Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:7/07/2011
Comment Ranking:#260
Highest Content Rank:#1474
Highest Comment Rank:#31
Content Thumbs: 5569 total,  6407 ,  838
Comment Thumbs: 102775 total,  122528 ,  19753
Content Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 153 Content: Faptastic → Level 154 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 86.9% (869/1000)
Level 393 Comments: Demi God → Level 394 Comments: Demi God
Content Views:159311
Times Content Favorited:699 times
Total Comments Made:54281
FJ Points:35798

latest user's comments

#1497241 - awp at mid as soon as i can, seems to do the trick so far sinc…  [+] (5 replies) 10/18/2016 on Video Games 0
User avatar
#1497243 - whatthefek (10/18/2016) [-]
Yea i dont think old players will adjust as quickly as new players, i recently started to like inferno, so i didnt reallt feel the great difference.
User avatar
#1497242 - whatthefek (10/18/2016) [-]
Banana is more cancerous now
User avatar
#1497247 - herecomesjohnny (10/18/2016) [-]
i get banana gives the terrorists more of a chance and bottlenecks the shit out of them less, but.........damn this bitch is WIDE
User avatar
#1497345 - whatthefek (10/19/2016) [-]
Got som free time today? Lets play some cs
User avatar
#1497421 - herecomesjohnny (10/19/2016) [-]
nah i barely play a game of comp every 3 days anymore, i'm working all the time now
#1497239 - new inferno feels too..........wide...  [+] (7 replies) 10/18/2016 on Video Games +1
User avatar
#1497240 - whatthefek (10/18/2016) [-]
You are right, but i love the new haystacks under the appartment, it makes it easier to go sneaky peeky like.
I usually go up there with a bizon and i just fuck em up
User avatar
#1497241 - herecomesjohnny (10/18/2016) [-]
awp at mid as soon as i can, seems to do the trick so far since people aren't used to the new map, we'll see eh?
User avatar
#1497243 - whatthefek (10/18/2016) [-]
Yea i dont think old players will adjust as quickly as new players, i recently started to like inferno, so i didnt reallt feel the great difference.
User avatar
#1497242 - whatthefek (10/18/2016) [-]
Banana is more cancerous now
User avatar
#1497247 - herecomesjohnny (10/18/2016) [-]
i get banana gives the terrorists more of a chance and bottlenecks the shit out of them less, but.........damn this bitch is WIDE
User avatar
#1497345 - whatthefek (10/19/2016) [-]
Got som free time today? Lets play some cs
User avatar
#1497421 - herecomesjohnny (10/19/2016) [-]
nah i barely play a game of comp every 3 days anymore, i'm working all the time now
#5 - i don't get it, what's so scandalous here?  [+] (31 replies) 10/17/2016 on Let them eat cake +2
#55 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
Podesta is just throwing shade at a child rapist.
#89 - anon (10/18/2016) [-]
You're a weak bait account
User avatar
#11 - feelythefeel (10/17/2016) [-]
Podesta brags that he eats better than Assange, who's been forced to hide in an Ecuadoran embassy. wikileaks takes a OHKO at him for it.
#54 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
Hide because he is wanted for raping a child, you guys always seem to leave that part out.
User avatar
#56 - feelythefeel (10/18/2016) [-]
>he doesn't know what kind of shit they'll make up as an excuse
My sweet summer child.
#60 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
User avatar
#130 - feelythefeel (10/18/2016) [-]
Because he didn't you sperg.
#93 - anon (10/18/2016) [-]
>no source
User avatar
#12 - feelythefeel (10/17/2016) [-]
@ wikileaks
User avatar
#10 - grimsho (10/17/2016) [-]
John Podesta is part of the Clinton Foundation.
Julian Assange, co-founder of Wikileaks has been holed up inside the Ecuadorian Embassy of London for years now under risk from the Swedish and British governments arresting and handing him over to America unlawfully.
Podesta what making a wierd autistic joke/insult regarding the food Assange must be served in the Embassy compared to the food he was about to eat at the moment, and Assange responds via the Wikileaks twitter that obviously the elites (Podesta) would eat better than the peasants they abuse (Assange).
#57 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
He is wanted in SWEDEN dumb shit! FOR RAPING A CHILD!!! He isn't wanted in America for anything at all, I mean anything at all.
#72 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
He raped a child.
#74 - mixedfeelings (10/18/2016) [-]
it wasn't rape and it was a 30 year old woman.
#78 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
It was rape.
#80 - mixedfeelings (10/18/2016) [-]
dude i just read the womans statement in original swedish as it was released by swedish authorities, it does not qualify as rape. It can at best be stretched to "sexual assault" (the closest translation) but even that is a stretch.
#90 - anon (10/18/2016) [-]
He is a bait account. In future check the profile
#91 - mixedfeelings (10/18/2016) [-]
fuck off
#94 - anon (10/18/2016) [-]
kill yourself you're the reason he keeps going
he's literally just antagonizing you
#95 - mixedfeelings (10/18/2016) [-]
shut the fuck off
#81 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
Honestly. I apologize. I just looked it up myself and I was mistaken. He's still a piece of shit though.
User avatar
#61 - grimsho (10/18/2016) [-]
I wasn't talking about Sweden, Swedish authorities want him for sexual assault allegations which he has denied, and expressed that he would be fine having Swedish officers coming into the embassy to question him. But Sweden has constantly denied the offer, instead insisting he leave the Embassy and come to Sweden for questioning. Really sounds like they just want him out of the Embassy so they can arrest and hand him over to America without breaking international law, but that's just me. Only very recently have they agreed to come to the Embassy to question him, but no further arrangements have been made from what I've heard.

He is wanted in America, the government has declared his actions of released classified documents as an act of espionage and want his arrest, the British government even went on record saying they would storm the Embassy and hand him over to America and it would be lawful as long as they gave Assange notice ahead of time. Ecuador was quick to step in and point out that it would NOT be lawful, and would clearly in no complicated terms be a breach of international law. British authorities later withdrew that statement.
#64 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
You're confusing governments with a few dumbshit politicians.
User avatar
#65 - grimsho (10/18/2016) [-]
I don't believe I am, everything I just attributed to governments were official government statements, if those can't be attributed to the entire government of a country, then nothing can.
#71 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
You're right. Nothing can be attributed to an entire government.
User avatar
#73 - grimsho (10/18/2016) [-]
Then there is literally no purpose to any government ever. Ancap shill pls go.
#76 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
So the Flint water crisis was the ATFs fault? And the FBI is responsible for making sure everyone pays their taxes?
User avatar
#83 - grimsho (10/18/2016) [-]
The FBI isn't the government, it is an organization working under the government. The American government is responsible for making sure people pay their taxes, yes.
Assuming the ATF is the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives organization, then no the Flint crisis is not their fault because the ATF is not the governing group of the United States, fucking obviously.
If the government posts a statement on an issue, such as George Bush demanding retribution on the terrorists for 9/11, or Senate declaring a new national law, then those are attributed to the government as a whole, not "a few dumbshit politicians".
Jaywalking isn't illegal in America because of a few dumbshit politicians, it's illegal because the government says so. It is something that can be attributed to the entire government, yes? The government as a whole is seperate from the sum of its parts.
I didn't say the Swedish immigration agency was responsible for wanting Assange arrested, I said the Swedish authorities were, and since they are a branch of the government, and their order come from higher government officials, their actions on the matter can be attributed to the government. It doesn't work in reverse. A senator passing a law does not mean that law can be attributed to the Postal Service of the country, despite that being a government organization.
#121 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
You keep confusing America with Canada.
User avatar
#123 - grimsho (10/18/2016) [-]
I don't.
#127 - logicalreason (10/18/2016) [-]
But you are... We aren't communists here (yet)... Our government is duly elected and barely functions as a result of that...
#17 - nope, it was clear surrender after clear defeat, there's an ac…  [+] (1 reply) 10/16/2016 on It's spelled, A.M.E.R.I.C.A +4
#64 - anon (10/17/2016) [-]
Yeah, he's repeating German propaganda that the French wanted them there, after they spent decades slaughtering Frenchmen. They formed a collaborator government that allied with Germany, which he's taking as official. You're right, there is no debate among historians about this at all.
#15 - yeah sure whatever just saying, menelaus would get robbed  [+] (1 reply) 10/16/2016 on Civ 6 to Allow multiple... 0
#17 - stalini (10/16/2016) [-]
fair point
#2 - but i liked it, never really saw an ending with batman finding…  [+] (14 replies) 10/16/2016 on catwoman +381
#37 - ciacheczko (10/17/2016) [-]
In all honesty, with Batman's personality and a truckload of issues, the latter is far more likely to happen.
User avatar
#76 - herecomesjohnny (10/17/2016) [-]
i know, i know so much, but can't help myself being happy for the guy at the end there
#3 - bluemagebrilly (10/16/2016) [-]
If you mean the actual movie, then... I think the major issue is how convoluted it was. Last thing we see is Batman flying away with a bomb, and then Alfred gets all happy that he sees Bruce Wayne just randomly at a restaurant he was going to with Selina. Just like his "dream." That was the bad part. If that dream thing didn't come up, it might've been accepted a bit better.

The biggest issue, overall, was how the main guy just didn't really seem like he wanted to be Batman. Which is pretty against how Batman usually acts and Alfred was also against it. So it was like... Why not just stop? Instead he faked his own death and I don't recall if anyone actually knew he was Bruce Wayne at that point either, so he had no reason to fake his death as Batman and still stay hidden until stalking Alfred.
User avatar
#90 - Haentar (10/17/2016) [-]
Also, the plane did not get far enough away with the bomb. The city's ocean would still be irradiated and there would probably still be a lot of destruction.
User avatar
#78 - sphincterface (10/17/2016) [-]
Gordon knew, but I dont think he would go out and reveal it. Plus Bane did drop Bruce's name a few time in front of his soldiers so they knew. But I mean I think it would be safe to bet that most of the guys who knew would have been killed in that big battle at the end.
User avatar
#5 - lightninghorse (10/16/2016) [-]
>it was shown after the funeral that Bruce had made an autopilot program for the plane.
>Bruce brought Selina to that cafe because he knew alfred would go to that cafe because of the dream, it was to let alfred know he was alright.
>i got nothing for your last point.
#6 - bluemagebrilly (10/16/2016) [-]
Yes, the method of him getting out alive was fine. But why did he pretend in the first place? Pretend for Batman to be dead, sure, that's fine. He could've ditched the outfit in the ocean or just burned it.

How did he know Alfred was going to the cafe on that very day and how did he even afford it without cashing into the Wayne funds, thereby alerting everyone, especially Alfred, that he was alive? Sure, Selina could have bought them in, but I don't really think that she was the type.

Like I said, if it wasn't for the dream part Alfred was ranting about, then having Bruce just show up randomly would've been accepted a bit better on our end, though I imagine Alfred himself would have exploded without that "dream" context.
#88 - anon (10/17/2016) [-]
The mostly canonical ending for Batman is the Knight Fall protocol where he fakes his death. Best written, and maybe most in-character batman iterations, are the most recent movie and game.

Bruce never wished to be Batman unless he needed to be so.
User avatar
#11 - clonedcommando (10/17/2016) [-]
Because the city needed a hero, the memory of Batman could live on and inspire people not not be crazed vigilantes in a suit but to fight to make a better Gothem together. And as shown in the movie Bruce wasn't really capable of being Batman anymore years of beatings had taken it's toll, and if the Dark Knight just vanished all the hope he created would disappear with him.

But with this one final act of "sacrifice" he could insure a brighter future for everyone including himself.

The real issue I have with the movie is a huge plot point is centered on illegal trades being made while the stock market being held up by terrorists being honored and sending Bruce into "billions of dollars of debt" it's just so half assed it hurts.
#13 - bluemagebrilly (10/17/2016) [-]
But why did Bruce Wayne need to disappear too? That's what I'm asking.
#17 - ugoboom (10/17/2016) [-]
Alfred never wanted Bruce to come back like he did in BB
So when Batman was done, Bruce could finally leave Gotham for good and live a life.
User avatar
#26 - stickmanz (10/17/2016) [-]
That hurt me bad
User avatar
#14 - clonedcommando (10/17/2016) [-]
Because he needed an out as well, so he could live a quite life with Catwoman like Alfred always wanted for him.
#10 - anon (10/17/2016) [-]
i got nothing on your other points, but he was with catwoman. id say you could get anywhere in the world with her, starting out with nothing but your birthdaysuit.