Upload
Login or register

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Stats
Comment Ranking:#4180
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 79199 total,  97227 ,  18028
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 15% (150/1000)
Level 368 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 369 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10929
Total Comments Made:20878
FJ Points:40264

latest user's comments

#183 - And you should never save your money in case you die tomorrow,…  [+] (12 replies) 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! 0
User avatar
#184 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
but money is just something we agree on so if i spend all my money one a car and teh next day the currency is cars then i win though yeah your right. but i mean were fine as is for now
User avatar
#185 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
And how likely do you think that is to happen?

We're not supposed to be 'fine', we're supposed to excel. At the rate of expansion we have, we could literally just keep going with everyone breeding and still not run risk of de-supplying.
User avatar
#186 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
but that type of thinking lead to the death of multable species we just let people hunt anything and this lead to a lot of unnecessary loss of life
User avatar
#189 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Is that not just evolution?
User avatar
#199 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinking it would last forever. they may have not been able to adapt but we didn't give them a chance to try.
User avatar
#200 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests).
User avatar
#201 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future.
User avatar
#202 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility?

It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible.

Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant.
User avatar
#204 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it.
User avatar
#205 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick.
User avatar
#207 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale
#203 - djmaryhikineet has deleted their comment.
#179 - It would, actually. Considering we are only a decade or so awa…  [+] (14 replies) 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! 0
User avatar
#181 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
we should never breed extra encase we fail to colonize other planets, also do you want more cring/memelords
User avatar
#183 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
And you should never save your money in case you die tomorrow, just spend it all without a care for the future. Come on now.
User avatar
#184 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
but money is just something we agree on so if i spend all my money one a car and teh next day the currency is cars then i win though yeah your right. but i mean were fine as is for now
User avatar
#185 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
And how likely do you think that is to happen?

We're not supposed to be 'fine', we're supposed to excel. At the rate of expansion we have, we could literally just keep going with everyone breeding and still not run risk of de-supplying.
User avatar
#186 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
but that type of thinking lead to the death of multable species we just let people hunt anything and this lead to a lot of unnecessary loss of life
User avatar
#189 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Is that not just evolution?
User avatar
#199 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinking it would last forever. they may have not been able to adapt but we didn't give them a chance to try.
User avatar
#200 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests).
User avatar
#201 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future.
User avatar
#202 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility?

It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible.

Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant.
User avatar
#204 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it.
User avatar
#205 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick.
User avatar
#207 - djmaryhikineet (12/27/2015) [-]
i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale
#203 - djmaryhikineet has deleted their comment.
#110 - Holy **** I have MET people diagnosed as autistic and still ha…  [+] (4 replies) 12/27/2015 on Vader's motivation to... 0
#130 - selfdenyingbeggar (12/27/2015) [-]
Well, look at yourself in the mirror. you've lost the ability to differentiate between art and shit.
User avatar
#133 - captainfuckitall (12/27/2015) [-]
Whether it's art or shit is irrelevant. It's canonical, and you disliking it doesn't change that
#136 - selfdenyingbeggar (12/27/2015) [-]
#129 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
As an Autist and a human being I take offense to autism being brought up to compare to this guy...
There's lunatics out there who are better than this guy
#16 - Picture 12/26/2015 on (untitled) +2
#48 - Actually, the Rule of Two is something constantly disputed amo…  [+] (1 reply) 12/26/2015 on TR-8R Strikes Back! (part 2) 0
User avatar
#49 - runelh (12/26/2015) [-]
And what you described happens in the Clone Wars TV Series, where Darth Maul takes on his brother as a Sith apprentice and proclaims himself the sith master. Yes it can happen! But then those two 'parties' of sith tries to destroy each other, because there can only be two. Palpatine hunts Maul and brother down and proclaims himself that there can only be two.

So if Snoke was truly a Sith during the time as Darth Sidious, I am pretty sure that Sidious would had know and hunted him down for two reason
1) As stated before, all sith follows the rule of two and if there was to be other sith lords, their goal would always be to destroy them.
2) Because it could seriously mess with Sidious plans to become emperor, the second reason he also hunted down Maul, he was a threat to compromise his plans.

And I don't want to dispute the EU even though it isn't canon, since I see that most of it is canon until proven otherwise in the new canon.

But for what is canon and what I know, I personally don't think Snoke is a Sith Lord. It might turn out otherwise, who knows. But to me it seems like Disney (or lucasfilm since disney isn't writing it) are trying to do their own thing with elements from EU/Legends.
#44 - But he FOLLOWS a Sith Lord, and idealizes another as well. Nat…  [+] (3 replies) 12/26/2015 on TR-8R Strikes Back! (part 2) +1
User avatar
#46 - runelh (12/26/2015) [-]
We don't know if Snoke is a sith yet, TBH. At least not from the movie. It never states anywhere that Snoke is a sith... Only a dark side user, and if we follow the canon, Rule of two, Snoke couldn't had been a sith either, I think he also was alive during the clone wars and since Palpy never took him in as apprentice in all the changes he had in them leads me to assume that he isn't a sith. If he never was trained has a sith either, he might call himself one, but can never truly be one completely, since all sith are death and Palpatine worked real trying to hide his sith ways (Which we see in the new Lando Comics where he his willing to blow up his private yacht with ancient sith relics, rather than let it be stolen)
User avatar
#48 - captainfuckitall (12/26/2015) [-]
Actually, the Rule of Two is something constantly disputed among the Sith in the expanded universe. Some people believe it to lead to the best while others believe that it only weakens the Sith.

Regardless, as it stands, the rule of two is ineffective as there COULD just be two Sith lords who never met and still regard themselves as Sith while each taking on one apprentice. In fact, I think that's exactly what the rule 'is', that there can only BE one master to one apprentice, rather than only two Sith in the entirety of the galaxy.

And pardon what I said before. I thought it was confirmed somewhere that Snoke was a Sith Lord, but so far it's only 'likely', as he is a powerful Dark-Side practitioner and possesses items (such as the garments) a Sith Lord would otherwise have.
User avatar
#49 - runelh (12/26/2015) [-]
And what you described happens in the Clone Wars TV Series, where Darth Maul takes on his brother as a Sith apprentice and proclaims himself the sith master. Yes it can happen! But then those two 'parties' of sith tries to destroy each other, because there can only be two. Palpatine hunts Maul and brother down and proclaims himself that there can only be two.

So if Snoke was truly a Sith during the time as Darth Sidious, I am pretty sure that Sidious would had know and hunted him down for two reason
1) As stated before, all sith follows the rule of two and if there was to be other sith lords, their goal would always be to destroy them.
2) Because it could seriously mess with Sidious plans to become emperor, the second reason he also hunted down Maul, he was a threat to compromise his plans.

And I don't want to dispute the EU even though it isn't canon, since I see that most of it is canon until proven otherwise in the new canon.

But for what is canon and what I know, I personally don't think Snoke is a Sith Lord. It might turn out otherwise, who knows. But to me it seems like Disney (or lucasfilm since disney isn't writing it) are trying to do their own thing with elements from EU/Legends.