Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:11/15/2011
Last Login:3/29/2014
Comment Thumbs: 37 total,  66 ,  29
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 60% (33/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Total Comments Made:34
FJ Points:29

latest user's comments

#74 - I saw the pope  [+] (1 reply) 01/18/2014 on Can't Tell +5
User avatar
#78 - lurifax (01/18/2014) [-]
"Sir, the terrorists have bombed the Vatican!"
"They also kidnapped the entire boy's choir"
#225 - but its damn faster killing people with a gun than with a plank  [+] (8 replies) 12/16/2013 on just sayin 0
User avatar
#461 - commontroll (12/16/2013) [-]
Actually, melee weapons kill far faster than most guns. Guns you're supposed to aim for the central mass. A punctured lung would take hours to just maybe kill somebody. Melee gives you just as much internal bleeding, if not more, only far more accurate and you're able to just go for something that just kills almost instantly, a lot easier.

Also lots of rounds these days are made to wound, not kill. Especially military rounds.
#242 - vanguard (12/16/2013) [-]
no people have usually die from blood loss from firearms, which takes a couple of minutes if not hours and can mostly be treated....people who die from blunt trauma get hit in the neck or head, killing them in seconds.
User avatar
#260 - blargusknarpus (12/16/2013) [-]
you cant stop every bleeding. if you get shot you have
internal bleedings which rarely can be stopped.
if organs get shot, they stop working. you cant heal that.

to get hit to death hurts way more. firearms are not there to
hurt, but to kill efficiently. if someone hits you to death with a
baseball bat it will hurt way more.
#267 - vanguard (12/16/2013) [-]
but it is faster on average to kill with a plank. stop trying to circumvent the original statement.
User avatar
#280 - blargusknarpus (12/16/2013) [-]
uhhm...no? you have to hit his head. otherwise you will just hurt your enemy.
#292 - vanguard (12/16/2013) [-]
same with a gun. since you've probably never shot anything, I'm guessing that you think guns are just point, shoot and someone dies. Reality is quite different. Only about 30% of bullets fired by police hit their target. bullets aren't magic. The wounding mechanisms remain the same. Only a bullet from a handgun will create a wound channel about as big as the width of a sharpie, while the blunt force from a 2x4 blow will create massive lesions and internal bleeding for a thorax hit. In fact, most 9mm bullets and smaller don't have enough power to get through a human skull, their only way of killing someone is by hemorrhage.
User avatar
#351 - blargusknarpus (12/16/2013) [-]
you ignorant little kid.
the most ammunition doesnt penetrate the body because
its build for that. If it doesnt penetrate, its way more effective.
the whole energy is will be released into the target.

just shut up please. you never shot someone too so you dont know shit too.
If you are actually hunting: Ammunition for hunting is mostly penetrating. they are less effective. the propabilty to survive is way higher.

please, you sound like a kid. just stop it.
#828 - vanguard (12/17/2013) [-]
Well, its not your lucky day because this kid owns multiple guns and knows a ton more about ballistics than you do. I'm pretty sure you're thinking about hollow or soft point bullets :


These rounds mushroom out and even fragment on contact, their goal is to take up as much room as possible in order to create a larger wound channel due to increased cavitation. This augments tissue and vascular damage, if it doesn't hit bone. Where you're wrong is on the notion of "stopping power". Bullets don't have much energy, only about the same as a 10 lb weight dripped from 6 feet for a .308 at the muzzle. That can easily be absorbed by the bones if it is distributed enough. That's why low velocity hollow point rounds are mostly ineffective on the head and partly ineffective in the thorax. In fact some of these rounds have been known to stop penetrating before they reach organs. Self defense ammo is mainly a compromise between hurting the target and being concealable. To this effect, i will have to claim that your statement that these rounds are "way more effective" is untrue. As for hunting rounds, they are typically a LOT heavier and MUCH faster than self defense pistol ammo. They are the real killers, those things are built to kill elk and grizzly bears. They typically expand a bit on impact and continue straight through the animal. However, the things easily penetrate bone and heavy muscle creating a huge wound channel due to their high velocity. With a good hit to the lungs, most deer will fall under a dozen seconds after the shot.

Here's a surgeon to explain it in detail:

9mm vs .45 vs Rifle A Dr's View of Gunshot Wounds (graphic photos)
#181 - Americans arguing about guns they dont need to have  [+] (14 replies) 12/16/2013 on just sayin +2
User avatar
#647 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/16/2013) [-]
You don't "need" the internet, and yet here you are.
#724 - blancka (12/16/2013) [-]
The internet isn't a massive cause of murder. Only a small one.

The general public does not need guns. You can't argue that they do. Maybe certain individuals after long and extremely strict background checks, but not the general public.
User avatar
#734 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/16/2013) [-]
Ah, but you never mentioned anything about danger, just about "need". There are many things in life you don't need.

The general public doesn't "need" many things. We shouldn't remove their access to all of these things just because of that.
#738 - blancka (12/16/2013) [-]
Maybe because it's a massive safety risk as proven by those murdered on a daily basis? Maybe because something that can end someones life with the pull of a trigger should be handled only by trained individuals with perfectly clean backgrounds.
User avatar
#784 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/17/2013) [-]
Cars, knives, cleaning supplies, and blunt objects, just to name a few, all are used daily by murderers and are all things we don't "need", but I don't see you decrying them as dangers for the average person to own.
#801 - blancka (12/17/2013) [-]
Because that would be retarded. Each of those things has a function it fulfils. Guns' function is specifically to kill or dangerously injure.

Are you seriously saying "why not?" is justification for allowing every civilian to have a potential murder weapon?
User avatar
#322 - twofreegerbils (12/16/2013) [-]

Careful with that word there friendo.

All you "need" to survive is shelter and sustenance. There's a lot of things you use and enjoy every day that you don't "need".
User avatar
#365 - Cookiez (12/16/2013) [-]
Boy, i sure can't go a day without knowing I can kill someone at range.
User avatar
#406 - lonerider (12/16/2013) [-]
Who said anything about killing?
User avatar
#371 - twofreegerbils (12/16/2013) [-]
You're fucking retarded and the entire point of my comment went entirely over your head. Please go back to sixth grade and learn some reading comprehension.

Also, if you would never breathe air again, I would appreciate that.
#253 - vanguard (12/16/2013) [-]
you retards ever hear bout switzerland?
User avatar
#601 - nervaaurelius (12/16/2013) [-]
Switzerland still has harder regulations than the US. A swiss fjer posted about this subject on the last big argument on this.
#826 - vanguard (12/17/2013) [-]

how is that worst than california or washington DC?
User avatar
#215 - animedudej (12/16/2013) [-]
Scandinavian brotherhood ftw!
#21 - United Kindom***  [+] (1 reply) 12/10/2013 on Canada is red +2
User avatar
#23 - lmfaoattheboat (12/10/2013) [-]
I dun goofed..
#37 - But opinion is subjective and facts are objective?  [+] (2 replies) 11/25/2013 on Michele Bachman is a genius… +1
#38 - aherorising has deleted their comment.
#57 - aherorising (11/25/2013) [-]
nothing to see people, move along
#34 - But some of that is not opinion. Its outright not true.  [+] (7 replies) 11/25/2013 on Michele Bachman is a genius… +8
#35 - aherorising (11/25/2013) [-]
that's what an opinion is..
#40 - mrgreatnamess (11/25/2013) [-]
Opinion is "Global warming sucks"
Belief is "Global warming isn't real"
Fact is "You don't know what an opinion is"
#55 - aherorising (11/25/2013) [-]
fair enough
#54 - aherorising has deleted their comment.
#37 - everyonesderplol (11/25/2013) [-]
But opinion is subjective and facts are objective?
#38 - aherorising has deleted their comment.
#57 - aherorising (11/25/2013) [-]
nothing to see people, move along
#33 - its actually two sides of the same coin, your friend was somew…  [+] (1 reply) 11/25/2013 on Michele Bachman is a genius… +2
User avatar
#71 - jasytis (11/25/2013) [-]
I know he's right in a way, but most of the rain is thanks to seas and oceans, not fucking trees
[ 33 Total ]