Upload
Login or register

fiddlestickers

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:6/17/2011
Last Login:9/25/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 4718 total,  6600 ,  1882
Comment Thumbs: 847 total,  1063 ,  216
Content Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 146 Content: Faptastic → Level 147 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 180 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 181 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Subscribers:0
Content Views:246915
Times Content Favorited:339 times
Total Comments Made:280
FJ Points:5570
Favorite Tags: Pokemon (4) | a (3) | ponies (3) | the (3) | comp (2) | game (2) | My Little Pony (2) | omegle (2)

  • Views: 55222
    Thumbs Up 1532 Thumbs Down 142 Total: +1390
    Comments: 115
    Favorites: 75
    Uploaded: 03/21/13
    Never Would Have Thunk It Never Would Have Thunk It
  • Views: 17048
    Thumbs Up 844 Thumbs Down 75 Total: +769
    Comments: 58
    Favorites: 37
    Uploaded: 09/30/11
    Google Chrome Google Chrome
  • Views: 23861
    Thumbs Up 719 Thumbs Down 99 Total: +620
    Comments: 30
    Favorites: 20
    Uploaded: 11/14/12
    Epic Feel Epic Feel
  • Views: 21040
    Thumbs Up 610 Thumbs Down 28 Total: +582
    Comments: 65
    Favorites: 31
    Uploaded: 06/04/13
    Joooodiiiiiii Joooodiiiiiii
  • Views: 30639
    Thumbs Up 959 Thumbs Down 677 Total: +282
    Comments: 253
    Favorites: 15
    Uploaded: 03/29/12
    How every FJ'er feels How every FJ'er feels
  • Views: 6828
    Thumbs Up 241 Thumbs Down 15 Total: +226
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 19
    Uploaded: 04/10/12
    Pokemon comp Pokemon comp
  • Views: 1510
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 10 Total: +4
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 07/18/12
    Squirrel Squirrel
  • Views: 1049
    Thumbs Up 2 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +1
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 01/21/12
    RAPED CHILDHOOD RAPED CHILDHOOD
  • Views: 16670
    Thumbs Up 618 Thumbs Down 216 Total: +402
    Comments: 25
    Favorites: 55
    Uploaded: 06/19/12
    Emo Chick Emo Chick
  • Views: 3180
    Thumbs Up 86 Thumbs Down 55 Total: +31
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 10
    Uploaded: 04/27/12
    Power of Christ Power of Christ

latest user's comments

#46028 - Does anybody remember that one Japanese-ish thing where the gu…  [+] (2 replies) 07/17/2016 on Television - cartoon... 0
User avatar
#46029 - machiavellianhumor (07/17/2016) [-]
User avatar
#46050 - fiddlestickers (07/18/2016) [-]
Thank you!!!! This was it!!!
#1 - The "4" is ********. I call shenanigans  [+] (10 replies) 10/01/2015 on Watch +21
User avatar
#74 - deliraptor (10/02/2015) [-]
they do it for symmetry on the watch-face. obviously not the best example here but by having IIII instead of IV on the face it puts 14 (i think) numerals on each half of the watch, making it subconsciously more aesthetically pleasing.
User avatar
#62 - numbmind (10/01/2015) [-]
I agree the roman numerial for four is "IV" not "IIII"...
#84 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Refer to comment #3.

You guys really think a PROFESSIONAL WATCH MAKER would incorrectly put "IIII" instead of "IV" for the Roman Numeral 4? A PROFESSIONAL WATCH MAKER?

I can guarantee you all watch designers are intimately familiar with Roman numerals. They use Roman numerals ever fucking day, and it's common ass knowledge that "IV" = 4. Therefore, they probably used "IIII" for a DAMN GOOD reason, as comment #3 pointed out.

Y'all need to do some research before you start demonizing someone for making a "mistake" that wasn't even a real mistake because you didn't have enough time to do a Google search.

User avatar
#88 - numbmind (10/02/2015) [-]
Okay then he made a bad choice for going with the uglier and less common option..
User avatar
#3 - ganjalf (10/01/2015) [-]
From wiki
"Clock faces that use Roman numerals normally show IIII for four o’clock [...] a practice that goes back to very early clocks such as the Wells Cathedral clock."

User avatar
#15 - kibuza (10/01/2015) [-]
...But why?

It's wrong...
#85 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Hey, kabuza, man.

Were you banned from Google? What about Wikipedia? Or did nobody ever teach you how to search the internet?

I didn't realize you were such an expert on Roman numerals despite obviously having done no research about them.
User avatar
#89 - kibuza (10/02/2015) [-]
When did I say I was an expert on them you stupid anon?

Don't put words in my mouth. Everyone who knows a little about roman numerals knows that 4 is IV, or is at least taught as IV now. People like you are the problem with making any kind of comment on the internet now, you just immediately add shit to the comment that the person didn't say just to fit your view.

Fuck off.
User avatar
#21 - ganjalf (10/01/2015) [-]
again from wiki

"The "standard" forms [...] reflect typical modern usage rather than a universally accepted convention. Usage in ancient Rome varied greatly.
[...]
Roman inscriptions [...] seem to show a preference for additive forms such as IIII and VIIII instead of (or even as well as) subtractive forms such as IV and IX. Both methods appear in documents from the Roman era, even within the same document. "

So no, it's not wrong.

#5 - iyr (10/01/2015) [-]

user's friends