Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/03/2012
Last Login:10/06/2015
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#17719
Highest Content Rank:#15783
Highest Comment Rank:#5527
Content Thumbs: 22 total,  42 ,  20
Comment Thumbs: 1393 total,  1505 ,  112
Content Level Progress: 44.06% (26/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:3702
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:224
FJ Points:1390

latest user's comments

#15 - Just so you guys know, kayfabe news is a wrestling parody site. 09/23/2015 on His reign is over +13
#15 - #6 was such a *********** and I loved every second of it 09/12/2015 on good ol' dank webm comp 0
#113 - If I win this shirt, I will go to the new world trade center w… 09/11/2015 on Free stuff! 0
#128 - Speaking from mobile view: -performance is noticably bette… 09/09/2015 on update, rant and complain here 0
#15 - Hey man just want to say that you did good man..always look ba… 06/08/2015 on bitches be crazy +2
#6 - "A new experiment provided further evidence that reality …  [+] (9 new replies) 06/08/2015 on This week in science | June... +210
User avatar #61 - lapsushominum (06/08/2015) [-]
Pet peeve rant:

I hate it so much when people phrase quantum mechanic shit like there's something special about human "observation." It's not like the conscious human mind witnessing it does something unique to it, it's literally just physical interactions that allow stuff to be measured. And this stuff only happens at incredibly small scales (so far) anyway. Phrasing that shit like "reality doesn't exist until we measure it" is just attention fishing.
User avatar #23 - bullbrigade (06/08/2015) [-]
It's just a very shitty way of phrasing a very well established fact of quantum mechanics.
#8 - physicsdude (06/08/2015) [-]
It's just a clickbait spin on quantum mechanics.

It isn't true in the way it is posted here.
In reality it is more like a small object( we are talking insanely small) doesn't have defined characteristics until you meassure it. It's a possibility function. Fx you can tell for sure which way it is moving until you meassure it.
Also the part about until "WE" meassure it is wrong. So far quantum mechanics only seem to affect things smaller than the largest atoms 10-15 year old data, we might have observed it in a bit larger things because when the object gets big enough it reacts with the surrounding enviroment and is hence being "observed" by what it is reacting with.
#59 - anon (06/08/2015) [-]
We have done the double slit experiment with bucky - balls and have gotten quantum behavior. Also, there was a report of an instrument probe a few hundred microns long entering a superposition while attempting to measure another system in superposition.
User avatar #11 - tenfinnvo (06/08/2015) [-]
Yeah, you are exactly right. It's that when we try to measure an object's momentum with more precision we get less precision in it's coordinates, and vice-versa.
User avatar #27 - bullbrigade (06/08/2015) [-]
Actually, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle has nothing to do with the so-called "wave function collapse" induced by a measurement, which is what the article is about.
User avatar #28 - tenfinnvo (06/08/2015) [-]
Well shit.
User avatar #30 - bullbrigade (06/08/2015) [-]
It's ok, this is actually a very subtle problem in quantum mechanics.
User avatar #37 - tenfinnvo (06/08/2015) [-]
Yeah i know, i had an exam in quantum mechanics like 1,5 weeks ago.
#4 - Congrats 05/25/2015 on When I found out she has a... 0
#200 - What a fitting username to upload this content. 05/24/2015 on Heard that you were talkin... 0
#97 - I will thoroughly enjoy this review. 04/12/2015 on Cory in the House 0
#37 - ********** ? 12/31/2014 on OCD relaxer +2
[ 224 Total ]


Total unique items point value: 2100 / Total items point value: 2550


Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)