Upload
Login or register

fragman

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/03/2010
Last Login:5/29/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5078
Highest Content Rank:#1376
Highest Comment Rank:#583
Content Thumbs: 11451 total,  14737 ,  3286
Comment Thumbs: 15609 total,  18607 ,  2998
Content Level Progress: 28% (28/100)
Level 208 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 209 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 61.9% (619/1000)
Level 313 Comments: Wizard → Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:19
Content Views:512799
Times Content Favorited:1509 times
Total Comments Made:3036
FJ Points:24668
Favorite Tags: it (2) | Lost (2) | the (2)

Text Posts

  • Views: 69419
    Thumbs Up 3696 Thumbs Down 770 Total: +2926
    Comments: 1500
    Favorites: 135
    Uploaded: 01/09/12
    Brony or not, it doesn't matter. Brony or not, it doesn't matter.
  • Views: 58859
    Thumbs Up 2090 Thumbs Down 281 Total: +1809
    Comments: 518
    Favorites: 558
    Uploaded: 06/17/12
    Channel Skipper (updated) Channel Skipper (updated)
  • Views: 51445
    Thumbs Up 2277 Thumbs Down 526 Total: +1751
    Comments: 109
    Favorites: 21
    Uploaded: 03/31/12
    Thumper Thumper
  • Views: 55363
    Thumbs Up 999 Thumbs Down 285 Total: +714
    Comments: 368
    Favorites: 79
    Uploaded: 11/10/13
    "equality" "equality"
  • Views: 37227
    Thumbs Up 704 Thumbs Down 84 Total: +620
    Comments: 78
    Favorites: 41
    Uploaded: 01/08/15
    Starter kit Starter kit
  • Views: 34073
    Thumbs Up 632 Thumbs Down 70 Total: +562
    Comments: 133
    Favorites: 431
    Uploaded: 02/18/14
    LearningJunk - YouTube channels LearningJunk - YouTube channels
  • Views: 2261
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +12
    Comments: 7
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/16/16
    #HILLARYSVAG2016 #HILLARYSVAG2016
First2[ 11 ]
  • Views: 12995
    Thumbs Up 282 Thumbs Down 182 Total: +100
    Comments: 92
    Favorites: 6
    Uploaded: 03/24/12
    Haters... Haters...

latest user's comments

#792 - **fragman used "*roll picture*"** **fragman rolled image ** 9 hours ago on Roll for your new girlfriend 0
#41 - I'm still not sure if I should buy it. It looks great, but… 05/24/2016 on Overwatch Servers 0
#21 - ******** 05/02/2016 on Life +1
#18 - >more often than not theres a ******* of pesticides used on… 05/01/2016 on GMOs +32
#15 - just. no. You are so insanely misinformed on that subject …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/01/2016 on GMOs +42
User avatar
#17 - PopcornViking (05/01/2016) [-]
everything you just said is irrelevant
i know gmos allow for better yield and many other pros

some people dont like them because regardless of whether the crop is affected by the pesticide/herbicide, its still sitting on the crop
thats my entire point

#18 - fragman (05/01/2016) [-]
>more often than not theres a fuckton of pesticides used on them
Which is demonstrably false, since the pesticide use is much lower on average for GMO crops vs. non-GMO crops. Herbicides and pesticides aren't interchangeable terms for one thing. They are very different compounds for very different use cases and herbicides are way less harmful for humans than pesticides. And making a crop pesticide resistant would be the most idiotic thing to even consider, since pesticides don't create collateral damage on crops in the first place. Herbicides do.

I know full well what your "entire point" was, it's just that it was based on misinformation and is the opposite of reality. Now if you change that to "because people think there are a fuckton of pesticides on them", there's no argument there... because as you've shown people will go very far defending a point without even knowing what they're talking about.
#11 - What the honest **** are you talking about? One of th…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/01/2016 on GMOs +88
User avatar
#12 - PopcornViking (05/01/2016) [-]
the crops are genetically modified so the pesticides dont affect them and only affect insects and other organisms that could damage/destroy crops

im saying people dislike gmos because of the pesticides used on them
User avatar
#65 - nimba (05/02/2016) [-]
>only harm insects
So what's the problem here
User avatar
#76 - PopcornViking (05/02/2016) [-]
when did at any point did i say I think gmos are bad
User avatar
#77 - nimba (05/02/2016) [-]
Do you think I suggested you did?
User avatar
#78 - PopcornViking (05/02/2016) [-]
implying
User avatar
#81 - nimba (05/02/2016) [-]
I didn't imply, you just inferred - rather defensively too.
#15 - fragman (05/01/2016) [-]
just. no.
You are so insanely misinformed on that subject that it isn't even funny anymore.
Traits introduced into GMO crops can be for example a herbicide resistance (which is probably what you have confused with pesticide resistance), insect resistant (reducing or eliminating the need for pesticides), more vitamin A production to reduce blindness in chlildren in the third world, better yield, faster growth rate etc.
The exact opposite of your claim is the case.
User avatar
#17 - PopcornViking (05/01/2016) [-]
everything you just said is irrelevant
i know gmos allow for better yield and many other pros

some people dont like them because regardless of whether the crop is affected by the pesticide/herbicide, its still sitting on the crop
thats my entire point

#18 - fragman (05/01/2016) [-]
>more often than not theres a fuckton of pesticides used on them
Which is demonstrably false, since the pesticide use is much lower on average for GMO crops vs. non-GMO crops. Herbicides and pesticides aren't interchangeable terms for one thing. They are very different compounds for very different use cases and herbicides are way less harmful for humans than pesticides. And making a crop pesticide resistant would be the most idiotic thing to even consider, since pesticides don't create collateral damage on crops in the first place. Herbicides do.

I know full well what your "entire point" was, it's just that it was based on misinformation and is the opposite of reality. Now if you change that to "because people think there are a fuckton of pesticides on them", there's no argument there... because as you've shown people will go very far defending a point without even knowing what they're talking about.
#900 - **fragman used "*roll picture*"** **fragman rolled image ** 05/01/2016 on Win 1 million dollars by... 0
#8 - Meep America great again! 04/30/2016 on Candidates and their... 0
#15 - If you ever even consider to start whitelisting sites, you des… 04/26/2016 on Adblock +1
#17 - Limited in the sense that it's going to be an issue in the nex… 04/25/2016 on Kinetic Power Station 0
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (40)
[ 40 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
35 comments displayed.
#39 - myitems (07/04/2014) [-]
I've been advertising your channel skipper a lot lately, and someone suggested uploading a content for it. I did re-host it on userscripts, but if you don't mind I would like to upload a post about it. And yes, I have been making sure to give credit where it's due for you <3 It is an awesome thing.
#40 to #39 - fragman ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
sure, go ahead
#38 - suckittrebek (12/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#35 - DisgruntledTomato (10/16/2013) [-]
Just a quick reminder, I still use your channel skipper <3
#36 to #35 - fragman ONLINE (10/17/2013) [-]
woah that is still a thing?
awesome, thanks
#37 to #36 - DisgruntledTomato (10/17/2013) [-]
I don't know if others use it, but I still do. Probably going to write a UI for it as well. Pretty useful.
#33 - akkere (06/19/2012) [-]
I decided to do an EZ setup
www.mediafire.com/?b5qdg8cez3563db

I wasn't able to finish it in time before the post was out of its 24 hour slot, but it has a readme with some instructions so you don't have to keep repeating yourself

What do you think?
#26 - venumb (06/18/2012) [-]
Is it alright if I take what you have so far and edit it and repost the results as long as I mention your name? I plan on adding GUI and other features other than Skipper. The auto thumb/thumb down will probably be in there too.

Really good work on the idea :)
#27 to #26 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I really wouldn't recommend the thumb down feature, there is a vote limit for a certain timespan which could have negative impact on functionality and would also motivate people to post their content outside the channel.
But expanding it in general, sure.
#28 to #27 - venumb (06/18/2012) [-]
I guess your right. I'll leave the thumbing out of the expanded release. I have other ideas that I'm am way more motivated on accomplishing anyway.
#21 - negrocop (06/18/2012) [-]
If you want, I can make a quick step by step guide for you to post for Chrome users and how to edit the skipped channels.
#22 to #21 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
this would be really nice. but since my 24 hour frame is almost done and this content will go back to the depths of *************** I dont think it will be necessary.
#23 to #22 - negrocop (06/18/2012) [-]
Ah I truly doubt that. This was a huge step forward for FJ today, it'll be remembered for a while. And you could upload a Firefox guide and a Chrome guide for newbies in the following days. Especially probably around Thursday or Friday since a lot of Bendingtime posts will come about Saturday. There will be tons of bitchin about it. :P
#24 to #23 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
good idea. I like it.
In this case it'd be wonderful if you could provide the chrome guide :)
#29 to #24 - negrocop (06/18/2012) [-]
Rawr, this should be good.
Here is the Tampermonkey Beta link
chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gcalenpjmijncebpfijmoaglllgpjagf
#31 to #29 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
big yay for you, thx.
I think I'll have it ready by around thursday
#32 to #31 - negrocop (06/18/2012) [-]
Sorry it took so long, I was PMing some people tryin to help them
#30 to #29 - negrocop (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll have a friend try it out later with that when he gets home though
#25 to #24 - negrocop (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll get to workin on it here in a few minutes :)
#12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Which page did you fond the source code that showed the channels in an array?
#13 to #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
find*
#14 to #13 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't quite get what you mean...
the code is fully hand-written
#15 to #14 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Oh, I thought you said that there was a way to edit the source code.
#16 to #15 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
ah now I get it.
Depends on your browser. You might want to check out this if you're using chrome:
stackoverflow [DOT] com/questions/5258989/manually-adding-a-userscript-to-google-chrome
#17 to #16 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
rest should be in the content description.
#18 to #17 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
If you're referring to adding the channel skipper, don't worry about that it installed automatically :). I was just wondering about when you said that you could edit the source code so it only skips certain channels.
#19 to #18 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
actually that's what I meant...
you'll need to find where the script is stored in order to edit it. that should be explained in the description pretty much, on the stackoverflow site you'll find the various user-datadir defaults for chrome.
then edit the file script.js in notepad++ or something like that
#20 to #19 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Ohhh ok now I get it :). Thank you, Sir.
#9 - missladyhalmighty (06/18/2012) [-]
You are a god. << Seriously, thank you.
#10 to #9 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
you're welcome
#8 - fjdesign (06/18/2012) [-]
Good work my friend. I am truly proud of what you have done. If you ever need anything from us please do ask.
#11 to #8 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
thank you.
#6 - anon (06/18/2012) [-]
i ahve no ******* idea what a user scrpt is. how do i use it. inb4 newfag
#7 to #6 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't know you, and this is crazy...
but read the damn description maybe?

seriously the manual in there should be pretty straightforward
#34 to #7 - anon (06/25/2012) [-]
**** you you, you analnutbag. go die in a ******* fire
[ 40 comments ]
Leave a comment