Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:2/13/2014
Last Login:9/28/2016
Content Ranking:#5328
Comment Ranking:#2984
Highest Content Rank:#4313
Highest Comment Rank:#912
Content Thumbs: 335 total,  403 ,  68
Comment Thumbs: 8951 total,  9503 ,  552
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 26 Content: Peasant → Level 27 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 12% (12/100)
Level 267 Comments: Pure Win → Level 268 Comments: Pure Win
Content Views:30201
Times Content Favorited:10 times
Total Comments Made:1198
FJ Points:6810
Favorite Tags: all (3) | and (3) | for (3) | justice (3) | liberty (2)

Text Posts

latest user's comments

#404 - <MFW this whole mess of a debate. Never did I think I w…  [+] (1 reply) 09/27/2016 on New: Presidential Debate Live +3
#532 - anon (09/27/2016) [-]
You sound like a true Hillary cult follower
#1 - I never understood why people would lie about their skills in …  [+] (15 replies) 09/04/2016 on slippery slope +277
User avatar
#39 - toosexyforyou (09/05/2016) [-]
If you can't understand why someone would lie on a resume then you're fucking retarded. It's pretty simple, they don't have the skills required for the job but they still want to be hired so they lie. Also, in this post it said he put the part about mastering piano at 15 in his cv, not the resume so this job has nothing to do with playing a piano but the board of directors for the company wants to hear it.
User avatar
#37 - fistings (09/05/2016) [-]
I lied in an interview/application about being able to drive stick (I was going for a job at a car dealership with my friends) I lied so I would get the job. I learned how to drive stick later though
User avatar
#40 - fluttergrey (09/05/2016) [-]
Yeah, obviously the guy in question was going to master the piano at the age of 15... once technology could let him.
User avatar
#36 - jusbox (09/05/2016) [-]
Well, having extra skills can be the deciding factor.
Say you have two applicants for a job, and they both qualify equally. They meet all requirements and are both equally capable of performing the job 100%.
The only difference between the applicants is that one of them have a useful (but not requiered) skill. One of them have nothing extra to bring to the table, but the other applicant knows first aid (or at least claims so).

As an employer, would you hire the person that can do the job and only the job? Or would you hire the person that can get the job done and help out in a potential emergency?

It's a fairly easy choice.
User avatar
#24 - buckymcbadbait (09/04/2016) [-]
Some people just have more dollars than sense
User avatar
#14 - derpthefifth (09/04/2016) [-]
I mean if you're going to lie at least have a plausible excuse for not being able to perform that lasts long enough for you to actually learn the skill.
User avatar
#12 - mondominiman (09/04/2016) [-]
A lot of jobs train new hires so they know how things are done at that particular job.
User avatar
#5 - ssjkirby (09/04/2016) [-]
It's a lot harder to get a job than keep a job.
User avatar
#6 - ssjkirby (09/04/2016) [-]
Whenever you are interviewing, they will always pick the strongest applicant.

You only get fired when something goes wrong.
User avatar
#13 - schwantz (09/04/2016) [-]
Lol u reply to urself
#11 - anon (09/04/2016) [-]
like lying on resume?
User avatar
#4 - aximil (09/04/2016) [-]
I can barely heat myself up some microwave dinners but I'm going to tell you I can make 5-star gourmet meals. Will you hire me? I promise to freak out when I realize I'm going to have to put those skills to the test.
User avatar
#3 - bemymaster (09/04/2016) [-]
honesty is the most valuable skill to have!
User avatar
#8 - zytherman (09/04/2016) [-]
Implying Dank Meme shitposting isn't a better skill
User avatar
#2 - amuzen (09/04/2016) [-]
Happens pretty often, a lot of those side sills are just because when they see them they think that you as a person are smarter, more skillful, and more determined than other people that didn't learn those skills.
[ 1197 Total ]