Upload
Login or register

datargumme

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:11/21/2011
Last Login:9/29/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#6631
Highest Content Rank:#1836
Highest Comment Rank:#1871
Content Thumbs: 5236 total,  5784 ,  548
Comment Thumbs: 7352 total,  8705 ,  1353
Content Level Progress: 36% (36/100)
Level 152 Content: Faptastic → Level 153 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 267 Comments: Pure Win → Level 268 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:3
Content Views:143742
Times Content Favorited:191 times
Total Comments Made:1257
FJ Points:12005

latest user's comments

#39 - Picture  [+] (7 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +35
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#38 - Picture  [+] (8 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +36
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#37 - Picture  [+] (9 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +32
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#36 - Picture  [+] (13 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +31
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#34 - Picture  [+] (14 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +34
#36 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#33 - Picture  [+] (15 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +31
#34 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#36 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#32 - Picture  [+] (16 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +34
#33 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#34 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#36 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#31 - Picture  [+] (18 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +38
User avatar
#50 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
I'm going to use this one. A lot.
#32 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#33 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#34 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#36 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#30 - Picture  [+] (19 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +37
#31 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#50 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
I'm going to use this one. A lot.
#32 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#33 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#34 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#36 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/
#29 - Picture  [+] (20 replies) 11/16/2015 on We need these +37
#30 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#31 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#50 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
I'm going to use this one. A lot.
#32 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#33 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#34 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#36 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
User avatar
#52 - taniv (11/16/2015) [-]
Rhetoric is incredibly important though in debates. Ensuring things are properly defined and lines are properly drawn creates productive and efficient communication. It's a huge hassle when someone says "oh, but I wasn't talking about X2 I was talking about X1" and you're making a point on the entire group of "X", for example, but working through the rhetoric and using it to your advantage against a person is useful. If someone uses it to sidestep your argument, then just use rhetoric to solidify yours and blindside them.
User avatar
#69 - akkere (11/17/2015) [-]
Debates aren't effective models of analyzing objectively appropriate positions for given issues though; going by the fundamental triangle of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) only 1/3 of the rhetoric is pure logical analysis and the other 2/3 is simply appealing to tertiary information disconnected to the bare facts. One could even presume pathos and ethos are objectively fallacious, in fact.
Discussion models are more effective because of the open-ended nature which allows scrutiny to filter out the bare facts, instead of hinging primarily on charismatic appeal.
User avatar
#81 - taniv (11/17/2015) [-]
I firmly agree
#37 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#38 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#39 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#41 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#42 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#43 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
#44 - datargumme (11/16/2015) [-]
I did not cross check them all, some of them might also be in the OP.
#149 - JustintheWaysian (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing god's work son
User avatar
#112 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
thanks b0ss
User avatar
#106 - CodeUltra (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing gods work, thank you/