Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

freddyhollensen    

Rank #5015 on Content
freddyhollensen Avatar Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to freddyhollensen Block freddyhollensen Invite freddyhollensen to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Youtube Channel: FreddyHollensen
Date Signed Up:4/11/2012
Last Login:7/23/2014
Location:Denmark
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5015
Comment Ranking:#7004
Highest Content Rank:#360
Highest Comment Rank:#2301
Content Thumbs: 23774 total,  25937 ,  2163
Comment Thumbs: 3474 total,  5087 ,  1613
Content Level Progress: 61.9% (619/1000)
Level 223 Content: Mind Blower → Level 224 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 68% (68/100)
Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:4
Content Views:717747
Times Content Favorited:1623 times
Total Comments Made:1063
FJ Points:27001
Favorite Tags: I knew you would (3)

latest user's comments

#3 - Picture 05/10/2014 on Post your broken .gifs here +11
#18 - There was a danish resistance you know, and people cheered the…  [+] (12 new replies) 05/10/2014 on Denmark's plan 0
User avatar #20 - charagrin (05/10/2014) [-]
>France surrenders because it can't resist Germany's military
>Engages in one of the most successful sabotage campaigns in human history.
>Remembered as cowards and surrender monkey's.

>Denmark surrenders because it can not resist Germany's military
> Does everything it can to support Germany, genocide and all.
>Denmark commits some minor acts of sabotage.
>Convinces themselves they were the good guys.
#58 - devout feminist (05/10/2014) [-]
I couldn't take you serious after the ">Remembered as cowards and surrender monkeys."

It's got nothing to do with anything.
User avatar #29 - didactus (05/10/2014) [-]
Flamman och Citronen, check it for fucks sake, Danish resistance fighters.
User avatar #45 - lordlolland (05/10/2014) [-]
Hvidstensgruppen is much better if one is looking for a Danish resistance movie, its much less of an action movie and keeps to the real story much better.
User avatar #31 - charagrin (05/10/2014) [-]
Yes, that would b the token resistance I mentioned, that did not begin major resistance until 1944, after the Nazi's started pulling back. I will say, they were successful enough that Germany fully took over the Danish government in fall of '43, where the DFC started their own underground government that aided the resistance movement, however, it was again, token. Operation Carthage in conjunction with the DFC was quite effective though, I will admit.
#26 - dillerfranz (05/10/2014) [-]
World War 1 was pure business for Denmark. They were selling goods to Germany for profit only. In World War 2 they tried to do same. What could you expect from a country with an army 10 times smaller than any country surrounding it? Anyways Germany finally realized Denmark could be used as a strategic point rather than a gorcery store. Resistance was futile and Denmark would only punished further if making too much trouble.

France is a much bigger country with a much larger army with borders touching allies. Denmark had to ocean... in other words if you really have to open your noisehole in your ugly head please do some research beforehand
#32 - dillerfranz (05/10/2014) [-]
You have a valid point however I do though not think it is fair to judge the whole nation on behalf of the goverments choices. There has most certainly been strong political reasons to whatever was done at the time in order to minimize the conflict as much as possible. Besides you will alwways be able to find pro and anti-(insert conflict here) in countries. Some more than others. I think it was your choice of wording that made me misunderstand your intention, my bad
User avatar #28 - charagrin (05/10/2014) [-]
Your right, if only I had taken courses on world history with electives in WWI and WWII....Oh wait! I did.

You completely missed the point. No mention was made of allies, borders, or militaries beyond both Frances and Denmark's inability to resist Germany. Th fact neither could have won is not the issue, the issue is one lead a guerilla and sabotage resistance while the other 100% gave up and fully supported nazism beyond a very minor token effort at resistance. Between fighting the Germans before surrender, and Danes lost after surrender, Denmark lost only 0.08% of it's(albeit minor) military and civilian populace.

The Danish resistance did not even fully take off until AFTER Nazi Germany had started to decline back to it's own borders. Even the Danish government admitted it was wrong, you might want to look up what the Danish Government itself said about it's actions. Anders Fogh Rasmussen in particular said it rather well..

And before you try and twist anything, I acknowledge Denmark could not fight the Nazi's, and I acknowledge they had a resistance. The issue is how minor their resistance was versus how much they aided the Nazi's, at least in comparison to France.
#35 - deaminzaints (05/10/2014) [-]
but again, you are comparing a much larger country to a much smaller one... of course there is gonna be a bigger resistance when there are more people that live there.
think about this. there is a room with 100 people. they are locked in and are told that they will be shot if they dont co-operate. 1 person says: "we can get out if we work together!" how many will follow?

now assume that 10000 people are locked in with the same conditions. 100 people say the exact same thing. what will happen?

humans are very weak to group pressure, in a country with alot of people there will allways be a higher resistance becourse the amount of people who live there can counter the amount who invade. that is not the case for a smaller country.

but yeah, facts are facts. but just dont look at it without considering the human aspect.
#24 - emotep (05/10/2014) [-]
Denmark became in April 2014 officially recognized as one of the 'allied' nations, due to losing 1/6 of the Danish sailors serving under allied forces in world war 2. A casualty rate only topped by the US marines.

1.072 out of approximately 6000 according to the Danish news agency TV2

Also Denmark resisted the German invasion(however shortly) killing a more than 200 soldiers and destroying several German armored vehicles.
User avatar #23 - minorian (05/10/2014) [-]
You are talking about countries like they are persons.
Denmark had a complacent government of Nazi-lovers that led a cooperation policy with Germany, but we also had a substantial resistance force of dirty kike-lovers, like every other country that got invaded.
User avatar #22 - reginleif (05/10/2014) [-]
Let's be fair though, there WAS mass evacuations of the Jews before the Germans came. Poland got way too much cred for what basically was a half assed attempt to do that. Even though as I said earlier the Poles and French put much more of a fight.

Not that Danes didn't support genocide, but pretty much every nation in Europe did, and if we go by historical accounts more resistance friendly nations like Poland probably cooperated more than the Danish on that aspect.
#113 - DO IT MAN 05/09/2014 on Pokemon Combinations 0
#85 - Well obviously money always have to come from somwhere, I didn…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/09/2014 on Michele Bachman is a genius… 0
#86 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
Once again, it is Universal and not free. It is a really expensive tax you and everyone who is working (has income) has to pay for.

But every tax (well not just the taxes...everything) is really expensive over there.
#82 - Well you should check again, I have pretty free health care. …  [+] (4 new replies) 05/09/2014 on Michele Bachman is a genius… 0
#84 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
What i meant is: free means the government funds it on it's own and not thru taxes taken from the public. It is free if you don't have to pay for it, not when you use it, not from your salary.
#83 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
Free healthcare implies that it cost no money. It is only "free on point of use", but you pay for it in your whole life. It is Universal Healthcare, but it is publicly funded and not free. Free means government pays it and not the public.
User avatar #85 - freddyhollensen (05/09/2014) [-]
Well obviously money always have to come from somwhere, I didn't know you were looking for a semantic debate, but if you really want, then the word ''free'' is meaningless.

In denmark, it's not like you have to pay taxes in order to receive education or healthcare, you could be a homeless bum, your child could be, your childrens children, and your entire family could be bums who paid no taxes.

If they go to a doctor, he will treat em without charge.

Is that not free? or do you disagree with the use of the word in general?
#86 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
Once again, it is Universal and not free. It is a really expensive tax you and everyone who is working (has income) has to pay for.

But every tax (well not just the taxes...everything) is really expensive over there.
#76 - But be honest, would you not rather live like the scandinavian…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/09/2014 on Michele Bachman is a genius… 0
#78 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
Last time i checked the so called "scandinavian master race" didn't have free healthcare.

And I wouldn't be so proud of the most expensive country to live, while even US has higher avg wages (they have the highest...so yea... altho it might dropped with the new "tax" in)
User avatar #82 - freddyhollensen (05/09/2014) [-]
Well you should check again, I have pretty free health care.

It doesn't cover dentists though.
#84 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
What i meant is: free means the government funds it on it's own and not thru taxes taken from the public. It is free if you don't have to pay for it, not when you use it, not from your salary.
#83 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
Free healthcare implies that it cost no money. It is only "free on point of use", but you pay for it in your whole life. It is Universal Healthcare, but it is publicly funded and not free. Free means government pays it and not the public.
User avatar #85 - freddyhollensen (05/09/2014) [-]
Well obviously money always have to come from somwhere, I didn't know you were looking for a semantic debate, but if you really want, then the word ''free'' is meaningless.

In denmark, it's not like you have to pay taxes in order to receive education or healthcare, you could be a homeless bum, your child could be, your childrens children, and your entire family could be bums who paid no taxes.

If they go to a doctor, he will treat em without charge.

Is that not free? or do you disagree with the use of the word in general?
#86 - devout feminist (05/09/2014) [-]
Once again, it is Universal and not free. It is a really expensive tax you and everyone who is working (has income) has to pay for.

But every tax (well not just the taxes...everything) is really expensive over there.
#53 - I must be getting old... 05/09/2014 on Work what 0
#14 - The Third last, I don't get it...  [+] (2 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Third one really ****ed my... +1
User avatar #30 - datlaugh (05/08/2014) [-]
There's two girls in the picture. One is under the guy's arm and one is in the background. Both of the girls' shirts are the same color so they blend.
User avatar #16 - daffyduckyo (05/08/2014) [-]
The girls kinda look like siamese twins
#40 - moving on, move their feet... what the fuck. 05/05/2014 on Play the song in the... +1
#34 - Why do people always want parker to be a complete nerd? … 05/05/2014 on Tobey Maguire: the Man of... -2
#13 - I genuinly think Keanu Reeves is a better man than Jesus. … 05/05/2014 on no more sad keanu, just god +1
#58 - Mocking the dead are we? 05/05/2014 on this gif cheers me up 0
#45 - Your*  [+] (4 new replies) 05/05/2014 on If you are Austin, +4
#46 - devout feminist (05/05/2014) [-]
What needs correcting in this?
User avatar #54 - noisia (05/05/2014) [-]
Description
#55 - devout feminist (05/05/2014) [-]
Ah, right. I never read description unless it's something I want source on. Thanks!
User avatar #56 - noisia (05/05/2014) [-]
No probs. Took me a while to see it too.
#118 - I know people here are like ''what an asshole, can't tolerate … 05/05/2014 on Facebook status -1
#217 - I'm fairly certain it's supposed to be believed he does all th… 05/04/2014 on (untitled) -2
#201 - I remember the episode with the train in some U.S terrain. …  [+] (3 new replies) 05/04/2014 on (untitled) +2
#219 - SognaVetr (05/04/2014) [-]
Just for you.
User avatar #209 - norrisblade (05/04/2014) [-]
It's meant to be fake, he knows it, everybody knows it, he just shows you what you can do and that it can be done, he has never once claimed he is a badass who does everything legitimately, he's just giving you an idea.
User avatar #217 - freddyhollensen (05/04/2014) [-]
I'm fairly certain it's supposed to be believed he does all those things.

If I could convinced everyone I was a pure badass, and make tons of money doing it, even though it's a complete lie... I would own a lamborghini.
#165 - Breaking the question to newfound GF(ex), could we start not u… 05/02/2014 on Never stick it in crazy +7
#496 - It means without guidance, not human, not divine, not anything… 05/02/2014 on that last panel… 0
#37 - Picture 05/01/2014 on Those Talons +5
#46 - I feel it equally. The only time I've struck someone … 05/01/2014 on oh andy +3
#193 - People actually defending creationism, trying to rationalize i…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/01/2014 on that last panel… +7
User avatar #237 - shiifter (05/01/2014) [-]
"evolution through natural selection pretty much means, without guidance"

I think that was meant to mean without _ human_ guidance. So that you can't say pugs are the result of natural selection. Because that shit's like the opposite of natural selection
User avatar #496 - freddyhollensen (05/02/2014) [-]
It means without guidance, not human, not divine, not anything.

It's a direct response to the environment around it, it's the whole basis of natural selection.
User avatar #377 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/01/2014) [-]
Nah, it's based off of random chance. Unless god is the Chaos Theory, it can't be involved at all.
#239 - devout feminist (05/01/2014) [-]
Oh please, you really don't know anything about the genetic Drift, the specifics of natural selection, Gene flow, Genetic hitchhiking, or biases mutation that occurred along the course of evolution to such an extent as to assert anything intelligently about the guidance of evolution. You would almost have to be there when it happened to know these things. So many rookies jumping to conclusions way too fast.
User avatar #240 - shiifter (05/01/2014) [-]
Well it was just a suggestion. Not an assertion.
#126 - A bunch of hillbillies with shotguns VS <---  [+] (7 new replies) 04/29/2014 on yep 0
User avatar #153 - icameforthepron (04/29/2014) [-]
You mean the Apaches that have been downed by Arabs with AKs?
User avatar #136 - GnRNoD (04/29/2014) [-]
I support the right to own a weapon I don't own one or want to own one...
But clearly you're missing a very important point, if you have a gun you'll fight if you don't they'll just send someome with a gun to tell you what to do.
Also therealslimjim kinda has a point.
#130 - therealslimjim (04/29/2014) [-]
A bunch of hillbillies with muskets

beat

<------ These guys
#148 - kingoflint (04/29/2014) [-]
They had some help. Not to mention the British weren't really trying. They were so tired of war they hired Germans to fight the Americans.
#137 - devout feminist (04/29/2014) [-]
That was then...maybe not now
User avatar #132 - therealslimjim (04/29/2014) [-]
I meant to say, "these guys ↑"
#131 - therealslimjim has deleted their comment.
#22 - Try Jumping 04/29/2014 on dark souls messages are... 0
#70 - Too lazy to even thumb content I like, still thumbed your comment. 04/29/2014 on so it's official now +1
#22 - I'm pretty sure that's an actual fucking skulltula... …  [+] (2 new replies) 04/25/2014 on Evolution +3
#36 - xxmemosxx (04/25/2014) [-]
It's not real
#66 - goodshinyhunter (04/25/2014) [-]
Really?

Sarcasm.

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #14 - someponynew ONLINE (06/05/2013) [-]
>Fully supporting your mod.
User avatar #15 to #14 - freddyhollensen (06/05/2013) [-]
Thanks, if you wish to follow what's going on, I've actually just made a facebook page like 10 minutes ago, we're at the moment 2-3 people working on content for Skyrim.

The page obviously isn't worth much at the moment, but soon I'll add some screenshots of places around the world, and eventually I'll make it into a real page with daily / weekly updates for your feed. ;)

www.facebook.com/SkyrimFreeDlc
User avatar #3 - CannonFodder (10/30/2012) [-]
Are you getting your pictures from I Fucking Love Science? Because your recent posts were posted there a couple days ago
User avatar #4 to #3 - freddyhollensen (10/30/2012) [-]
Ha, yes... I think so, Sometimes I just save funny pictures in my folder, and I'm subscribed to their facebook page.. so may very well be. ;)
User avatar #5 to #4 - CannonFodder (10/30/2012) [-]
Yeah same here, they're good stuff. You should post the follow up the Has Science Gone To Far post with the one of the fat guys as heavy metals. That made me laugh
User avatar #6 to #5 - freddyhollensen (10/30/2012) [-]
Can't remember seeing that, I'll go look for it, unless you got the link to it on you? :b
User avatar #8 to #7 - freddyhollensen (10/30/2012) [-]
Ha, brilliant, thanks mate... I'll save it in my folder for the next time I post ;) You could also post it yourself though, I see you're collecting quite a bit of thumbs yourself... Feel free to use the title :b

Has science gone to far... I think so.

Would be more fitting though I think ;)
User avatar #9 to #8 - CannonFodder (10/30/2012) [-]
Nah I only post comics so all your man
#1 - blartonfairweather (07/18/2012) [-]
What's up, mate
?
 Friends (0)