Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

encoder

Rank #8751 on Subscribers
encoder Avatar Level 231 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to encoder Block encoder Invite encoder to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/29/2012
Last Login:11/04/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 31159 total,  36755 ,  5596
Comment Thumbs: 1875 total,  1997 ,  122
Content Level Progress: 14.9% (149/1000)
Level 231 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 232 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz
Comment Level Progress: 74% (74/100)
Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:8
Content Views:855055
Times Content Favorited:849 times
Total Comments Made:173
FJ Points:33030

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 122495
    Thumbs Up 6705 Thumbs Down 196 Total: +6509
    Comments: 503
    Favorites: 186
    Uploaded: 04/15/12
    Title Title
  • Views: 89999
    Thumbs Up 6350 Thumbs Down 882 Total: +5468
    Comments: 155
    Favorites: 64
    Uploaded: 03/02/12
    Conspiracy Keanu Conspiracy Keanu
  • Views: 90506
    Thumbs Up 3758 Thumbs Down 562 Total: +3196
    Comments: 288
    Favorites: 81
    Uploaded: 03/19/12
    Touch screens Touch screens
  • Views: 84683
    Thumbs Up 3595 Thumbs Down 823 Total: +2772
    Comments: 446
    Favorites: 83
    Uploaded: 04/23/12
    Don't you hate when Don't you hate when
  • Views: 71345
    Thumbs Up 2619 Thumbs Down 631 Total: +1988
    Comments: 213
    Favorites: 74
    Uploaded: 03/27/12
    Ressurected old meme comp you say? Ressurected old meme comp you say?
  • Views: 80112
    Thumbs Up 2442 Thumbs Down 515 Total: +1927
    Comments: 206
    Favorites: 46
    Uploaded: 03/25/12
    The most interesting title in the world The most interesting title in...
1 2 > [ 12 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

  • Views: 70344
    Thumbs Up 1804 Thumbs Down 107 Total: +1697
    Comments: 38
    Favorites: 61
    Uploaded: 04/24/12
    Silly electrode Silly electrode
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#69574 - My guess is you're single; wanna sex? 02/19/2013 on Social Board 0
#624 - Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don'…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/09/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... 0
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
#460 - Then it's a retarded example. For example here in Norway, poli…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/08/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... -1
User avatar #537 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Well America isn't Norway now is it, we have a booming firearms industry and more than 10 guns per capita (accounted for). Its a perfectly logical example because America and its demographic are drastically different than Norway. Making guns illegal here would do nothing to stop gun crime, because the would be criminals either already possess a firearm or could easily EASILY obtain one off the street. I also think its retarded that your officers do not carry guns, what if a group of guys manages to get ahold of guns and decide to rob a bank?
User avatar #624 - encoder (11/09/2012) [-]
Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don't wear them at all times. I can understand your example with America, but logically more guns means more dead people which imo is bad even if they are gang members or what ever
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
#457 - marijuana doesn't kill people  [+] (5 new replies) 11/08/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... 0
User avatar #458 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
...you missed my point entirely
User avatar #460 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Then it's a retarded example. For example here in Norway, police officers doesn't even wear guns. Which makes criminals don't use weapons either, and normal people don't because it's illegal.


Weapons kill people, you would want to limit how easy people can kill each other
User avatar #537 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Well America isn't Norway now is it, we have a booming firearms industry and more than 10 guns per capita (accounted for). Its a perfectly logical example because America and its demographic are drastically different than Norway. Making guns illegal here would do nothing to stop gun crime, because the would be criminals either already possess a firearm or could easily EASILY obtain one off the street. I also think its retarded that your officers do not carry guns, what if a group of guys manages to get ahold of guns and decide to rob a bank?
User avatar #624 - encoder (11/09/2012) [-]
Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don't wear them at all times. I can understand your example with America, but logically more guns means more dead people which imo is bad even if they are gang members or what ever
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
#385 - Obviously because "kids in the ghetto" also is able …  [+] (8 new replies) 11/08/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... -2
User avatar #413 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Making things illegal does not stop those who already do not respect the law in the first place. For gods sake, marijuana is illegal and 8th graders can get ahold of it. Do you have any idea just how retarded 8th graders really are?
User avatar #457 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
marijuana doesn't kill people
User avatar #458 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
...you missed my point entirely
User avatar #460 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Then it's a retarded example. For example here in Norway, police officers doesn't even wear guns. Which makes criminals don't use weapons either, and normal people don't because it's illegal.


Weapons kill people, you would want to limit how easy people can kill each other
User avatar #537 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Well America isn't Norway now is it, we have a booming firearms industry and more than 10 guns per capita (accounted for). Its a perfectly logical example because America and its demographic are drastically different than Norway. Making guns illegal here would do nothing to stop gun crime, because the would be criminals either already possess a firearm or could easily EASILY obtain one off the street. I also think its retarded that your officers do not carry guns, what if a group of guys manages to get ahold of guns and decide to rob a bank?
User avatar #624 - encoder (11/09/2012) [-]
Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don't wear them at all times. I can understand your example with America, but logically more guns means more dead people which imo is bad even if they are gang members or what ever
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
User avatar #390 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
No. All that would happen then would be legal gun owners getting pissed off, and dumbasses in the ghetto still getting guns because they do it illegally in the first place.
#382 - Which it's why people shouldn't have guns, then other people, …  [+] (10 new replies) 11/08/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... 0
User avatar #383 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
Only those already prone to criminal activity use them to kill. Why should responsible gun collectors and hobbyists suffer for idiots in the ghetto.
User avatar #385 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Obviously because "kids in the ghetto" also is able to get guns far easier. Better to make it illegal for everyone.
User avatar #413 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Making things illegal does not stop those who already do not respect the law in the first place. For gods sake, marijuana is illegal and 8th graders can get ahold of it. Do you have any idea just how retarded 8th graders really are?
User avatar #457 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
marijuana doesn't kill people
User avatar #458 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
...you missed my point entirely
User avatar #460 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Then it's a retarded example. For example here in Norway, police officers doesn't even wear guns. Which makes criminals don't use weapons either, and normal people don't because it's illegal.


Weapons kill people, you would want to limit how easy people can kill each other
User avatar #537 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Well America isn't Norway now is it, we have a booming firearms industry and more than 10 guns per capita (accounted for). Its a perfectly logical example because America and its demographic are drastically different than Norway. Making guns illegal here would do nothing to stop gun crime, because the would be criminals either already possess a firearm or could easily EASILY obtain one off the street. I also think its retarded that your officers do not carry guns, what if a group of guys manages to get ahold of guns and decide to rob a bank?
User avatar #624 - encoder (11/09/2012) [-]
Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don't wear them at all times. I can understand your example with America, but logically more guns means more dead people which imo is bad even if they are gang members or what ever
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
User avatar #390 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
No. All that would happen then would be legal gun owners getting pissed off, and dumbasses in the ghetto still getting guns because they do it illegally in the first place.
#376 - You are totally missing the point and looking like an idiot wh…  [+] (12 new replies) 11/08/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... +1
User avatar #380 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
No shit Sherlock. I think you'll find that most weapons are invented for killing things.
User avatar #382 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Which it's why people shouldn't have guns, then other people, and perhaps themselves, die.
User avatar #383 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
Only those already prone to criminal activity use them to kill. Why should responsible gun collectors and hobbyists suffer for idiots in the ghetto.
User avatar #385 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Obviously because "kids in the ghetto" also is able to get guns far easier. Better to make it illegal for everyone.
User avatar #413 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Making things illegal does not stop those who already do not respect the law in the first place. For gods sake, marijuana is illegal and 8th graders can get ahold of it. Do you have any idea just how retarded 8th graders really are?
User avatar #457 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
marijuana doesn't kill people
User avatar #458 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
...you missed my point entirely
User avatar #460 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Then it's a retarded example. For example here in Norway, police officers doesn't even wear guns. Which makes criminals don't use weapons either, and normal people don't because it's illegal.


Weapons kill people, you would want to limit how easy people can kill each other
User avatar #537 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Well America isn't Norway now is it, we have a booming firearms industry and more than 10 guns per capita (accounted for). Its a perfectly logical example because America and its demographic are drastically different than Norway. Making guns illegal here would do nothing to stop gun crime, because the would be criminals either already possess a firearm or could easily EASILY obtain one off the street. I also think its retarded that your officers do not carry guns, what if a group of guys manages to get ahold of guns and decide to rob a bank?
User avatar #624 - encoder (11/09/2012) [-]
Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don't wear them at all times. I can understand your example with America, but logically more guns means more dead people which imo is bad even if they are gang members or what ever
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
User avatar #390 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
No. All that would happen then would be legal gun owners getting pissed off, and dumbasses in the ghetto still getting guns because they do it illegally in the first place.
#368 - People die when people have guns. When people don't have guns,…  [+] (15 new replies) 11/08/2012 on Straya Doesn't Want... 0
User avatar #375 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
Plus, very, very few people use an M4 to murder someone. The fuck do you think this is, Grand Theft Auto?
User avatar #372 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
I could hunt with an M4 if they would allow us. If it can kill a man at long distance I'm damn sure it could kill a deer.
User avatar #376 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
You are totally missing the point and looking like an idiot while at it.

Hunting rifles are made for, guess what? Hunting!

Most other guns are made for killing.
User avatar #380 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
No shit Sherlock. I think you'll find that most weapons are invented for killing things.
User avatar #382 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Which it's why people shouldn't have guns, then other people, and perhaps themselves, die.
User avatar #383 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
Only those already prone to criminal activity use them to kill. Why should responsible gun collectors and hobbyists suffer for idiots in the ghetto.
User avatar #385 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Obviously because "kids in the ghetto" also is able to get guns far easier. Better to make it illegal for everyone.
User avatar #413 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Making things illegal does not stop those who already do not respect the law in the first place. For gods sake, marijuana is illegal and 8th graders can get ahold of it. Do you have any idea just how retarded 8th graders really are?
User avatar #457 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
marijuana doesn't kill people
User avatar #458 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
...you missed my point entirely
User avatar #460 - encoder (11/08/2012) [-]
Then it's a retarded example. For example here in Norway, police officers doesn't even wear guns. Which makes criminals don't use weapons either, and normal people don't because it's illegal.


Weapons kill people, you would want to limit how easy people can kill each other
User avatar #537 - JuliusC (11/08/2012) [-]
Well America isn't Norway now is it, we have a booming firearms industry and more than 10 guns per capita (accounted for). Its a perfectly logical example because America and its demographic are drastically different than Norway. Making guns illegal here would do nothing to stop gun crime, because the would be criminals either already possess a firearm or could easily EASILY obtain one off the street. I also think its retarded that your officers do not carry guns, what if a group of guys manages to get ahold of guns and decide to rob a bank?
User avatar #624 - encoder (11/09/2012) [-]
Police have guns (in the car) and gun training, they just don't wear them at all times. I can understand your example with America, but logically more guns means more dead people which imo is bad even if they are gang members or what ever
User avatar #625 - JuliusC (11/10/2012) [-]
more guns =/= to more deaths, more criminals = more death. The average american gun owner is not going to go on a killing spree.
User avatar #390 - nittsurri (11/08/2012) [-]
No. All that would happen then would be legal gun owners getting pissed off, and dumbasses in the ghetto still getting guns because they do it illegally in the first place.
#15 - ohaithar  [+] (16 new replies) 10/25/2012 on Too damn fast +11
#73 - thesheepfarmer (10/25/2012) [-]
KANDU ja.... *host host * TG *host host*

YFW
User avatar #59 - mennopauze (10/25/2012) [-]
Fucking Sweden and their beast internet. I heard Sweden had the best internet off the world.
#18 - longer (10/25/2012) [-]
You are probably living in a school campus sharing the connection with many other people. Which isn't really impressive.
User avatar #26 - sannukas (10/25/2012) [-]
it's norway. They have very fast internet connections there. But i bet he pays like 150€ a month for that.
#85 - longer (10/25/2012) [-]
They don't pay in Euro's, you don't exactly understand how it works do you?
User avatar #114 - sannukas (10/25/2012) [-]
Fuck, forgot that Norway isn't in European Union.
#116 - longer (10/25/2012) [-]
Also I can pay 700euro's for a 1gigabit download/upload. However he is clearly sharing it with like 100-1000 people.
#115 - longer (10/25/2012) [-]
Denmark, Sweden, and Finland are in the European Union, they don't use Euro's.
User avatar #117 - sannukas (10/25/2012) [-]
Yeah i know that some EU members don't use Euro's but Norway isn't in the EU at all.
btw Finland uses Euro's
#118 - longer (10/25/2012) [-]
Neither is Iceland, however we still follow European rules.

And I forgot, I haven't been in Finland since 90 something, before the euro.
User avatar #70 - gunzas (10/25/2012) [-]
Well that's a lot. Back here in Lithuania (eastern europe) you can get 300 Mb/s for about 25 euros. Though on the other hand getting a Optic Fibre not in an apartment building is a pain in the ass.
#88 - longer (10/25/2012) [-]
Where you are probably sharing it with several other people.
User avatar #128 - gunzas (10/26/2012) [-]
Nope, It's just convieniant that our country is top 5 or 10 in the world by average internet speed. And the price is that low because we're just poor. Minimum salary - about 250 euros/month.
#129 - longer (10/26/2012) [-]
Actually having done some research on this, you are sharing it with around 100 other people. Speedtest.net looks up how much bandwidth your IP address can have. However the kim jongistrator usually limits the connection depending on how many devices are using it, perhaps at night you might have this insane connection, however at day you will be limited.
User avatar #130 - gunzas (10/26/2012) [-]
Those bastards (ISP)...

Well i'm myself quite content with 80 mbps that i have, good enough for downloading and gaming - what else do you need.
#131 - longer (10/26/2012) [-]
Well for one thing you cannot setup a server for minecraft or something like that.
#424 - I'm sorry.. 09/15/2012 on Head of 9Gag's IT department 0
[ 173 Total ]

user's channels

Join Subscribe 4chan

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - articunicorn (09/12/2012) [-]
You friended me and please refresh my memeory, have I talked to you before good sir? or do I know you from somewhere else?
 Friends (0)