Upload
Login or register

eiaisqzbsesb

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:3/02/2012
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3547
Comment Ranking:#4116
Highest Content Rank:#3438
Highest Comment Rank:#796
Content Thumbs: 2593 total,  3996 ,  1403
Comment Thumbs: 11417 total,  14908 ,  3491
Content Level Progress: 43% (43/100)
Level 123 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 65% (65/100)
Level 302 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 303 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:7
Content Views:244979
Times Content Favorited:193 times
Total Comments Made:7244
FJ Points:6834
Favorite Tags: dark ages (4) | manga (4) | sweden (4) | vikings (4) | medieval (3) | Music (3) | Video (3) | youtube (3) | feels (2) | Fzero (2) | politics (2) | sjw (2)
I am the malest there is.

Text Posts

First2[ 12 ]

latest user's comments

#11 - "Dreamy sigh. Regret. Always the bride's maid. Never the … 4 hours ago on bird is the word +16
#59 - Interview. Some ******** asked if any overwatch character was … 4 hours ago on Ping~ +2
#228 - Apologies. 5 hours ago on HOLY SHIT!!! 0
#53 - Phara/Mercy = Impossible, as there is only one gay Overbotch c…  [+] (2 new replies) 6 hours ago on Ping~ +1
User avatar
#58 - lordogames (4 hours ago) [-]
All I found is a comment saying a few of the characters are gay. Nothing saying exactly one character is gay.
#59 - eiaisqzbsesb (4 hours ago) [-]
Interview. Some dumbfuck asked if any overwatch character was gay, and the answer was that there was a gay character. A as in singular.
#52 - Pharmercy is litteraly worst ship, since it is actualy impossible.  [+] (1 new reply) 6 hours ago on Ping~ +5
#62 - orangekingsixfour (2 hours ago) [-]
Mercy is 37, Phara is 32
5 year difference

It is entirely possible
#19 - >Disgust.  [+] (1 new reply) 8 hours ago on Takoyaki +2
#31 - jaggsauce (2 hours ago) [-]
#17 - >Handsoap Please make this a thing.  [+] (4 new replies) 8 hours ago on Takoyaki 0
User avatar
#18 - elduroto (8 hours ago) [-]
Shit did I just make a meme?
User avatar
#22 - velzizar (5 hours ago) [-]
Already exist, sorry bruh someone link handsoap comic here
#19 - eiaisqzbsesb (8 hours ago) [-]
>Disgust.
#31 - jaggsauce (2 hours ago) [-]
#61 - Since when was making a comment on a specific point equal to f… 8 hours ago on Anon is a fan of Mark Twain +1
#58 - "both of you were talking about what made knights obsolet…  [+] (2 new replies) 9 hours ago on Anon is a fan of Mark Twain +1
User avatar
#59 - angelious (9 hours ago) [-]
to a person talking about why knights became obsolete. you joined the convo.
User avatar
#61 - eiaisqzbsesb (8 hours ago) [-]
Since when was making a comment on a specific point equal to fully joining in a conversation? I never engaged the talking point of knights going obsolete.

As it is, ">>#17, both of you are forgetting about crossbows" would be a retarded statement, as I wasn't arguing for any of the reasons why knights went obsolete. My comment was only concerning longbow penetration of typical late medieval era armours and how a gambeson can drasticly reduce bodkin arrow efficiency.
#55 - I don't think you read my comment, seeing as your comment adds…  [+] (4 new replies) 9 hours ago on Anon is a fan of Mark Twain +1
User avatar
#57 - angelious (9 hours ago) [-]
both of you were talking about what made knights obsolete. i just notified you two of one of the most pressing reasons why they were made obsolete (the switch from levies to standing military was another one) and crossbows can be used en masse thanks to how easy they are to use i would add.
#58 - eiaisqzbsesb (9 hours ago) [-]
"both of you were talking about what made knights obsolete."

Proof you did not read my comment, as I was only responding to his mention of longbow arrows penetrating armour, and explained that it's not as simple as just producing steel plating of a higher quality.

Never did I mention anything about knights going obsolete.
User avatar
#59 - angelious (9 hours ago) [-]
to a person talking about why knights became obsolete. you joined the convo.
User avatar
#61 - eiaisqzbsesb (8 hours ago) [-]
Since when was making a comment on a specific point equal to fully joining in a conversation? I never engaged the talking point of knights going obsolete.

As it is, ">>#17, both of you are forgetting about crossbows" would be a retarded statement, as I wasn't arguing for any of the reasons why knights went obsolete. My comment was only concerning longbow penetration of typical late medieval era armours and how a gambeson can drasticly reduce bodkin arrow efficiency.

channels owned

Subscribe fucking-beards