Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

captainfuckitall    

Rank #638 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 339 Comments: Practically Famous
Offline
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#638
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  90 ,  50
Comment Thumbs: 40281 total,  49365 ,  9084
Content Level Progress: 76.27% (45/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 45% (450/1000)
Level 339 Comments: Practically Famous → Level 340 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:20
Content Views:9576
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:12992
FJ Points:11673

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#309 - If you listen really closely, you can hear the unanimous, eart… 13 hours ago on Hottest Guys Of FunnyJunk... +1
#4 - "Any1 ever notice how this thing works like this?" … 19 hours ago on Facebook(1) 0
#144 - Mhmm. You didn't 'cite' anything, though; you just claimed it …  [+] (1 new reply) 04/19/2014 on Take a stand -1
#149 - tomthehippie (9 hours ago) [-]
Where did you post your link? Not to me.

And google "FBI Rape Study", or "FBI rape statistics", seems simple enough, but apparantly that requires too much intellect for you.

Yeah, I'm saying this is what I know. I never once stated you had to believe the truth (after all, I am assuming you are an adult and can decide for yourself how you want to delude yourself).

And way to throw a tantrum there buddy! You know, for claiming that I am the one throwing a tantrum, you've done a pretty good job of throwing one yourself.

Strawman tactics; you refuse to post a link to your sources, yet claim that me being lazy and not looking up a link for you means I've lost (there's one), you claim I'm being emotional (throwing a tantrum) when I have done no such thing, repeatedly claiming this as though it makes you right (there's two), you redthumb me for disagreeing with you (there's three).

There's three strawman tactics I've spotted while drunk, and extremely tired.

You are fucking hilarious dude. Keep it up neckbeard! Maybe one day you can impress a girl with how many internet debates you've won! ;D
#141 - You and I both know that's not true. Other's thumbed you down,…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/19/2014 on Take a stand -1
#143 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Really? So when I click on the little question mark that tells me who voted me down... and all of them say you (and no one else), I guess thats just wrong. Because you are always right and all. After all your mommy said you're never wrong. And you are her special little boy!

And not fixated? I made a sexuality neutral statement, including both male and female as your partner of choice, and you fixated on the male. Didn't notice the female, just the male. I didn't even state anything about you being the catcher for the male, or the female using a strap-on, merely that one day you might find a sexual partner (of either gender) who was tight enough that you could actually enjoy sex with them, you having a one inch dick and all.

Hmmm, yep, totally not fixating right there. Not at all. After all it's not like you ignored part of the statement and fixated on one part. Nope. Never happened.

And yes, it is just my word. My words about a study I read, that has been cited by many others in multiple forms of media. Just like your word about the links you refuse to post for me. See how that logic works back against you?

And yes, taking what I say and trying to twist it (doing a piss poor job of it too) is a strawman tactic.

When I state statistics about unreported rapes, then state how the FBI came to those numbers, and you try to say I "said that unreported claims counts as evidence", when all I ever did was cite a study about the rates of false claims and unreported claims, well, how is that not a strawman tactic?

Because obviously, citing statistics about unreported rapes means that unreported claims count as evidence. After all I can not report that you stole 20 bucks from me and still take you to court over it.

Seriously dude, I'm starting to feel bad for making fun of you. Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
#140 - You honestly believe me asking for your references is 'showing…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/19/2014 on Take a stand -1
#142 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Wait wait wait...

I cite an FBI study that reported the following (keep in mind, although I've said this before, these are approximate figures), only 70% of rapes are reported, with approximately 50% of reported rapes making it to trial, and less than half of those charges that do make it to trial resulting in convictions, many of lesser included charges (not sure the figure on this one) such as sexual assault, of reported rapes, only 8% are believed by law enforcement to be false, the vast majority of which are caught by investigating detectives.

Where in the above statements did I say that "unreported claims counts as evidence"? No, I NEVER stated that. I stated that there is a large number of rapes that go unreported, and that the FBI came to this figure through criminals either copping to an old crime they committed to get leniency, or ratting out another criminal, or women (and men) coming forward during a serial rapist/sexual murderer and extrapolating these statistics.

And no, you asking for references (when I tell you that you can use google just as easily as I can), but then expecting me to look up yours are completely different.

You showed anger because you repeatedly claim I am insisting on you taking what I say as fact (when I have simply stated what I know and left it at that), get butt hurt because I'm not following perfect debate rules with someone using completely obvious strawman tactics, and then claim (repeatedly) I'm throwing a tantrum when I simply state that I can't be bothered to look up the study that has been cited in news reports, blogs, ect, yet cry when I mention that you never showed me your supposed links that debunk what I am saying.

Keep it coming cap. You are hilarious!
User avatar #144 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Mhmm. You didn't 'cite' anything, though; you just claimed it was there, just like you're doing now. You have no links, no references, no reports, no assessments, no ANYTHING to prove that what you're saying is correct.

Well not in the above statements, but in other comments. You consistently brought up "Only X amount of claims are reported", obviously alleging to your argument that false rape claims are drastically lower than even the rapes that go unreported. You said it in order to help your argument, otherwise you wouldn't have said it, and I asked for proof of your findings that you failed to provide. Simple.

I can use google, but I don't know where to look while you have a vague idea. And again, even if I did have a better idea of it than you, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR ARGUMENT, IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERSON YOU ARE DEBATING WITH TO PROVIDE YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU. It's not rocket science. And the difference between your words and my actual links is that you can literally see them by backing out of these strings of comments, while I would have to run through pages and pages of google just to MAYBE find what you're looking for (as they don't exist, as proven by your repeated dodging of providing them).

You are. You're saying "Believe me or shove off", as if you had already won the argument. You know, but I bet if a religious person told you "No, well my god is the true god and you will burn forever if you don't worship him. Because I just know", you wouldn't find that too pleasant. I'm not using strawman tactics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Those are strawman tactics.

So you can't bother to look them up but you can bother to waste time? You must have a very boring day. My boring day has just ended though, so I'll be off. Have fun stroking yourself to your supposed winnings. I look forward to kicking your ass in another debate some time.
#149 - tomthehippie (9 hours ago) [-]
Where did you post your link? Not to me.

And google "FBI Rape Study", or "FBI rape statistics", seems simple enough, but apparantly that requires too much intellect for you.

Yeah, I'm saying this is what I know. I never once stated you had to believe the truth (after all, I am assuming you are an adult and can decide for yourself how you want to delude yourself).

And way to throw a tantrum there buddy! You know, for claiming that I am the one throwing a tantrum, you've done a pretty good job of throwing one yourself.

Strawman tactics; you refuse to post a link to your sources, yet claim that me being lazy and not looking up a link for you means I've lost (there's one), you claim I'm being emotional (throwing a tantrum) when I have done no such thing, repeatedly claiming this as though it makes you right (there's two), you redthumb me for disagreeing with you (there's three).

There's three strawman tactics I've spotted while drunk, and extremely tired.

You are fucking hilarious dude. Keep it up neckbeard! Maybe one day you can impress a girl with how many internet debates you've won! ;D
#137 - Except it's not up to me. YOU stated there was evidence, YOU m…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/19/2014 on Take a stand -1
#139 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
I only started thumbing you down after you did that to me. Turn about being fair play and all.

Also, you've done the exact same thing and told me the same thing (before I refused to spend the time looking up the source, which by the way I did give, just not a link to it; the FBI study on rape).

Nice strawman tactics dude.

Oh, and notice how (in the other chain of comments) I stated you'd find either a girl OR a guy, yet you fixated on the guy part? Hmmm, I bet your closet is fabulous, sense you seem to be hiding pretty deep in it.




the only reason I've kept this going is you keep making me laugh, but of course that means your winning, doesn't it?
User avatar #141 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You and I both know that's not true. Other's thumbed you down, but it was not me. Believe it or not, other people can believe you are incorrect as well.

But again, that's just your WORDS. throwing around the word "F.B.I" doesn't make it any more credible than if I did it for the exact opposite argument. You need to provide sources and references, otherwise you HAVE no proof.

That's not a straw-man tactic, actually. Straw-man would be making the statement that I have beaten your argument by 'winning' over an entirely different proposition. But I didn't win over a proposition. We debated, you made claims, I asked for proof, you failed to provide and began insulting me. It's not as if any of this is false, and all points to you not having an argument in the first-place. And if the roles were reversed, you would be saying the exact same thing.

I'm not fixated on anything. YOU brought mud-slinging into it because you have no other arguments to give.

I am winning, yes. Because I'm remaining calm and continuing to ask for evidence for your claims and you are constantly failing to provide. And I certainly do hope I am giving you a laugh, it would be too bad if you got nothing out of being proven wrong.
#143 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Really? So when I click on the little question mark that tells me who voted me down... and all of them say you (and no one else), I guess thats just wrong. Because you are always right and all. After all your mommy said you're never wrong. And you are her special little boy!

And not fixated? I made a sexuality neutral statement, including both male and female as your partner of choice, and you fixated on the male. Didn't notice the female, just the male. I didn't even state anything about you being the catcher for the male, or the female using a strap-on, merely that one day you might find a sexual partner (of either gender) who was tight enough that you could actually enjoy sex with them, you having a one inch dick and all.

Hmmm, yep, totally not fixating right there. Not at all. After all it's not like you ignored part of the statement and fixated on one part. Nope. Never happened.

And yes, it is just my word. My words about a study I read, that has been cited by many others in multiple forms of media. Just like your word about the links you refuse to post for me. See how that logic works back against you?

And yes, taking what I say and trying to twist it (doing a piss poor job of it too) is a strawman tactic.

When I state statistics about unreported rapes, then state how the FBI came to those numbers, and you try to say I "said that unreported claims counts as evidence", when all I ever did was cite a study about the rates of false claims and unreported claims, well, how is that not a strawman tactic?

Because obviously, citing statistics about unreported rapes means that unreported claims count as evidence. After all I can not report that you stole 20 bucks from me and still take you to court over it.

Seriously dude, I'm starting to feel bad for making fun of you. Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
#136 - For someone throwing homosexual accusations, you seem to be re…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/19/2014 on Take a stand -1
#138 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
lmao, throwing a tantrum. You showed anger first, demanded to show facts (how about you toss a link or two my way, oh wait, I'm supposed to look it up too, nice how you get to get away with saying that, but I don't), yet I'm the one throwing a tantrum.

Seriously dude, you are hilarious. Do you have many friends in that wonderful world of make believe you live in?
User avatar #140 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You honestly believe me asking for your references is 'showing anger'?

1. I did post links here. They're elsewhere in the comments section. You could literally find them by clicking 'back to comments' and scrolling a little.
2. Even if I didn't, I didn't make any claims other than we should believe the evidence. YOU said that unreported claims counts as evidence and said you had objective references that prove this, and then failed to provide them. YOU are at fault. He who makes the claim must provide proof for it, that's how it works.

Thank you, I do try. Yes I do, and in the world of make-belief too, thank you for asking.
#142 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Wait wait wait...

I cite an FBI study that reported the following (keep in mind, although I've said this before, these are approximate figures), only 70% of rapes are reported, with approximately 50% of reported rapes making it to trial, and less than half of those charges that do make it to trial resulting in convictions, many of lesser included charges (not sure the figure on this one) such as sexual assault, of reported rapes, only 8% are believed by law enforcement to be false, the vast majority of which are caught by investigating detectives.

Where in the above statements did I say that "unreported claims counts as evidence"? No, I NEVER stated that. I stated that there is a large number of rapes that go unreported, and that the FBI came to this figure through criminals either copping to an old crime they committed to get leniency, or ratting out another criminal, or women (and men) coming forward during a serial rapist/sexual murderer and extrapolating these statistics.

And no, you asking for references (when I tell you that you can use google just as easily as I can), but then expecting me to look up yours are completely different.

You showed anger because you repeatedly claim I am insisting on you taking what I say as fact (when I have simply stated what I know and left it at that), get butt hurt because I'm not following perfect debate rules with someone using completely obvious strawman tactics, and then claim (repeatedly) I'm throwing a tantrum when I simply state that I can't be bothered to look up the study that has been cited in news reports, blogs, ect, yet cry when I mention that you never showed me your supposed links that debunk what I am saying.

Keep it coming cap. You are hilarious!
User avatar #144 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Mhmm. You didn't 'cite' anything, though; you just claimed it was there, just like you're doing now. You have no links, no references, no reports, no assessments, no ANYTHING to prove that what you're saying is correct.

Well not in the above statements, but in other comments. You consistently brought up "Only X amount of claims are reported", obviously alleging to your argument that false rape claims are drastically lower than even the rapes that go unreported. You said it in order to help your argument, otherwise you wouldn't have said it, and I asked for proof of your findings that you failed to provide. Simple.

I can use google, but I don't know where to look while you have a vague idea. And again, even if I did have a better idea of it than you, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR ARGUMENT, IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERSON YOU ARE DEBATING WITH TO PROVIDE YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU. It's not rocket science. And the difference between your words and my actual links is that you can literally see them by backing out of these strings of comments, while I would have to run through pages and pages of google just to MAYBE find what you're looking for (as they don't exist, as proven by your repeated dodging of providing them).

You are. You're saying "Believe me or shove off", as if you had already won the argument. You know, but I bet if a religious person told you "No, well my god is the true god and you will burn forever if you don't worship him. Because I just know", you wouldn't find that too pleasant. I'm not using strawman tactics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Those are strawman tactics.

So you can't bother to look them up but you can bother to waste time? You must have a very boring day. My boring day has just ended though, so I'll be off. Have fun stroking yourself to your supposed winnings. I look forward to kicking your ass in another debate some time.
#149 - tomthehippie (9 hours ago) [-]
Where did you post your link? Not to me.

And google "FBI Rape Study", or "FBI rape statistics", seems simple enough, but apparantly that requires too much intellect for you.

Yeah, I'm saying this is what I know. I never once stated you had to believe the truth (after all, I am assuming you are an adult and can decide for yourself how you want to delude yourself).

And way to throw a tantrum there buddy! You know, for claiming that I am the one throwing a tantrum, you've done a pretty good job of throwing one yourself.

Strawman tactics; you refuse to post a link to your sources, yet claim that me being lazy and not looking up a link for you means I've lost (there's one), you claim I'm being emotional (throwing a tantrum) when I have done no such thing, repeatedly claiming this as though it makes you right (there's two), you redthumb me for disagreeing with you (there's three).

There's three strawman tactics I've spotted while drunk, and extremely tired.

You are fucking hilarious dude. Keep it up neckbeard! Maybe one day you can impress a girl with how many internet debates you've won! ;D
#131 - How am I butthurt? I'm stating the argument as it goes. If tha…  [+] (7 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#133 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Oh, so because I can waste thirty seconds on a reply, and an insult that makes me laugh, I must be throwing a tantrum.

You have shown obvious anger.

And nope, you aren't right, but its alright. You and your small dick will one day find a girl with a tight enough pussy for you to actually cum. Or if you are into guys, a guy with a tight enough asshole.
User avatar #136 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
For someone throwing homosexual accusations, you seem to be really fixated on my penis.

In any case, you're only proving my point by continuing to throw a tantrum instead of providing the evidence that could so easily be given. You are obviously wrong, everyone can see it, and your mud-slinging only makes you seem like a sore loser.
#138 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
lmao, throwing a tantrum. You showed anger first, demanded to show facts (how about you toss a link or two my way, oh wait, I'm supposed to look it up too, nice how you get to get away with saying that, but I don't), yet I'm the one throwing a tantrum.

Seriously dude, you are hilarious. Do you have many friends in that wonderful world of make believe you live in?
User avatar #140 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You honestly believe me asking for your references is 'showing anger'?

1. I did post links here. They're elsewhere in the comments section. You could literally find them by clicking 'back to comments' and scrolling a little.
2. Even if I didn't, I didn't make any claims other than we should believe the evidence. YOU said that unreported claims counts as evidence and said you had objective references that prove this, and then failed to provide them. YOU are at fault. He who makes the claim must provide proof for it, that's how it works.

Thank you, I do try. Yes I do, and in the world of make-belief too, thank you for asking.
#142 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Wait wait wait...

I cite an FBI study that reported the following (keep in mind, although I've said this before, these are approximate figures), only 70% of rapes are reported, with approximately 50% of reported rapes making it to trial, and less than half of those charges that do make it to trial resulting in convictions, many of lesser included charges (not sure the figure on this one) such as sexual assault, of reported rapes, only 8% are believed by law enforcement to be false, the vast majority of which are caught by investigating detectives.

Where in the above statements did I say that "unreported claims counts as evidence"? No, I NEVER stated that. I stated that there is a large number of rapes that go unreported, and that the FBI came to this figure through criminals either copping to an old crime they committed to get leniency, or ratting out another criminal, or women (and men) coming forward during a serial rapist/sexual murderer and extrapolating these statistics.

And no, you asking for references (when I tell you that you can use google just as easily as I can), but then expecting me to look up yours are completely different.

You showed anger because you repeatedly claim I am insisting on you taking what I say as fact (when I have simply stated what I know and left it at that), get butt hurt because I'm not following perfect debate rules with someone using completely obvious strawman tactics, and then claim (repeatedly) I'm throwing a tantrum when I simply state that I can't be bothered to look up the study that has been cited in news reports, blogs, ect, yet cry when I mention that you never showed me your supposed links that debunk what I am saying.

Keep it coming cap. You are hilarious!
User avatar #144 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Mhmm. You didn't 'cite' anything, though; you just claimed it was there, just like you're doing now. You have no links, no references, no reports, no assessments, no ANYTHING to prove that what you're saying is correct.

Well not in the above statements, but in other comments. You consistently brought up "Only X amount of claims are reported", obviously alleging to your argument that false rape claims are drastically lower than even the rapes that go unreported. You said it in order to help your argument, otherwise you wouldn't have said it, and I asked for proof of your findings that you failed to provide. Simple.

I can use google, but I don't know where to look while you have a vague idea. And again, even if I did have a better idea of it than you, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR ARGUMENT, IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERSON YOU ARE DEBATING WITH TO PROVIDE YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU. It's not rocket science. And the difference between your words and my actual links is that you can literally see them by backing out of these strings of comments, while I would have to run through pages and pages of google just to MAYBE find what you're looking for (as they don't exist, as proven by your repeated dodging of providing them).

You are. You're saying "Believe me or shove off", as if you had already won the argument. You know, but I bet if a religious person told you "No, well my god is the true god and you will burn forever if you don't worship him. Because I just know", you wouldn't find that too pleasant. I'm not using strawman tactics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Those are strawman tactics.

So you can't bother to look them up but you can bother to waste time? You must have a very boring day. My boring day has just ended though, so I'll be off. Have fun stroking yourself to your supposed winnings. I look forward to kicking your ass in another debate some time.
#149 - tomthehippie (9 hours ago) [-]
Where did you post your link? Not to me.

And google "FBI Rape Study", or "FBI rape statistics", seems simple enough, but apparantly that requires too much intellect for you.

Yeah, I'm saying this is what I know. I never once stated you had to believe the truth (after all, I am assuming you are an adult and can decide for yourself how you want to delude yourself).

And way to throw a tantrum there buddy! You know, for claiming that I am the one throwing a tantrum, you've done a pretty good job of throwing one yourself.

Strawman tactics; you refuse to post a link to your sources, yet claim that me being lazy and not looking up a link for you means I've lost (there's one), you claim I'm being emotional (throwing a tantrum) when I have done no such thing, repeatedly claiming this as though it makes you right (there's two), you redthumb me for disagreeing with you (there's three).

There's three strawman tactics I've spotted while drunk, and extremely tired.

You are fucking hilarious dude. Keep it up neckbeard! Maybe one day you can impress a girl with how many internet debates you've won! ;D
#130 - Throwing a tantrum doesn't have to do with insulting, you just…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#135 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Also, redthumbing all of my comments just because I disagree with you is pretty butthurt behavior. Which doesn't make you right at all.

But I forgot, you're always right. Because your mommy says so. Because you're her "special" little baby.
#134 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Did I insist? No, I stated the facts and told you it was up to you to research it if you really cared that much, while stating that I myself did not care that much.

And I have shown statistics, you have simply ignored them because you don't want to believe.

Its alright captain. You're always right. Just like your mommy told you.
User avatar #137 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Except it's not up to me. YOU stated there was evidence, YOU must provide it. It is not my job to go out and find your information for you, that is not how a debate works. You do not care because you know you will not find it, because you know you're wrong. It's that simple. Nobody else would go to such an extent of carrying on the conversation unless they were desperately trying to hide that fact.

What statistics? You mean the ones you had absolutely no references for?

Not always right, just when I actually know my arguments and am able to back them up.

Just as well, you've red-thumbed my comments too, so now you not only prove to be a sore loser, but also a hypocrite.
#139 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
I only started thumbing you down after you did that to me. Turn about being fair play and all.

Also, you've done the exact same thing and told me the same thing (before I refused to spend the time looking up the source, which by the way I did give, just not a link to it; the FBI study on rape).

Nice strawman tactics dude.

Oh, and notice how (in the other chain of comments) I stated you'd find either a girl OR a guy, yet you fixated on the guy part? Hmmm, I bet your closet is fabulous, sense you seem to be hiding pretty deep in it.




the only reason I've kept this going is you keep making me laugh, but of course that means your winning, doesn't it?
User avatar #141 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You and I both know that's not true. Other's thumbed you down, but it was not me. Believe it or not, other people can believe you are incorrect as well.

But again, that's just your WORDS. throwing around the word "F.B.I" doesn't make it any more credible than if I did it for the exact opposite argument. You need to provide sources and references, otherwise you HAVE no proof.

That's not a straw-man tactic, actually. Straw-man would be making the statement that I have beaten your argument by 'winning' over an entirely different proposition. But I didn't win over a proposition. We debated, you made claims, I asked for proof, you failed to provide and began insulting me. It's not as if any of this is false, and all points to you not having an argument in the first-place. And if the roles were reversed, you would be saying the exact same thing.

I'm not fixated on anything. YOU brought mud-slinging into it because you have no other arguments to give.

I am winning, yes. Because I'm remaining calm and continuing to ask for evidence for your claims and you are constantly failing to provide. And I certainly do hope I am giving you a laugh, it would be too bad if you got nothing out of being proven wrong.
#143 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Really? So when I click on the little question mark that tells me who voted me down... and all of them say you (and no one else), I guess thats just wrong. Because you are always right and all. After all your mommy said you're never wrong. And you are her special little boy!

And not fixated? I made a sexuality neutral statement, including both male and female as your partner of choice, and you fixated on the male. Didn't notice the female, just the male. I didn't even state anything about you being the catcher for the male, or the female using a strap-on, merely that one day you might find a sexual partner (of either gender) who was tight enough that you could actually enjoy sex with them, you having a one inch dick and all.

Hmmm, yep, totally not fixating right there. Not at all. After all it's not like you ignored part of the statement and fixated on one part. Nope. Never happened.

And yes, it is just my word. My words about a study I read, that has been cited by many others in multiple forms of media. Just like your word about the links you refuse to post for me. See how that logic works back against you?

And yes, taking what I say and trying to twist it (doing a piss poor job of it too) is a strawman tactic.

When I state statistics about unreported rapes, then state how the FBI came to those numbers, and you try to say I "said that unreported claims counts as evidence", when all I ever did was cite a study about the rates of false claims and unreported claims, well, how is that not a strawman tactic?

Because obviously, citing statistics about unreported rapes means that unreported claims count as evidence. After all I can not report that you stole 20 bucks from me and still take you to court over it.

Seriously dude, I'm starting to feel bad for making fun of you. Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
#127 - Well the very definition of 'unreported' would mean that it is…  [+] (9 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#129 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
lol, it's funny how butt hurt you get, but accuse me of throwing a tantrum when you wont take my word.

seriously, I've been laughing my ass off this whole time. Tell me, are you always this angry, or is it just because you have a small dick?
User avatar #131 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
How am I butthurt? I'm stating the argument as it goes. If that qualifies as 'butthurt' to you, I can understand why you refuse to provide anything.

Good for you. No, I am very calm despite your insults to my penis size. Wanna know why? Because I know it's a defensive mechanism because you know I'm right. And that's why you'll keep replying to me and continuing to insult me, because THAT'S worth your time, while providing evidence (that doesn't exist) for your argument is apparently...not.
#133 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Oh, so because I can waste thirty seconds on a reply, and an insult that makes me laugh, I must be throwing a tantrum.

You have shown obvious anger.

And nope, you aren't right, but its alright. You and your small dick will one day find a girl with a tight enough pussy for you to actually cum. Or if you are into guys, a guy with a tight enough asshole.
User avatar #136 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
For someone throwing homosexual accusations, you seem to be really fixated on my penis.

In any case, you're only proving my point by continuing to throw a tantrum instead of providing the evidence that could so easily be given. You are obviously wrong, everyone can see it, and your mud-slinging only makes you seem like a sore loser.
#138 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
lmao, throwing a tantrum. You showed anger first, demanded to show facts (how about you toss a link or two my way, oh wait, I'm supposed to look it up too, nice how you get to get away with saying that, but I don't), yet I'm the one throwing a tantrum.

Seriously dude, you are hilarious. Do you have many friends in that wonderful world of make believe you live in?
User avatar #140 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You honestly believe me asking for your references is 'showing anger'?

1. I did post links here. They're elsewhere in the comments section. You could literally find them by clicking 'back to comments' and scrolling a little.
2. Even if I didn't, I didn't make any claims other than we should believe the evidence. YOU said that unreported claims counts as evidence and said you had objective references that prove this, and then failed to provide them. YOU are at fault. He who makes the claim must provide proof for it, that's how it works.

Thank you, I do try. Yes I do, and in the world of make-belief too, thank you for asking.
#142 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Wait wait wait...

I cite an FBI study that reported the following (keep in mind, although I've said this before, these are approximate figures), only 70% of rapes are reported, with approximately 50% of reported rapes making it to trial, and less than half of those charges that do make it to trial resulting in convictions, many of lesser included charges (not sure the figure on this one) such as sexual assault, of reported rapes, only 8% are believed by law enforcement to be false, the vast majority of which are caught by investigating detectives.

Where in the above statements did I say that "unreported claims counts as evidence"? No, I NEVER stated that. I stated that there is a large number of rapes that go unreported, and that the FBI came to this figure through criminals either copping to an old crime they committed to get leniency, or ratting out another criminal, or women (and men) coming forward during a serial rapist/sexual murderer and extrapolating these statistics.

And no, you asking for references (when I tell you that you can use google just as easily as I can), but then expecting me to look up yours are completely different.

You showed anger because you repeatedly claim I am insisting on you taking what I say as fact (when I have simply stated what I know and left it at that), get butt hurt because I'm not following perfect debate rules with someone using completely obvious strawman tactics, and then claim (repeatedly) I'm throwing a tantrum when I simply state that I can't be bothered to look up the study that has been cited in news reports, blogs, ect, yet cry when I mention that you never showed me your supposed links that debunk what I am saying.

Keep it coming cap. You are hilarious!
User avatar #144 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Mhmm. You didn't 'cite' anything, though; you just claimed it was there, just like you're doing now. You have no links, no references, no reports, no assessments, no ANYTHING to prove that what you're saying is correct.

Well not in the above statements, but in other comments. You consistently brought up "Only X amount of claims are reported", obviously alleging to your argument that false rape claims are drastically lower than even the rapes that go unreported. You said it in order to help your argument, otherwise you wouldn't have said it, and I asked for proof of your findings that you failed to provide. Simple.

I can use google, but I don't know where to look while you have a vague idea. And again, even if I did have a better idea of it than you, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR ARGUMENT, IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERSON YOU ARE DEBATING WITH TO PROVIDE YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU. It's not rocket science. And the difference between your words and my actual links is that you can literally see them by backing out of these strings of comments, while I would have to run through pages and pages of google just to MAYBE find what you're looking for (as they don't exist, as proven by your repeated dodging of providing them).

You are. You're saying "Believe me or shove off", as if you had already won the argument. You know, but I bet if a religious person told you "No, well my god is the true god and you will burn forever if you don't worship him. Because I just know", you wouldn't find that too pleasant. I'm not using strawman tactics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Those are strawman tactics.

So you can't bother to look them up but you can bother to waste time? You must have a very boring day. My boring day has just ended though, so I'll be off. Have fun stroking yourself to your supposed winnings. I look forward to kicking your ass in another debate some time.
#149 - tomthehippie (9 hours ago) [-]
Where did you post your link? Not to me.

And google "FBI Rape Study", or "FBI rape statistics", seems simple enough, but apparantly that requires too much intellect for you.

Yeah, I'm saying this is what I know. I never once stated you had to believe the truth (after all, I am assuming you are an adult and can decide for yourself how you want to delude yourself).

And way to throw a tantrum there buddy! You know, for claiming that I am the one throwing a tantrum, you've done a pretty good job of throwing one yourself.

Strawman tactics; you refuse to post a link to your sources, yet claim that me being lazy and not looking up a link for you means I've lost (there's one), you claim I'm being emotional (throwing a tantrum) when I have done no such thing, repeatedly claiming this as though it makes you right (there's two), you redthumb me for disagreeing with you (there's three).

There's three strawman tactics I've spotted while drunk, and extremely tired.

You are fucking hilarious dude. Keep it up neckbeard! Maybe one day you can impress a girl with how many internet debates you've won! ;D

user's channels

Join Subscribe morbid-channel

Comments(474):

[ 474 comments ]
Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
#480 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#479 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#478 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#477 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#476 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #474 - aherorising ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, ******** , and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - anonymous (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
#437 - anonymous (07/31/2011) [-]
Lololololol mfw you block me and delete my comment because I expose that you're an ignorant dumbass
User avatar #438 to #447 - captainfuckitall (07/31/2011) [-]
no, i didn't block you because you "exposed that i am an ignorant dumbass". i blocked you because i know who you are, and remembered who you are. you are thebiggestmaggot. you have a (last time i checked) profile picture of an old lady with bouncing tits in a swimsuit. and you are also a nihilist that annoyed the hell out of me last time i talked because you were ignorant, arrogant, and rude, and drove me to a place i don't like going to simply because i do not like people like you. the reason i removed the comment is because 1. it was wrong. 2. you wouldn't have listened if i told you otherwise. and 3. it was Wikipedia, and unreliable source. and, since you are against what i believe, you will logically look for a source that undermines it. and i simply don't have the patience to deal with you

that's why
#436 - captainspankmonkey (07/04/2011) [-]
Happy 4th of july!
User avatar #429 - EpicFacePalm (06/27/2011) [-]
Now I made it to level 28 with just comments, too. Awwww yeah!
User avatar #430 to #439 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2011) [-]
HIGH FIVE BUDDY :D
User avatar #431 to #440 - EpicFacePalm (06/27/2011) [-]
That took ******* YEARS.
User avatar #432 to #441 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2011) [-]
mine took just over 1 year :P
User avatar #433 to #442 - EpicFacePalm (06/27/2011) [-]
Took me half a year longer than you :P
User avatar #434 to #443 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2011) [-]
haha, well it's the effort that counts, that's all that matters :)
[ 474 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)