Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

drewvinator

no avatar Level 0 Comments: Untouched account
Offline
Send mail to drewvinator Block drewvinator Invite drewvinator to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/25/2012
Last Login:12/17/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 47 total,  163 ,  116
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 92.72% (51/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:179
FJ Points:47

latest user's comments

#34425 - go over and smoke all his pot for him  [+] (2 new replies) 10/31/2012 on Advice - love advice,... +2
User avatar #34431 - midnightglass (10/31/2012) [-]
i dont smoke
#34455 - drewvinator (10/31/2012) [-]
people who grow plant smelly flowers outside of their house like lavender. guess that is more of a spring thing though
#11981 - thanks for the link 10/30/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#21 - THATs what irritates me. How sure you are. I am not a scientis… 10/30/2012 on Global Warming -1
#11946 - He cut medicare. But the two things are not related. 10/30/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#16 - no. 10/30/2012 on Global Warming 0
#15 - I don't know if it exists or not, and it irritates me that you…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/30/2012 on Global Warming 0
#19 - daddycool (10/30/2012) [-]
Feel free to be irritated. I don't mind at all.

After years of listening to people talk about this stuff and looking into it, the only thing I conclusion I can reach is that it's a fraud. Pure and simple.

There are many different places you can look around the internet for the truth of the subject. Look into "climate gate" wherein emails were hacked from East Anglia University and it was shown that the scientists there were destroying evidence("hiding the decline" was the phrase) that global warming wasn't happening. Here's a link to a nice story about it:

www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/climate-change/4338343

A little snippet from it, if you want:

"Related to this is a comment that one correspondent would not let critics' papers be discussed in an upcoming report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), stating that "[we] will keep them out somehow--even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!""

Really, though, what confirms it in my mind is the "solutions" that are brought to the public. Specifically schemes like "Cap and Trade" wherein there is no actual solution to the "problem" merely a means by which money will switch hands. Specifically, from the hands of the first world countries to the hands of the third world countries. Why? Well, for there precious carbon credits.

You don't know if Global Warming is a hoax or real? Fine. I don't mind at all. But just because you don't know doesn't mean the rest of us don't.
#21 - drewvinator (10/30/2012) [-]
THATs what irritates me. How sure you are. I am not a scientist, and the source you just quoted didn't provide any reasoning except to discredit a specific organization through some media whoring. Without YEARS of research on my behalf and a higher level of education, I will not same with any sense of certainty that it is false or not. You may have a high level of education, and have worked specifically in this field, but if you have you have said nothing to hint at that. So no, your certainty doesn't prove anything except that you are one of the masses.
#35 - I play tennis for a community college. So...I understand that … 10/29/2012 on Got into argument about halo 4 -1
#48 - Vertigo... 10/29/2012 on Zooming in -1
#11878 - I am against the idea that because of the beliefs of a religio… 10/29/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -2
#16031 - HOLY **** lol. Yeh...thats expensive. I broke my …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/27/2012 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #16034 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
Monitors were usually because they were fucking up.

Cameras;

XP10 - essentially ended up being a 7th wheel on a date
XP20 - wouldn't focus

MP3s;

Old one - friend was being a bitch
1st 8GB - not sure
2nd - fucked up while under warranty, and the store refused to do anything, so I smashed it in their parking lot

Phones;

Pop - fight with parents
Phoenix - got dumped

DS - someone scared me when I was in a bad mood
#16029 - extensive  [+] (3 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #16030 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
No. Expensive.

4 desktop monitors
2 cameras
3 MP3 players
2 phones
1 DS

Total: ~$1880.
#16031 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
HOLY shit lol. Yeh...thats expensive. I broke my monitor last year when I lost a chess game :p
User avatar #16034 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
Monitors were usually because they were fucking up.

Cameras;

XP10 - essentially ended up being a 7th wheel on a date
XP20 - wouldn't focus

MP3s;

Old one - friend was being a bitch
1st 8GB - not sure
2nd - fucked up while under warranty, and the store refused to do anything, so I smashed it in their parking lot

Phones;

Pop - fight with parents
Phoenix - got dumped

DS - someone scared me when I was in a bad mood
#11810 - How is wanting to be treated as a normal couple "more&quo…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -3
User avatar #11877 - rageisfunny (10/29/2012) [-]
Exactly. Steamroll everything for gay "rights"! Who cares about religious freedom, gays should get what they want. In not giving a shit about those adoption centers, you are saying you don't give a shit about the homes those centers help kids find. And nonameavailable has a good point, that the rights movement has no goal, there is always one more thing, until it isn't equal but unfair to others. If we continue with this, we will end up like Canada, where they teach in schools there are seven genders.
#11878 - drewvinator (10/29/2012) [-]
I am against the idea that because of the beliefs of a religious institution kids can't be given to a gay couple. Home with same sex parents vs. foster home. But whatever, I cast my vote in WA. Hopefully it will pass.
#15985 - Or would i? DUM DUM DUMMMMMMMMM  [+] (5 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #15986 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
Ok. That was hilarious.

But the main reason I rant here is to blow off anger because, I have a very, shall we say, expensive history with it...
#16029 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
extensive
User avatar #16030 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
No. Expensive.

4 desktop monitors
2 cameras
3 MP3 players
2 phones
1 DS

Total: ~$1880.
#16031 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
HOLY shit lol. Yeh...thats expensive. I broke my monitor last year when I lost a chess game :p
User avatar #16034 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
Monitors were usually because they were fucking up.

Cameras;

XP10 - essentially ended up being a 7th wheel on a date
XP20 - wouldn't focus

MP3s;

Old one - friend was being a bitch
1st 8GB - not sure
2nd - fucked up while under warranty, and the store refused to do anything, so I smashed it in their parking lot

Phones;

Pop - fight with parents
Phoenix - got dumped

DS - someone scared me when I was in a bad mood
#15983 - red thumb if you skipped, green if you read guessing -5  [+] (7 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #15984 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
You'd be surprised, this board actually takes the time to read my rants.
#15985 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
Or would i? DUM DUM DUMMMMMMMMM
User avatar #15986 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
Ok. That was hilarious.

But the main reason I rant here is to blow off anger because, I have a very, shall we say, expensive history with it...
#16029 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
extensive
User avatar #16030 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
No. Expensive.

4 desktop monitors
2 cameras
3 MP3 players
2 phones
1 DS

Total: ~$1880.
#16031 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
HOLY shit lol. Yeh...thats expensive. I broke my monitor last year when I lost a chess game :p
User avatar #16034 - Totaler (10/27/2012) [-]
Monitors were usually because they were fucking up.

Cameras;

XP10 - essentially ended up being a 7th wheel on a date
XP20 - wouldn't focus

MP3s;

Old one - friend was being a bitch
1st 8GB - not sure
2nd - fucked up while under warranty, and the store refused to do anything, so I smashed it in their parking lot

Phones;

Pop - fight with parents
Phoenix - got dumped

DS - someone scared me when I was in a bad mood
#93 - Yes. i would get irritated. You should call it a night though.…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/27/2012 on Timelapse of a McDonalds... -1
User avatar #97 - vexaton (10/27/2012) [-]
Can't... I gotta finish this logo I'm making for a dude by tomorrow
#11746 - What you are describing sounds a lot like "separate but e…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -2
#11780 - nonameavailable (10/27/2012) [-]
i disagree with you on almost every "point" you've made and I woul like to point out that rights movement NEVER end until finally it would just be virtually illegal to disagree. Also, i see why you think it is an issue of equality, but i dont see it that way. What they want isnt equality. What they want is MORE. And when you call it descrimination, its not, its opposition. Say a homosexual couple applies for adoption but are rejected because they are homosexuals. They would sue because they say they should have EQUAL RIGHTS, well, first of all you do not have the right to adoption, second of all, they denied them because they are opposed to them because they beleive that what they are oing is morally wrong. They are not going to force you not to do it, but they sure shouldnt be forced to support it.
#11810 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
How is wanting to be treated as a normal couple "more" than equality? I was not saying that adoption is a right, I was saying that a gay couple shouldn't be immediately disqualified. And honestly, I couldn't give less of a shit about catholic adoption centers. I've lived with 6 brothers and sisters who were all foster children, and I can assure you that not one of them cared about the sexual orientation of my parents.
Education level?
User avatar #11877 - rageisfunny (10/29/2012) [-]
Exactly. Steamroll everything for gay "rights"! Who cares about religious freedom, gays should get what they want. In not giving a shit about those adoption centers, you are saying you don't give a shit about the homes those centers help kids find. And nonameavailable has a good point, that the rights movement has no goal, there is always one more thing, until it isn't equal but unfair to others. If we continue with this, we will end up like Canada, where they teach in schools there are seven genders.
#11878 - drewvinator (10/29/2012) [-]
I am against the idea that because of the beliefs of a religious institution kids can't be given to a gay couple. Home with same sex parents vs. foster home. But whatever, I cast my vote in WA. Hopefully it will pass.
#11744 - No, I guess it isn't necessary. It really is more of an issue …  [+] (6 new replies) 10/27/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -1
User avatar #11745 - rageisfunny (10/27/2012) [-]
Yea but civil union is on the same footing as a heterosexual marriage. So why isn't it equal. I kind of think its gay just pushing for another thing, and maybe once they can have it called marriage, they will be accepted by all, when generally I think the opposite is true.
#11746 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
What you are describing sounds a lot like "separate but equal", which I think we all know has failed on several occasions in history. I agree that being able to marry wont make the gay community any more accepted, but I think it is a step towards that. If I were to guess, I would say in 100 years homosexuality will widely accepted and the gay rights movement will be just another chapter in a history book.(maybe just a couple paragraphs actually)
#11780 - nonameavailable (10/27/2012) [-]
i disagree with you on almost every "point" you've made and I woul like to point out that rights movement NEVER end until finally it would just be virtually illegal to disagree. Also, i see why you think it is an issue of equality, but i dont see it that way. What they want isnt equality. What they want is MORE. And when you call it descrimination, its not, its opposition. Say a homosexual couple applies for adoption but are rejected because they are homosexuals. They would sue because they say they should have EQUAL RIGHTS, well, first of all you do not have the right to adoption, second of all, they denied them because they are opposed to them because they beleive that what they are oing is morally wrong. They are not going to force you not to do it, but they sure shouldnt be forced to support it.
#11810 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
How is wanting to be treated as a normal couple "more" than equality? I was not saying that adoption is a right, I was saying that a gay couple shouldn't be immediately disqualified. And honestly, I couldn't give less of a shit about catholic adoption centers. I've lived with 6 brothers and sisters who were all foster children, and I can assure you that not one of them cared about the sexual orientation of my parents.
Education level?
User avatar #11877 - rageisfunny (10/29/2012) [-]
Exactly. Steamroll everything for gay "rights"! Who cares about religious freedom, gays should get what they want. In not giving a shit about those adoption centers, you are saying you don't give a shit about the homes those centers help kids find. And nonameavailable has a good point, that the rights movement has no goal, there is always one more thing, until it isn't equal but unfair to others. If we continue with this, we will end up like Canada, where they teach in schools there are seven genders.
#11878 - drewvinator (10/29/2012) [-]
I am against the idea that because of the beliefs of a religious institution kids can't be given to a gay couple. Home with same sex parents vs. foster home. But whatever, I cast my vote in WA. Hopefully it will pass.
#11720 - "Everyone else"? This is a highly debated issue. I a…  [+] (8 new replies) 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -1
User avatar #11729 - rageisfunny (10/26/2012) [-]
By everyone else I just meant that it got voted down like three times in Cali and has been elsewhere. Yes but it would go against there belief that children should be raised by a mother and father. So religiously, they wouldn't be able to, and would likely have to close. Just seems like they are pushing for something that isn't necessary.
#11744 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
No, I guess it isn't necessary. It really is more of an issue of equality. Everyone wishes to be treated fairly and without bias, and if you are being discriminated against I think it is only natural for you to seek equality.
User avatar #11745 - rageisfunny (10/27/2012) [-]
Yea but civil union is on the same footing as a heterosexual marriage. So why isn't it equal. I kind of think its gay just pushing for another thing, and maybe once they can have it called marriage, they will be accepted by all, when generally I think the opposite is true.
#11746 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
What you are describing sounds a lot like "separate but equal", which I think we all know has failed on several occasions in history. I agree that being able to marry wont make the gay community any more accepted, but I think it is a step towards that. If I were to guess, I would say in 100 years homosexuality will widely accepted and the gay rights movement will be just another chapter in a history book.(maybe just a couple paragraphs actually)
#11780 - nonameavailable (10/27/2012) [-]
i disagree with you on almost every "point" you've made and I woul like to point out that rights movement NEVER end until finally it would just be virtually illegal to disagree. Also, i see why you think it is an issue of equality, but i dont see it that way. What they want isnt equality. What they want is MORE. And when you call it descrimination, its not, its opposition. Say a homosexual couple applies for adoption but are rejected because they are homosexuals. They would sue because they say they should have EQUAL RIGHTS, well, first of all you do not have the right to adoption, second of all, they denied them because they are opposed to them because they beleive that what they are oing is morally wrong. They are not going to force you not to do it, but they sure shouldnt be forced to support it.
#11810 - drewvinator (10/27/2012) [-]
How is wanting to be treated as a normal couple "more" than equality? I was not saying that adoption is a right, I was saying that a gay couple shouldn't be immediately disqualified. And honestly, I couldn't give less of a shit about catholic adoption centers. I've lived with 6 brothers and sisters who were all foster children, and I can assure you that not one of them cared about the sexual orientation of my parents.
Education level?
User avatar #11877 - rageisfunny (10/29/2012) [-]
Exactly. Steamroll everything for gay "rights"! Who cares about religious freedom, gays should get what they want. In not giving a shit about those adoption centers, you are saying you don't give a shit about the homes those centers help kids find. And nonameavailable has a good point, that the rights movement has no goal, there is always one more thing, until it isn't equal but unfair to others. If we continue with this, we will end up like Canada, where they teach in schools there are seven genders.
#11878 - drewvinator (10/29/2012) [-]
I am against the idea that because of the beliefs of a religious institution kids can't be given to a gay couple. Home with same sex parents vs. foster home. But whatever, I cast my vote in WA. Hopefully it will pass.
#11706 - I guess I just understand why people care, or feel like they h… 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#11705 - Hahahahahahaha... Omg it would be fun to talk to you irl. 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#11702 - I do not however, look like that. So why don't you think Homos…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #11704 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
Because they can acquire the same benefits through a Civil Union. It's the classic give them an inch and they take a mile scenario.
#11706 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
I guess I just understand why people care, or feel like they have any say in the matter.
#11701 - You're right, really I just don't want someone in such an impo…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #11703 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
2 things.
1: I'm pretty sure you don't know the meaning of transparent.
2: You're bad at making arguments. I get it, you don't like Mormonism so you should vote for the person who is running this country into the ground instead just because.

Now that we're done with that you should get to bed because you obviously need to take a nap mr. cranky pants.
#11705 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
Hahahahahahaha... Omg it would be fun to talk to you irl.
#11699 - Thats funny, because I play alot of chess  [+] (4 new replies) 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#11700 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
#11702 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
I do not however, look like that. So why don't you think Homosexuals should have the ability to marry?
User avatar #11704 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
Because they can acquire the same benefits through a Civil Union. It's the classic give them an inch and they take a mile scenario.
#11706 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
I guess I just understand why people care, or feel like they have any say in the matter.
#11696 - Explain...please  [+] (4 new replies) 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -1
User avatar #11698 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
"I don't dislike all mormons." and in the other comment "I don't like Mormons."
GJ bro.
#11701 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
You're right, really I just don't want someone in such an important office to believe in such a transparent religion.
User avatar #11703 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
2 things.
1: I'm pretty sure you don't know the meaning of transparent.
2: You're bad at making arguments. I get it, you don't like Mormonism so you should vote for the person who is running this country into the ground instead just because.

Now that we're done with that you should get to bed because you obviously need to take a nap mr. cranky pants.
#11705 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
Hahahahahahaha... Omg it would be fun to talk to you irl.
#11694 - Isn't this fun? I'm going to follow you around for awhile..  [+] (6 new replies) 10/26/2012 on Politics - politics news,... -1
#11697 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
Cool story bro. This picture describes you perfectly.
#11699 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
Thats funny, because I play alot of chess
#11700 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
#11702 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
I do not however, look like that. So why don't you think Homosexuals should have the ability to marry?
User avatar #11704 - Peirs (10/26/2012) [-]
Because they can acquire the same benefits through a Civil Union. It's the classic give them an inch and they take a mile scenario.
#11706 - drewvinator (10/26/2012) [-]
I guess I just understand why people care, or feel like they have any say in the matter.
[ 165 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 650

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)