Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #4506 on Comments
didactus Avatar Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite
Send mail to didactus Block didactus Invite didactus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 19
Steam Profile: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/765611980502221
Consoles Owned: Xbox 360
Video Games Played: CS:GO, AoE II
X-box Gamertag: Jiraiyadude
Interests: Muay Thai, Physics, Books.
Date Signed Up:12/03/2012
Last Login:12/22/2014
Location:Karlshamn Sweden
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9445
Comment Ranking:#4506
Highest Content Rank:#5821
Highest Comment Rank:#1438
Content Thumbs: 111 total,  133 ,  22
Comment Thumbs: 5229 total,  5768 ,  539
Content Level Progress: 80% (4/5)
Level 8 Content: New Here → Level 9 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 32% (32/100)
Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite
Content Views:11326
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:1002
FJ Points:4671
You gon get rekt.

Git gud.

Nah, if you need anything, holla at me.

Sort by:

funny text/links

Sort by:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#2 - The first one, holy **** .... 9 hours ago on Pretty to wut comp 0
#66 - So Soviet/Russia never had anything on the moon, thanks for fa… 12/21/2014 on The Imperial System -1
#51 - "I am the first and the last, the alpha and the omega, th… 12/19/2014 on Shit Rappers Say +1
#44 - Magnamon and Omnimon were based. 12/18/2014 on Basic Idea 0
#24 - It was and will always be that way, he's just a guy doing stuf… 12/18/2014 on has a smile on his face, +65
#21 - You misread what I said, I said it has not DONE it yet, I've e… 12/18/2014 on HALO LOREMASTER: Slipspace 0
#18 - I'm sorry but the LHC has been confirmed to not create Black h…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/17/2014 on HALO LOREMASTER: Slipspace 0
#20 - anonymous (12/18/2014) [-]
Nobody but the conspiracy nuts actually believe the black holes created would be dangerous. and the stuff OP posted was right: the microscopic singularities created at the point of impact between the particles would evaporate within a tiny fraction of a second due to a form of radiation produced by black holes themselves.

So can LHC's create black holes? yes technically speaking. do they pose any sort of threat whatsoever? fuck no.
User avatar #21 - didactus (12/18/2014) [-]
You misread what I said, I said it has not DONE it yet, I've even elaborated the possibility of it happening in my previous comments, if you look into it, Particles entering our atmosphere have a much higher energy than those created at LHC. The issue I took with what OP wrote is that he said it has happened, it has infact not. I am well aware of how the LHC works. I am as of right now studying high energy reactions and particle decay formed in Accelerators.
#354 - The scene were Anon greets DJ admin, where's that from?  [+] (1 new reply) 12/14/2014 on vocaroo motivational 0
#379 - anonymous (12/15/2014) [-]
It's from Kingdom of Heaven. Anon is the King of Jerusalem and Admin is Saladin. Actually a pretty good movie and Orlando Bloom is the main protagonist. I'd recommend it.
#72 - But if they don't have the information that they think they ha… 12/13/2014 on 10/10 Would Torture Again 0
#10 - I suggest you watch Christopher Hitchens video of him being wa…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/12/2014 on 10/10 Would Torture Again +2
#17 - anonymous (12/12/2014) [-]

user's friends

User avatar mooshmallow    
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 2370 / Total items point value: 5720

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
I'm responding here because it's become a ***********
>And that's not to say everyone will go vegan overnight. Veganism will grow slowly.

We can say it won't happen if the world goes vegan because we can already measure the resources that will go into crops. the resources that go into meat is wildly inefficient. the resources that go into crops are provably, measurably, sustainable.

what's more, the crops we grow for cows and such are already wildly overgrown. we put resources into them. We will stop putting said resources in if we stop growing them.

It's also provable we don't need supplement in a vegan diet. In fact it's been shown vegans get more than adequate protein intake. you can get everything you need from a vegan diet with moderate planning, as shown by lifelong vegans, vegan atheletes, so on and so forth. it's the opinion of many professional medical outlet that vegan diets are fine for all walks of life
in fact the conservative American Dietetic Association acknowledges "appropriately planned vegetarian diets, including total vegetarian or vegan diets, are healthful, nutritionally adequate and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases.
At most, we would need b12 pills but even then we don't need that if we grow the right crops.
User avatar #2 to #1 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
The highest protein source I found for non meat product was at 39% for soybeans, one of the most pesticide ridden crops in all the world, where they cut down trees in south america to grow more. And moreover infants can't live on vegan diets they need meat no matter how you put it, because they grow. Otherwise they become malnourished.
User avatar #3 to #2 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
We deforest for soybean crops because we grow them to feed animals.
what's more, how much protein the crop has by itself is irrelevant. the question was can we have adequate vegan diets. and the answer is provably, yes. in fact many americans get too much protein.

what's more, what are you basing your idea that you can't feed infants vegan off of? A few articles about vegan parents that had malnourished kids? that's mere annecdote. I wouldn't say omnivorous diets malnourish infants because a few omnivore parents had malnourished kids.

There are ways to feed infants vegan. Again, with adequate planning, as you would need with an omnivore diet.
User avatar #4 to #3 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
I wasn't talking about the animal crop, I was talking about the crop humans eat has 39% protein. And judging by the article, it's mentioned that they should take soy formula.
They NEED protein it's non debatable, they don't need a balanced diet, they need an increasing diet to sustain their growth.
And yes a simple case does not mean the whole group is the same. And that many people get too much protein, I won't argue that because it's true, I mentioned earlier about wanting to decrease the need on meat, which we should it's both a massive waste in the industry aswell as we eat too much, but we shouldn't eliminate it from our diets. Having non meat days is fine, I see no reason as to why you can't cut down on meat that way.
User avatar #6 to #4 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
And the question of simply 'cutting down' on meat brings us back to the question of
1) can we justify hurting animals unnecessarily
[which many people agree and say no]
2) should we really continue to eat meat when it's currently contributing more to global warming than all forms of transportation combined?
User avatar #10 to #6 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
1) No, we can't justify it. but we can do it so that it doesn't feel unnecessary pain.
2) www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html, We can cut down by alot. But we shouldn't eliminate it.
User avatar #12 to #10 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
it's impossible to kill an animal without it feeling pain. to suggest an animal doesn't value it's life is irrational. it's like suggesting an animal with eyes doesn't have an interest in seeing. Can we likewise suggest a human being with the mentality of a cow [or equivalent too] wouldn't be suffering if we killed it?

We should very much eliminate it. Switching to a vegan diet is actually more of an environmentally contribution than buying an smart car
User avatar #14 to #12 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
Animals suffer regardless if we stop eating meat or not and they will suffer a different pain if we choose to stop eating them. They will die neglected instead, does that shift the burden of responsibility to something else?, I stick with the idea we should make it more humane, but to suggest it's strictly bad to kill for meat is something many carnivores disagrees about.
User avatar #16 to #14 - theluppijackal (11/15/2014) [-]
Also, again thank you for actually partaking in a fruitful discussion rather than shutting your ears and screeching 'bacon'
that puts you head and shoulders above many people here.
User avatar #15 to #14 - theluppijackal (11/15/2014) [-]
Humans will suffer regardless of our own interference. Why shouldn't we still act to minimize human suffer?
Animals needn't suffer at our hands if we don't demand their meat, so why not seize demanding meat?

Also, again, carnivores are irrelevant. We don't refer to the lions in terms of any social or moral behavior. Humans are omnivores. Not carnivores.
User avatar #5 to #4 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
I wasn't arguing they didn't need protein.
Again, it wasn't a question of how much protein it has, the question was can we have adequate vegan diets. and the answer is yes

I wasn't debating as to whether they needed protein. you said infants can't be vegan. i went out of my way to show otherwise.
It's not a question of the diet, it's a question of making sure the infant gets adequate nutrition, which they can with a vegan diet.
User avatar #7 to #5 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
The thing is, you can't exchange protein with more food, just because you can find other sources doesn't mean the baby can just take a larger amount of food. Yet alone process it. I never suggested you thought they didn't need protein, but vegan food doesn't give adequate nutrition for the amount a baby usually eats to satisfy it's needs.
User avatar #9 to #7 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
Also, i need to go to work. I'm happy to respond to whatever you say when I get back.
this has been a lot more fruitful of a discussion than most and you seem mostly rational about this [which isn't a shot against you. I had the same mentality. i didn't want to give up my sushi]
User avatar #11 to #9 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
Fair enough.
User avatar #8 to #7 - theluppijackal (11/14/2014) [-]
Earlier you suggested
>They need an increasing diet to sustain their growth.
Unless I'm misreading what you're saying

Also, you seem to keep pressing that you simply can't have vegan infants.
User avatar #13 to #8 - didactus ONLINE (11/14/2014) [-]
I did say that yes, but I fail to see how that corresponds to me telling you that you suggested protein was unnecessary.
 Friends (0)