Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

hawaiianhappysauce    

Rank #5332 on Comments
hawaiianhappysauce Avatar Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to hawaiianhappysauce Block hawaiianhappysauce Invite hawaiianhappysauce to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:7/25/2011
Last Login:7/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5332
Highest Content Rank:#2083
Highest Comment Rank:#498
Content Thumbs: 1172 total,  1360 ,  188
Comment Thumbs: 8987 total,  11629 ,  2642
Content Level Progress: 8% (4/50)
Level 110 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 111 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 77% (77/100)
Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 288 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:2
Content Views:91557
Times Content Favorited:90 times
Total Comments Made:5166
FJ Points:815
Favorite Tags: Football (5)

latest user's comments

#145603 - My point is that if a girl is giving you hugs, you hug them ba… 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
#53 - He isn't like Ron Paul. I think Ron Paul put his philosophy w… 07/19/2014 on Everything white is now racist -1
#145562 - Don't ever give women ANYTHING unless they give you a little l… 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
#145541 - Seriously though, you clearly were not trying in this school. …  [+] (6 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
#145556 - confusedasian (07/19/2014) [-]
All you see are my grades and you judge me because of that you don't know how hard it is for me to focus you don't know how hard I have to study. My parents know I normally get bs and cs. If you're just going to gloat how smart you are just leave me alone. You're not doing anything other boosting your own ego and calling me shit. It's the same shit for 13 years of schooling. You people are so high up your fucking castles always looking down on me. You think you're so much better you don't help anyone like me you just go prancing around spitting on us
User avatar #145604 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
You got an F in your second semester and you only took 3 classes. It's hard to believe that you weren't out partying instead of putting enough effort into the class, because I guarantee you a professor wouldn't fail a student who tried really hard.
#145616 - confusedasian (07/19/2014) [-]
The f was an online class with no professor telling me what or how to do anything and I don't have friends I live with my parents I go to school and then go home my stepdad and mom both know that I'm always in my room I don't go partying and i already said if you're just here to shit talk me without knowing anything about my life than leave me alone.
User avatar #145588 - iridium (07/19/2014) [-]
Well, let me ask you something, as a legitimate question and not trying to sound egotistical at all: did you in fact do everything you could in your power to pass those courses? Not just studying the textbooks and paying attention to/coming to every single class as best as you can, I'm talking asking the teacher for help, going to their office hours if they have them, doing every homework assignment given, attempting to organize study groups/sessions with other students in those classes, tutoring sessions (many campuses offer free tutoring sessions for students, at least with more general subjects), and asking others for help on anything else you didn't understand?

If you truly did all that, then I have my honest doubts that you would have failed to pass your classes. My guesses are A: You had some serious medical complication preventing you from success, B: Had absolutely abysmal professors who set their students up for failure (there are a few out there, that's why every student should know about RateMyProfessors.com), C: Some actual, serious real life stuff which just got in the way, or D: You didn't do all that.

And for the record unless you live in an environment where the job market is impossible (Which since seeing how that isn't your excuse, I have my doubts) to get into, you can get a job, so don't give the experience excuse. It might not be able to put you through school as much as you want it to, but you can at least have work if you're willing to put time and energy into getting that work. Are you writing and giving resumes, checking classifieds, attending job fairs, asking for and submitting applications to anywhere possible, calling back places you apply to, etc. and doing this on a consistent basis as much as you can?

Continued:
User avatar #145589 - iridium (07/19/2014) [-]
Cont.

I'll say this: you're not fucked, bro. You're in a difficult situation and it's frustrating you. But you need to put the work forth to get yourself there and not make excuses. And I'm not saying this to belittle you in any way. And you really don't need to be out of the house yet. As long as you're working towards self-sustained independence and you have the option of staying at home to get there, you should take it. Just act more and more like a roommate and less and less like a kid to your parents. Offer to help around the house more if you can, don't ask for money every five seconds, only for the things you really need.
#145617 - confusedasian (07/19/2014) [-]
No my mom. When growing up my mom knew I wasn't straight a type. I was always having difficulty on class because people around me always did good and put me down because I was Asian. They think it's funny how better they are and always made me hate them. The f was from online class. The lady professor just gave me things to do without much help. Her office was in another county. County not country. I can not drive their because my family have only one car that bothy parents use to get to places.

If not experience it's my referrals for job.from one of my application it asked me to list referral so they can do background check. It was retail store and I don't know why they asked that, but I can not give them anything anyways because I don't know anyone other than family of mine.
#48 - I don't think Carson could win. It's just like Hermain Cain. …  [+] (2 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Everything white is now racist -1
#50 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
I think Ran Paul is our 100% answer, and because of that I don't see him winning, but something about the man makes me feel like I can connect with him on a personal level, I really like him.
User avatar #53 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
He isn't like Ron Paul. I think Ron Paul put his philosophy way ahead of winning, whereas Ran Paul has some of his fathers ideas, but he is a little more strategic about it. Still, I think he wont win. I hope someone like Ted Cruz or Santorum don't win the primary because they come across as "my party first" candidates. The reason I liked Romney was because he didn't come across as a candidate who will only help his constituents. His goal was to change things to promote growth, which helps everyone. Romney had this idea to save government jobs and cut spending, through attrition - we won't fire anyone, but if someone leaves we won't fill more positions. That way no one loses jobs. At the same time, when you promote economic growth you create more jobs. He also had the idea of cutting spending by sending many federal government roles back to the states, including healthcare, let the states experiment. In Massachusetts we have Mass Health, which is similar to Obamacare, but only concerns the people who don't have insurance, if you have insurance, this doesn't affect you. Now is it perfect? Not at all, there are flaws with it.
#47 - Mitt also wanted sanctions on Iran, which is what Obama did to… 07/19/2014 on Everything white is now racist -1
#45 - I think because Hillary isn't Black, black people will vote de…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Everything white is now racist -2
#46 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
If the Repubes are throwing up Ben Carson for pres, its check mate. He's black Ronald Regean, if he loses I hope the Russians pick us apart and ill gladly be a filthy rooskie like the Democrats want us to be anyway.
User avatar #48 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I don't think Carson could win. It's just like Hermain Cain. He has a solid plan, he is smart, and he is a likeable guy. BUT, when it came to foreign policy he struggled. A president is the representative of the american people (and honestly, I think Obama did OK in that department) and I don't think Carson has the kind of experience to do this. I think he will be a popular figure. But if I had to choose a person to run and win, it would be either Ran Paul or Paul Ryan. I trust that Ran Paul believes in what he preaches and I think Paul Ryan is one of the most intelligent people in the House of Rep.
#50 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
I think Ran Paul is our 100% answer, and because of that I don't see him winning, but something about the man makes me feel like I can connect with him on a personal level, I really like him.
User avatar #53 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
He isn't like Ron Paul. I think Ron Paul put his philosophy way ahead of winning, whereas Ran Paul has some of his fathers ideas, but he is a little more strategic about it. Still, I think he wont win. I hope someone like Ted Cruz or Santorum don't win the primary because they come across as "my party first" candidates. The reason I liked Romney was because he didn't come across as a candidate who will only help his constituents. His goal was to change things to promote growth, which helps everyone. Romney had this idea to save government jobs and cut spending, through attrition - we won't fire anyone, but if someone leaves we won't fill more positions. That way no one loses jobs. At the same time, when you promote economic growth you create more jobs. He also had the idea of cutting spending by sending many federal government roles back to the states, including healthcare, let the states experiment. In Massachusetts we have Mass Health, which is similar to Obamacare, but only concerns the people who don't have insurance, if you have insurance, this doesn't affect you. Now is it perfect? Not at all, there are flaws with it.
#40 - Wont happen because republicans are always viewed as "out…  [+] (7 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Everything white is now racist -1
#42 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
Honest to god if Hillary wins the next election and somebody doesn't vote from a rooftop Im just leave this country to it's own devices, The Repubichairs are (sadly) our only chance at starting up again. If poor people are dumb enough to vote Democrat after the current wanna be tyrannical lunatic I want nothing to do here >_>
User avatar #47 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Mitt also wanted sanctions on Iran, which is what Obama did too. He also was going to repeal Obamacare, which would have been nice. Since Obamacare has been in effect, we have a failing website and we have people losing insurance because some of their plans do not cover what is legally required on the plans, thanks to obamacare. As an aspiring actuary, I know that insurance companies can provide insurance by having copayments, deductibles, policy limits, and premiums being paid. When you have a plan that have specific coverages and you are forced to add more coverage, you have to increase premiums or deductibles in order for the insurance policy to be stable (that is, more money going in to pay for employees and other peoples coverages, than your coverages).
User avatar #45 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I think because Hillary isn't Black, black people will vote democratic 98% of the time instead of 99% of the time. So we got that going for us. The original definition of a tea party conservative is someone who cares about controlling the size of government, but it has evolved into a bunch of religious nuts. If we elect a "tea party conservative," as opposed to what the tea party actually stands for, then the democrats will win with the help of social media. They will tell people that they want to take away contraception, that they want the rich to pay less and the poor to pay more, and they want to make cuts to education. Things like this will scare independents and typical democrat voters, even though these aren't going to actually happen. But since people are too lazy to actually pay attention to the elections and watch debates, they fall for this shit.

Most people on this site, as ignorant as they are, would never agree with me when I say "Mitt should have won the election." Mitt had what I thought was a solid tax reform plan. His idea was to cut taxes across the board by 20% but offset the rich taxcuts by making a cap on deductions to 25000 dollars, which is nothing compared to what the wealthiest people can deduct now.
#46 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
If the Repubes are throwing up Ben Carson for pres, its check mate. He's black Ronald Regean, if he loses I hope the Russians pick us apart and ill gladly be a filthy rooskie like the Democrats want us to be anyway.
User avatar #48 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I don't think Carson could win. It's just like Hermain Cain. He has a solid plan, he is smart, and he is a likeable guy. BUT, when it came to foreign policy he struggled. A president is the representative of the american people (and honestly, I think Obama did OK in that department) and I don't think Carson has the kind of experience to do this. I think he will be a popular figure. But if I had to choose a person to run and win, it would be either Ran Paul or Paul Ryan. I trust that Ran Paul believes in what he preaches and I think Paul Ryan is one of the most intelligent people in the House of Rep.
#50 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
I think Ran Paul is our 100% answer, and because of that I don't see him winning, but something about the man makes me feel like I can connect with him on a personal level, I really like him.
User avatar #53 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
He isn't like Ron Paul. I think Ron Paul put his philosophy way ahead of winning, whereas Ran Paul has some of his fathers ideas, but he is a little more strategic about it. Still, I think he wont win. I hope someone like Ted Cruz or Santorum don't win the primary because they come across as "my party first" candidates. The reason I liked Romney was because he didn't come across as a candidate who will only help his constituents. His goal was to change things to promote growth, which helps everyone. Romney had this idea to save government jobs and cut spending, through attrition - we won't fire anyone, but if someone leaves we won't fill more positions. That way no one loses jobs. At the same time, when you promote economic growth you create more jobs. He also had the idea of cutting spending by sending many federal government roles back to the states, including healthcare, let the states experiment. In Massachusetts we have Mass Health, which is similar to Obamacare, but only concerns the people who don't have insurance, if you have insurance, this doesn't affect you. Now is it perfect? Not at all, there are flaws with it.
#36 - First we have gun poptarts, now we have white clothing = racis…  [+] (14 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Everything white is now racist +35
#39 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
Wait till the 2016 elections, we are sick of the white elitists Democraps, since the Repubichairs own the house and Senate, we will have a wonderful combo of a straight conservative system. In my opinion, the god fearing people are better than whatever the left can chuck at us "For our safety"
User avatar #95 - nigeltheoutlaw (07/19/2014) [-]
>god fearing
#43 - anonymous (07/19/2014) [-]
... You do know most of this 'for our safety' shit started under a Republican controlled Senate and Presidency, right? Patriot act, increased security, large portion of the increased spying of civilians and foreign powers... Obama just hasn't bothered to get rid of it.
#44 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
"For our safety" Started under Liberals back in the post JFK assassantion era, stringent gun control raised crime then, Brady got a brain boo boo and called for stricter control, raising crime more, Billy Clintons anti assault weapons act raised crime to completely unbelievable heights. And no, the Patriot act was pushed into Bush's dick via Libtards under the premise "itll make us safer" and dumbass Bush ate that shit up.
#78 - nimba (07/19/2014) [-]
#155 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
This isn't the only nation where these things regularly happen, more people die in Chicago each year than victims of mass shootings in the last 32 years. In fact, it seems to these things happen in Gun Free Zones, which the Left has attempted to slap across our great nation endangering my kids. Hell my fucking local military recruiters are unarmed, what happens if a bad guy with a fucking crowbar has enough of there shit?
User avatar #40 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Wont happen because republicans are always viewed as "out of touch." I sense that next election, democrats win, and we have a huge turnover in the senate and house. It will be just like 2008 elections. The reason why they will fail is because young people are becoming more involved in elections, poor people are becoming more common and they always vote democrat, and finally non - white groups are becoming the majority and they always vote democratic.

In short. Poor people want handouts, minorities think republicans are racist, and young people think that all republicans think in terms of "what would jesus do" (and them being fedora wearing atheists, they will assume that they are retarded).
#42 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
Honest to god if Hillary wins the next election and somebody doesn't vote from a rooftop Im just leave this country to it's own devices, The Repubichairs are (sadly) our only chance at starting up again. If poor people are dumb enough to vote Democrat after the current wanna be tyrannical lunatic I want nothing to do here >_>
User avatar #47 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Mitt also wanted sanctions on Iran, which is what Obama did too. He also was going to repeal Obamacare, which would have been nice. Since Obamacare has been in effect, we have a failing website and we have people losing insurance because some of their plans do not cover what is legally required on the plans, thanks to obamacare. As an aspiring actuary, I know that insurance companies can provide insurance by having copayments, deductibles, policy limits, and premiums being paid. When you have a plan that have specific coverages and you are forced to add more coverage, you have to increase premiums or deductibles in order for the insurance policy to be stable (that is, more money going in to pay for employees and other peoples coverages, than your coverages).
User avatar #45 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I think because Hillary isn't Black, black people will vote democratic 98% of the time instead of 99% of the time. So we got that going for us. The original definition of a tea party conservative is someone who cares about controlling the size of government, but it has evolved into a bunch of religious nuts. If we elect a "tea party conservative," as opposed to what the tea party actually stands for, then the democrats will win with the help of social media. They will tell people that they want to take away contraception, that they want the rich to pay less and the poor to pay more, and they want to make cuts to education. Things like this will scare independents and typical democrat voters, even though these aren't going to actually happen. But since people are too lazy to actually pay attention to the elections and watch debates, they fall for this shit.

Most people on this site, as ignorant as they are, would never agree with me when I say "Mitt should have won the election." Mitt had what I thought was a solid tax reform plan. His idea was to cut taxes across the board by 20% but offset the rich taxcuts by making a cap on deductions to 25000 dollars, which is nothing compared to what the wealthiest people can deduct now.
#46 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
If the Repubes are throwing up Ben Carson for pres, its check mate. He's black Ronald Regean, if he loses I hope the Russians pick us apart and ill gladly be a filthy rooskie like the Democrats want us to be anyway.
User avatar #48 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I don't think Carson could win. It's just like Hermain Cain. He has a solid plan, he is smart, and he is a likeable guy. BUT, when it came to foreign policy he struggled. A president is the representative of the american people (and honestly, I think Obama did OK in that department) and I don't think Carson has the kind of experience to do this. I think he will be a popular figure. But if I had to choose a person to run and win, it would be either Ran Paul or Paul Ryan. I trust that Ran Paul believes in what he preaches and I think Paul Ryan is one of the most intelligent people in the House of Rep.
#50 - boothead (07/19/2014) [-]
I think Ran Paul is our 100% answer, and because of that I don't see him winning, but something about the man makes me feel like I can connect with him on a personal level, I really like him.
User avatar #53 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
He isn't like Ron Paul. I think Ron Paul put his philosophy way ahead of winning, whereas Ran Paul has some of his fathers ideas, but he is a little more strategic about it. Still, I think he wont win. I hope someone like Ted Cruz or Santorum don't win the primary because they come across as "my party first" candidates. The reason I liked Romney was because he didn't come across as a candidate who will only help his constituents. His goal was to change things to promote growth, which helps everyone. Romney had this idea to save government jobs and cut spending, through attrition - we won't fire anyone, but if someone leaves we won't fill more positions. That way no one loses jobs. At the same time, when you promote economic growth you create more jobs. He also had the idea of cutting spending by sending many federal government roles back to the states, including healthcare, let the states experiment. In Massachusetts we have Mass Health, which is similar to Obamacare, but only concerns the people who don't have insurance, if you have insurance, this doesn't affect you. Now is it perfect? Not at all, there are flaws with it.
#145503 - Let me give an example. Would you want a girlfriend who just …  [+] (1 new reply) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
User avatar #145504 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
"Yeah, I agree with that bit." - Thebestpieever 2014.
#145499 - I think you are misunderstanding what I'm trying to get across…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
User avatar #145500 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
Yeah, I agree with that bit. But I think phrasing things like that as weakness is... troubling. Because words mean something, and I don't think that what one ought to be looking for is a relationship where they have power or strength.
User avatar #145503 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Let me give an example. Would you want a girlfriend who just does everything for you? I wouldn't.
User avatar #145504 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
"Yeah, I agree with that bit." - Thebestpieever 2014.
#145497 - Then you don't know women. Women hate men who get walked over…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... +1
User avatar #145498 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
It just troubles me. Phrasing things like "Don't show weakness" makes it woefully clear how you see these things. Women aren't out to get you, nor are they biased against you. And you're not a hunter or a warrior. You're just a dude, there's no need for "strenght" or any kind of dominance. Don't let yourself be a pushover, yes, but let's put it in clear terms: you like this person, so engage this person as a person, not as an object of adoration. She's not a prey or a prize, she's just some random girl who you find attractive.
User avatar #145499 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I think you are misunderstanding what I'm trying to get across. Giving an Ipad to someone who you don't really know well enough to get them to love you is pretty lame, it shows you have a false sense of what love is.
User avatar #145500 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
Yeah, I agree with that bit. But I think phrasing things like that as weakness is... troubling. Because words mean something, and I don't think that what one ought to be looking for is a relationship where they have power or strength.
User avatar #145503 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Let me give an example. Would you want a girlfriend who just does everything for you? I wouldn't.
User avatar #145504 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
"Yeah, I agree with that bit." - Thebestpieever 2014.
#145488 - First of all, you don't give women SHIT until she is in a rela…  [+] (9 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
User avatar #145593 - iridium (07/19/2014) [-]
I dunno, I think it depends on what you give her and also if you aren't already associated with another. If you can't give anything you're probably not going to have a good relationship anyways as the whole point of a relationship is something mutual so there's some give and take. But you definitely don't start with anything you would really feel bad about if it went down the drain, and you don't make a habit of being a guy who is only really about giving material things.
User avatar #145603 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
My point is that if a girl is giving you hugs, you hug them back. If a girl is flirting, you flirt back, if a girl is teasing you tease back, if a girl gives you a gift, you should return the favor, etc etc etc. I would never give a gift to a girl that I wasn't sure about having a shot at.
User avatar #145489 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
Meh, I'd agree that he was dumb but "Don't show weakness" sounds like dumb shit you would read in the red pill.
User avatar #145497 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Then you don't know women. Women hate men who get walked over and are too nice. They want someone who is going to challenge them, someone who will make life interesting. They don't want a personal butler.
User avatar #145498 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
It just troubles me. Phrasing things like "Don't show weakness" makes it woefully clear how you see these things. Women aren't out to get you, nor are they biased against you. And you're not a hunter or a warrior. You're just a dude, there's no need for "strenght" or any kind of dominance. Don't let yourself be a pushover, yes, but let's put it in clear terms: you like this person, so engage this person as a person, not as an object of adoration. She's not a prey or a prize, she's just some random girl who you find attractive.
User avatar #145499 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
I think you are misunderstanding what I'm trying to get across. Giving an Ipad to someone who you don't really know well enough to get them to love you is pretty lame, it shows you have a false sense of what love is.
User avatar #145500 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
Yeah, I agree with that bit. But I think phrasing things like that as weakness is... troubling. Because words mean something, and I don't think that what one ought to be looking for is a relationship where they have power or strength.
User avatar #145503 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Let me give an example. Would you want a girlfriend who just does everything for you? I wouldn't.
User avatar #145504 - thebestpieever (07/19/2014) [-]
"Yeah, I agree with that bit." - Thebestpieever 2014.
#145487 - The truth is, me giving advice is 1% of it. You have to make … 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
#145484 - wait... did you seriously give her an ipad? If so then that w…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... 0
User avatar #145545 - betta (07/19/2014) [-]
Nahh, I actually never got the nerve to do it thank god, we started to talk slowly though so yeah we're decent friends and it isn't the worst thing in the world.
User avatar #145562 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
Don't ever give women ANYTHING unless they give you a little love in return. If they flirt, you flirt back, but not too much. If you get into a relationship, don't think about marriage.
#145475 - I... I helped someone on here? I helped someone... I helped …  [+] (2 new replies) 07/19/2014 on Advice - love advice,... +1
User avatar #145483 - svenninja (07/19/2014) [-]
You're right dude. Your advice has helped a lot, I'd be willing to help you out if you need anything.
User avatar #145487 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/19/2014) [-]
The truth is, me giving advice is 1% of it. You have to make decisions yourself. You have to take actions. I know this and I just take action.
#24 - Still. I wouldn't go down easy. I would try to run, make the…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/18/2014 on Upside down pepsi -1
#60 - opsbuttbuddy (07/18/2014) [-]
you wanna risk torture instead of a just a clean death?
User avatar #30 - wthree (07/18/2014) [-]
It's easy to say that when you're not in the situation.
#26 - youxbarstard (07/18/2014) [-]
It's quick no matter how it happens.
#21 - What I don't get is why the guy just gave up and died.  [+] (5 new replies) 07/18/2014 on Upside down pepsi +2
#22 - youxbarstard (07/18/2014) [-]
Maybe he knew that he was dead either way?
User avatar #24 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/18/2014) [-]
Still. I wouldn't go down easy. I would try to run, make them take me down.
#60 - opsbuttbuddy (07/18/2014) [-]
you wanna risk torture instead of a just a clean death?
User avatar #30 - wthree (07/18/2014) [-]
It's easy to say that when you're not in the situation.
#26 - youxbarstard (07/18/2014) [-]
It's quick no matter how it happens.
#19 - I think they shot him then decapitated him.  [+] (7 new replies) 07/18/2014 on Upside down pepsi 0
#20 - youxbarstard (07/18/2014) [-]
But it shows them chopping the head off then shooting the body then moving on to the other guy.....
User avatar #21 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/18/2014) [-]
What I don't get is why the guy just gave up and died.
#22 - youxbarstard (07/18/2014) [-]
Maybe he knew that he was dead either way?
User avatar #24 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/18/2014) [-]
Still. I wouldn't go down easy. I would try to run, make them take me down.
#60 - opsbuttbuddy (07/18/2014) [-]
you wanna risk torture instead of a just a clean death?
User avatar #30 - wthree (07/18/2014) [-]
It's easy to say that when you're not in the situation.
#26 - youxbarstard (07/18/2014) [-]
It's quick no matter how it happens.
#65952 - They aren't mean, they are just doing what Allah told them to do.  [+] (1 new reply) 07/18/2014 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #65959 - newvein (07/18/2014) [-]
Then Allah is also a meanie =P
#13 - One video they buried someone alive, he probably died. … 07/18/2014 on Upside down pepsi 0
#18 - he was new and 10 years old.  [+] (1 new reply) 07/18/2014 on Brofist 0
User avatar #19 - fishinyourface (07/18/2014) [-]
and he still does it, he's got no excuse now
#16 - He caught caterpie first, then tried to use it to catch pidgeo…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/18/2014 on Brofist 0
User avatar #17 - fishinyourface (07/18/2014) [-]
oh right. Now I remember. That was stupid of me to think he'd actually use type advantages correctly he only uses pikachu against pidgeotto because that's all he has. I bet he'd send out a weedle if he'd had one
User avatar #18 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/18/2014) [-]
he was new and 10 years old.
User avatar #19 - fishinyourface (07/18/2014) [-]
and he still does it, he's got no excuse now
#14 - Caterpie he just threw a pokeball on too.  [+] (5 new replies) 07/18/2014 on Brofist 0
User avatar #15 - fishinyourface (07/18/2014) [-]
to be fair though, caterpie are pretty weak. and I thougth he had pidgeotto attack it first?
User avatar #16 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/18/2014) [-]
He caught caterpie first, then tried to use it to catch pidgeotto, and had to use pikachu.
User avatar #17 - fishinyourface (07/18/2014) [-]
oh right. Now I remember. That was stupid of me to think he'd actually use type advantages correctly he only uses pikachu against pidgeotto because that's all he has. I bet he'd send out a weedle if he'd had one
User avatar #18 - hawaiianhappysauce (07/18/2014) [-]
he was new and 10 years old.
User avatar #19 - fishinyourface (07/18/2014) [-]
and he still does it, he's got no excuse now
#10 - First one was a guy getting his head buried and the other is 2…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/18/2014 on Upside down pepsi 0
#51 - alcxander (07/18/2014) [-]
and its no joke. its not hidden in any way. prepare yourself if you watch it you will see 3 men die, from start to finish. dont watch it. its not worth it....
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2400

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - vissova (06/28/2013) [-]
Takes major balls not to remove a comment with -100 thumbs. Respect to you, sir.
 Friends (0)