Upload
Login or register

froghole

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/02/2011
Stats
Content Ranking:#5816
Comment Ranking:#4103
Highest Content Rank:#721
Highest Comment Rank:#306
Content Thumbs: 5818 total,  6436 ,  618
Comment Thumbs: 12049 total,  14462 ,  2413
Content Level Progress: 85% (85/100)
Level 156 Content: Faptastic → Level 157 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 32.8% (164/500)
Level 311 Comments: Wizard → Level 312 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:6
Content Views:92395
Times Content Favorited:599 times
Total Comments Made:4077
FJ Points:17287

latest user's comments

#32 - they asked him friday, so his message to stop was delayed 2 da…  [+] (3 replies) 11/16/2016 on CBS being assholes 0
User avatar
#33 - theism (11/16/2016) [-]
But again, it aired as scheduled. Do they expect it to get special treatment? People are ridiculous.
User avatar
#34 - froghole (11/16/2016) [-]
i agree
User avatar
#53 - lebarricuda (11/17/2016) [-]
It was cut. The interview was butchered by a left interviewer and a left reporting company. The entire film was cut all throughout it.
#30 - sunday  [+] (5 replies) 11/16/2016 on CBS being assholes 0
User avatar
#31 - theism (11/16/2016) [-]
So what are people complaining about?
User avatar
#32 - froghole (11/16/2016) [-]
they asked him friday, so his message to stop was delayed 2 days. i guess that's worth complaining about? idk?
User avatar
#33 - theism (11/16/2016) [-]
But again, it aired as scheduled. Do they expect it to get special treatment? People are ridiculous.
User avatar
#34 - froghole (11/16/2016) [-]
i agree
User avatar
#53 - lebarricuda (11/17/2016) [-]
It was cut. The interview was butchered by a left interviewer and a left reporting company. The entire film was cut all throughout it.
#28 - interview was friday, and they held his answer until sunday.  [+] (7 replies) 11/15/2016 on CBS being assholes +2
User avatar
#29 - theism (11/16/2016) [-]
When did they broadcast the episode though? I don't follow 60 minutes but it sounds like this was aired as part of a bigger episode.
User avatar
#30 - froghole (11/16/2016) [-]
sunday
User avatar
#31 - theism (11/16/2016) [-]
So what are people complaining about?
User avatar
#32 - froghole (11/16/2016) [-]
they asked him friday, so his message to stop was delayed 2 days. i guess that's worth complaining about? idk?
User avatar
#33 - theism (11/16/2016) [-]
But again, it aired as scheduled. Do they expect it to get special treatment? People are ridiculous.
User avatar
#34 - froghole (11/16/2016) [-]
i agree
User avatar
#53 - lebarricuda (11/17/2016) [-]
It was cut. The interview was butchered by a left interviewer and a left reporting company. The entire film was cut all throughout it.
#119 - Assuming half vote does nothing. Why even say lets assume it w…  [+] (1 reply) 11/15/2016 on 3 million illegals have voted 0
User avatar
#138 - Ripsometime (11/15/2016) [-]
He meant that he assumes half the percentage of illegals voted compared to legal citizens.

So if 43% of legal citizens voted, then he assumes 21.5% of illegals voted, and of those that voted, all voted Hillary.

if there are 5,000,000 Illegals then 43% of them = 2,150,000
21.5% of 5,000,000 = 1,075,000

That's all he is trying to say.

Not saying I agree or even know if those numbers are accurate, it was just annoying me that you continually misunderstood everything he was saying.
#117 - Dude re-read your extrapolation comment. You literally said le…  [+] (3 replies) 11/15/2016 on 3 million illegals have voted 0
User avatar
#118 - zomaru (11/15/2016) [-]
I assumed it was obvious that what I meant was "Lets assume half vote, and their votes would all be for Hillary.
User avatar
#119 - froghole (11/15/2016) [-]
Assuming half vote does nothing. Why even say lets assume it when it changes the numbers equally. You make no sense right now.
User avatar
#138 - Ripsometime (11/15/2016) [-]
He meant that he assumes half the percentage of illegals voted compared to legal citizens.

So if 43% of legal citizens voted, then he assumes 21.5% of illegals voted, and of those that voted, all voted Hillary.

if there are 5,000,000 Illegals then 43% of them = 2,150,000
21.5% of 5,000,000 = 1,075,000

That's all he is trying to say.

Not saying I agree or even know if those numbers are accurate, it was just annoying me that you continually misunderstood everything he was saying.
#79 - No I don't. I was just using your numbers  [+] (5 replies) 11/15/2016 on 3 million illegals have voted +1
User avatar
#84 - zomaru (11/15/2016) [-]
You implied that the vote would be split 50 50. Otherwise your point was MOOT
User avatar
#117 - froghole (11/15/2016) [-]
Dude re-read your extrapolation comment. You literally said lets say half voted for hillary. That's what I was pointing out. Was your comment change both peoples votes by 1.2 million. Of course the illegals would give over 90% of their votes to hillary, but that isn't what you said lol.
User avatar
#118 - zomaru (11/15/2016) [-]
I assumed it was obvious that what I meant was "Lets assume half vote, and their votes would all be for Hillary.
User avatar
#119 - froghole (11/15/2016) [-]
Assuming half vote does nothing. Why even say lets assume it when it changes the numbers equally. You make no sense right now.
User avatar
#138 - Ripsometime (11/15/2016) [-]
He meant that he assumes half the percentage of illegals voted compared to legal citizens.

So if 43% of legal citizens voted, then he assumes 21.5% of illegals voted, and of those that voted, all voted Hillary.

if there are 5,000,000 Illegals then 43% of them = 2,150,000
21.5% of 5,000,000 = 1,075,000

That's all he is trying to say.

Not saying I agree or even know if those numbers are accurate, it was just annoying me that you continually misunderstood everything he was saying.
#33 - dude. your numbers literally change nothing. if half voted hil…  [+] (7 replies) 11/15/2016 on 3 million illegals have voted +5
User avatar
#60 - zomaru (11/15/2016) [-]
You think any illegal would have voted for the man who ran on a campaign promising to out them?
User avatar
#79 - froghole (11/15/2016) [-]
No I don't. I was just using your numbers
User avatar
#84 - zomaru (11/15/2016) [-]
You implied that the vote would be split 50 50. Otherwise your point was MOOT
User avatar
#117 - froghole (11/15/2016) [-]
Dude re-read your extrapolation comment. You literally said lets say half voted for hillary. That's what I was pointing out. Was your comment change both peoples votes by 1.2 million. Of course the illegals would give over 90% of their votes to hillary, but that isn't what you said lol.
User avatar
#118 - zomaru (11/15/2016) [-]
I assumed it was obvious that what I meant was "Lets assume half vote, and their votes would all be for Hillary.
User avatar
#119 - froghole (11/15/2016) [-]
Assuming half vote does nothing. Why even say lets assume it when it changes the numbers equally. You make no sense right now.
User avatar
#138 - Ripsometime (11/15/2016) [-]
He meant that he assumes half the percentage of illegals voted compared to legal citizens.

So if 43% of legal citizens voted, then he assumes 21.5% of illegals voted, and of those that voted, all voted Hillary.

if there are 5,000,000 Illegals then 43% of them = 2,150,000
21.5% of 5,000,000 = 1,075,000

That's all he is trying to say.

Not saying I agree or even know if those numbers are accurate, it was just annoying me that you continually misunderstood everything he was saying.
#151 - well in this case though, there is plenty of video evidence th…  [+] (1 reply) 11/15/2016 on Anti-Trump Protester Hit By... 0
User avatar
#206 - howyafj (11/15/2016) [-]
I wish it did. Pedestrian claims are few cases were an insurance company will pay regardless of negligence . Again, they'll use this video to mitigate their payout showing these dumb asses walked in the interstate, but not to deny the claim most likely.

The insurance company will most likely pay the claim to "make it go away" and minimize the chance for them and their insured getting sued.