x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#329
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 64311 total,  78740 ,  14429
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 5.7% (57/1000)
Level 357 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 358 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10923
Total Comments Made:17627
FJ Points:29289

latest user's comments

#50 - Race, religion, ethnic pride, nationalism, ect. also teaches y… 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. +4
#48 - Not really. Military and conflict are kinda synonymous with ea… 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. 0
#47 - I plan to run for a political office in the future. I figure t…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. 0
User avatar #52 - rhetoricalfunny (07/28/2014) [-]
I don't really have much to say to that. I mean, it sounds alright I guess.

But speaking as a (future?) soldier, do you actually want to fight.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
Thank you.

Well that depends. Do I enjoy fighting? Yes, I would like to join a boxing gym, practice dueling, ect. Do I enjoy killing? I don't know yet. I WANT to fight because it'll give me more opportunities to rise through the ranks and achieve my ambitions sooner, so whether I dislike it or not is irrelevant
#37 - I know, I was just trying to assure you that I don't promote a…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. 0
User avatar #39 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
Come to america. most satanist-friendly country in the world, as far as ability to carry out most our beliefs lawfully.
#35 - I don't promote theft. I have never said I completely support …  [+] (3 new replies) 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. 0
User avatar #36 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I see what you mean but I wouldn't confuse rules and morality, although they cross paths often. Sadly a cultural shift would likely only come to fruition via international disaster, if you understand what I mean.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I know, I was just trying to assure you that I don't promote any type of criminal activity (Although there are many activities that ARE criminal that I would rather not be). Keep hoping; it has to happen sometime.
User avatar #39 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
Come to america. most satanist-friendly country in the world, as far as ability to carry out most our beliefs lawfully.
#25 - I am the Satanist guy, but I think I was misunderstood. What I…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. 0
User avatar #32 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I propose to you to think of 'might-makes-right' this way: the man who owns the wallet had the necessary ability to earn it for himself, in a righteous way. this makes him mightier.

You call yourself a satanist but clearly you are a misguided fool. A true satanist would never promote theft.
User avatar #35 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I don't promote theft. I have never said I completely support the philosophy of 'might-makes-right' (although I do think strength and righteousness must win out in the end, and TO that end, conflicting and testing your might to others is proper), I simply said it is probably the closest thing we'll get to an objective source of morality. He who is most mighty makes the rules, and might is based upon strength of arms. If it were my way, might would be based upon a combination of mind, body, skill, and ethics

You see?

Unfortunately for us, most of the world doesn't care about such things as honour or righteousness, and since we can't impose our thoughts upon them, the most we can do is act as they would against us (at least until a cultural shift takes place, which is exactly what I myself am working toward)
User avatar #36 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I see what you mean but I wouldn't confuse rules and morality, although they cross paths often. Sadly a cultural shift would likely only come to fruition via international disaster, if you understand what I mean.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I know, I was just trying to assure you that I don't promote any type of criminal activity (Although there are many activities that ARE criminal that I would rather not be). Keep hoping; it has to happen sometime.
User avatar #39 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
Come to america. most satanist-friendly country in the world, as far as ability to carry out most our beliefs lawfully.
#13 - Is there...umm...any type of source for..uh, this?  [+] (1 new reply) 07/28/2014 on slap dat bitch 0
#14 - anon (07/28/2014) [-]
The Secretary. Took me longer to write this comment than to just search for it.
#22 - How so? I'm in Canada, one of the most anti-military/…  [+] (15 new replies) 07/28/2014 on Problem Solved. +3
User avatar #63 - isenseven (07/28/2014) [-]
I live in Canada too.
What propaganda influences you? The ongoing stream of media and ideas that assure you that "they" are the enemy and "we" need to stop them. If you have ever talked to someone who returned from Iraq or Afghanistan, they would tell you that "the enemy" was barely an enemy at all.


Like I said, I am all for the military and I know that it's important to have one, but don't think that you're signing up on your own merit. You're signing up because it's been glorified through decades of media.
#45 - anon (07/28/2014) [-]
Because you want a fucking job that fits the way you want to live your life. Wanting to be in the army and wanting to "Fight" are completely different things.
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
Not really. Military and conflict are kinda synonymous with eachother.

In any case, I also WANT to fight, as fighting and throwing myself into conflict will provide me with the opportunities to rise through the ranks and achieve my ambitions faster.
#44 - anon (07/28/2014) [-]
We have a military o-o?

I just thought we kinda just ran into people and yelled sorry and people just felt bad .-.
User avatar #43 - rhetoricalfunny (07/28/2014) [-]
Why ARE you joining the military?
As a Canadian all I have ever been exposed to regarding our military is us sucking ourselves off on november 11th.

Like Canada has it's head so far up its own ass regarding military, I'd say even moreso than the US because of all the "holier than thou" peacekeeping bullshit which hasn't been relevant since Cyprus.

I just wanna know.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I plan to run for a political office in the future. I figure the military will give me the finances, supplies, connections, and record needed to go into such a profession without winding up in some bankers pocket.
User avatar #52 - rhetoricalfunny (07/28/2014) [-]
I don't really have much to say to that. I mean, it sounds alright I guess.

But speaking as a (future?) soldier, do you actually want to fight.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
Thank you.

Well that depends. Do I enjoy fighting? Yes, I would like to join a boxing gym, practice dueling, ect. Do I enjoy killing? I don't know yet. I WANT to fight because it'll give me more opportunities to rise through the ranks and achieve my ambitions sooner, so whether I dislike it or not is irrelevant
User avatar #24 - hudis (07/28/2014) [-]
Aren't you the satanist guy who doesn't believe people deserve mercy or some shit like that, or is that someone else
User avatar #25 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I am the Satanist guy, but I think I was misunderstood. What I said is that "might-makes-right" is the most objective source for morality there can be beyond "But I FEEL like...". If someone is capable of doing something, it is within their right to do it; for better or worse. However, they must also accept the consequences of their actions

For example. Someone could try to steal your wallet through a mugging, and you could defend yourself; after the fight is over, whoever has the wallet deserves it. If the mugger wanted it more, he should have been stronger; likewise, if you wanted to protect it, YOU should have been stronger (this is, of course, assuming both parties have equal opportunity in the fight. No guns or knives involved, but just strength and skill). That's all. Personally, I would not show mercy in a fight (or any type of conflict) because I would never want someone to show mercy toward me; that's probably where the misunderstanding came in.
User avatar #32 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I propose to you to think of 'might-makes-right' this way: the man who owns the wallet had the necessary ability to earn it for himself, in a righteous way. this makes him mightier.

You call yourself a satanist but clearly you are a misguided fool. A true satanist would never promote theft.
User avatar #35 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I don't promote theft. I have never said I completely support the philosophy of 'might-makes-right' (although I do think strength and righteousness must win out in the end, and TO that end, conflicting and testing your might to others is proper), I simply said it is probably the closest thing we'll get to an objective source of morality. He who is most mighty makes the rules, and might is based upon strength of arms. If it were my way, might would be based upon a combination of mind, body, skill, and ethics

You see?

Unfortunately for us, most of the world doesn't care about such things as honour or righteousness, and since we can't impose our thoughts upon them, the most we can do is act as they would against us (at least until a cultural shift takes place, which is exactly what I myself am working toward)
User avatar #36 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I see what you mean but I wouldn't confuse rules and morality, although they cross paths often. Sadly a cultural shift would likely only come to fruition via international disaster, if you understand what I mean.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I know, I was just trying to assure you that I don't promote any type of criminal activity (Although there are many activities that ARE criminal that I would rather not be). Keep hoping; it has to happen sometime.
User avatar #39 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
Come to america. most satanist-friendly country in the world, as far as ability to carry out most our beliefs lawfully.
#3 - Indeed, because there has never been a soldier who has conscio…  [+] (40 new replies) 07/27/2014 on Problem Solved. +43
#54 - glycogen (07/28/2014) [-]
Inexcusable.
#67 - anon (08/03/2014) [-]
I would lol, but FUCK
User avatar #55 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I can't tell if you're being serious or making a joke
User avatar #56 - glycogen (07/28/2014) [-]
Thats probably because you dont have a heart
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I'm really sorry, but I still can't tell. It's difficult to discern sarcasm over text
User avatar #66 - tsalmark (07/28/2014) [-]
glycogen is bat shit crazy, it would seem.
User avatar #58 - glycogen (07/28/2014) [-]
good
User avatar #59 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
Well, seeing as how you thumbed me down, I'm going to take it you actually believe all soldiers are just heartless monsters who go around killing children. I suppose I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt because it's such a stupid belief that it makes my head spin. Here, let me explain:

As soldiers go by, you inevitably see some hippie calling them monsters for being able to go overseas or even in our own backyards and kill people, but if enemy soldiers marched over HERE and stormed the house of the hippie, democracy and talking wouldn't really work, now would it? They would use force to take whatever they wanted including his possessions, family, and even his life. At that point he (the hippie) has two options, to use violence against them or to let these things happen. But of course he doesn't want to kill them, what he wants is OTHERS to come in and kill the enemy for him. And that's the problem, really. Because it's not about pacifism, it's that he's too cowardly to use force when it's the only thing necessary, so instead he passes on the responsibility to others so he can have the luxury of thinking himself morally superior to them.
*Note: I mean fake pacifists. I like real pacifists, because every real pacifist I've ever known has been able to drive my ass into the ground if they so pleased, and they are capable of doing that because they understand that having those skills and weapons is a deterrent, not to be used, but to have things PREVENTED (similar to stockpiling nuclear weapons). That's why, in my opinion, any TRUE pacifist would seek out all the fire-power they could possibly have so that when the time comes that people want to use violence, he will have so many weapons that they would not dare to do so. George Orwell hated hippies/pacifists for the same reason, because they never understand that when words break down, it just comes down to a contest of headbutts, and the head that hits harder gets hurt the least.
#61 - glycogen (07/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #69 - thatslovesbanned (08/09/2014) [-]
I just rolled this picture.
Fuck you
#62 - captainfuckitall Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
User avatar #60 - glycogen (07/28/2014) [-]
I agree with the principle of self defense.

However being involved with army insitutions is unethical.

User avatar #13 - isenseven (07/28/2014) [-]
By being convinced through propaganda
User avatar #22 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
How so?

I'm in Canada, one of the most anti-military/conflict places on the planet, and yet I'm still trying to join the military. What propaganda influence me? Am I in it for the glory? For money? Because I'm a violent killer? Please sir, tell me my motivations, I'd like to know.
User avatar #63 - isenseven (07/28/2014) [-]
I live in Canada too.
What propaganda influences you? The ongoing stream of media and ideas that assure you that "they" are the enemy and "we" need to stop them. If you have ever talked to someone who returned from Iraq or Afghanistan, they would tell you that "the enemy" was barely an enemy at all.


Like I said, I am all for the military and I know that it's important to have one, but don't think that you're signing up on your own merit. You're signing up because it's been glorified through decades of media.
#45 - anon (07/28/2014) [-]
Because you want a fucking job that fits the way you want to live your life. Wanting to be in the army and wanting to "Fight" are completely different things.
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
Not really. Military and conflict are kinda synonymous with eachother.

In any case, I also WANT to fight, as fighting and throwing myself into conflict will provide me with the opportunities to rise through the ranks and achieve my ambitions faster.
#44 - anon (07/28/2014) [-]
We have a military o-o?

I just thought we kinda just ran into people and yelled sorry and people just felt bad .-.
User avatar #43 - rhetoricalfunny (07/28/2014) [-]
Why ARE you joining the military?
As a Canadian all I have ever been exposed to regarding our military is us sucking ourselves off on november 11th.

Like Canada has it's head so far up its own ass regarding military, I'd say even moreso than the US because of all the "holier than thou" peacekeeping bullshit which hasn't been relevant since Cyprus.

I just wanna know.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I plan to run for a political office in the future. I figure the military will give me the finances, supplies, connections, and record needed to go into such a profession without winding up in some bankers pocket.
User avatar #52 - rhetoricalfunny (07/28/2014) [-]
I don't really have much to say to that. I mean, it sounds alright I guess.

But speaking as a (future?) soldier, do you actually want to fight.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
Thank you.

Well that depends. Do I enjoy fighting? Yes, I would like to join a boxing gym, practice dueling, ect. Do I enjoy killing? I don't know yet. I WANT to fight because it'll give me more opportunities to rise through the ranks and achieve my ambitions sooner, so whether I dislike it or not is irrelevant
User avatar #24 - hudis (07/28/2014) [-]
Aren't you the satanist guy who doesn't believe people deserve mercy or some shit like that, or is that someone else
User avatar #25 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I am the Satanist guy, but I think I was misunderstood. What I said is that "might-makes-right" is the most objective source for morality there can be beyond "But I FEEL like...". If someone is capable of doing something, it is within their right to do it; for better or worse. However, they must also accept the consequences of their actions

For example. Someone could try to steal your wallet through a mugging, and you could defend yourself; after the fight is over, whoever has the wallet deserves it. If the mugger wanted it more, he should have been stronger; likewise, if you wanted to protect it, YOU should have been stronger (this is, of course, assuming both parties have equal opportunity in the fight. No guns or knives involved, but just strength and skill). That's all. Personally, I would not show mercy in a fight (or any type of conflict) because I would never want someone to show mercy toward me; that's probably where the misunderstanding came in.
User avatar #32 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I propose to you to think of 'might-makes-right' this way: the man who owns the wallet had the necessary ability to earn it for himself, in a righteous way. this makes him mightier.

You call yourself a satanist but clearly you are a misguided fool. A true satanist would never promote theft.
User avatar #35 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I don't promote theft. I have never said I completely support the philosophy of 'might-makes-right' (although I do think strength and righteousness must win out in the end, and TO that end, conflicting and testing your might to others is proper), I simply said it is probably the closest thing we'll get to an objective source of morality. He who is most mighty makes the rules, and might is based upon strength of arms. If it were my way, might would be based upon a combination of mind, body, skill, and ethics

You see?

Unfortunately for us, most of the world doesn't care about such things as honour or righteousness, and since we can't impose our thoughts upon them, the most we can do is act as they would against us (at least until a cultural shift takes place, which is exactly what I myself am working toward)
User avatar #36 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
I see what you mean but I wouldn't confuse rules and morality, although they cross paths often. Sadly a cultural shift would likely only come to fruition via international disaster, if you understand what I mean.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (07/28/2014) [-]
I know, I was just trying to assure you that I don't promote any type of criminal activity (Although there are many activities that ARE criminal that I would rather not be). Keep hoping; it has to happen sometime.
User avatar #39 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
Come to america. most satanist-friendly country in the world, as far as ability to carry out most our beliefs lawfully.
#14 - johnmacronstone has deleted their comment.
User avatar #15 - isenseven (07/28/2014) [-]
I'm not even against wars, but you'd have to be stupid to not realize that there is heavy propaganda that influences the majority of enlistments into the army.
#16 - johnmacronstone has deleted their comment.
User avatar #18 - ohhhsnap (07/28/2014) [-]
you're the one of the reasons your country is known as 'murica to the rest of the world
User avatar #19 - johnmacronstone (07/28/2014) [-]
Bro, I'm not being some 'murica loving gun totin jackass. I'm just saying that a majority of the people in our armed forces don't give half a shit sbout "the american dream" and freedom, they just want to keep the people they love safe.
User avatar #38 - sardinez (07/28/2014) [-]
Actually, you can stop putting words to the mouths of those unrepresented. My brother is a 2 war combat veteran and the ONLY reason he joined is military propoganda and lack of options in his life.
User avatar #65 - johnmacronstone (07/28/2014) [-]
I'm not saying there aren't some members that are there because of propaganda, but don't put words into the mouths of all the veterans and active duty service members I've talked to that told me they joined to protect their loved ones
User avatar #20 - ohhhsnap (07/28/2014) [-]
So the way of keeping the people you love safe, is to take war across the ocean right?
I am aware of the fact that most of American civilians are against the war but please don't try to bullshit me cause I know for a fact most soldiers in the armed forces are a bunch of trigger happy kids who failed high school
User avatar #41 - fallenraven (07/28/2014) [-]
oh you know that? you're fucking retarded
User avatar #21 - johnmacronstone (07/28/2014) [-]
Actually, most of our service branches won't take highschool dropouts or kids with GED's. They aren't trigger happy kids either, they are soldiers who have done and seen some shit, and the one thing most of them cling onto to help them sleep at night is that it all served a purpose somehow. That it kept their families safe. They don't know how, but thats what they need to think.
#17 - anon (07/28/2014) [-]
You're literally retarded.
#6 - No! 07/27/2014 on enlarge 0
#15 - What the **** did you fix?  [+] (1 new reply) 07/25/2014 on Map of where fj is being used +45
User avatar #16 - dvdfaust (07/25/2014) [-]
He added north korea.
#12 - I actually always wondered why none of them ever switched off …  [+] (2 new replies) 07/25/2014 on Lightsaber Techniques +21
User avatar #25 - kiaserzerg (07/25/2014) [-]
takes three seconds to deactivate and reactivate, theres only like one jedi i think who fully mastered the technique.
User avatar #162 - jacksipian (07/26/2014) [-]
do you have any idea of name or anything so i can read about him?
#15 - You mean they're not? 07/25/2014 on A Love Story 0
#3 - Who the hell eats cereal in bed?  [+] (5 new replies) 07/25/2014 on i'm super cereal right now +25
#34 - domogle (07/25/2014) [-]
Same people who eat it in the car
#14 - inspiteofsprite (07/25/2014) [-]
User avatar #7 - hellomynameisbill (07/25/2014) [-]
you can't tell me what to do
User avatar #4 - unlithe (07/25/2014) [-]
seminormal people?
#13 - anon (07/25/2014) [-]
i choked on my saliva
#13 - This is the first time I've ever heard of a woman so bad at se…  [+] (9 new replies) 07/25/2014 on Women +110
#59 - thismustbeseen (07/25/2014) [-]
It happened to my ex.
User avatar #66 - romanlettuce (07/25/2014) [-]
It's way more common than people here think. If you just watch porn all of the time maybe you start to think that every woman is a star. Not true.
User avatar #14 - pokimone (07/25/2014) [-]
Its Matt Bomer. He isn't guy, just alive. Everyone on earth is into him. Hes like a younger and more handsome version of Robert Downey Jr.
User avatar #68 - collateraldamageco (07/25/2014) [-]
I didn't even know who Matt Bomer was until I saw this post
#60 - asmathiel (07/25/2014) [-]
I don't know man. He is nice, but I would not give my butt for him.
But for Alexander? Shit, I would suck his cock like a little bitch I am
#61 - pokimone (07/25/2014) [-]
He's alright, but look at Matts handsome all up in the place.
#37 - toxicovrtake (07/25/2014) [-]
He sure gives me a Bomer.
User avatar #41 - dorfdorfdorf (07/25/2014) [-]
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT, CARLOS
User avatar #22 - awesomedewd (07/25/2014) [-]
I'm a guy and I wouldn't fuck any male celebrity.
In fact... why do people care so much about celebrities?
#12 - Comment deleted 07/25/2014 on Women 0
#30 - Oh kjoni, you're such a silly sausage 07/24/2014 on Humans vs animals 0
#20 - Don't animals go to war with eachother and destroy their envir…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/24/2014 on Humans vs animals +9
User avatar #29 - kjoni (07/24/2014) [-]
hehehe humans doodoo though
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (07/24/2014) [-]
Oh kjoni, you're such a silly sausage
#18 - Not exactly. The participants would have to agree to let the w… 07/24/2014 on Chivalry +1
#6 - I agree with antzell, although a bit differently. I d…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/24/2014 on Chivalry +1
User avatar #7 - satansferret (07/24/2014) [-]
And the winner take control the losers assets and can have the woman if he wants.
User avatar #18 - captainfuckitall (07/24/2014) [-]
Not exactly. The participants would have to agree to let the winner have X thing in the event that they lose; as the losers family are still entitled to the contents of a will. And, of course, anyone can choose whether they want to date someone else or not.
#9 - Mhmm, but the Oxford comma can do that too, can it not?  [+] (3 new replies) 07/24/2014 on commas, know the difference -1
User avatar #11 - somethingpants (07/24/2014) [-]
As far as I can tell and have always been taught, its use is in a list to avoid ambiguity. It's used in lists like "I'd like to thank my friends, Anne Rice, and God." Instead of "I'd like to thank my friends, Anne Rice, and God."
So, not as far as I can tell, no it can't. If you have an example, please do tell me.
#26 - anon (07/24/2014) [-]
Am I going insane or are both of those sentences 100% identical?
User avatar #43 - somethingpants (07/24/2014) [-]
Yeah, they are. I was writing this at about 2 AM and it looked correct at the time. *"I'd like to thank my friends, Anne Rice and God."
Without the Oxford comma it makes it look like you're saying God and Anne Rice are your friends.
#8 - It's not JUST the first sentences, it's many that use the stan… 07/24/2014 on commas, know the difference 0
#6 - Well, come on, you can only go through so many Communist regim… 07/24/2014 on Just a casual drive in Russia +5
#2 - Only filthy plebs who want to confuse the hell out of people u…  [+] (9 new replies) 07/24/2014 on commas, know the difference +26
User avatar #7 - somethingpants (07/24/2014) [-]
The standard comma has its uses, just not in this context where it's more confusing than not. I always learned it with the stripper sentence.
Standard: "I invited strippers, JFK and Stalin."
This is implying that JFK and Stalin are strippers. This has its own uses, if you know how it should be used.
Oxford: "I invited strippers, JFK, and Stalin."
JFK and Stalin aren't the strippers.
User avatar #18 - danster (07/24/2014) [-]
I beg to differ
User avatar #9 - captainfuckitall (07/24/2014) [-]
Mhmm, but the Oxford comma can do that too, can it not?
User avatar #11 - somethingpants (07/24/2014) [-]
As far as I can tell and have always been taught, its use is in a list to avoid ambiguity. It's used in lists like "I'd like to thank my friends, Anne Rice, and God." Instead of "I'd like to thank my friends, Anne Rice, and God."
So, not as far as I can tell, no it can't. If you have an example, please do tell me.
#26 - anon (07/24/2014) [-]
Am I going insane or are both of those sentences 100% identical?
User avatar #43 - somethingpants (07/24/2014) [-]
Yeah, they are. I was writing this at about 2 AM and it looked correct at the time. *"I'd like to thank my friends, Anne Rice and God."
Without the Oxford comma it makes it look like you're saying God and Anne Rice are your friends.
#3 - twilightdusk (07/24/2014) [-]
What's confusing about the first sentence?
User avatar #12 - deathleprechaun (07/24/2014) [-]
What's confusing is why anyone would want to type it without that second comma.
User avatar #8 - captainfuckitall (07/24/2014) [-]
It's not JUST the first sentences, it's many that use the standard comma in general. It just gets a bit confusing to read, and it's much harder to depend on context than to just...read. Granted, the Oxford comma may be considered less tasteful, but I don't read books for taste, I read them to read.
#212 - Me being conqueror of the universe 07/23/2014 on What would you draw? 0

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Comments(509):

[ 509 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#517 - falloutsurvivor (07/12/2015) [-]
mfw using the bathroom after captain
#513 - anon (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anon (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anon (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
[ 509 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)