Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

captainfuckitall    

Rank #280 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 348 Comments: Sold Soul
Offline
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#280
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 34 total,  90 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 51877 total,  63425 ,  11548
Content Level Progress: 66.1% (39/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 24.9% (249/1000)
Level 348 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 349 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:21
Content Views:9725
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:15207
FJ Points:20474

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#2 - Why? She didn't know you didn't slap her, she honestly thought… 48 minutes ago on Admin vs. Troll +1
#9 - But isn't there documented fact that while the Indians and Eur… 55 minutes ago on Mexicans 0
#102 - If you really need the last comment that bad, here, I'll give … 3 hours ago on Well shit 0
#97 - I'm not even reading your comments at this point because it do…  [+] (2 new replies) 3 hours ago on Well shit 0
#101 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Haha I'm winning! But I'm not playing anymore so I win!"

As for the rest of that, I can only hope you're trolling or trying to be ironic.

User avatar #102 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
If you really need the last comment that bad, here, I'll give it to you; this will be the last.
#13 - For the record, a Muslim wasn't the first one to fly. The firs… 3 hours ago on Faith in Humanity 83 - By... 0
#95 - You're still doing it.  [+] (4 new replies) 3 hours ago on Well shit 0
User avatar #96 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
And you still have yet to prove your originally implied point that stoners are incapable of higher-level thinking and debating while (regardless to your next baseless character assault) a third-party observer would be hard pressed to admit that I, a "stoner", have displayed at least a degree of intelligent expression. So, while you've made no progress in proving stoners dumb by attempting to discredit me with fallacies and assumptions, I have managed to display that stoners, as a whole, are not incapable of intelligence or tact.

The funniest part about you repeatedly trying to fall back on my use of words that you either don't understand or simply don't realize that using proper diction when expressing an argument is crucial in actual debate and thus should be treated similarly regardless of medium.

In case the big words intimidated you, infuriated you, or made you immediately reopen the wikipedia page you linked me to, here is a simple version of the above argument:

You keep saying I lost, but in terms of the points we were making at the start, I've made progress, you have not.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
I'm not even reading your comments at this point because it doesn't matter. You're trying so hard to salvage what you've already lost that it's borderline pathetic and the only reason you're commenting (and trying to seem like you're enjoying it) is because I goaded you. Any single person who reads this chain of comments will know the exact type of person you are, and even if that's not clear to YOU, it is clear to them and everyone else you meet (provided you ARE the same person offline).

Really man, you need to learn to cut your losses and understand when it's best to walk away. You are doing nothing but making yourself look like a narcissistic, ill-tempered, try hard.
#101 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Haha I'm winning! But I'm not playing anymore so I win!"

As for the rest of that, I can only hope you're trolling or trying to be ironic.

User avatar #102 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
If you really need the last comment that bad, here, I'll give it to you; this will be the last.
#92 - By the way, something you might want to look up on Google next…  [+] (6 new replies) 3 hours ago on Well shit 0
User avatar #94 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Good job looking up..." Baseless character assault

Yes you did. "I do/do not support pot and it's uses" is a stance, based on opinion, that makes no claims, nor can the opinions basing the stance be assumed. Can't disprove it, either.

I don't use words I don't understand, I have yet to need to use a search engine to more than match wits with you; assuming so is character assault (again). also, there is difference between using correct, relevant diction and padding it with big words to try and sound smart, kinda like "sesquipedalian loquaciousness" (which is more than one word, by the way.)

"Another good job splitting hairs..." There's that character assault again.

But now I'm enjoying myself. Mostly because you're trying so hard to win an argument and seem like I've lost when you can't even pass fallacies 101.
User avatar #95 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
You're still doing it.
User avatar #96 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
And you still have yet to prove your originally implied point that stoners are incapable of higher-level thinking and debating while (regardless to your next baseless character assault) a third-party observer would be hard pressed to admit that I, a "stoner", have displayed at least a degree of intelligent expression. So, while you've made no progress in proving stoners dumb by attempting to discredit me with fallacies and assumptions, I have managed to display that stoners, as a whole, are not incapable of intelligence or tact.

The funniest part about you repeatedly trying to fall back on my use of words that you either don't understand or simply don't realize that using proper diction when expressing an argument is crucial in actual debate and thus should be treated similarly regardless of medium.

In case the big words intimidated you, infuriated you, or made you immediately reopen the wikipedia page you linked me to, here is a simple version of the above argument:

You keep saying I lost, but in terms of the points we were making at the start, I've made progress, you have not.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
I'm not even reading your comments at this point because it doesn't matter. You're trying so hard to salvage what you've already lost that it's borderline pathetic and the only reason you're commenting (and trying to seem like you're enjoying it) is because I goaded you. Any single person who reads this chain of comments will know the exact type of person you are, and even if that's not clear to YOU, it is clear to them and everyone else you meet (provided you ARE the same person offline).

Really man, you need to learn to cut your losses and understand when it's best to walk away. You are doing nothing but making yourself look like a narcissistic, ill-tempered, try hard.
#101 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Haha I'm winning! But I'm not playing anymore so I win!"

As for the rest of that, I can only hope you're trolling or trying to be ironic.

User avatar #102 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
If you really need the last comment that bad, here, I'll give it to you; this will be the last.
#91 - I know that it was, so there's nothing to 'disprove'. By the w… 3 hours ago on Well shit 0
#87 - I would if there was anything TO discredit. 1. You li…  [+] (9 new replies) 4 hours ago on Well shit 0
User avatar #89 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
1. Yes, it's called parody, in which I made sure to parenthetically get the point across that while attempting to make stoners look dumb, you did so to yourself
2. Yes, you did. You can change an opinion or standpoint, not disprove it, as it is neither fact nor theory.
3. Reread 1&2 as many times as necessary to prevent you from replying to me again
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
By the way, something you might want to look up on Google next time you want a large word: "sesquipedalian loquaciousness", as it's exactly what you're trying to do right now.

Here, I'll even give you a link: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SesquipedalianLoquaciousness
User avatar #94 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Good job looking up..." Baseless character assault

Yes you did. "I do/do not support pot and it's uses" is a stance, based on opinion, that makes no claims, nor can the opinions basing the stance be assumed. Can't disprove it, either.

I don't use words I don't understand, I have yet to need to use a search engine to more than match wits with you; assuming so is character assault (again). also, there is difference between using correct, relevant diction and padding it with big words to try and sound smart, kinda like "sesquipedalian loquaciousness" (which is more than one word, by the way.)

"Another good job splitting hairs..." There's that character assault again.

But now I'm enjoying myself. Mostly because you're trying so hard to win an argument and seem like I've lost when you can't even pass fallacies 101.
User avatar #95 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
You're still doing it.
User avatar #96 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
And you still have yet to prove your originally implied point that stoners are incapable of higher-level thinking and debating while (regardless to your next baseless character assault) a third-party observer would be hard pressed to admit that I, a "stoner", have displayed at least a degree of intelligent expression. So, while you've made no progress in proving stoners dumb by attempting to discredit me with fallacies and assumptions, I have managed to display that stoners, as a whole, are not incapable of intelligence or tact.

The funniest part about you repeatedly trying to fall back on my use of words that you either don't understand or simply don't realize that using proper diction when expressing an argument is crucial in actual debate and thus should be treated similarly regardless of medium.

In case the big words intimidated you, infuriated you, or made you immediately reopen the wikipedia page you linked me to, here is a simple version of the above argument:

You keep saying I lost, but in terms of the points we were making at the start, I've made progress, you have not.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
I'm not even reading your comments at this point because it doesn't matter. You're trying so hard to salvage what you've already lost that it's borderline pathetic and the only reason you're commenting (and trying to seem like you're enjoying it) is because I goaded you. Any single person who reads this chain of comments will know the exact type of person you are, and even if that's not clear to YOU, it is clear to them and everyone else you meet (provided you ARE the same person offline).

Really man, you need to learn to cut your losses and understand when it's best to walk away. You are doing nothing but making yourself look like a narcissistic, ill-tempered, try hard.
#101 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Haha I'm winning! But I'm not playing anymore so I win!"

As for the rest of that, I can only hope you're trolling or trying to be ironic.

User avatar #102 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
If you really need the last comment that bad, here, I'll give it to you; this will be the last.
User avatar #91 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
I know that it was, so there's nothing to 'disprove'. By the way, good job looking up a word on Google to get a larger vocabulary, I can do that too.

No I didn't. You can 'disprove' a claim, and any standpoint, either fact or theory, can be expressed in a claim.

Another good job splitting hairs so you don't seem so much like a bumblefuck. Seriously, just quit the argument, go pick up some books, and learn proper debating and critical thinking skills before getting your panties in a twist over another argument.

#82 - And I thought stoners were supposed to be passive, peace-lovin…  [+] (11 new replies) 4 hours ago on Well shit 0
#84 - gmarrox (4 hours ago) [-]
"Haha guys look I got this guy who smokes to make a reply to a dumbass misinformed comment I made! haha smoke more weed guy cuz ur so mad lol"

Jesus if you're gonna start shit and then come back at me when I reply, maybe don't immediately fail to discredit my argument and instead attempt to assault my character fallaciously.
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (4 hours ago) [-]
I would if there was anything TO discredit.

1. You literally just rephrased the same thing I said, so by your logic you would have to 'discredit' me first.
2. I didn't use 'disprove' incorrectly. Most people have a negative view of marijuana use, to try to change their opinion by showing it in a positive light is to 'disprove' their view.
3. You use a lot of big words without understanding what they mean in an attempt to seem smarter than you are. How can you say my sentence (paraphrasing) "That's exactly the type of shit a stoner would say to refute their belief" is wrong when YOUR sentence is (paraphrasing) "And instead attempt to hit my personality falsely". Seriously, I know you want to portray pot heads as really smart, but you can't exactly do that when you talk so much out of your ass that you can't even see it's shit.
User avatar #89 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
1. Yes, it's called parody, in which I made sure to parenthetically get the point across that while attempting to make stoners look dumb, you did so to yourself
2. Yes, you did. You can change an opinion or standpoint, not disprove it, as it is neither fact nor theory.
3. Reread 1&2 as many times as necessary to prevent you from replying to me again
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
By the way, something you might want to look up on Google next time you want a large word: "sesquipedalian loquaciousness", as it's exactly what you're trying to do right now.

Here, I'll even give you a link: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SesquipedalianLoquaciousness
User avatar #94 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Good job looking up..." Baseless character assault

Yes you did. "I do/do not support pot and it's uses" is a stance, based on opinion, that makes no claims, nor can the opinions basing the stance be assumed. Can't disprove it, either.

I don't use words I don't understand, I have yet to need to use a search engine to more than match wits with you; assuming so is character assault (again). also, there is difference between using correct, relevant diction and padding it with big words to try and sound smart, kinda like "sesquipedalian loquaciousness" (which is more than one word, by the way.)

"Another good job splitting hairs..." There's that character assault again.

But now I'm enjoying myself. Mostly because you're trying so hard to win an argument and seem like I've lost when you can't even pass fallacies 101.
User avatar #95 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
You're still doing it.
User avatar #96 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
And you still have yet to prove your originally implied point that stoners are incapable of higher-level thinking and debating while (regardless to your next baseless character assault) a third-party observer would be hard pressed to admit that I, a "stoner", have displayed at least a degree of intelligent expression. So, while you've made no progress in proving stoners dumb by attempting to discredit me with fallacies and assumptions, I have managed to display that stoners, as a whole, are not incapable of intelligence or tact.

The funniest part about you repeatedly trying to fall back on my use of words that you either don't understand or simply don't realize that using proper diction when expressing an argument is crucial in actual debate and thus should be treated similarly regardless of medium.

In case the big words intimidated you, infuriated you, or made you immediately reopen the wikipedia page you linked me to, here is a simple version of the above argument:

You keep saying I lost, but in terms of the points we were making at the start, I've made progress, you have not.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
I'm not even reading your comments at this point because it doesn't matter. You're trying so hard to salvage what you've already lost that it's borderline pathetic and the only reason you're commenting (and trying to seem like you're enjoying it) is because I goaded you. Any single person who reads this chain of comments will know the exact type of person you are, and even if that's not clear to YOU, it is clear to them and everyone else you meet (provided you ARE the same person offline).

Really man, you need to learn to cut your losses and understand when it's best to walk away. You are doing nothing but making yourself look like a narcissistic, ill-tempered, try hard.
#101 - gmarrox (3 hours ago) [-]
"Haha I'm winning! But I'm not playing anymore so I win!"

As for the rest of that, I can only hope you're trolling or trying to be ironic.

User avatar #102 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
If you really need the last comment that bad, here, I'll give it to you; this will be the last.
User avatar #91 - captainfuckitall (3 hours ago) [-]
I know that it was, so there's nothing to 'disprove'. By the way, good job looking up a word on Google to get a larger vocabulary, I can do that too.

No I didn't. You can 'disprove' a claim, and any standpoint, either fact or theory, can be expressed in a claim.

Another good job splitting hairs so you don't seem so much like a bumblefuck. Seriously, just quit the argument, go pick up some books, and learn proper debating and critical thinking skills before getting your panties in a twist over another argument.

user's channels

Join Subscribe morbid-channel

Comments(483):

[ 483 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - Womens Study Major (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - Womens Study Major (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
[ 483 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)