2016
Location:Ann Arbor Michigan
Stats
Content Ranking:#6132
Comment Ranking:#11512
Highest Content Rank:#3277
Highest Comment Rank:#4665
Content Thumbs: 3255 total,  4086 ,  831
Comment Thumbs: 2253 total,  2969 ,  716
Content Level Progress: 17% (17/100)
Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 133 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 25% (25/100)
Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:3
Content Views:55539
Times Content Favorited:334 times
Total Comments Made:4195
FJ Points:22377
Favorite Tags: fuck (3) | The Game (3) | twitch (3) | my (2) | stream (2)
1st year in Law School

Text Posts

  • Views: 39257
    Thumbs Up 1962 Thumbs Down 390 Total: +1572
    Comments: 305
    Favorites: 196
    Uploaded: 11/10/11
    that arch that arch
  • Views: 24388
    Thumbs Up 1122 Thumbs Down 175 Total: +947
    Comments: 60
    Favorites: 107
    Uploaded: 03/21/12
    No driver No driver
  • Views: 14860
    Thumbs Up 470 Thumbs Down 22 Total: +448
    Comments: 13
    Favorites: 22
    Uploaded: 11/30/11
    turd beast explained turd beast explained
  • Views: 903
    Thumbs Up 23 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +18
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/09/11
    not a person not a person
  • Views: 668
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +16
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 11/14/11
    Kids Kids
  • Views: 578
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +13
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 03/15/12
    Waldo Waldo
  • Views: 5251
    Thumbs Up 19 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +16
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/16/12
    Best indoor soccer goal Best indoor soccer goal
  • Views: 697
    Thumbs Up 10 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +8
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/10/11
    LA Noire LA Noire
  • Views: 598
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +5
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 11/22/11
    The history of english The history of english
  • Views: 643
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +4
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/07/11
    Best door to door salesman Best door to door salesman
  • Views: 650
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +3
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/20/12
    cat on ice cat on ice
  • Views: 429
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +2
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/12/11
    owned owned
First2[ 12 ]

latest user's comments

#52 - the thing is though there were 3+ officers with gunds raised. …  [+] (4 replies) 09/25/2016 on /k/ weighs in on charlotte -3
User avatar
#81 - jasohazard (09/26/2016) [-]
Whose Lives Matter When someone else has a weapon, especially a gun, you are in danger. There is no such thing as no danger in that situation. The cop told him many times to put the gun down, and he should have. It's not a hard thing to do, put the gun on the ground and live, or be a stupid son of a bitch and ignore the officer and die. These cops don't want to kill people. As soon as the danger is cleared the officer calls out for stuff in his trunk to stop the bleeding.
User avatar
#61 - elsanna (09/26/2016) [-]
You would be surprised how little time it takes for a situation to go from contained, to oh that cop just got shot multiple times. Need to start saving the webms from /gif/ rekt threads of cops getting killed.
User avatar
#80 - jasohazard (09/26/2016) [-]
Could always show that one video of riots and cops getting shot out of nowhere.
#82 - elsanna (09/26/2016) [-]
>>#52, This will do for now.
#31 - tbh that doesnt look like a gun in his hand. there is a black …  [+] (8 replies) 09/25/2016 on /k/ weighs in on charlotte -9
#42 - asasqw (09/25/2016) [-]
No officer is going to risk their life on the chance he is able to squeeze a shot or two out before he is taken out (Getting shot isn't always an instant kill)
User avatar
#52 - hibyeman (09/25/2016) [-]
the thing is though there were 3+ officers with gunds raised. the moment he moves his arm up would be when they are allowed to shoot. it wouldnt take great reaction time at all to be able to shoot before being shot so there is no risk in the situation. like they would all be physically incapable of being cops with such reaction time and by that I mean they would fail some physical requirement to be fit for police work with reaction time anywhere near bad enough to lose that fight or even let him shoot at all
User avatar
#81 - jasohazard (09/26/2016) [-]
Whose Lives Matter When someone else has a weapon, especially a gun, you are in danger. There is no such thing as no danger in that situation. The cop told him many times to put the gun down, and he should have. It's not a hard thing to do, put the gun on the ground and live, or be a stupid son of a bitch and ignore the officer and die. These cops don't want to kill people. As soon as the danger is cleared the officer calls out for stuff in his trunk to stop the bleeding.
User avatar
#61 - elsanna (09/26/2016) [-]
You would be surprised how little time it takes for a situation to go from contained, to oh that cop just got shot multiple times. Need to start saving the webms from /gif/ rekt threads of cops getting killed.
User avatar
#80 - jasohazard (09/26/2016) [-]
Could always show that one video of riots and cops getting shot out of nowhere.
#82 - elsanna (09/26/2016) [-]
>>#52, This will do for now.
User avatar
#41 - durkadurka (09/25/2016) [-]
I'm not 100% on the circle around the hand either. It is possible depending on how he's holding the gun but it's too grainy to be sure.

What does it for me is the ankle holster. The holster itself is strong evidence for him having the gun, plus it looks pretty clear that the gun isn't in the holster.

I do think that maybe they were a bit jumpy on this one, though if the guy has a gun period, that gives cops enough for shootings like this to be lawful.
Perhaps all of this tension with police and BLM is making them more jumpy and just exacerbating things.
User avatar
#77 - commontroll (09/26/2016) [-]
I mean, in general if you have a gun in your hands cops are pretty much allowed to shoot if you don't comply. They gave him a lot of opportunity, and it obviously wasn't holstered.

I swear, these days black Democrats make up the majority of conspiracy theorists instead of white Republicans. But, you know, stereotypes show that it's the latter that are crazy!
#20 - I'll say after watching the 3 videos (dash cam, body cam, wife…  [+] (24 replies) 09/25/2016 on /k/ weighs in on charlotte +16
User avatar
#78 - guillermogage (09/26/2016) [-]
I'm not here to make any sort of ideological statement or take sides, but for those who are participating in literal rioting (not just peaceful protesting or demonstrations)..

Like, if the officer actually does get convicted for doing wrong anyway... like, what was the point of that rioting? To protest that justice wasn't served?

How quickly did the riots even break out? Like, within a day or two? It might make sense if a long time had passed without the officer being charged with anything.

Is it my moral responsibility "as a woke American" to keep up with every single instance of these things? I get burned whenever I try to just get the facts and there's either not enough straightforward unbiased facts, or when the facts end up being so concrete that it is depressingly ridiculous that there could still possibly be more than one side of the story, especially on such highly-charged subject matter.
User avatar
#44 - kevinipples (09/25/2016) [-]
sauce on 3 videos?
#26 - durkadurka (09/25/2016) [-]
This may help.
User avatar
#31 - hibyeman (09/25/2016) [-]
tbh that doesnt look like a gun in his hand. there is a black line that goes full up his body and everything. that just looks like his hand. i rewatched the dashcam trying to see it there in his right hand as here and while it was distorted and everything when looking at both hands they looked the same.

i will say though even if he had a gun there was no reason to shoot. he was not being aggresive or threatening. I would trust the 3+ officers already pointing their guns to be able to shoot before that guy even brought it up or between the time he begins bringing it up and shoots. Since he didnt even start bringing it up (assuming there was a gun) then it is still not justified
#42 - asasqw (09/25/2016) [-]
No officer is going to risk their life on the chance he is able to squeeze a shot or two out before he is taken out (Getting shot isn't always an instant kill)
User avatar
#52 - hibyeman (09/25/2016) [-]
the thing is though there were 3+ officers with gunds raised. the moment he moves his arm up would be when they are allowed to shoot. it wouldnt take great reaction time at all to be able to shoot before being shot so there is no risk in the situation. like they would all be physically incapable of being cops with such reaction time and by that I mean they would fail some physical requirement to be fit for police work with reaction time anywhere near bad enough to lose that fight or even let him shoot at all
User avatar
#81 - jasohazard (09/26/2016) [-]
Whose Lives Matter When someone else has a weapon, especially a gun, you are in danger. There is no such thing as no danger in that situation. The cop told him many times to put the gun down, and he should have. It's not a hard thing to do, put the gun on the ground and live, or be a stupid son of a bitch and ignore the officer and die. These cops don't want to kill people. As soon as the danger is cleared the officer calls out for stuff in his trunk to stop the bleeding.
User avatar
#61 - elsanna (09/26/2016) [-]
You would be surprised how little time it takes for a situation to go from contained, to oh that cop just got shot multiple times. Need to start saving the webms from /gif/ rekt threads of cops getting killed.
User avatar
#80 - jasohazard (09/26/2016) [-]
Could always show that one video of riots and cops getting shot out of nowhere.
#82 - elsanna (09/26/2016) [-]
>>#52, This will do for now.
User avatar
#41 - durkadurka (09/25/2016) [-]
I'm not 100% on the circle around the hand either. It is possible depending on how he's holding the gun but it's too grainy to be sure.

What does it for me is the ankle holster. The holster itself is strong evidence for him having the gun, plus it looks pretty clear that the gun isn't in the holster.

I do think that maybe they were a bit jumpy on this one, though if the guy has a gun period, that gives cops enough for shootings like this to be lawful.
Perhaps all of this tension with police and BLM is making them more jumpy and just exacerbating things.
User avatar
#77 - commontroll (09/26/2016) [-]
I mean, in general if you have a gun in your hands cops are pretty much allowed to shoot if you don't comply. They gave him a lot of opportunity, and it obviously wasn't holstered.

I swear, these days black Democrats make up the majority of conspiracy theorists instead of white Republicans. But, you know, stereotypes show that it's the latter that are crazy!
User avatar
#29 - Einsty (09/25/2016) [-]
Yup, those be them red circles auntie was talking bout. Damn niggers threatening our cops with dem rings, yo.
User avatar
#68 - loganmadder (09/26/2016) [-]
Those fuckin google's, man
#25 - anon (09/25/2016) [-]
Open
Your
Fucking
Eyes
When
You
Watch
The
Evidence
#21 - anon (09/25/2016) [-]
The guy in the red picks up a gun from the guy and then sets it down by his feet it's very visible and you can also hear it.
User avatar
#28 - Lejizack (09/25/2016) [-]
I dont see a gun or hear a gun being moved, and as it was stated, that just became a crime scene, and nothing can be disturbed until an investigation is complete, its an important part of the criminal invesitgation not to disturbe the scene. And if they moved the gun, especially to where it was supposedly photographed, then they broke conduct and should be either terminated or fined. If they didnt move the gun, and that is where it landed, then in any video, the gun was not seen, clearly,or at all, flying from the guy, landing in that spot. Meaning it was planted. This is all besides the point. One, carrying is legal in N.C, two, they were there on a warrant for someone else entirely, and three, he wasnt pointing it at them, and he wasnt moving in a way to suggest aggression. All of those factors mean the officers involved at fucked regardless of the outcome of if it was his, or not, if it was legal or if it was not.
User avatar
#32 - paintskillz (09/25/2016) [-]
You retarded fuck. He was a convicted felon and convicted felons cant own guns or have them on their possession. (EVEN IN AN OPEN CARRY STATE). Cops always move weapons from the near vicinity of a criminal in case they regain consciousness and attempt to use them. The cops didn't stumble onto a murder scene and move a weapon, they legally killed a non-compliant criminal and removed the gun from the immediate vicinity of the criminal.
User avatar
#43 - Lejizack (09/25/2016) [-]
You understand that in NC in order for an officer to use deadly force there has to be a clear present danger to the cops with intent to cause harm to them. Its fucking stipulated by the Chief. And yes, they did infact stumble upon this man, THEY WERE THERE TO SERVE A WARRANT FOR SOMEONE ELSE. They had no business in even interacting with this guy as he was NOT their perp. And in fact, felons CAN get the right to own guns again in NC, its hard and requires special conditions, but they can. And can you provide a link for his felony conviction?
User avatar
#83 - atusek (09/26/2016) [-]
They stopped him because he was rolling a blunt in his car. Its also illegal to own firearms and be a user of marijuana. Also, refusing to drop your gun presents a clear and present danger to responding officers. If you aren't dropping your gun when they're aiming at you and yelling, that gun will be used for one thing and one thing only, to shoot at the officers.
User avatar
#49 - XVI (09/25/2016) [-]
In the video you can hear a cop shouting "PUT THE GUN DOWN" endlessly. They clearly saw the gun and felt endangered.
User avatar
#53 - Lejizack (09/25/2016) [-]
Yeah but that isn't justification in the eyes of NC to fire at a person, even more so in a state that allows carry. And before people get back into the felon thing, even if he was, which I have not even seen an article on, the officers didn't know that at the time, so that is inadmissible.
User avatar
#74 - commontroll (09/26/2016) [-]
Laws are different for cops because they're legally obligated to stop crime instead of running away. Even still in any state if someone brandished a firearm (different from carrying, carrying is in a holster or slung over your shoulder, brandishing is in your hands ready to shoot) and you gave them a warning you would be in the right. Can't turn your back on them to retreat at that point, so...
#73 - anon (09/26/2016) [-]
1.Felony in possession is a federal statute.

2. Serving a warrant doesn't mean police actions stop. If they have probable cause that a crime was being commited, they can initiate a stop which from reports, subject was seen smoking what looked like a blunt which is probable cause. "Hurrr weed shouldn't be illegal " Different time, different place for that argument. What is illegal is still illegal.

3. Person with possession of a gun (if he so had it in his hand) and comitting a crime with no indication of complying to officer instructions is perceived as a threat to life, limb or eyesight. The key to this is all in perceived threat to life. If I'm the officer on scene and a person has a gun, not complying and turns to face me, that would seem threatening. All it takes is fractions of a second for the brain to send signals to the arm and hand to raise and fire. Which in reality, from video of people target shooting, can be even quicker than a trigger pull.

tl;dr felons can't have guns, cops will stop a person even if it's not their original motivation, we aren't there the cop who is in that situation.
#18 - i mean with the russians being caught for doping anything coul…  [+] (1 reply) 08/10/2016 on I think so 0
#33 - firesky (08/10/2016) [-]
Do you seriously think the Russians are the only ones doping?

They were just stupid enough to get caught/doing it too obvious
#5 - hey its hibyeman here. Im d3 (lost d2 like 2 days ago and on t…  [+] (1 reply) 07/08/2016 on Friends 0
User avatar
#9 - largilloquent (07/08/2016) [-]
im going to bed right now, but you should add me "kidmurkury"
#11 - how do you make a megathread that will last. is it just a post…  [+] (2 replies) 07/08/2016 on Channel ownership 0
User avatar
#12 - blackestblacksmith (07/08/2016) [-]
mostly it just depends on the time of day you post it. other than that mostly just luck. I could make the post since i have a few subscribers, and since i own the channel. Want me to throw your name onto the post?
User avatar
#13 - hibyeman (07/08/2016) [-]
sure. my league name is same as here. d2 and im open for anyone to friend me. just make sure to send em a pm saying ur from FJ lol