Upload
Login or register

dopeydoo

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/03/2012
Last Login:9/30/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#8664
Highest Content Rank:#174
Highest Comment Rank:#3225
Content Thumbs: 12221 total,  13389 ,  1168
Comment Thumbs: 1861 total,  2144 ,  283
Content Level Progress: 14% (14/100)
Level 209 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 210 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:2
Content Views:706907
Times Content Favorited:951 times
Total Comments Made:3204
FJ Points:2963
Favorite Tags: greentext (6) | comic (4) | League of Legend (4) | tumblr (4) | 4Chan (2) | africa (2) | america (2) | are (2) | cat (2) | cockslap (2) | Fitness (2) | for (2) | Liam Neeson (2) | lol (2) | Nintendo (2) | nope (2) | release the krak (2) | sex (2) | that 70s show (2) | the (2)

Text Posts

  • Views: 50602
    Thumbs Up 1156 Thumbs Down 42 Total: +1114
    Comments: 108
    Favorites: 51
    Uploaded: 11/12/13
    That 70s Show That 70s Show
  • Views: 44757
    Thumbs Up 1099 Thumbs Down 64 Total: +1035
    Comments: 92
    Favorites: 102
    Uploaded: 12/06/13
    Hurricane Death Megatron 300 Hurricane Death Megatron 300
  • Views: 32311
    Thumbs Up 978 Thumbs Down 28 Total: +950
    Comments: 54
    Favorites: 16
    Uploaded: 01/13/15
    "Swordfighter" "Swordfighter"
  • Views: 39807
    Thumbs Up 999 Thumbs Down 52 Total: +947
    Comments: 148
    Favorites: 133
    Uploaded: 11/18/13
    Every Video Game, No Exceptions Every Video Game, No Exceptions
  • Views: 39910
    Thumbs Up 978 Thumbs Down 82 Total: +896
    Comments: 160
    Favorites: 45
    Uploaded: 12/04/13
    WWI WWI
  • Views: 35218
    Thumbs Up 901 Thumbs Down 60 Total: +841
    Comments: 27
    Favorites: 38
    Uploaded: 12/21/13
    NPH NPH
  • Views: 15908
    Thumbs Up 232 Thumbs Down 30 Total: +202
    Comments: 20
    Favorites: 11
    Uploaded: 12/03/13
    PLOT TWIST PLOT TWIST
  • Views: 7321
    Thumbs Up 16 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +11
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 11/18/13
    Fuck you Teemo Fuck you Teemo

latest user's comments

#16 - it looks like it was the Fox News republican debate in Detroit…  [+] (7 replies) 11 hours ago on Know what hope is +11
User avatar
#18 - obviousxplains (11 hours ago) [-]
So she took the picture then and claimed it was the most recent debate. People were tearing her apart on twitter for lying.
User avatar
#25 - sorcha (9 hours ago) [-]
Where does she claim it was the recent debate ?
User avatar
#27 - obviousxplains (9 hours ago) [-]
She tweeted it during the debate
#20 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
Probably because Trump fanboys grow vaginas at any kind of joke towards Trump.
#22 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
Sure they do, kiddo.


Which is why this content reached front page, right?

It's like you guys aren't even trying, just baselessly pushing your sides tropes onto the other because you're buttblasted about them being related to you.
#35 - anon (7 hours ago) [-]
Nice job proving my point.
User avatar
#19 - dopeydoo (11 hours ago) [-]
Hey, I'm not saying it isn't fake, it might be, I'm just throwing out possibilities. I mean, it obviously isn't the presidential debate, so if she said it was then yeah, she's a fucking liar
#44 - I hate Hillary too, but that seems extremely thin at best, I d…  [+] (1 reply) 09/28/2016 on Dems already turning on... 0
User avatar
#45 - zekeon (09/28/2016) [-]
You obviously didn't even watch it all.

Did you know Hillary and her campaign have openly said they wanted Holt in the past?
#41 - Some polls are showing Trump winning, some are showing Hillary…  [+] (3 replies) 09/28/2016 on Dems already turning on... 0
User avatar
#42 - zekeon (09/28/2016) [-]
User avatar
#44 - dopeydoo (09/28/2016) [-]
I hate Hillary too, but that seems extremely thin at best, I don't buy that at all
User avatar
#45 - zekeon (09/28/2016) [-]
You obviously didn't even watch it all.

Did you know Hillary and her campaign have openly said they wanted Holt in the past?
#160 - I agree that question 9 was mostly an attack on Trump from blu…  [+] (2 replies) 09/28/2016 on Damn that was fast -4
#164 - anon (09/28/2016) [-]
Actually they're not, this whole thing reads like a huffington post comments section.

The way I see it theres no need for all this commentary. The facts are clear as day.

Trump was asked about the birther movement, his supposed support for the iraq war, his tax returns, and his position on stop and frisk. These are all Trump related scandals.

The only scandal of Clintons that was brought up was the emails, and Trump is the one who addressed it, not Holt, who simply offered clinton a chance to rebuttal and didnt push her at all.

The facts are clear as day in this case. It's simply a matter of what questions were asked, and Trump was the one being attacked with the questions. There is no debating that, and that is biased.
User avatar
#177 - dopeydoo (09/28/2016) [-]
Except that's such a laughably incomplete picture.

Trump was asked on the birther movement because it was a movement he very vocally supported, even after it was revealed that none of it was true. Trump was never asked about his support for the war, which makes me believe you didn't read it at all, or that your critical reading skills are horrible he WAS asked about his judgement, since HE was the one who brought up the Iraq War by saying Hillary had shown bad judgement by voting for it, even though he also voted for it. His decision was never claimed as good or bad, but he was asked to defend why he claimed he had better judgement for the same decision. His Tax returns were brought up legitimately, so was Hillary's emails you can't claim it was "only Trump that addressed it", since he did bring the point up, but it was incredibly early in the debate, and there's no way to know whether that was a planned question. Additionally, since most mud-slinging accusations weren't made into full questions like that, but this specific one was, it's actually pretty likely it was planned for later.. His position on stop and frisk was never a question, but HE brought it up as something he wanted to initiate, and the moderator pointed out it was declared unconstitutional.

The facts are as clear as day, which is why I'm so impressed you've still managed to get them wrong. Also, just to address "Holt, who simply offered clinton a chance to rebuttal and didnt push her at all", the only time Holt "pushed" Trump was when he went off on one of his many derailments, and he was "pushing" Trump back on topic. If Hillary had answered the question the same way, he would have "pushed" Hillary too. Trump wasn't attacked, and if he was a good politician instead of just a business man, all those "attacking" questions were easy to answer.

In reality, the only reason people are saying these questions "attacked" Trump is because he didn't have good answers and I mean objectively good answers. You can say his policies and ideas are good or bad, but there's no arguing that Trump did not compose himself well during the debate, and his answers were objectively bad, since they were mostly mud slinging, tangents, interruptions, derailments, ramblings, etc. To be fair, Hillary did a lot of that too, but not nearly as much, and much quieter
#155 - I see you didn't read it, good on you  [+] (4 replies) 09/28/2016 on Damn that was fast -3
#156 - anon (09/28/2016) [-]
No, I did. I understand that liberal snark mixed with "fucking" may appeal to the twitter liberal crowd as leet debate skills, but blue is retarded. Half of his rebuttals are dedicated to attacking trump personally and don't even address greens points. Question 9 is a perfect example, he spends the mass majority of that crying about how bad trump is and doesn't even really tackle greens point.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but aggressive typing =/= making a great point.
User avatar
#160 - dopeydoo (09/28/2016) [-]
I agree that question 9 was mostly an attack on Trump from blue, but the point that the moderator WASN'T attacking Trump is still valid, and the fact that Trump went on a lot of unrelated tangents that most people are now criticizing is also true. Plus, if you read it, responses like that are pretty much the minority.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but cherry picking =/= a good argument
#164 - anon (09/28/2016) [-]
Actually they're not, this whole thing reads like a huffington post comments section.

The way I see it theres no need for all this commentary. The facts are clear as day.

Trump was asked about the birther movement, his supposed support for the iraq war, his tax returns, and his position on stop and frisk. These are all Trump related scandals.

The only scandal of Clintons that was brought up was the emails, and Trump is the one who addressed it, not Holt, who simply offered clinton a chance to rebuttal and didnt push her at all.

The facts are clear as day in this case. It's simply a matter of what questions were asked, and Trump was the one being attacked with the questions. There is no debating that, and that is biased.
User avatar
#177 - dopeydoo (09/28/2016) [-]
Except that's such a laughably incomplete picture.

Trump was asked on the birther movement because it was a movement he very vocally supported, even after it was revealed that none of it was true. Trump was never asked about his support for the war, which makes me believe you didn't read it at all, or that your critical reading skills are horrible he WAS asked about his judgement, since HE was the one who brought up the Iraq War by saying Hillary had shown bad judgement by voting for it, even though he also voted for it. His decision was never claimed as good or bad, but he was asked to defend why he claimed he had better judgement for the same decision. His Tax returns were brought up legitimately, so was Hillary's emails you can't claim it was "only Trump that addressed it", since he did bring the point up, but it was incredibly early in the debate, and there's no way to know whether that was a planned question. Additionally, since most mud-slinging accusations weren't made into full questions like that, but this specific one was, it's actually pretty likely it was planned for later.. His position on stop and frisk was never a question, but HE brought it up as something he wanted to initiate, and the moderator pointed out it was declared unconstitutional.

The facts are as clear as day, which is why I'm so impressed you've still managed to get them wrong. Also, just to address "Holt, who simply offered clinton a chance to rebuttal and didnt push her at all", the only time Holt "pushed" Trump was when he went off on one of his many derailments, and he was "pushing" Trump back on topic. If Hillary had answered the question the same way, he would have "pushed" Hillary too. Trump wasn't attacked, and if he was a good politician instead of just a business man, all those "attacking" questions were easy to answer.

In reality, the only reason people are saying these questions "attacked" Trump is because he didn't have good answers and I mean objectively good answers. You can say his policies and ideas are good or bad, but there's no arguing that Trump did not compose himself well during the debate, and his answers were objectively bad, since they were mostly mud slinging, tangents, interruptions, derailments, ramblings, etc. To be fair, Hillary did a lot of that too, but not nearly as much, and much quieter