x
Click to expand

hawaiianhappysauce

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:7/25/2011
Last Login:6/29/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6654
Comment Ranking:#12384
Highest Content Rank:#2083
Highest Comment Rank:#498
Content Thumbs: 1265 total,  1477 ,  212
Comment Thumbs: 9272 total,  12042 ,  2770
Content Level Progress: 54% (27/50)
Level 111 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 74% (74/100)
Level 289 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 290 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:2
Content Views:110240
Times Content Favorited:106 times
Total Comments Made:6111
FJ Points:1069
Favorite Tags: Football (5)

latest user's comments

#30838 - I recommend talking about the movie with spoilers. … 06/11/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
#30836 - It holds up because it was consistent with the trailers, it wa… 06/11/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
#30835 - The expendables is different. The tone for that movie is set …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/11/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
#30839 - Rascal (06/11/2015) [-]
ok we'll just agree to disagree
#30832 - I set my expectations high. I think the main difference betwe…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30833 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Idk I think cliches are really annoying at times, but they can be done well, for example, movies like the expendables and others like it aren't good to me

But Kingsman was just so well done, with an interesting plot, backstory, and a great set up for a whole bunch of new stories. That's what made it good for me. Was the overall summary of events a bit cliche? Yes. But was the the story dull? No. It kept me entertained.
User avatar #30905 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
I'm really sorry you tried to argue against a retard
You have to be able to pick up the warning signs earlier, like whining about a U.K movie having English accents, or complaining that a satirical movie wasn't up to his "super intelligent" standards
User avatar #30913 - bionicpanda (06/13/2015) [-]
hahaha

I wouldn't call Kingsman satirical as it was based of comic books though
User avatar #30914 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
Fair enough, wasn't the right word
I guess just "comedy movie" would suffice
User avatar #30835 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
The expendables is different. The tone for that movie is set from the beginning, "Don't take the plot seriously, this is a shoot em up action movie." They never deviated from it, and they never lied to me about anything in the trailers about what the movie will be like (see Godzilla for lies).

Another example of this is Guardians of the Galaxy, sure it's reddit the movie, but at least it never tried to take itself seriously at any point. It set the tone right at the beginning with Star-Lord dancing to Redbone.

Now, Kingsman was consistent too, just too many cliches done very poorly.
#30839 - Rascal (06/11/2015) [-]
ok we'll just agree to disagree
#30830 - The Bond movies of late had Javier, who basically used explosi…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30831 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
bukkake
#30828 - I look for things that made me cringe because they were too cl…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30829 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Have you ever seen a Matthew Vaughn movie? A lot of his movies have the visual flair i'm talking about. I personally liked the firework touch instead of hundreds of head brutally exploding.

Well, did you want him to just put on a suit and go "i'm a kingsman now!!"

And i don't know, didn't really like any of the Harry Potters either, but i feel like they just didn't dive into her character enough, i honestly can't even remember her name

He killed about 50 people in the church because of the device Samuel Jackson had (a lot less far fetched than a lot of plot devices in Bond movies)
User avatar #30830 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
The Bond movies of late had Javier, who basically used explosives and technology, how is that unrealistic? A lot of the machinations that the villains use are silly, but remember they were made a long time ago when this wasn't a cliche. You look at the bond movies today: Casino Royale - Poker the movie, didn't think it was that great anyway. Quantum of solace - never saw that one so idk, heard it was about water tho. Skyfall - great movie. Spectre I think will be better because the villain is Waltz. Overall these movies are hit and miss too and I am critical about them, even so, it's not nearly as bad as Kingsman because I am watching an older person be a spy, someone who had years of training already implied in the first 2 minutes of the movie (Casino Royale, the rest is implied by being sequels).

User avatar #30831 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
bukkake
#47878 - It's more about seeing Cleveland fail again. People want the …  [+] (4 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... +1
User avatar #47889 - skullnigga (06/11/2015) [-]
dont worry the nba will just rig the rest of the games like they always do and the warriors will somehow magically win the next 3 games in a row
User avatar #47892 - mimisiku (06/11/2015) [-]
You're kidding right? LeBron is the media's baby. They've been calling him the greatest since he was in high school. If it were rigged in anyone's favor it would be for Lebron
User avatar #47909 - skullnigga (06/12/2015) [-]
not really lol if you pay attention the media doesnt really give a shit about lebron this year because everybody was jumping on the curry bandwagon and even last year kd was more popular then lebron and with all these other stars like harden, griffin, cp3, melo, kd, curry, and leonard there isnt much room left for lebron and the media never really rode his dick as much as everyone said
User avatar #47928 - mimisiku (06/12/2015) [-]
Dude, there's no way you're serious. All ESPN does is talk about Lebron. He's their favorite topic of conversation.
#30823 - The point is that his English voice is annoying as hell. Also…  [+] (13 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30824 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Dang, it's almost like you were LOOKING for things to not like in this movie. Did you go into it with low expecations or are you just super cynical?

I'm pretty sure the fireworks thing with the heads was just for visual flair

What dumb training shit?

And Idk about her, she barely got any lines, idk why you're comparing her to Hermoine

And yeah, characters die, it happens, doesn't make it shit, Harry's death is what led to Eggsy being able to become a Kingsman even after failing his training
User avatar #30828 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
I look for things that made me cringe because they were too cliche or poorly performed. Sometimes I get annoyed when I see a plot being too predictable, though, this movie wasn't predictable. I will give it that. To address your responses.

1. Visual flair? The movie is rated R, they could have had gore. That would have been less annoying. If they are trying to be artsy then they failed miserably.

2. The entire movie was him training to become a kingsman, and they all involved him and other KIDS. It makes the movie less believable. Compared to Bond movies, this is shit. Also, it doesn't matter if he is 24, he looks like he is a kid. If you told me he was 18 I would still believe you.

3. It is unfair to compare her to hermione because Harry Potter is a terrible franchise and I won't like her performance no matter what. It's set up to fail because by default they are kids. Also, she was still boring.

4. It's not just about him dying, but how basically he kills a billion people in some cathedral due to some silly plot device that Samual Jackson makes (make people irrational with radio waves or some shit that is completely unrealistic).
User avatar #30829 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Have you ever seen a Matthew Vaughn movie? A lot of his movies have the visual flair i'm talking about. I personally liked the firework touch instead of hundreds of head brutally exploding.

Well, did you want him to just put on a suit and go "i'm a kingsman now!!"

And i don't know, didn't really like any of the Harry Potters either, but i feel like they just didn't dive into her character enough, i honestly can't even remember her name

He killed about 50 people in the church because of the device Samuel Jackson had (a lot less far fetched than a lot of plot devices in Bond movies)
User avatar #30830 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
The Bond movies of late had Javier, who basically used explosives and technology, how is that unrealistic? A lot of the machinations that the villains use are silly, but remember they were made a long time ago when this wasn't a cliche. You look at the bond movies today: Casino Royale - Poker the movie, didn't think it was that great anyway. Quantum of solace - never saw that one so idk, heard it was about water tho. Skyfall - great movie. Spectre I think will be better because the villain is Waltz. Overall these movies are hit and miss too and I am critical about them, even so, it's not nearly as bad as Kingsman because I am watching an older person be a spy, someone who had years of training already implied in the first 2 minutes of the movie (Casino Royale, the rest is implied by being sequels).

User avatar #30831 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
bukkake
User avatar #30825 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
expectations*
User avatar #30832 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
I set my expectations high. I think the main difference between you and me is about 5 or more years in age. When you hit 25, you've pretty much get sick of the same cliches.

For example, lets take the two movies "Silver Linings Playbook" and "Gone Girl" two stories about a man and a woman (lets not try to compare genres like action and comedy here). I know you might argue that Gone Girl is more Drama where Silver Linings is not. But both generally received good reception so I will make this comparison.

Silver Linings Playbook was garbage because i knew what was going to happen before I saw the movie: Guy meets girl, guy and girl learn more about each other, guy and girl both have problems and try to work through things together. Guy and girl go through a difficult time, but fight through it in the end and they live happily ever after.

The cliche has been done so many times that it's almost revolting to see it. Now... on the other hand:

Gone Girl is a masterpiece. Things are completely different. The couple thinks that things are really good, they feel like the perfect match... then one loses a job... then they struggle... do things get better? NO. Things get worse. It escalates to a point where they have little control over what is going on. They are back together, but not because they love each other, but because they have to live a lie for their own sake and for their kid's sake.

To me, this is new and thought provoking. One of the best movies I've seen in awhile.
User avatar #30833 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Idk I think cliches are really annoying at times, but they can be done well, for example, movies like the expendables and others like it aren't good to me

But Kingsman was just so well done, with an interesting plot, backstory, and a great set up for a whole bunch of new stories. That's what made it good for me. Was the overall summary of events a bit cliche? Yes. But was the the story dull? No. It kept me entertained.
User avatar #30905 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
I'm really sorry you tried to argue against a retard
You have to be able to pick up the warning signs earlier, like whining about a U.K movie having English accents, or complaining that a satirical movie wasn't up to his "super intelligent" standards
User avatar #30913 - bionicpanda (06/13/2015) [-]
hahaha

I wouldn't call Kingsman satirical as it was based of comic books though
User avatar #30914 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
Fair enough, wasn't the right word
I guess just "comedy movie" would suffice
User avatar #30835 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
The expendables is different. The tone for that movie is set from the beginning, "Don't take the plot seriously, this is a shoot em up action movie." They never deviated from it, and they never lied to me about anything in the trailers about what the movie will be like (see Godzilla for lies).

Another example of this is Guardians of the Galaxy, sure it's reddit the movie, but at least it never tried to take itself seriously at any point. It set the tone right at the beginning with Star-Lord dancing to Redbone.

Now, Kingsman was consistent too, just too many cliches done very poorly.
#30839 - Rascal (06/11/2015) [-]
ok we'll just agree to disagree
#30821 - But he has the dialect of a teen.  [+] (15 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30822 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
I mean, he grew up in the slums, wouldn't expect him to speak like a rich person


he also doesn't speak like that later in the movie
User avatar #30823 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
The point is that his English voice is annoying as hell. Also, more dumb stuff:

1. The exploding heads... really? Fireworks? Now you are insulting my intelligence.
2. The dumb training shit.
3. Boring female character who is basically Hermoine as a spy.
4. Colin Firth, the only character who was ok, dies.
User avatar #30824 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Dang, it's almost like you were LOOKING for things to not like in this movie. Did you go into it with low expecations or are you just super cynical?

I'm pretty sure the fireworks thing with the heads was just for visual flair

What dumb training shit?

And Idk about her, she barely got any lines, idk why you're comparing her to Hermoine

And yeah, characters die, it happens, doesn't make it shit, Harry's death is what led to Eggsy being able to become a Kingsman even after failing his training
User avatar #30828 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
I look for things that made me cringe because they were too cliche or poorly performed. Sometimes I get annoyed when I see a plot being too predictable, though, this movie wasn't predictable. I will give it that. To address your responses.

1. Visual flair? The movie is rated R, they could have had gore. That would have been less annoying. If they are trying to be artsy then they failed miserably.

2. The entire movie was him training to become a kingsman, and they all involved him and other KIDS. It makes the movie less believable. Compared to Bond movies, this is shit. Also, it doesn't matter if he is 24, he looks like he is a kid. If you told me he was 18 I would still believe you.

3. It is unfair to compare her to hermione because Harry Potter is a terrible franchise and I won't like her performance no matter what. It's set up to fail because by default they are kids. Also, she was still boring.

4. It's not just about him dying, but how basically he kills a billion people in some cathedral due to some silly plot device that Samual Jackson makes (make people irrational with radio waves or some shit that is completely unrealistic).
User avatar #30829 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Have you ever seen a Matthew Vaughn movie? A lot of his movies have the visual flair i'm talking about. I personally liked the firework touch instead of hundreds of head brutally exploding.

Well, did you want him to just put on a suit and go "i'm a kingsman now!!"

And i don't know, didn't really like any of the Harry Potters either, but i feel like they just didn't dive into her character enough, i honestly can't even remember her name

He killed about 50 people in the church because of the device Samuel Jackson had (a lot less far fetched than a lot of plot devices in Bond movies)
User avatar #30830 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
The Bond movies of late had Javier, who basically used explosives and technology, how is that unrealistic? A lot of the machinations that the villains use are silly, but remember they were made a long time ago when this wasn't a cliche. You look at the bond movies today: Casino Royale - Poker the movie, didn't think it was that great anyway. Quantum of solace - never saw that one so idk, heard it was about water tho. Skyfall - great movie. Spectre I think will be better because the villain is Waltz. Overall these movies are hit and miss too and I am critical about them, even so, it's not nearly as bad as Kingsman because I am watching an older person be a spy, someone who had years of training already implied in the first 2 minutes of the movie (Casino Royale, the rest is implied by being sequels).

User avatar #30831 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
bukkake
User avatar #30825 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
expectations*
User avatar #30832 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
I set my expectations high. I think the main difference between you and me is about 5 or more years in age. When you hit 25, you've pretty much get sick of the same cliches.

For example, lets take the two movies "Silver Linings Playbook" and "Gone Girl" two stories about a man and a woman (lets not try to compare genres like action and comedy here). I know you might argue that Gone Girl is more Drama where Silver Linings is not. But both generally received good reception so I will make this comparison.

Silver Linings Playbook was garbage because i knew what was going to happen before I saw the movie: Guy meets girl, guy and girl learn more about each other, guy and girl both have problems and try to work through things together. Guy and girl go through a difficult time, but fight through it in the end and they live happily ever after.

The cliche has been done so many times that it's almost revolting to see it. Now... on the other hand:

Gone Girl is a masterpiece. Things are completely different. The couple thinks that things are really good, they feel like the perfect match... then one loses a job... then they struggle... do things get better? NO. Things get worse. It escalates to a point where they have little control over what is going on. They are back together, but not because they love each other, but because they have to live a lie for their own sake and for their kid's sake.

To me, this is new and thought provoking. One of the best movies I've seen in awhile.
User avatar #30833 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Idk I think cliches are really annoying at times, but they can be done well, for example, movies like the expendables and others like it aren't good to me

But Kingsman was just so well done, with an interesting plot, backstory, and a great set up for a whole bunch of new stories. That's what made it good for me. Was the overall summary of events a bit cliche? Yes. But was the the story dull? No. It kept me entertained.
User avatar #30905 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
I'm really sorry you tried to argue against a retard
You have to be able to pick up the warning signs earlier, like whining about a U.K movie having English accents, or complaining that a satirical movie wasn't up to his "super intelligent" standards
User avatar #30913 - bionicpanda (06/13/2015) [-]
hahaha

I wouldn't call Kingsman satirical as it was based of comic books though
User avatar #30914 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
Fair enough, wasn't the right word
I guess just "comedy movie" would suffice
User avatar #30835 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
The expendables is different. The tone for that movie is set from the beginning, "Don't take the plot seriously, this is a shoot em up action movie." They never deviated from it, and they never lied to me about anything in the trailers about what the movie will be like (see Godzilla for lies).

Another example of this is Guardians of the Galaxy, sure it's reddit the movie, but at least it never tried to take itself seriously at any point. It set the tone right at the beginning with Star-Lord dancing to Redbone.

Now, Kingsman was consistent too, just too many cliches done very poorly.
#30839 - Rascal (06/11/2015) [-]
ok we'll just agree to disagree
#30819 - Movie was total garbage. 1. The main character's e…  [+] (19 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30855 - godshandshake (06/11/2015) [-]
His english is like that because of where he was raised
In furious 7 it's not random at all it's a callback to vin diesels character only drinking corona
It wasn't your movie though so I guess it's okay
User avatar #30863 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
Yes, but the beer lines were out of nowhere and the Kingsman ones appear in a useless scene.
User avatar #30820 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Those all seem like pivotal problems, the McDonalds one was kind of funny, and the Happy meal was a pun by Harry.

and kids? Eggsy is like 24 in the movie..
User avatar #30821 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
But he has the dialect of a teen.
User avatar #30822 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
I mean, he grew up in the slums, wouldn't expect him to speak like a rich person


he also doesn't speak like that later in the movie
User avatar #30823 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
The point is that his English voice is annoying as hell. Also, more dumb stuff:

1. The exploding heads... really? Fireworks? Now you are insulting my intelligence.
2. The dumb training shit.
3. Boring female character who is basically Hermoine as a spy.
4. Colin Firth, the only character who was ok, dies.
User avatar #30824 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Dang, it's almost like you were LOOKING for things to not like in this movie. Did you go into it with low expecations or are you just super cynical?

I'm pretty sure the fireworks thing with the heads was just for visual flair

What dumb training shit?

And Idk about her, she barely got any lines, idk why you're comparing her to Hermoine

And yeah, characters die, it happens, doesn't make it shit, Harry's death is what led to Eggsy being able to become a Kingsman even after failing his training
User avatar #30828 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
I look for things that made me cringe because they were too cliche or poorly performed. Sometimes I get annoyed when I see a plot being too predictable, though, this movie wasn't predictable. I will give it that. To address your responses.

1. Visual flair? The movie is rated R, they could have had gore. That would have been less annoying. If they are trying to be artsy then they failed miserably.

2. The entire movie was him training to become a kingsman, and they all involved him and other KIDS. It makes the movie less believable. Compared to Bond movies, this is shit. Also, it doesn't matter if he is 24, he looks like he is a kid. If you told me he was 18 I would still believe you.

3. It is unfair to compare her to hermione because Harry Potter is a terrible franchise and I won't like her performance no matter what. It's set up to fail because by default they are kids. Also, she was still boring.

4. It's not just about him dying, but how basically he kills a billion people in some cathedral due to some silly plot device that Samual Jackson makes (make people irrational with radio waves or some shit that is completely unrealistic).
User avatar #30829 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Have you ever seen a Matthew Vaughn movie? A lot of his movies have the visual flair i'm talking about. I personally liked the firework touch instead of hundreds of head brutally exploding.

Well, did you want him to just put on a suit and go "i'm a kingsman now!!"

And i don't know, didn't really like any of the Harry Potters either, but i feel like they just didn't dive into her character enough, i honestly can't even remember her name

He killed about 50 people in the church because of the device Samuel Jackson had (a lot less far fetched than a lot of plot devices in Bond movies)
User avatar #30830 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
The Bond movies of late had Javier, who basically used explosives and technology, how is that unrealistic? A lot of the machinations that the villains use are silly, but remember they were made a long time ago when this wasn't a cliche. You look at the bond movies today: Casino Royale - Poker the movie, didn't think it was that great anyway. Quantum of solace - never saw that one so idk, heard it was about water tho. Skyfall - great movie. Spectre I think will be better because the villain is Waltz. Overall these movies are hit and miss too and I am critical about them, even so, it's not nearly as bad as Kingsman because I am watching an older person be a spy, someone who had years of training already implied in the first 2 minutes of the movie (Casino Royale, the rest is implied by being sequels).

User avatar #30831 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
bukkake
User avatar #30825 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
expectations*
User avatar #30832 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
I set my expectations high. I think the main difference between you and me is about 5 or more years in age. When you hit 25, you've pretty much get sick of the same cliches.

For example, lets take the two movies "Silver Linings Playbook" and "Gone Girl" two stories about a man and a woman (lets not try to compare genres like action and comedy here). I know you might argue that Gone Girl is more Drama where Silver Linings is not. But both generally received good reception so I will make this comparison.

Silver Linings Playbook was garbage because i knew what was going to happen before I saw the movie: Guy meets girl, guy and girl learn more about each other, guy and girl both have problems and try to work through things together. Guy and girl go through a difficult time, but fight through it in the end and they live happily ever after.

The cliche has been done so many times that it's almost revolting to see it. Now... on the other hand:

Gone Girl is a masterpiece. Things are completely different. The couple thinks that things are really good, they feel like the perfect match... then one loses a job... then they struggle... do things get better? NO. Things get worse. It escalates to a point where they have little control over what is going on. They are back together, but not because they love each other, but because they have to live a lie for their own sake and for their kid's sake.

To me, this is new and thought provoking. One of the best movies I've seen in awhile.
User avatar #30833 - bionicpanda (06/10/2015) [-]
Idk I think cliches are really annoying at times, but they can be done well, for example, movies like the expendables and others like it aren't good to me

But Kingsman was just so well done, with an interesting plot, backstory, and a great set up for a whole bunch of new stories. That's what made it good for me. Was the overall summary of events a bit cliche? Yes. But was the the story dull? No. It kept me entertained.
User avatar #30905 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
I'm really sorry you tried to argue against a retard
You have to be able to pick up the warning signs earlier, like whining about a U.K movie having English accents, or complaining that a satirical movie wasn't up to his "super intelligent" standards
User avatar #30913 - bionicpanda (06/13/2015) [-]
hahaha

I wouldn't call Kingsman satirical as it was based of comic books though
User avatar #30914 - averagewhitekid (06/13/2015) [-]
Fair enough, wasn't the right word
I guess just "comedy movie" would suffice
User avatar #30835 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
The expendables is different. The tone for that movie is set from the beginning, "Don't take the plot seriously, this is a shoot em up action movie." They never deviated from it, and they never lied to me about anything in the trailers about what the movie will be like (see Godzilla for lies).

Another example of this is Guardians of the Galaxy, sure it's reddit the movie, but at least it never tried to take itself seriously at any point. It set the tone right at the beginning with Star-Lord dancing to Redbone.

Now, Kingsman was consistent too, just too many cliches done very poorly.
#30839 - Rascal (06/11/2015) [-]
ok we'll just agree to disagree
#30818 - I just read somewhere all the spoilers to the movie Jurassic W…  [+] (8 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar #30852 - altairtheassassin (06/11/2015) [-]
Henry Wu is BD Wong. You know...Wu being a chinese name and all.

Irrfan Khan is the new Park Owner.
User avatar #30837 - ferrettamer (06/11/2015) [-]
I don't like Chris Pratt as an actor
User avatar #30838 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
I recommend talking about the movie with spoilers.

I think the bad part of this is that most of the movie is around the kids who were in the Gyro. Fucking hate kids in my movies (like episode 1 anakin skywalker, now this is podracing...woooooo)
#30834 - Rascal (06/10/2015) [-]
Not reading the spoilers but the film skips 2 and 3. And is a sequel to the original. So not sure if what you read holds up.
User avatar #30853 - altairtheassassin (06/11/2015) [-]
Yeah...no.

Definitely set after the last 3 films. Why they hell would they skip them?

1 and 2 are adapted from the books Michael Chrichton wrote, why would they acknowledge 1 but ignore 2 and 3.

Ive seen JW, and youre wrong.
User avatar #30872 - machiavellianhumor (06/11/2015) [-]
they said it would "ignore" the sequels.
User avatar #30836 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/11/2015) [-]
It holds up because it was consistent with the trailers, it was predictable anyway, and the guy who posted them saw the movie in another country. Other countries get to see the movie before we do (all of them basically).
#174 - > Brags about being best at League of Legends > Prob…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/10/2015 on 2015 and no love found on FJ? -7
User avatar #1392 - vaulttec (06/11/2015) [-]
elitism is a hell of a drug
User avatar #192 - mewcubed (06/10/2015) [-]
I don't give a fuck what MOBA you think takes more skill, I happen to like League better than other MOBAs. And I said I was the 1v1 champ at my school, where most of the competition was silver or bronze with one or two diamonds. FITE ME.
#793 - Rascal (06/10/2015) [-]
You like it more because you are a scrub and you couldn't play at a DOTA level.
User avatar #187 - ttallonn (06/10/2015) [-]
and non-russians. I play both with no real preference
#68 - full scholorships are for 2 types of people. 1. very poor bu… 06/10/2015 on Leaning 0
#30 - remember, you are paying for this education.  [+] (3 new replies) 06/10/2015 on Leaning 0
User avatar #40 - mirukawa (06/10/2015) [-]
people get scholarships
User avatar #68 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/10/2015) [-]
full scholorships are for 2 types of people. 1. very poor but talented people. 2. Very rich and talented people. I am going to guess that he is middle class and average.
User avatar #31 - mangostormlegend (06/10/2015) [-]
Yeah, I know.

Still, I was really backed up with assignments that week. It helped.
#135 - is this a scene from the movie? Or is this sort of fan made? …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/09/2015 on Hurricane with a will +1
User avatar #138 - tepidteal (06/09/2015) [-]
It's a fanedit. It looks pretty good.
#47855 - Just because I hate a team doesn't mean I don't recognize thei…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/09/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#47856 - averagewhitekid (06/09/2015) [-]
There is a difference between saying "I gotta give props to this team, they are really putting in a ton of effort to win this" and "How much you wanna bet Lightning lose game 4 or 5. Eastern conference is so bad." Both are talented teams, and its not likely to be a short series, let alone an 'easy sweep' from the Hawks.
But hey, I don't want to be an asshole about it, enjoy your sports how ya enjoy your sports
#47852 - What I don't understand is, you thumb me down (don't care abou…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/09/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #47853 - averagewhitekid (06/09/2015) [-]
Because to be honest, you are flopping around as much as these announcers between games, especially predicting a 4 or 5 game sweep against the Lightning after the first game
It'd be nice if you picked a side and kinda stuck with it, catch my drift?
User avatar #47855 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/09/2015) [-]
Just because I hate a team doesn't mean I don't recognize their talent.
#47856 - averagewhitekid (06/09/2015) [-]
There is a difference between saying "I gotta give props to this team, they are really putting in a ton of effort to win this" and "How much you wanna bet Lightning lose game 4 or 5. Eastern conference is so bad." Both are talented teams, and its not likely to be a short series, let alone an 'easy sweep' from the Hawks.
But hey, I don't want to be an asshole about it, enjoy your sports how ya enjoy your sports
#47850 - I'm telling you. Emrick wants to give Kane a blowjob. The Bl…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/09/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... +1
User avatar #47851 - averagewhitekid (06/09/2015) [-]
I couldn't care less about what Emrick does, at least I can laugh my ass off for days at his commentary and I haven't taken him seriously at all during the playoffs
These other guys are not only sucking the Hawk's dicks, but they are doing so in the most monotonous way possible by barely getting excited unless the Hawks just scored, and always droning on about "Ohhhhhhh no, Bishop is really struggling here, I don't think he can do it, he's lost it" whenever he saves a shot
User avatar #47852 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/09/2015) [-]
What I don't understand is, you thumb me down (don't care about thumbs, but it's a sign of disapproval), but you then say exactly what I am saying... the announcers are pro hawks.
User avatar #47853 - averagewhitekid (06/09/2015) [-]
Because to be honest, you are flopping around as much as these announcers between games, especially predicting a 4 or 5 game sweep against the Lightning after the first game
It'd be nice if you picked a side and kinda stuck with it, catch my drift?
User avatar #47855 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/09/2015) [-]
Just because I hate a team doesn't mean I don't recognize their talent.
#47856 - averagewhitekid (06/09/2015) [-]
There is a difference between saying "I gotta give props to this team, they are really putting in a ton of effort to win this" and "How much you wanna bet Lightning lose game 4 or 5. Eastern conference is so bad." Both are talented teams, and its not likely to be a short series, let alone an 'easy sweep' from the Hawks.
But hey, I don't want to be an asshole about it, enjoy your sports how ya enjoy your sports
#47847 - I'm talking about Emrick 06/09/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#47840 - I'm starting to dislike the blackhawks because I really do not…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/09/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #47841 - MillionsKnives (06/09/2015) [-]
If you're talking about Eddie, it's because he's an ex-Hawk. If you're talking about Pierre, it's because he sucks all of the "superstars" dicks, especially Kane/Toews, Crosby/Malkin.

Also, most announcers like the Hawks more than any other team because they are pretty much making the most money for the NHL, and plugging Kane, the star of the team, they further the chances his name will become a household name, making more bandwagon fans/fans of the NHL, which, finally, makes the NHL more money.
User avatar #47847 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/09/2015) [-]
I'm talking about Emrick
#319 - Why is admin posting relationship stuff? Is admin going throu… 06/08/2015 on Guy finds love from QT pie... +2
#125 - Same, but I'm 25. 06/08/2015 on :) +1
#44 - > Get Condom > Auction it off  [+] (1 new reply) 06/07/2015 on Wonka +1
User avatar #57 - mutzaki (06/07/2015) [-]
Instant pimp status.
#47797 - How much do you want to bet that the Hawks win in at most 5?  [+] (1 new reply) 06/05/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #47798 - plataeiou (06/05/2015) [-]
$0
#47795 - Skip Bayless predicted Lebron wins the game with a clutch shot…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/05/2015 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #47802 - themanwithnoplan (06/06/2015) [-]
Shumpert was closer than Lebron and he was falling down

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2400
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - vissova (06/28/2013) [-]
Takes major balls not to remove a comment with -100 thumbs. Respect to you, sir.
 Friends (0)