Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/11/2013
Last Login:11/15/2016
Comment Ranking:#15122
Highest Content Rank:#1162
Highest Comment Rank:#2017
Content Thumbs: 7674 total,  8516 ,  842
Comment Thumbs: 2253 total,  2578 ,  325
Content Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 168 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 169 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 49% (49/100)
Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:378287
Times Content Favorited:439 times
Total Comments Made:728
FJ Points:8749
Favorite Tags: Love (3) | Pizza (3) | to (3) | aang (2) | about (2) | and (2) | avatar (2) | cool (2) | i (2) | it (2) | my (2) | the (2) | this (2)

latest user's comments

#152 - plz 01/12/2016 on Gus n' Al 0
#161 - how common is it that guys are called "expendable or disp…  [+] (3 replies) 10/12/2015 on Milo being awesome part 2 0
User avatar
#169 - jiichei (10/12/2015) [-]
hmm.. Maybe it's the whole thing that men can take the beating? like in the movies a lot of men die even though the scenario would take both gender lives equally? in jurassic world there was a certain death with a woman not gonna spoil it anymore if you haven't seen it and some people thought it was tasteless because it happened to a woman.
and you know titanic? women and children first? I know that happened some time ago, but I think those kind of ideas are still a little bit in the air that men should sacrifice themselves and women should be rescued first.
maybe expendable and disposable because most of the soldiers are men? and soldiers are kinda expected to die or something
maybe they're disposable because they are good for nothing? or because it's okay to sleep with a guy or even rape him because men are monsters and that way expendable? I dunno. I'm running out of ideas.
I'm not exactly sure how the OP meant the disposable thing, just offering my thoughts.
User avatar
#251 - syntheticdoll (10/12/2015) [-]
I think "women and children" is a thing because men have the most chance of surviving in case of shit going down without lifeboats. Imagine how many kids would have died if men went first. Of course I'm not saying they're disposable but during emergencies weaker people are usually top priority.
User avatar
#208 - maton (10/12/2015) [-]
On the Titanic part, the "women and children" was actually a result of a misheard order, I believe. They don't really do that sort of thing.