x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#547
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 62455 total,  76461 ,  14006
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 77.1% (771/1000)
Level 355 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 356 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10917
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:17331
FJ Points:28003

latest user's comments

#175 - Hm. Well then, as long as it suits you, I support you…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy 0
User avatar #179 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I'm working on that part. Finding something in budget is difficult, but honestly, for the time being, I love living where I do, even if it's on the floor and has to be temporary. Fantastic, loving people that have never asked for a single thing from me..though I am too grateful/generous to not throw help their way when I know they're struggling
User avatar #181 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Bah. Everyone struggles. My own regret is that I cannot help them. Are you sure you will be well? And find a place soon?
User avatar #183 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I will certainly be well and hopefully I will find a place soon. Thank you for your concern
User avatar #185 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Good. As said if you put a few of my comments together, I live in Kamloops British Columbia in Canada; I have a room you could rent very cheaply and jobs I could pull favours to give you. If you ever require a change of scenery or to get out of a bad environment, just hit me up on here and we'll work it out.
User avatar #492 - Conquistador (05/07/2015) [-]
Wanting the tranny D I see.
User avatar #187 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
Why thank you dear. Coincidentally enough, my sister lives around there haha it'd be neat to be near her again, though I do love living in colorado and the people I know here, but desperate times call for desperate measures, so I may hit you up
#167 - Hm, so why not move to a more tolerant country? Such as, indee…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy 0
User avatar #694 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/07/2015) [-]
It's often very hard for immigrants to get decent jobs in Canada since most businesses opt to hire only Canadians unless they absolutely can not find one to fill the position. Then and only then will they normally consider hiring a foreigner. Plus, somebody shouldn't have to leave their home just to be treated like a human being.
#166 - So the discomfort of lying is greater than the discomfort of b…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy -2
User avatar #171 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
It actually is wore than being in the situation I am now. Hiding myself is painful in a way. And I may be kinda homeless, but I've got a job, great friends, and I've got the hormones even started losing body hair and growing tits already and I am living as a woman every day. By being me, I enjoy life now more than I did under my parent's roof. I could have continued to hide it; I am a very emotionally strong person that is able to endure so much, but I chose to open up to them, and I don't regret that decision in the slightest. The only thing I regret is hiding it as long as I did
User avatar #175 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Hm.

Well then, as long as it suits you, I support your decision and believe you are making the right ones. I can only hope you get your own place soon.
User avatar #179 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I'm working on that part. Finding something in budget is difficult, but honestly, for the time being, I love living where I do, even if it's on the floor and has to be temporary. Fantastic, loving people that have never asked for a single thing from me..though I am too grateful/generous to not throw help their way when I know they're struggling
User avatar #181 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Bah. Everyone struggles. My own regret is that I cannot help them. Are you sure you will be well? And find a place soon?
User avatar #183 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I will certainly be well and hopefully I will find a place soon. Thank you for your concern
User avatar #185 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Good. As said if you put a few of my comments together, I live in Kamloops British Columbia in Canada; I have a room you could rent very cheaply and jobs I could pull favours to give you. If you ever require a change of scenery or to get out of a bad environment, just hit me up on here and we'll work it out.
User avatar #492 - Conquistador (05/07/2015) [-]
Wanting the tranny D I see.
User avatar #187 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
Why thank you dear. Coincidentally enough, my sister lives around there haha it'd be neat to be near her again, though I do love living in colorado and the people I know here, but desperate times call for desperate measures, so I may hit you up
#157 - Can you bring up a citation for that? I hail from Canada, for …  [+] (4 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy 0
User avatar #167 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Hm, so why not move to a more tolerant country? Such as, indeed, Canada. Hell, I would be happy to set you up with a few jobs and a place to stay if you needed them.
User avatar #694 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/07/2015) [-]
It's often very hard for immigrants to get decent jobs in Canada since most businesses opt to hire only Canadians unless they absolutely can not find one to fill the position. Then and only then will they normally consider hiring a foreigner. Plus, somebody shouldn't have to leave their home just to be treated like a human being.
#163 - phoenixactual (05/06/2015) [-]
The map about halfway down the page is pretty decent. Bearing in mind, in the states that have protections in state and federal offices only, your workplace can still fire you. Also, in states without protections, you can actually be discriminated against in housing, too, so trans people have to worry in some places about losing their homes entirely, just because their landlord disagrees with it.
#156 - It's good that you found somewhere to stay, though I wish it w…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy 0
User avatar #161 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
Well I didn't so much tell them as my mom found girl clothes in my bathroom and she kept pestering me about why my ex left me, but when she asked me what that was about, I honestly told her, dishonesty makes me feel like shit and hiding it was already awful enough. I knew my parents were bigots and what would happen if they knew, but I cannot go my whole life hiding it from them and eventually needing to remove myself from them completely since I'll clearly have become a woman. If I do that, I am guaranteed to lose my family forever. By being open with them about, I maintain the chance that down the road they will accept me as their child, and I get to be me 24/7 without fear of discovery since everyone knows
User avatar #166 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
So the discomfort of lying is greater than the discomfort of being homeless? I admire your heart, but that doesn't make you any less of an idiot.

You shouldn't have even gotten the girls clothes, but just saved everything for when you were out and stable; now it's going to be even LONGER before you can enjoy life the way you desire. You realize that, don't you? This is one of those scenarios where will-power and hindsight would be best; I recommend you remember that for the next occasion you need them.
User avatar #171 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
It actually is wore than being in the situation I am now. Hiding myself is painful in a way. And I may be kinda homeless, but I've got a job, great friends, and I've got the hormones even started losing body hair and growing tits already and I am living as a woman every day. By being me, I enjoy life now more than I did under my parent's roof. I could have continued to hide it; I am a very emotionally strong person that is able to endure so much, but I chose to open up to them, and I don't regret that decision in the slightest. The only thing I regret is hiding it as long as I did
User avatar #175 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Hm.

Well then, as long as it suits you, I support your decision and believe you are making the right ones. I can only hope you get your own place soon.
User avatar #179 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I'm working on that part. Finding something in budget is difficult, but honestly, for the time being, I love living where I do, even if it's on the floor and has to be temporary. Fantastic, loving people that have never asked for a single thing from me..though I am too grateful/generous to not throw help their way when I know they're struggling
User avatar #181 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Bah. Everyone struggles. My own regret is that I cannot help them. Are you sure you will be well? And find a place soon?
User avatar #183 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I will certainly be well and hopefully I will find a place soon. Thank you for your concern
User avatar #185 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Good. As said if you put a few of my comments together, I live in Kamloops British Columbia in Canada; I have a room you could rent very cheaply and jobs I could pull favours to give you. If you ever require a change of scenery or to get out of a bad environment, just hit me up on here and we'll work it out.
User avatar #492 - Conquistador (05/07/2015) [-]
Wanting the tranny D I see.
User avatar #187 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
Why thank you dear. Coincidentally enough, my sister lives around there haha it'd be neat to be near her again, though I do love living in colorado and the people I know here, but desperate times call for desperate measures, so I may hit you up
#152 - Eh, adult males are easily have the highest rate of homelessne… 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy 0
#146 - How? What laws or rules state they can do that?  [+] (5 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy +1
#325 - commanderphoenix (05/07/2015) [-]
you do know corporations can fire you for what ever the fuck they want right? gif related given the context of this
User avatar #326 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
Not that I've ever heard of. At least in Canada, they would actually need a reason related to your performance or their lack of supplies.
User avatar #329 - commanderphoenix (05/07/2015) [-]
ow i see Canada well in America they can do that
User avatar #488 - Conquistador (05/07/2015) [-]
I've never heard of that either. I thought most of the US has adopted liberal hiring policies.
User avatar #696 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/07/2015) [-]
>>#164,
#141 - That goes for you too! What kind of people do you live with th…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy 0
User avatar #153 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
It was my family that tossed me out and made me homeless. I was pretty quickly able to find somewhere and have been sleeping on the floor at my best friend's apartment ever since haha
User avatar #156 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
It's good that you found somewhere to stay, though I wish it was somewhere other than a floor. But if you feared your family would be so unsupportive, why tell them at all? Surely you gauged the waters and what their reaction might be beforehand, right?
User avatar #161 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
Well I didn't so much tell them as my mom found girl clothes in my bathroom and she kept pestering me about why my ex left me, but when she asked me what that was about, I honestly told her, dishonesty makes me feel like shit and hiding it was already awful enough. I knew my parents were bigots and what would happen if they knew, but I cannot go my whole life hiding it from them and eventually needing to remove myself from them completely since I'll clearly have become a woman. If I do that, I am guaranteed to lose my family forever. By being open with them about, I maintain the chance that down the road they will accept me as their child, and I get to be me 24/7 without fear of discovery since everyone knows
User avatar #166 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
So the discomfort of lying is greater than the discomfort of being homeless? I admire your heart, but that doesn't make you any less of an idiot.

You shouldn't have even gotten the girls clothes, but just saved everything for when you were out and stable; now it's going to be even LONGER before you can enjoy life the way you desire. You realize that, don't you? This is one of those scenarios where will-power and hindsight would be best; I recommend you remember that for the next occasion you need them.
User avatar #171 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
It actually is wore than being in the situation I am now. Hiding myself is painful in a way. And I may be kinda homeless, but I've got a job, great friends, and I've got the hormones even started losing body hair and growing tits already and I am living as a woman every day. By being me, I enjoy life now more than I did under my parent's roof. I could have continued to hide it; I am a very emotionally strong person that is able to endure so much, but I chose to open up to them, and I don't regret that decision in the slightest. The only thing I regret is hiding it as long as I did
User avatar #175 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Hm.

Well then, as long as it suits you, I support your decision and believe you are making the right ones. I can only hope you get your own place soon.
User avatar #179 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I'm working on that part. Finding something in budget is difficult, but honestly, for the time being, I love living where I do, even if it's on the floor and has to be temporary. Fantastic, loving people that have never asked for a single thing from me..though I am too grateful/generous to not throw help their way when I know they're struggling
User avatar #181 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Bah. Everyone struggles. My own regret is that I cannot help them. Are you sure you will be well? And find a place soon?
User avatar #183 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
I will certainly be well and hopefully I will find a place soon. Thank you for your concern
User avatar #185 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Good. As said if you put a few of my comments together, I live in Kamloops British Columbia in Canada; I have a room you could rent very cheaply and jobs I could pull favours to give you. If you ever require a change of scenery or to get out of a bad environment, just hit me up on here and we'll work it out.
User avatar #492 - Conquistador (05/07/2015) [-]
Wanting the tranny D I see.
User avatar #187 - whiterabit (05/06/2015) [-]
Why thank you dear. Coincidentally enough, my sister lives around there haha it'd be neat to be near her again, though I do love living in colorado and the people I know here, but desperate times call for desperate measures, so I may hit you up
#147 - phoenixactual (05/06/2015) [-]
Well, if recent LGBT homeless youth numbers are to be believed, a lot of parents out there seem to think it's a valid reason to disown the child that depends on you for everything
#154 - phoenixactual (05/06/2015) [-]
Dude, where do you live? Trans employment discrimination is legal in most of the US, and there's no federal law preventing it. Why? Because every time we try to get equal protections, the naysayers say we don't deserve to be treated equally to other humans
User avatar #157 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Can you bring up a citation for that? I hail from Canada, for the record. Nice place. Quite cold. Lots of bears.
User avatar #167 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Hm, so why not move to a more tolerant country? Such as, indeed, Canada. Hell, I would be happy to set you up with a few jobs and a place to stay if you needed them.
User avatar #694 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/07/2015) [-]
It's often very hard for immigrants to get decent jobs in Canada since most businesses opt to hire only Canadians unless they absolutely can not find one to fill the position. Then and only then will they normally consider hiring a foreigner. Plus, somebody shouldn't have to leave their home just to be treated like a human being.
#163 - phoenixactual (05/06/2015) [-]
The map about halfway down the page is pretty decent. Bearing in mind, in the states that have protections in state and federal offices only, your workplace can still fire you. Also, in states without protections, you can actually be discriminated against in housing, too, so trans people have to worry in some places about losing their homes entirely, just because their landlord disagrees with it.
User avatar #152 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
Eh, adult males are easily have the highest rate of homelessness, and also the least amount of support centers. Indeed, women, children, and LGBT have the most.

And I don't get that myself. If your family is so bigoted or vile that you feel like they would disown you for being whatever, why even tell them at all? Why not keep it to yourself until you're out of there?
#138 - What the hell kind of people do you live with that make you go…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Degeneracy +2
User avatar #504 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
im a trans man
my mother accepted me as trans thinking it was just a phase or trend
when i started wanting HRT she kicked me out of the house even when i said i would pay for it all
she calls me "the cuntboy"
User avatar #505 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
When did you come out to her?
User avatar #506 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
last year in October
User avatar #507 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
What I mean to say is, how old were you? As it seems quite strange for her to think a grown person would be going through a phase.

Did she not display this type of behaviour before?

Likewise, why did you have to come out to her? Why not keep it to yourself until you were sure of your safety and well being?
User avatar #508 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
i was 17
when i came out she said "oh i thought so"
i was never a girly girl always a tomboy
as a kid i never understood why there was a difference
as i got older and learned what made a woman and what made a man
i grew to deeply hate the feminine side

i came out to her because i was offered to go on a LGBT panel to talk trans topics
but i couldnt of been on TV and not out to my mother
User avatar #511 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
Hm, and now you have no place to go and live in a hostile environment?
User avatar #512 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
i was homeless for a while
now i have my own apartment
i work in a gay bar to pay my rent and school
User avatar #513 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
Well I'm glad you're doing well, at least; and certainly hope you're enjoying life as you want to. You have all my sympathy and support, I just wish you got the same from someone more important to you.
User avatar #515 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
you are more important to me than my mother at the moment
all of these comments are
i see the opinions very mixed
i have to realize that there still are bigots here
i have to remember that even though i have a beard some will call me she if i say im trans
i have to remember that there are people who think its somehow a hassle to call me he
i have to remember that there are people who are so self righteous that they think that they need to express their hate for me even though they never met me
User avatar #516 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
Unfortunately there will always be people like that. The only thing I can really suggest is only telling your partners that you're Transsexual for obvious reasons and leaving everyone else in the dark.

If you had to keep one thing in mind, it would just be that someone would always find a reason to hate you regardless of who you were; and the best way to 'win' is to speak about your experiences, get more of the public in on it, and enjoy living.

You'll be fine, old boy; I'm sure of it.
User avatar #517 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
i tell all my potential mates im trans straight up
User avatar #519 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
Wonderful.
User avatar #520 - evilanakie (05/07/2015) [-]
its the only straight thing about me ;)
#143 - phoenixactual (05/06/2015) [-]
Funny how hard it is to make rent when your work can and does fire you purely for being trans, isn't it?
User avatar #146 - captainfuckitall (05/06/2015) [-]
How? What laws or rules state they can do that?
#325 - commanderphoenix (05/07/2015) [-]
you do know corporations can fire you for what ever the fuck they want right? gif related given the context of this
User avatar #326 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2015) [-]
Not that I've ever heard of. At least in Canada, they would actually need a reason related to your performance or their lack of supplies.
User avatar #329 - commanderphoenix (05/07/2015) [-]
ow i see Canada well in America they can do that
User avatar #488 - Conquistador (05/07/2015) [-]
I've never heard of that either. I thought most of the US has adopted liberal hiring policies.
User avatar #696 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/07/2015) [-]
>>#164,
#21 - I actually really sympathized with Ultron as a villain and as …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/06/2015 on I knew Tumblr would be our... +19
User avatar #118 - hwaraam (05/06/2015) [-]
I think that's actually human. Villains usually are that because they take the hidden inner human desire and exteriorize them, whereas heroes are just there to be ''the good guys'' and protect grannies and puppies.
#80 - I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove t…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #81 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#78 - Well they were 'convinced'. The happenings in the book have be…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #79 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
An imprint is evidence of something
Not ghosts. Not elephants. You have to actually determine what caused the imprint. That's why it's useless as evidence for anything other than itself.

And I'll be right in doing so.
If you can prove it, great. I'll accept that ghosts are real, and I'll be right in doing so.
User avatar #80 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove there's more credit behind the paranormal than many people want to admit.
User avatar #81 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#76 - The book is actually quite famous for convincing many skeptics…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #77 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Sure.
Go on youtube and search for "Islam skeptics" and you'll find hundreds of videos that show a skeptic being convinced that Islam is the one true religion.
This doesn't mean shit.

When you convince the scientific community, then you can talk about proper evidence.
Until then, nah. Your evidence is shit.
User avatar #78 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Well they were 'convinced'. The happenings in the book have been examined and no probable cause was found; so they just put it on the backburner and it's been there ever since.

They can't conclude 'dem ghosts gone dun it!' because we don't have the materials required to measure such things, but only the imprint, which is literally what you asked for, remember? "An invisible elephant still leaves a footprint".

The issue is that, no matter what anyone finds or what the scientific community says, it will not be concluded because we don't have the right tools. Until we do, it will always just be "strange happenings" that you will brush off.
User avatar #79 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
An imprint is evidence of something
Not ghosts. Not elephants. You have to actually determine what caused the imprint. That's why it's useless as evidence for anything other than itself.

And I'll be right in doing so.
If you can prove it, great. I'll accept that ghosts are real, and I'll be right in doing so.
User avatar #80 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove there's more credit behind the paranormal than many people want to admit.
User avatar #81 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#74 - Okay, so what you're telling me now is that you want evidence,…  [+] (7 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #75 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
It must be sufficient evidence to convince a skeptic.
Anything less is pointless.

Anecdotal evidence and argumentation is simply not enough.
If this is a physical phenomenon, it leaves physical traces ---> evidence.
Such things have not been found despite rigorous searching.

Absence of evidence when evidence should be present, is evidence of absence
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
The book is actually quite famous for convincing many skeptics and is, in fact, on the 'must read' list of non-fiction.

Though some are harder to convince than others I suppose.
User avatar #77 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Sure.
Go on youtube and search for "Islam skeptics" and you'll find hundreds of videos that show a skeptic being convinced that Islam is the one true religion.
This doesn't mean shit.

When you convince the scientific community, then you can talk about proper evidence.
Until then, nah. Your evidence is shit.
User avatar #78 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Well they were 'convinced'. The happenings in the book have been examined and no probable cause was found; so they just put it on the backburner and it's been there ever since.

They can't conclude 'dem ghosts gone dun it!' because we don't have the materials required to measure such things, but only the imprint, which is literally what you asked for, remember? "An invisible elephant still leaves a footprint".

The issue is that, no matter what anyone finds or what the scientific community says, it will not be concluded because we don't have the right tools. Until we do, it will always just be "strange happenings" that you will brush off.
User avatar #79 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
An imprint is evidence of something
Not ghosts. Not elephants. You have to actually determine what caused the imprint. That's why it's useless as evidence for anything other than itself.

And I'll be right in doing so.
If you can prove it, great. I'll accept that ghosts are real, and I'll be right in doing so.
User avatar #80 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove there's more credit behind the paranormal than many people want to admit.
User avatar #81 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#72 - 14 hours actually, the part you're listening to is just the fi… 05/05/2015 on Science 0
#68 - That's fine, I figured you were 'done' when you asked for evid… 05/05/2015 on Science 0
#67 - Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks… 05/05/2015 on Science 0
#64 - BECAUSE I read it, I would know you'd barely be past the intro…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #69 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Hey, ghosts would be fucking cool
It'd be a world-changing discovery.
We're talking Nobel Prize shit.
And yet, nobody has managed to produce so much as a proper indication that there's actually something there.

It's like the Loch Ness Monster.
Several decades.
No bodies.
Nothing other than hearsay and shitty pictures.

There's no fucking Loch Ness Monster.
Find it? Fucking awesome. Why the fuck was there not even a shred of evidence of its existence?


I would love it if the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, etc was real.
But it just doesn't seem like they are. And people have had a lot of time to prove their case.
#63 - No. If the word 'supernatural' is all you're concerned about, …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #65 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
still not getting my point...
"supernatural means what isnt measured" my rocks arent measured, they must be supernatural then by that definition correct? i agreed with this, but then you turn around and bring ghosts into the discussion like i wouldnt notice.
this is what happens when you have a poor definition, we cant even begin to argue whether something is real or not until you fully define your terms.

what is a "ghost" and what relation does it have with the term "supernatural"?
User avatar #67 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks, and how they are formed. When I say measure I'm not talking about putting a tape measurer to it. I thought someone so caught up on semantics as you would know that.

Well, I can't really say, because my evidence is anecdotal and I am not a peer reviewed scientist. Are you willing to take my word for it? If not, it doesn't matter.
#62 - Yet you don't have to, I put one right in front of you and you…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #70 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Seven hours
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
14 hours actually, the part you're listening to is just the first half.

I told you, it has a LOT of proof. They're just inconclusive, yet are so fantastical that only the most precise natural phenomena could have made them.
#66 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
...youre kidding?
please disregard my previous comment, im done here.
User avatar #68 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
That's fine, I figured you were 'done' when you asked for evidence and I gave you exactly what you asked for only for you to split hairs about why it's not good enough.

Is it the "wikipedia" thing? Editing articles and all that? Because if the article was in favour of your argument I'm sure you'd be more than happy to accept it at face value. Reviews at Amazon? Obviously you haven't looked up a scientific book before, as half a review goes entirely toward the credibility of the book and author, as the comments here do now.
#58 - Don't know, but I do know it actually covers that in the intro…  [+] (7 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #61 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
exactly, so if its unsolved, we dont know what happened and claiming the supernatural did it is, well, you seeing the problem yet?
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
No. If the word 'supernatural' is all you're concerned about, this debate could be solved with a simple sentence:

"Supernatural does not exist. It is just a word we use to describe what we are currently unable to measure. Ghosts are supernatural, but they will not be once we find the principles behind them"

See? Now you don't need to fret over semantics. You can read the book now.
User avatar #65 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
still not getting my point...
"supernatural means what isnt measured" my rocks arent measured, they must be supernatural then by that definition correct? i agreed with this, but then you turn around and bring ghosts into the discussion like i wouldnt notice.
this is what happens when you have a poor definition, we cant even begin to argue whether something is real or not until you fully define your terms.

what is a "ghost" and what relation does it have with the term "supernatural"?
User avatar #67 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks, and how they are formed. When I say measure I'm not talking about putting a tape measurer to it. I thought someone so caught up on semantics as you would know that.

Well, I can't really say, because my evidence is anecdotal and I am not a peer reviewed scientist. Are you willing to take my word for it? If not, it doesn't matter.
User avatar #60 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Some scientific paper
"We don't know shit. Maybe nothing even happened, lol"
User avatar #64 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
BECAUSE I read it, I would know you'd barely be past the introduction. It's quite a long book, and I know for a fact you would have postponed quite a bit before even clicking the link.

You're not fooling anyone.

As I said: If you don't want to be proven wrong, just say so next time. I only gave it to you because it seemed like you genuinely wanted proof.
User avatar #69 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Hey, ghosts would be fucking cool
It'd be a world-changing discovery.
We're talking Nobel Prize shit.
And yet, nobody has managed to produce so much as a proper indication that there's actually something there.

It's like the Loch Ness Monster.
Several decades.
No bodies.
Nothing other than hearsay and shitty pictures.

There's no fucking Loch Ness Monster.
Find it? Fucking awesome. Why the fuck was there not even a shred of evidence of its existence?


I would love it if the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, etc was real.
But it just doesn't seem like they are. And people have had a lot of time to prove their case.
#57 - Unknown, it's been a year or so since I read it and its a very…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #59 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
If I read through every occult/paranormal "book" out there, I'd have to devote my life to it.

But I'll put it to you simple.
If this book was a proper scientific paper (it isn't), and it had proper evidence (it doesn't), then mainstream science would accept that ghosts are real.

I still don't think you're serious, by the way.
User avatar #62 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet you don't have to, I put one right in front of you and you still refused.

And did you actually check or are you just saying that? It's very hard to tell with you; see, because:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_the_Damned

There's no criticism against it.

www.amazon.com/The-Book-Damned-Charles-Fort/dp/1596050276

Has positive reviews, none of which question its authenticity.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Fort

And the man himself is a credited researcher.

You can 'not think I'm serious' all you please, but lying to others, and most of all yourself, about what you're really looking for is a waste of time. Next time, just admit you want to stick to your mindset and don't WANT to be proven wrong or gain a new insight, and I will leave you be.
User avatar #70 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Seven hours
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
14 hours actually, the part you're listening to is just the first half.

I told you, it has a LOT of proof. They're just inconclusive, yet are so fantastical that only the most precise natural phenomena could have made them.
#66 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
...youre kidding?
please disregard my previous comment, im done here.
User avatar #68 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
That's fine, I figured you were 'done' when you asked for evidence and I gave you exactly what you asked for only for you to split hairs about why it's not good enough.

Is it the "wikipedia" thing? Editing articles and all that? Because if the article was in favour of your argument I'm sure you'd be more than happy to accept it at face value. Reviews at Amazon? Obviously you haven't looked up a scientific book before, as half a review goes entirely toward the credibility of the book and author, as the comments here do now.
#54 - But that's exactly what it is. If either of you bothered so mu…  [+] (17 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #56 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
and just like in our conversation, if its as genuine as you say it is, wheres the approval rating? why hasnt the majority of the scientific community accepted it yet?
User avatar #58 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Don't know, but I do know it actually covers that in the introduction (as well as the name). If memory serves me well it's just because the cases were unsolved and nobody could tell how these scenarios happened, so they just put them on a backburner as there wasn't enough evidence to tell of the origins.
User avatar #61 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
exactly, so if its unsolved, we dont know what happened and claiming the supernatural did it is, well, you seeing the problem yet?
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
No. If the word 'supernatural' is all you're concerned about, this debate could be solved with a simple sentence:

"Supernatural does not exist. It is just a word we use to describe what we are currently unable to measure. Ghosts are supernatural, but they will not be once we find the principles behind them"

See? Now you don't need to fret over semantics. You can read the book now.
User avatar #65 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
still not getting my point...
"supernatural means what isnt measured" my rocks arent measured, they must be supernatural then by that definition correct? i agreed with this, but then you turn around and bring ghosts into the discussion like i wouldnt notice.
this is what happens when you have a poor definition, we cant even begin to argue whether something is real or not until you fully define your terms.

what is a "ghost" and what relation does it have with the term "supernatural"?
User avatar #67 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks, and how they are formed. When I say measure I'm not talking about putting a tape measurer to it. I thought someone so caught up on semantics as you would know that.

Well, I can't really say, because my evidence is anecdotal and I am not a peer reviewed scientist. Are you willing to take my word for it? If not, it doesn't matter.
User avatar #60 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Some scientific paper
"We don't know shit. Maybe nothing even happened, lol"
User avatar #64 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
BECAUSE I read it, I would know you'd barely be past the introduction. It's quite a long book, and I know for a fact you would have postponed quite a bit before even clicking the link.

You're not fooling anyone.

As I said: If you don't want to be proven wrong, just say so next time. I only gave it to you because it seemed like you genuinely wanted proof.
User avatar #69 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Hey, ghosts would be fucking cool
It'd be a world-changing discovery.
We're talking Nobel Prize shit.
And yet, nobody has managed to produce so much as a proper indication that there's actually something there.

It's like the Loch Ness Monster.
Several decades.
No bodies.
Nothing other than hearsay and shitty pictures.

There's no fucking Loch Ness Monster.
Find it? Fucking awesome. Why the fuck was there not even a shred of evidence of its existence?


I would love it if the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, etc was real.
But it just doesn't seem like they are. And people have had a lot of time to prove their case.
User avatar #55 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Sure it is.

Which journal was this published in?
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Unknown, it's been a year or so since I read it and its a very large book; but, if you really want that evidence as much as you desire, you should have no problem spending 14 hours of your life sifting through it and learning something and gaining a new view. Or hell, you could even look it up on google.

You asked, I provided, now you're refusing to look. What does that say about you, I wonder?
User avatar #59 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
If I read through every occult/paranormal "book" out there, I'd have to devote my life to it.

But I'll put it to you simple.
If this book was a proper scientific paper (it isn't), and it had proper evidence (it doesn't), then mainstream science would accept that ghosts are real.

I still don't think you're serious, by the way.
User avatar #62 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet you don't have to, I put one right in front of you and you still refused.

And did you actually check or are you just saying that? It's very hard to tell with you; see, because:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_the_Damned

There's no criticism against it.

www.amazon.com/The-Book-Damned-Charles-Fort/dp/1596050276

Has positive reviews, none of which question its authenticity.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Fort

And the man himself is a credited researcher.

You can 'not think I'm serious' all you please, but lying to others, and most of all yourself, about what you're really looking for is a waste of time. Next time, just admit you want to stick to your mindset and don't WANT to be proven wrong or gain a new insight, and I will leave you be.
User avatar #70 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Seven hours
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
14 hours actually, the part you're listening to is just the first half.

I told you, it has a LOT of proof. They're just inconclusive, yet are so fantastical that only the most precise natural phenomena could have made them.
#66 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
...youre kidding?
please disregard my previous comment, im done here.
User avatar #68 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
That's fine, I figured you were 'done' when you asked for evidence and I gave you exactly what you asked for only for you to split hairs about why it's not good enough.

Is it the "wikipedia" thing? Editing articles and all that? Because if the article was in favour of your argument I'm sure you'd be more than happy to accept it at face value. Reviews at Amazon? Obviously you haven't looked up a scientific book before, as half a review goes entirely toward the credibility of the book and author, as the comments here do now.
#32 - winglift is right. We're even taught to disobey unlawful order… 05/05/2015 on I smell toast +6
#51 - You see? I give you evidence, a MASSIVE book containing docume…  [+] (19 new replies) 05/05/2015 on Science 0
User avatar #53 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
kinda budding off our argument but hes got a point, anyone writing a book can put whatever they want in it. theres a thing called a scientific journal with citations for this reason, thats probably what he was asking for.
User avatar #54 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
But that's exactly what it is. If either of you bothered so much to look it up or listen, you'd know that. It is a genuine, scientific journal, of compiled evidence regarding borderline paranormal phenomena. It HAS citations, dates, times, witnesses, testimonies, samples (when available), everything.

See, this is what I mean: Now it's not so much a matter of finding you both proof, as you guys simply not wanting to change your views.
User avatar #56 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
and just like in our conversation, if its as genuine as you say it is, wheres the approval rating? why hasnt the majority of the scientific community accepted it yet?
User avatar #58 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Don't know, but I do know it actually covers that in the introduction (as well as the name). If memory serves me well it's just because the cases were unsolved and nobody could tell how these scenarios happened, so they just put them on a backburner as there wasn't enough evidence to tell of the origins.
User avatar #61 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
exactly, so if its unsolved, we dont know what happened and claiming the supernatural did it is, well, you seeing the problem yet?
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
No. If the word 'supernatural' is all you're concerned about, this debate could be solved with a simple sentence:

"Supernatural does not exist. It is just a word we use to describe what we are currently unable to measure. Ghosts are supernatural, but they will not be once we find the principles behind them"

See? Now you don't need to fret over semantics. You can read the book now.
User avatar #65 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
still not getting my point...
"supernatural means what isnt measured" my rocks arent measured, they must be supernatural then by that definition correct? i agreed with this, but then you turn around and bring ghosts into the discussion like i wouldnt notice.
this is what happens when you have a poor definition, we cant even begin to argue whether something is real or not until you fully define your terms.

what is a "ghost" and what relation does it have with the term "supernatural"?
User avatar #67 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks, and how they are formed. When I say measure I'm not talking about putting a tape measurer to it. I thought someone so caught up on semantics as you would know that.

Well, I can't really say, because my evidence is anecdotal and I am not a peer reviewed scientist. Are you willing to take my word for it? If not, it doesn't matter.
User avatar #60 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Some scientific paper
"We don't know shit. Maybe nothing even happened, lol"
User avatar #64 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
BECAUSE I read it, I would know you'd barely be past the introduction. It's quite a long book, and I know for a fact you would have postponed quite a bit before even clicking the link.

You're not fooling anyone.

As I said: If you don't want to be proven wrong, just say so next time. I only gave it to you because it seemed like you genuinely wanted proof.
User avatar #69 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Hey, ghosts would be fucking cool
It'd be a world-changing discovery.
We're talking Nobel Prize shit.
And yet, nobody has managed to produce so much as a proper indication that there's actually something there.

It's like the Loch Ness Monster.
Several decades.
No bodies.
Nothing other than hearsay and shitty pictures.

There's no fucking Loch Ness Monster.
Find it? Fucking awesome. Why the fuck was there not even a shred of evidence of its existence?


I would love it if the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, etc was real.
But it just doesn't seem like they are. And people have had a lot of time to prove their case.
User avatar #55 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Sure it is.

Which journal was this published in?
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Unknown, it's been a year or so since I read it and its a very large book; but, if you really want that evidence as much as you desire, you should have no problem spending 14 hours of your life sifting through it and learning something and gaining a new view. Or hell, you could even look it up on google.

You asked, I provided, now you're refusing to look. What does that say about you, I wonder?
User avatar #59 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
If I read through every occult/paranormal "book" out there, I'd have to devote my life to it.

But I'll put it to you simple.
If this book was a proper scientific paper (it isn't), and it had proper evidence (it doesn't), then mainstream science would accept that ghosts are real.

I still don't think you're serious, by the way.
User avatar #62 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
Yet you don't have to, I put one right in front of you and you still refused.

And did you actually check or are you just saying that? It's very hard to tell with you; see, because:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_the_Damned

There's no criticism against it.

www.amazon.com/The-Book-Damned-Charles-Fort/dp/1596050276

Has positive reviews, none of which question its authenticity.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Fort

And the man himself is a credited researcher.

You can 'not think I'm serious' all you please, but lying to others, and most of all yourself, about what you're really looking for is a waste of time. Next time, just admit you want to stick to your mindset and don't WANT to be proven wrong or gain a new insight, and I will leave you be.
User avatar #70 - testaburger (05/05/2015) [-]
Seven hours
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
14 hours actually, the part you're listening to is just the first half.

I told you, it has a LOT of proof. They're just inconclusive, yet are so fantastical that only the most precise natural phenomena could have made them.
#66 - rakogoki (05/05/2015) [-]
...youre kidding?
please disregard my previous comment, im done here.
User avatar #68 - captainfuckitall (05/05/2015) [-]
That's fine, I figured you were 'done' when you asked for evidence and I gave you exactly what you asked for only for you to split hairs about why it's not good enough.

Is it the "wikipedia" thing? Editing articles and all that? Because if the article was in favour of your argument I'm sure you'd be more than happy to accept it at face value. Reviews at Amazon? Obviously you haven't looked up a scientific book before, as half a review goes entirely toward the credibility of the book and author, as the comments here do now.

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - Rascal (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - Rascal (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - Rascal (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)