Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

ecomp

Rank #5469 on Content
ecomp Avatar Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to ecomp Block ecomp Invite ecomp to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/29/2011
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5469
Comment Ranking:#6383
Highest Content Rank:#781
Highest Comment Rank:#1999
Content Thumbs: 4736 total,  5892 ,  1156
Comment Thumbs: 3308 total,  8353 ,  5045
Content Level Progress: 11% (11/100)
Level 137 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 138 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 53% (53/100)
Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 232 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:4
Content Views:197933
Times Content Favorited:245 times
Total Comments Made:14812
FJ Points:7022
Favorite Tags: am (2) | i (2) | These (2) | using (2)

latest user's comments

#71 - You can't give some people rights, but as soon as you don't li…  [+] (2 new replies) 29 minutes ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#74 - phoenixactual (20 minutes ago) [-]
By the way, again, you do realize you're defending some of the most hate filled people in American history, right?
#73 - phoenixactual (22 minutes ago) [-]
Freedom of speech is a human right, true. But it doesn't excuse threatening to kill people you haven't even met. You can say you're going to kill someone, but that doesn't excuse you from the consequences of making threats against someone's life.
#66328 - this 49 minutes ago on Drawing & Art - drawing... 0
#66 - And we aren't talking about hypotheticals here. Their intent i…  [+] (1 new reply) 50 minutes ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#68 - phoenixactual (40 minutes ago) [-]
But that's not what they said their intent was, though. They said their intent was to "use lethal force against terrorists masquerading as peaceful protestors". As stated, which is why I constantly keep going back to the hypothetical, the hypothetical is the only situation in which this could possibly happen, going off their own words. Going off their own words, on the only scenario that could really possibly play out from this situation as described by them, this is illegal. they were specific enough that only one potential scenario could be devised from what they said. Can you really see any other way in which the KKK could possibly shoot someone pretending to be a protestor unless what I described played out? For that matter, you do realize you're backing the fucking Ku Klux Klan, right?
#62 - Where do you live? In America it is legal to kill someone who …  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#65 - phoenixactual (1 hour ago) [-]
First off, depends where in America you live. Don't say stand your ground laws exist on a national level, they're state dictated. Now, they didn't say they were going to attack people who were destroying businesses, they said they were going to attack people acting as peaceful protestors. As stated, if they're pretending to be peaceful protestors, they're standing with actual peaceful protestors. Now, if you chase someone into a group of protestors, practicing their constitutionally guaranteed right to free protest, you had better know exactly who you're chasing. Because one single stray bullet hits someone in that crowd other than the guy you were chasing, you're a fucking murderer. If you chase down someone and shoot them when they don't pose a threat to you, you're a fucking murderer. In order to be able to say you shot someone who was pretending to be a peaceful protestor, you have to have chased them from whatever it was you caught them doing that gave you probable cause to think they were a rioter. Which means you chased someone who was no longer a threat to you. Implying they were running away from you. If they're running for their life, they aren't a threat to you. If they aren't a threat to you, you can't fucking shoot them dead. The KKK posts implied they would do exactly this. Hence, they threatened to kill people who weren't actually threats to them. WHICH IS FUCKING ILLEGAL
#60 - It's not illegal to say that you're going to kill people legal…  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#61 - phoenixactual (1 hour ago) [-]
Unless you're a cop, or a soldier, or you're shooting someone in self defense, there is no such thing as killing someone legally. Killing someone you think might commit violent crimes in the future is illegal. Saying you are going to kill someone implies you fully intend to kill somebody. Saying you're going to use lethal force before it's even required is illegal. WHAT THE KKK DID, IN SAYING THEY WERE GOING TO USE LETHAL FORCE BEFORE IT WAS EVEN REQUIRED IS FUCKING ILLEGAL. It's saying flat out that you're going to kill someone. They were saying they were going to kill people. Jesus fucking christ, dude, it's illegal. Get that through your fucking head
#57 - And they did not say that they would.  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#59 - phoenixactual (1 hour ago) [-]
Holy fuck, dude. They said there would be lethal force against anybody masquerading as peaceful protestors. As stated, if they're pretending to be peaceful protestors, there's no way to know, until they commit a crime, that they're pretending to be peaceful protestors. Implying that you're going to use lethal force against people masquerading as peaceful protestors suggests that you're going to kill any protestor you think is actually a rioter. Which, again, you couldn't possibly know, unless they broke out in a riot right before your very eyes. Ignoring of course the fact that saying you're going to use lethal force alone means you're going to take the law into your own hands, which is also illegal. Yes, saying you'll use lethal force is the exact same thing as saying you're going to kill someone. What the fuck do you think "lethal force" means? Do you honestly believe it's not illegal to go out and publicly announce you're going to kill people?
#53 - "masquerading as" That means that they are not peaceful.  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#56 - phoenixactual (1 hour ago) [-]
If they're masquerading as peaceful protestors, then they are standing in a group with peaceful protestors. If they're pretending to be peaceful protestors, that generally means they're not rioting at the time, right? Otherwise there would be no doubt whatsoever that they weren't actually peaceful protestors? You can't kill someone just standing around because you think they might be a violent criminal waiting to strike, that tends to get you thrown in jail for the rest of your life
#48 - Yes, and these threats were not illegal. Maybe you should take…  [+] (1 new reply) 2 hours ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#51 - phoenixactual (1 hour ago) [-]
Since when is threatening lethal force against non-violence not a fucking crime? Are you on crack? Go ahead, publicly announce you're going to use lethal force against non-violent protestors, see where it gets you
#43 - Not the official organization. People who wear the uniform and…  [+] (1 new reply) 2 hours ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#47 - phoenixactual (2 hours ago) [-]
Right, except the threats came directly from the leadership of the Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. But no, they weren't endorsed by any KKK leadership, right?
#40 - Of course you do... Anyways, the police watch the KKK like…  [+] (1 new reply) 2 hours ago on when in doubt, insult the baby 0
#42 - phoenixactual (2 hours ago) [-]
Hahahaha, are you fucking kidding me? The KKK constantly does illegal shit. It's the whole reason the country as a whole still sees them as dangerous. People generally don't consider you to be dangerous when you stay quiet for 40 years, or so, you know?

Comments(577):

ecomp has disabled anonymous comments.
[ 577 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
User avatar #1351 - derpityhurr (08/12/2013) [-]
stickied by ecomp
ecomp
User avatar #2087 - MrDeadiron (12/23/2014) [-]
dnd tmrw night
User avatar #2088 to #2087 - ecomp (12/24/2014) [-]
so like right now or what
User avatar #2071 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
ecomp
need some help bro
User avatar #2072 to #2071 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
what
User avatar #2073 to #2072 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
got a gay troll stalking me
can you please ho through my comments and thumb up the ones he redthumbed
User avatar #2074 to #2073 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
ok ill thumb down the ones he thumbed up
User avatar #2075 to #2074 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
WAIT WHAT

thumb me up bro
User avatar #2076 to #2075 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
oops sorry
User avatar #2078 to #2076 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
ecomp
Y U NO HELP
User avatar #2079 to #2078 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
i am selfish
User avatar #2080 to #2079 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
you total american
User avatar #2081 to #2080 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
im not american tho
User avatar #2082 to #2081 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
close enough
User avatar #2083 to #2082 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
no
User avatar #2084 to #2083 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
* asked for help
* refuses to do it

american
User avatar #2085 to #2084 - ecomp (12/20/2014) [-]
That's your definition of american?
In my experience, it's more like
* not asked for help
* accepts invitation to help
#2086 to #2085 - konradkurze (12/20/2014) [-]
actually i think we're both right
User avatar #2059 - konradkurze (12/14/2014) [-]
ecomp, can i please have your fj points
User avatar #2060 to #2059 - ecomp (12/14/2014) [-]
what what what
User avatar #2061 to #2060 - konradkurze (12/14/2014) [-]
i needs them buddy
i need to collect items
User avatar #2062 to #2061 - ecomp (12/14/2014) [-]
nope
User avatar #2064 to #2063 - ecomp (12/15/2014) [-]
ty ty
User avatar #2065 to #2064 - konradkurze (12/15/2014) [-]
little ecomp protecting his shekels....i mean FJ points
User avatar #2066 to #2065 - ecomp (12/15/2014) [-]
little konradkurze lusting after other people's shekels... i mean FJ points
#2067 to #2066 - konradkurze (12/15/2014) [-]
you must be new here

let me explain

we night lords prefer to pillage others resources.....
but since i cant sneak into your house and snatch and grab them..i have to ask nicely i suppose
User avatar #2068 to #2067 - ecomp (12/15/2014) [-]
>pillage
>pls ecomp pls pls pls pls pls ;__;
User avatar #2069 to #2068 - konradkurze (12/15/2014) [-]
hold on, let me put on my call of duty player voice

*whiny voice* IMMA ******* HACK YOU!!!!!!!!
User avatar #2057 - spawnconnery ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1861 - arandomanon ONLINE (10/25/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1810 - feelythefeel (10/16/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1799 - caffeinecommissar (09/30/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1761 - rokkarokkaali (09/03/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1760 - posttwo (09/03/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1752 - ffffyou (08/31/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1732 - chrisel (08/21/2014) [-]
Ecomp.
User avatar #1731 - thatssotoby (08/21/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1729 - derpingthederps (08/21/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1728 - rokkarokkaali (08/20/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1715 - wethepixelisgod (08/20/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1710 - ecomp (08/20/2014) [-]
Ecomp
User avatar #1708 - ecomp (08/20/2014) [-]
ecomp
User avatar #1707 - ecomp (08/20/2014) [-]
Ecomp
[ 577 comments ]
 Friends (0)