Upload
Login or register

freddyhollensen

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:4/11/2012
Last Login:9/11/2016
Location:Denmark
Stats
Comment Ranking:#21648
Highest Content Rank:#360
Highest Comment Rank:#2301
Content Thumbs: 23797 total,  25964 ,  2167
Comment Thumbs: 3489 total,  5120 ,  1631
Content Level Progress: 63.3% (633/1000)
Level 223 Content: Mind Blower → Level 224 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 82% (82/100)
Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:4
Content Views:725770
Times Content Favorited:1606 times
Total Comments Made:1089
FJ Points:27029
Favorite Tags: I knew you would (3)

latest user's comments

#193 - People actually defending creationism, trying to rationalize i…  [+] (5 replies) 05/01/2014 on that last panel… +7
User avatar
#237 - shiifter (05/01/2014) [-]
"evolution through natural selection pretty much means, without guidance"

I think that was meant to mean without _ human_ guidance. So that you can't say pugs are the result of natural selection. Because that shit's like the opposite of natural selection
User avatar
#496 - freddyhollensen (05/02/2014) [-]
It means without guidance, not human, not divine, not anything.

It's a direct response to the environment around it, it's the whole basis of natural selection.
User avatar
#377 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/01/2014) [-]
Nah, it's based off of random chance. Unless god is the Chaos Theory, it can't be involved at all.
#239 - anon (05/01/2014) [-]
Oh please, you really don't know anything about the genetic Drift, the specifics of natural selection, Gene flow, Genetic hitchhiking, or biases mutation that occurred along the course of evolution to such an extent as to assert anything intelligently about the guidance of evolution. You would almost have to be there when it happened to know these things. So many rookies jumping to conclusions way too fast.
User avatar
#240 - shiifter (05/01/2014) [-]
Well it was just a suggestion. Not an assertion.
#126 - A bunch of hillbillies with shotguns VS <---  [+] (7 replies) 04/29/2014 on yep 0
User avatar
#153 - icameforthepron (04/29/2014) [-]
You mean the Apaches that have been downed by Arabs with AKs?
User avatar
#136 - GnRNoD (04/29/2014) [-]
I support the right to own a weapon I don't own one or want to own one...
But clearly you're missing a very important point, if you have a gun you'll fight if you don't they'll just send someome with a gun to tell you what to do.
Also therealslimjim kinda has a point.
#130 - therealslimjim (04/29/2014) [-]
A bunch of hillbillies with muskets

beat

<------ These guys
#148 - kingoflint (04/29/2014) [-]
They had some help. Not to mention the British weren't really trying. They were so tired of war they hired Germans to fight the Americans.
#137 - anon (04/29/2014) [-]
That was then...maybe not now
User avatar
#132 - therealslimjim (04/29/2014) [-]
I meant to say, "these guys ↑"
#131 - therealslimjim has deleted their comment.
#22 - I'm pretty sure that's an actual ******* skulltula... …  [+] (2 replies) 04/25/2014 on Evolution +3
#36 - xxmemosxx (04/25/2014) [-]
It's not real
#66 - goodshinyhunter (04/25/2014) [-]
Really?

Sarcasm.
#2 - Comment deleted  [+] (3 replies) 04/18/2014 on From the Harrison Ford AMA... -4
#7 - augustusxxiv (04/18/2014) [-]
#6 - zanoman (04/18/2014) [-]
#3 - ihateaccountnames (04/18/2014) [-]