|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #1378 on SubscribersLevel 269 Comments: Pure Win
OfflineSend mail to cyanidesandvich Block cyanidesandvich Invite cyanidesandvich to be your friend flag avatar
- Text/Links 3
- Pictures 39
- YouTube 4
- Animated Gifs 4
- Favorites 26
- Friends 5
- Comments 1855
- Channels 8
- All 1946
- Views: 55880something went terribly wrong here.
2107 93 Total: +2014
- Views: 74674Fallout: Vaults
2052 122 Total: +1930
- Views: 86806Fallout: Vaults Pt.2
1932 196 Total: +1736
- Views: 30446some men just want to see the...
1400 183 Total: +1217
- Views: 51237Green lanturn
1085 73 Total: +1012
- Views: 27761admin's day out
1047 83 Total: +964
- Views: 1705Grandpa's will
14 7 Total: +7
- Views: 662troll house
4 2 Total: +2
- Views: 632watermelon man
1 1 Total: 0
- Views: 1175russianbob armypants
1 2 Total: -1
- Views: 18665ball skills
392 11 Total: +381
- Views: 5851Japanese horse racing
31 8 Total: +23
- Views: 2358amazing falling sand sculpture
16 13 Total: +3
- Views: 856let me just reload
3 6 Total: -3
latest user's comments
|#6 - I am the 5th commenter, my text is also green. [+] (2 new replies)||08/20/2014 on sandy moran||-15|
|#118 - well, obvious exclusions from the ability to birth are those w…||08/14/2014 on Some Random Interesting...||0|
|#109 - i kind of agree with tesla. In modern society for humans s… [+] (20 new replies)||08/14/2014 on Some Random Interesting...||+3|
#132 - anonymous (08/15/2014) [-]
Except that being a criminal is not genetic. There are many factors that contribute to criminality, chief among them is being raised in a single parent household.
How about we just tighten up the laws regarding divorce and welfare so it's no longer economically viable to be a single mother. That'll reduce crime better than eugenics.
#114 - hellsno (08/14/2014) [-]
The argument falls apart when you try to decide who's genetics are undesirable. Some traits that are not helpful at this moment in time may end up being the people that survive best in the future.
The opposite might be a better idea... encourage the most intelligent people to have as many kids as possible. That's are hard sell though, because they're smart enough to know the hell that that would be.
#140 - bearception (08/15/2014) [-]
he is wrong <with genetic engineering on the way that probably is obsolete> but i still agree with Tesla as you both misunderstood what he was trying to say <notice he mentioned the mentally ill and criminals> being a criminal is not genetic, nor is trying meth once in your life. what he was trying to say is if those groups of people had children <and no i don't care how many "kind father who is a criminal but still a stand up parent" movies you have seen> the children would not be brought up in ideal conditions "pre birth addictions are some of the worst" and could be lacking in basic resources such as food and education.
and while I agree with his ideas i understand the problem lies on who controls the policies can have a major influence. for example someone could decide that being an illegal immigrant is a crime worthy of euthination, and while i agree that this should be a last resort punishment for criminals whose live choices are almost guaranteed to ruin a child's life, i certainty don't agree with the taboo stamp society has put on it <we kill people and put them through solitary confinement which can be described as hell, but euthination, an option that would keep children from suffering, is somehow worse than both of those combined> and frankly this seems to be a vestige of ancient society which valued reproduction above everything else..
Please respond with any arguments or condolences this is The first time I have signed on to an extreme <from my pov> ideology and I want to think more critically about it before I can be certain that i am not fooling myself with confirmation bias, or that i'm not simply using "common sense" to blindly follow an authority figure, in this case Tesla.
#169 - LazierThanThou (08/15/2014) [-]
Because people have the right to parenthood. You'd be taking an essential part of being a living thing from them because you don't want their children.
They're not dogs or cats, they're human beings. You don't just get to remove them from the gene pool because you don't think they'd be good parents.
#174 - bearception (08/15/2014) [-]
"people have a right to parent hood" so what if the mother was a meth addict that would take meth during pregnancy, or even an alcoholic. what if the father is abusive and a rapist. what if.... and you would be surprised at how much of the nations criminal population was influenced by something traumatic happened that happened to them as children <a surprisingly large amount by their parents> so yes people can do whatever they want with their bodies, but when they are clearly incapable of or unwilling to make sure their child will grow up in adequate conditions than they will <by having a child> be knowingly negatively affecting the life of a person that is not them selves, this <if you think deeply> is analogous to child abuse and the reason i support seat belt laws.
#186 - bearception (08/15/2014) [-]
you make "painful childhood" sound like a midlife crisis <and if you think that because you're the main character of your own story you can "pull through" and make yourself than i can't argue> but children brought up in abusive homes often deal with starvation, verbal, emotional, psychological and sexual abuse and are much more likely to develop addiction to drugs or be disowned by their parents. they will start living i the streets and often turn to crime drugs prostitution or any combination of the three and their survival instincts and habit are probably the only things keeping them from killing themselves <and no i would want to live, but trust me even if keeping people from being born so they don't suffer was the most evil thing anyone could do, than some euthinizations aren't going to put a dent in the net evil every person that lives is automatically tagged with.
#193 - LazierThanThou (08/15/2014) [-]
Okay, there's an awful lot wrong with what you just said starting with your grammar. Periods are your friend. Use them. You sound incoherent and out of breath when you type like that.
#1. Most people that grow up in a single parent household don't go through that level of deprivation. Even then, euthanasia will not solve the problem.
#2. I'm Schizoid precisely because of a painful childhood. I have precisely zero friends and the only human contact I have during my day is when I see my family as I get food or go to the bathroom. I cannot stand physical intimacy, my mind rebels at the very notion of it. My painful childhood has morphed into a painful adulthood, so please don't misunderstand me when I ask questions. I know exactly what I'm talking about when I talk about painful childhoods.
#3. Taking away from someone their ability to have children purposefully is evil. If you're trying lessen the amount of evil in the world, consider not engaging in such an activity yourself.
I'm taking a break from FJ. You probably wont hear from me for a while.
#199 - bearception (08/15/2014) [-]
yeah "most" people. I said in my original comment that this should only be used in absolutely necessary cases, and only complained that it shouldn't still be taboo.
also i never mentioned "crazy people" i only mentioned this an option for people who obviously can't or won't take care of a child <if you think that euthinization is evil than how about locking up criminals in a cell for years on end>
also please explain why it is "evil" to take away a persons ability to have children when you know they'll treat the child like crap anyways <purposefully or not> especially since they can adopt if they prove to be responsible parents late on.
also my main point is to keep any children from being born into families that won't care for the, please explain how this automatically makes any children I might have "evil".
and finally why are you responding with rude comments and insults "was it something i said" <seriously though>.
#118 - cyanidesandvich (08/14/2014) [-]
well, obvious exclusions from the ability to birth are those who are born with birth defects, such as mutations (not like blonde/ginger hair), more like dwarfism or similar things such as downs syndrome.
not that they cant make good parents, it's just their genes are not really sounds horrible but desireable.
aside from that its not the idea to force evolution in a certain direction, it's just trying to phase out any imperfections (this overtime would see a drop i things such as alzhimers and parkinsons as those that have it would not be able to pass it on)
|#18 - no, only untill he was married +1 week, then the sex stopped.||08/14/2014 on My life as a 20th century male||+6|
|#22 - rolling for potential prize. Come on birthday luck do your thing!||08/14/2014 on Xbox 3 month give away||+3|
|#18 - i did not. now i feel like a fool i hardly ever read the…||08/13/2014 on imagine walkin in your moms...||+1|
|#16 - cave made of human flesh? i'd be surprised to walk into y… [+] (2 new replies)||08/13/2014 on imagine walkin in your moms...||+11|
|#6 - no he lives in Birmingham, UK but he probably does also … [+] (1 new reply)||08/09/2014 on Ozzy||+3|
|#24 - so... tuvok?||08/09/2014 on joe jackson people||+10|
|#94 - now why the **** is this tumblr post in the 4chan…||08/06/2014 on Dildo is a powerful word||+1|
Join Subscribe bendingtime
Join Subscribe deadpool
Join Subscribe katawa-shoujo
Join Subscribe katawashoujo
Join Subscribe pokemon
Join Subscribe star-trek-time
Join Subscribe startrek
Join Subscribe stoner-humor