x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#327
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 64396 total,  78954 ,  14558
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 17.19% (172/1000)
Level 357 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 358 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10923
Total Comments Made:17684
FJ Points:29404

latest user's comments

#27 - See comment #23 06/14/2014 on Feminism Quotes from Feminists -2
#26 - A really small percentage? Is that why over half of them have …  [+] (7 new replies) 06/14/2014 on Feminism Quotes from Feminists -1
User avatar #31 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
Yes. This is a really small percentage. Just because you see lots of propoganda like this doesn't make it true.

I live in Baltimore, a city with a 63.7 black population (even more if you count mixed people like myself.). Yes, to me it may SEEM like there are more black people in America than others think, but it would be foolish of me to say there are more black people in America because thats mostly what I see.

America is only 12.6% black.

The majority of feminism is not like this, these women in the quotes want equity, not equality.
User avatar #33 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand what I was saying. Many of these women quoted have been "The Face of Feminism" and have also been major contributors to the movement.

These are the people representing them.
User avatar #42 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
A lot of these women are now openly criticized for these quotes. And many of them are only famous and seen as ground breaking because many started writing about feminism in the 60's and 70's when feminism was still stigmatized as some thing to dislike and it was seen as revolutionary for women to write about men in such a way (we now see it as hateful, but at the time it was revolutionary none the less.). And also judging feminism as a whole based on these women is a great misrepresentation. Its like saying all atheists were as brash and crude as TheAmazingAtheist and making it purely based on him, and other more extremist YouTubers. And thats what I feel as if you're doing. You're only looking at these extremist feminists (or as some call them feminazis) and their supporters as feminism. When in fact they're barely known in our society. Emily Wilding Davison, Laura Bush, Malala Yousafzai. These are women that are more prominent in mainstream culture and do a great job of representing feminism.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
But it wouldn't be bad if most Atheists STOOD BEHIND TheAmazingAtheist and supported his rantings, then it WOULD be okay to judge them based on his speeches.

In any case, can you prove that these women are openly stigmatized or mocked by the common majority now? Rather than endorsed?
User avatar #100 - knackie (06/15/2014) [-]
I'm getting the stigmatized version of these people now.
User avatar #99 - knackie (06/15/2014) [-]
"But it wouldn't be bad if most Atheists STOOD BEHIND TheAmazingAtheist and supported his rantings, then it WOULD be okay to judge them based on his speeches."
Yes, THEM. NOT atheism as a whole. Because its clearly these people are a minority and clearly misrepresent what atheism is.
#25 - See comment #23 06/14/2014 on Feminism Quotes from Feminists -1
#24 - See comment #23  [+] (6 new replies) 06/14/2014 on Feminism Quotes from Feminists 0
User avatar #29 - crazyolitis (06/14/2014) [-]
I'm sujre there were also a lot of less extreme women who represented feminism. Also, this reminds me of the appeal to authority argument, but reversed, which is not exactly a good argument last time I checked.
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Are you telling me that viewing the people who represent a movement is NOT a good way to see what it's about? Are you kidding me right now?

I'm sure there are too, but the fact that these ones are openly endorsed says something.
User avatar #46 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
I'm telling you that viewing the worst EXTREMIST people as a representation of a movement is NOT a good way to see what its about.

Take for example: Christianity. I know you don't judge Christianity entirely on the acts of the Westboro Baptist Church. Why? Because thats only a small minority of Christians.

"but the fact that these ones are openly endorsed says something."
Al Qaeda was openly endorsed by Osama Bin Laden. Its just extremists backing extremists.
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Alright then, would you like to point me in the direction of Feminists, who also represent the whole movement, who truly believe in the 'equal' part? (stationed in first world countries, preferably)
User avatar #95 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
Betty Friedan
Rebecca Walker
Kathryn F. Clarenbach
Aileen Hernandez
Richard Alton Graham
Laura Bush.
User avatar #96 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Thank you, although I've never actually heard of these people, and I'm not sure how they've represented Feminism.
#23 - Actually it's a reasonable assumption, seeing as over half the…  [+] (18 new replies) 06/14/2014 on Feminism Quotes from Feminists -1
#65 - jakatackka (06/14/2014) [-]
Yeah, but not half of all people who represent feminism have been quoted. There's a huge fucking distinction. That's like saying half of all people in insane asylums are white, therefore half of all white people are insane. You'd have to be a jackass to think that makes sense.
User avatar #89 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
No, but if the majority of those in Asylums are white middle class males, I WOULD assume that white middle class males are the most prone to snapping under the pressure.
#51 - angelusprimus (06/14/2014) [-]
No, they represent a tiny group of radical lesbian feminists, almost exclusively american.
For example entire french feminist theory is completely different then american. And even in american feminism the people named here are a tiny minority that most feminist thinkers consider contraproductive.
They have represented RADICAL feminism.
That is like saying that Ron Paul represents Republican party in wanting smaller military, no interventions outside american borders and is for legalization of marijuana. He must be, because he is in the republican party. Or he represents tiny minority that gets lots of press because those views are more interesting to read about while wast majority believes in direct opposite.
User avatar #91 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Can you prove that? The difference between theory, I mean.
User avatar #30 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
This actually isn't. Its been shown that if FunnyJunk doesn't like something. They'll take the worst aspect of it and post it, repost it, and repost it multiple times until people honestly believe its the majority, when in reality its a very small minority. I'm a male feminist and I usually attend feminist meetings/rallies/events and its actually about equality for women. Because equality for women also means equality for men. Because its equal.

But if you haven't noticed. FunnyJunk's feminism hate circle jerk is dying down just like it usually does with any other thing FunnyJunk decides to hate for a while.
User avatar #34 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
You really don't seem to get it, do you?

These women represent Feminism. These women are spokespersons for it. Feminism as an ideology usually lies and pushes false statistics to get its way (the 1/4 women raped and the 75c to a mans $ are both bullshit that have been debunked numerous times).
User avatar #45 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
"1/4 of women raped"
_
I've actually never heard anyone say that. But:
"1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime. Among all victims, about nine out of ten are female."
(www.rccmsc.org/resources/get-the-facts.aspx)

_"75c to a mans $"

"When the Equal Pay Act was signed into law by President Kennedy in 1963, women were earning an average of 59 cents on the dollar compared to men. Today, women earn about 81 cents on the dollar compared to men — a gap that results in hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost wages. For African-American women and Latinas, the pay gap is even greater"
(www.dol.gov/equalpay/)
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
The problem with the first link is that they include "rapes gone unreported", which should technically be impossible to do and could vastly increase the amount of "rapes" to anything they desire.

The second post doesn't even include any links to these statistics...at all. It just includes blog spots and words.
User avatar #93 - knackie (06/14/2014) [-]
"Unreported rape" are rape cases that go unreported to the police, not unreported to anyone else or rapes that are reported be others and not directly from the victim.
But if you want another report then:
(www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0801.pdf)

The second one is fine. If you scroll down it says under "resources" multiple sources for the article.
User avatar #94 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Why would I EVER believe a rape claim that was NOT reported to the police? Why should I ever believe a rape claim where the accused was not found guilty? And you can call me lazy, but I'm not reading all that shit. If you like you can tell me what it says in a jist and I'll take your word for it, but otherwise no.

Those aren't sources, they're literally just more words backing up what the first few words are saying, no actual PROOF of their claims. Even the whitehouse website doesn't have any sources.
User avatar #98 - knackie (06/15/2014) [-]
www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0801.pdf

This is a link given in the resources. This is a .pdf file by the U. S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Justice Statistics the U.S.
Census Bureau, produced the tables and it gives you all the statistics and proof you want. It was linked under the resources.

"Why would I EVER believe a rape claim that was NOT reported to the police?
Why should I ever believe a rape claim where the accused was not found guilty?"

Because a lot of the time its done by friends or acquaintances who have easy access to the victims, thus the victim is reluctant to report out of fear of further violence. And also because some times rape cases that are brought to court are closed due to lack of evidence because the only way to prove someone was raped, is either through eye witness testimony or a rape kit, which I think you'd know why a rape kit is unappealing, and because physical assault marks (i.e. black eyes, bruises.) don't necessarily mean rape.

And no. I will not read this to you. This is why you have these views on feminism. Because you're too lazy to actually inform yourself about it. Rather, you let other people indoctrinate you with propaganda like this because its easier. And if you honestly can't be asked to inform yourself with evidence. Then you probably shouldn't be speaking about a group of people when you've just confessed to not wanting to actually learn about the issue they fight against.

User avatar #101 - captainfuckitall (06/15/2014) [-]
From the table of contents, it just talks about the type of victims and what they go through.

No, fuck you. I'm not going to believe anything that isn't proved just because someone wants to pull my heartstrings. I don't care how "Oh so scary" it is, if you want to be believed, you have to prove it.

Oh, oh dear me, I'm sorry, do you read 50 page PDFs on absolutely everything you know as well? Please forgive me, sir; I wasn't aware you were so knowledgeable. Please, tell me, if someone of my ignorance can be so bold as to speak to YOU, may you tell me all different types of fabric, their practical uses, time of discovery, cultivation, and practical innovation? I want to sew things, you see; and since I assume you know about Fabric, you've also studied absolutely everything about it to a T. Can you please inform me of these things sir?
User avatar #103 - knackie (06/15/2014) [-]
"From the table of contents, it just talks about the type of victims and what they go through."
You seriously did not read it, and yet you want to say its not evidence.

"No, fuck you. I'm not going to believe anything that isn't proved just because someone wants to pull my heartstrings. I don't care how "Oh so scary" it is, if you want to be believed, you have to prove it."

The .pdf I linked is one of the few that don't include unreported rape. This is an issue feminism is fighting against, we want women, AND men to report rape without fear of persecution.

"Oh, oh dear me, I'm sorry, do you read 50 page PDFs on absolutely everything you know as well? Please forgive me, sir; I wasn't aware you were so knowledgeable. Please, tell me, if someone of my ignorance can be so bold as to speak to YOU, may you tell me all different types of fabric, their practical uses, time of discovery, cultivation, and practical innovation? I want to sew things, you see; and since I assume you know about Fabric, you've also studied absolutely everything about it to a T. Can you please inform me of these things sir?"

No I don't and no I can't tell you about fabric. Why? Because I don't talk shit about fabric. The day I talk shit on fabric is the day I actually research fabric. Why? Because talking shit on something you don't know about, especially something you can't even be bothered to LEARN about, is stupid.


User avatar #104 - captainfuckitall (06/15/2014) [-]
I have no problem learning about things, but I don't like wasting my time, but simply getting to the facts. Have YOU even read the PDF?
User avatar #105 - knackie (06/15/2014) [-]
Yes. I have. Because I actually like to inform myself on the topics I'm talking about.
User avatar #106 - captainfuckitall (06/15/2014) [-]
Yet you can't give me the Jist of it? Interesting.
User avatar #107 - knackie (06/15/2014) [-]
I can give you the jist of it. I just refuse to. Because apparently you'll "take my word on it".
You know what? Sure, heres what the .pdf says:

Every female born is raped at birth. The .pdf says it, maybe. Just take my word on it.

The average man spends 2.7 years raping women. The .pdf says it, maybe. Just take my word on it.

The average women is raped 3 times per day. The .pdf says it, maybe. Just take my word on it.


This is how you got to this position, you don't want to actually inform yourself. You want others to inform you, so you can just "take their word on it" and blindly hate something for no good reason. Why? Because learning is hard and blind hate is easy.
User avatar #108 - captainfuckitall (06/15/2014) [-]
Okay.
#32 - People know what rape is, it's Feminists that constantly skew … 06/14/2014 on Facepalm breaks nose 0
#31 - Except that's still wrong. Even completely ignoring t…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/14/2014 on Facepalm breaks nose +1
User avatar #35 - gonzoen (06/14/2014) [-]
The ones you're talking about are called Radical Feminists, and are a fringe group, just as there are fringe groups in most political movements. These people are being ridiculed by mainstream feminists as well as others, as the majority of feminists are well aware that these idiots do nothing to help. I believe that you'd be hard pressed to find any political movement that doesn't have idiots. Have you ever gone off the internet and talked to real life feminists? I have, as I'm part of a group dedicated to exposing everyday sexism, and we meet about once a month. I assure you that none of the people I've met from that group are misandrists, and very few of the members of the online group have said anything hurtful about men.
User avatar #42 - malinko (06/14/2014) [-]
and before you say "but we do speak out against them! because i just said they are bad"
im sorry, but ive never seen any group within the feminist community actually do something about them. no campaign, no advertisement, no videos. no organization speeches about it. and no movement. however, feminists seem to be able to find the time for stupid shit like "ban bossy"

I find feminism completely devoid of logic, organization or any real goal aside from "omg equal rights for girls! girl power!" well, what do you consider equal rights? do you mean by law? because if that is the case, by las you have more rights then men. and when i say more rights and mean more laws are put in to place to protect women, and sometimes those laws fuck over men horribly. (divorce, child battles, rape cases, prison sentences. ect)

and i know for a fact you are going to mention equal pay for the same position. but, before you do, go look up the actual statistics on that insted of just the ones feminism focuses on.

so, if its not by law, do you want equal rights for women socially? cuz if so, you might as well pack up and good home. because in order to do that, you either have to change the opinion of everyone on the planet, or force them to. and in this country (usa) people have the freedom to be ignorant fucks. so good luck with that.
User avatar #41 - malinko (06/14/2014) [-]
well guess what. that fringe group has completely hijacked your image, and is now the face of modern feminism. they are the reason no one takes feminism seriously, and that fact that the so called "real" feminist are not doing anything about them gives off the image that they condone what they do and therefore are grouped along with them.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Indeed I have, and nearly all of them have held the same opinions as your minority. All of them (that I've met) believe that men are inherently oppressors and that there is a war against women, that women are oppressed even in the firstworld, and believe the bullshit propaganda usually spewed. I live in Canada too. Not many radicals on the average here.
User avatar #39 - gonzoen (06/14/2014) [-]
Ah, there's your problem: American feminists (and Canadian too, apparently).
Here in Denmark, radical feminists are the minority, and feminists fighting for actual equality are increasing in numbers. Last month, our museum of National History held a conference focused on feminism, both what it was and what it is, and what it might become in the future. There were several hundred feminists there, and I didn't hear any of them bitching about men, or saying that men are "inherently oppressors" or anything of the like. Those prejudices are seen as old-fashioned and unintelligent here in Denmark.
User avatar #45 - captainfuckitall (06/14/2014) [-]
Good for you guys.
#14 - Oh dear lords. 06/14/2014 on ooo that's... not kosher. +1
#4 - A much better quote, regarding this type of thing, is this: …  [+] (3 new replies) 06/14/2014 on not always true +70
#25 - Sarampintolas (06/14/2014) [-]
Here
User avatar #24 - Sarampintolas (06/14/2014) [-]
Hm.. that's a quote from a magic the gathering card
User avatar #10 - joeyliquid (06/14/2014) [-]
True. But motherfucker I'm going to play with the best toys before I die. Motherfucking duck toys.
#5 - You can immediately tell who the favourite child is.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/14/2014 on jus txtin +1
#7 - sulins (06/14/2014) [-]
that's because the boy is crying and the girl is like "okay, what now?"
#10 - Ah yes, teach all men not to commit crimes because one is igno…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/14/2014 on Facepalm breaks nose 0
User avatar #48 - nudybooty (06/15/2014) [-]
that's what I meant but I have poor wording, thank you
#7 - 1. Seeing as how most people aren't complete pieces of ***… 06/14/2014 on Facepalm breaks nose +4
#5 - And then someone mistakes it for a real dildo and the rubbing …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/14/2014 on best soap ive ever seen !! +1
User avatar #9 - Zeigh (06/14/2014) [-]
It would sting and burn like a mother fucker though.
#30 - So....Is anything else wondering why Kurt Godel didn't just co… 06/14/2014 on 100 Ways to Die #3 +1
#756 - Always. I'm willing to provide anything asked of me in order t…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/13/2014 on FJ Collab Comic +2
User avatar #757 - yuvesh (06/13/2014) [-]
cool, i dont know how far we got and what still needs to be done
i guess we should all read over the project so far and see what needs to be done next
#10 - Well I'm sure the victim doesn't disagree.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/13/2014 on Tumblr has a relationship 0
#12 - anon (06/13/2014) [-]
I don't think the victim really has an opinion
#2 - I'm pretty sure killing them would count as breaking up. Sorry…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/12/2014 on Tumblr has a relationship +4
#6 - anon (06/13/2014) [-]
I disagree. Sometimes people kill because they love the person so much that they want them to stay with them forever. So it's more like marriage, since they're gonna be stuck with them always
User avatar #10 - captainfuckitall (06/13/2014) [-]
Well I'm sure the victim doesn't disagree.
#12 - anon (06/13/2014) [-]
I don't think the victim really has an opinion
#10 - It's gonna be awful when more people start doing it. … 06/12/2014 on Slenderman Stabbings +1
#3 - That faggot dog doing that faggot look...  [+] (1 new reply) 06/12/2014 on SHOTGUN! +27
#13 - komandantmirkoo (06/12/2014) [-]
sup m8
#25 - For those of you wondering, the anime is just a Moe twist on H…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/12/2014 on Sword +1
#43 - fargfive (06/12/2014) [-]
I thought she was Cthugha?
#20 - I'll just go to a different universe. 06/11/2014 on Be careful what you wish for 0
#107 - You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed o… 06/11/2014 on - 0
#105 - That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#103 - And now you're just splitting hairs. People are diffe…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#100 - By like-minded individuals, yes. Not by the average person. …  [+] (6 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #102 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Implying that there is one type of average person instead of a large group of specific social circles?
User avatar #103 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
And now you're just splitting hairs.

People are different, but there's not so different that they cannot work in a cohesive society. Wanna know who cannot work in a cohesive society? People who are diseased, or disabled, or lack empathy toward their fellow man. And no matter how much you try to drill it in, none of these people will ever realize what they do is wrong.

What do you think would have happened if someone told Elliot that he was wrong? That he didn't deserve women and that he had to work for the privilege? Do you think he would have listened? Do you think all it would have taken is a "dude, stop" to make him look back and realize what a fool he was? He got to that position BECAUSE he never took blame or responsibility, and there was no way in hell that telling him anything would change his mind. Why are you so desperate to avoid that fact?
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Comments(509):

[ 509 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#517 - falloutsurvivor (07/12/2015) [-]
mfw using the bathroom after captain
#513 - anon (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anon (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anon (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
[ 509 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)