Upload
Login or register

conquer

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:9/07/2011
Last Login:8/30/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 349 total,  434 ,  85
Comment Thumbs: 1082 total,  1539 ,  457
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 34 Content: Peasant → Level 35 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 207 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 208 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:14209
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:481
FJ Points:1552
Favorite Tags: Youre it (5)

Text Posts

  • Views: 7404
    Thumbs Up 256 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +250
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 12
    Uploaded: 09/07/11
    being a smartass being a smartass
  • Views: 1519
    Thumbs Up 27 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +22
    Comments: 56
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 08/02/12
    FunnyJunk (86,984,289,435) FunnyJunk (86,984,289,435)
  • Views: 1799
    Thumbs Up 26 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +18
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 07/31/12
    MEPS MEPS
  • Views: 1587
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +10
    Comments: 15
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/04/16
    I'm an artist I'm an artist
  • Views: 1582
    Thumbs Up 17 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +10
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/01/12
    Wrong Love Story Wrong Love Story
  • Views: 605
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +10
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 10/01/11
    Random Comp Random Comp

latest user's comments

#153 - That's neat. Except that you're not going to load all of that …  [+] (1 new reply) 04/28/2016 on What can't we blame the... 0
#154 - Glitched (04/28/2016) [-]
"It will outlast us all.
So infinite enough." - submarine never mentioned

"Not really dude.. Nuclear submarines have to refuel every 20 years or so. Not my definition of infinite. Also definitely not long enough to outlast us all either" - brings up a refueling problem.....for submarines no less. Not relevant to the convo at all.

"So on the short 200 years. With breeders and sea water providers = 30k -60k years." - shows that uranium (nuclear fuel) will outlast us all

" www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-global-uranium-deposits-last/ " - shows source on why it was commented that it will outlast us all

"That's neat. Except that you're not going to load all of that into a single core in one shot." - talking about the irrelevant submarine again

"Fuel is used up and has to be replaced. If you can use it up, it is, by definition, finite." - another derp statement. Uranium/nuclear fuel is the topic. Sure it is finite. So is space. But like i said. It will outlast us all.

"Not to mention that uranium also decays on its own. But whatever dude" - duh. and no more is ever being made and we dont have the technology to make more? We do? So you're still an idiot? Gotcha

Now bring up your submarine again and shit.....blocking you because no matter how much proof is levied your way you're still too idiotic to see fact.








#150 - Not really dude.. Nuclear submarines have to refuel every 20 y…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/28/2016 on What can't we blame the... 0
#152 - Glitched (04/28/2016) [-]
refuel with what?
Something that will outlast us all.
So on the short 200 years. With breeders and sea water providers = 30k -60k years.
I didn't know you were going to live for another 200 years or 30k - 60k years.

www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-global-uranium-deposits-last/

You're not going to live that long.......so you are retarded?
I can agree with that.
User avatar
#153 - conquer (04/28/2016) [-]
That's neat. Except that you're not going to load all of that into a single core in one shot. Fuel is used up and has to be replaced. If you can use it up, it is, by definition, finite. That's like saying that my car can run for a 1000 years because there's a shell station down the road. Dumbass.
You're also talking about significantly increasing consumption of uranium. Powering entire societies in space is gonna burn thru that shit. And if the refueling ships are nuclear powered, there's another source of consumption.
Not to mention that uranium also decays on its own. But whatever dude
#154 - Glitched (04/28/2016) [-]
"It will outlast us all.
So infinite enough." - submarine never mentioned

"Not really dude.. Nuclear submarines have to refuel every 20 years or so. Not my definition of infinite. Also definitely not long enough to outlast us all either" - brings up a refueling problem.....for submarines no less. Not relevant to the convo at all.

"So on the short 200 years. With breeders and sea water providers = 30k -60k years." - shows that uranium (nuclear fuel) will outlast us all

" www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-global-uranium-deposits-last/ " - shows source on why it was commented that it will outlast us all

"That's neat. Except that you're not going to load all of that into a single core in one shot." - talking about the irrelevant submarine again

"Fuel is used up and has to be replaced. If you can use it up, it is, by definition, finite." - another derp statement. Uranium/nuclear fuel is the topic. Sure it is finite. So is space. But like i said. It will outlast us all.

"Not to mention that uranium also decays on its own. But whatever dude" - duh. and no more is ever being made and we dont have the technology to make more? We do? So you're still an idiot? Gotcha

Now bring up your submarine again and shit.....blocking you because no matter how much proof is levied your way you're still too idiotic to see fact.








#27 - **conquer used "*roll picture*"** **conquer rolled image *…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/26/2016 on What can't we blame the... -1
#101 - Glitched (04/27/2016) [-]
It will outlast us all.
So infinite enough.
User avatar
#150 - conquer (04/28/2016) [-]
Not really dude.. Nuclear submarines have to refuel every 20 years or so. Not my definition of infinite. Also definitely not long enough to outlast us all either
#152 - Glitched (04/28/2016) [-]
refuel with what?
Something that will outlast us all.
So on the short 200 years. With breeders and sea water providers = 30k -60k years.
I didn't know you were going to live for another 200 years or 30k - 60k years.

www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-global-uranium-deposits-last/

You're not going to live that long.......so you are retarded?
I can agree with that.
User avatar
#153 - conquer (04/28/2016) [-]
That's neat. Except that you're not going to load all of that into a single core in one shot. Fuel is used up and has to be replaced. If you can use it up, it is, by definition, finite. That's like saying that my car can run for a 1000 years because there's a shell station down the road. Dumbass.
You're also talking about significantly increasing consumption of uranium. Powering entire societies in space is gonna burn thru that shit. And if the refueling ships are nuclear powered, there's another source of consumption.
Not to mention that uranium also decays on its own. But whatever dude
#154 - Glitched (04/28/2016) [-]
"It will outlast us all.
So infinite enough." - submarine never mentioned

"Not really dude.. Nuclear submarines have to refuel every 20 years or so. Not my definition of infinite. Also definitely not long enough to outlast us all either" - brings up a refueling problem.....for submarines no less. Not relevant to the convo at all.

"So on the short 200 years. With breeders and sea water providers = 30k -60k years." - shows that uranium (nuclear fuel) will outlast us all

" www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-global-uranium-deposits-last/ " - shows source on why it was commented that it will outlast us all

"That's neat. Except that you're not going to load all of that into a single core in one shot." - talking about the irrelevant submarine again

"Fuel is used up and has to be replaced. If you can use it up, it is, by definition, finite." - another derp statement. Uranium/nuclear fuel is the topic. Sure it is finite. So is space. But like i said. It will outlast us all.

"Not to mention that uranium also decays on its own. But whatever dude" - duh. and no more is ever being made and we dont have the technology to make more? We do? So you're still an idiot? Gotcha

Now bring up your submarine again and shit.....blocking you because no matter how much proof is levied your way you're still too idiotic to see fact.








#18 - Chipotle one isn't technically true. The amount of food you ge… 04/04/2016 on fast food confessions -1
#1 - Good luck dude. Out of shape American sailor here, just lettin… 03/20/2016 on I'm retarded +4
#72 - Your source... That speach was televised in Germany. Effective… 03/19/2016 on Famous Quotes... 0
#1 - "Dude, what kind of Pizza should we get?" "… 03/19/2016 on Pizza Pizza 0
#69 - I'm wrong because only 99% of Germany agrees. Got it  [+] (2 new replies) 03/19/2016 on Famous Quotes... 0
User avatar
#71 - mikhailovych (03/19/2016) [-]
Cite your sources
User avatar
#72 - conquer (03/19/2016) [-]
Your source... That speach was televised in Germany. Effectively the only people who didn't hear "doughnut" were the people in Berlin. It's right there. In the article you posted. Or you could just not read beyond the word "misconception". You do you boo boo
#52 - "I'm bin ein Berliner"="I'm a doughnut" no…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/19/2016 on Famous Quotes... 0
User avatar
#69 - conquer (03/19/2016) [-]
I'm wrong because only 99% of Germany agrees. Got it
User avatar
#71 - mikhailovych (03/19/2016) [-]
Cite your sources
User avatar
#72 - conquer (03/19/2016) [-]
Your source... That speach was televised in Germany. Effectively the only people who didn't hear "doughnut" were the people in Berlin. It's right there. In the article you posted. Or you could just not read beyond the word "misconception". You do you boo boo
#12 - You eat crossdresser?  [+] (1 new reply) 03/04/2016 on I'm an artist 0
#13 - anon (03/04/2016) [-]
The roll explains it perfectly

user's friends