x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9554
Comment Ranking:#625
Highest Content Rank:#9533
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 58204 total,  71193 ,  12989
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 75.7% (757/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10866
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16670
FJ Points:24989

Funny Text/Links

Funny Pictures

YouTube Videos

latest user's comments

#63 - I mean...that's a LOT of John Cena's... 49 minutes ago on ≡≡≡ 0
#13 - It's really strange seeing this gif without his eyes as mouths too...  [+] (1 new reply) 03/29/2015 on Turning Signals +15
#35 - soloman (03/30/2015) [-]
Yeah, the eyes actually seem stranger in this one.
#47 - I'm well aware of that, however, it's very hard to describe th…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/21/2015 on Mosque burns +1
User avatar #50 - cadencee (02/21/2015) [-]
I understand where you are coming from however I find the terms good and evil to be rather vague, they're terms which aren't really all that great for describing anything as they seem to imply a sense of objectivity. Right and wrong however are very easy to describe as they are inherently subjective and the conditions are determined by the individual.

For example, it is wrong to steal, however it would be understandable for a poor man to steal food to survive and keep those he cared about alive as well, given that the man was impoverished not of his own volition or as a result of prior, unjustified criminal actions. Applying right and wrong to this, from a good or evil standpoint would inevitably end in condemning the mans theft as it leaves no room for desperation.

I suppose good and evil and right and wrong could be synonymous if that is how you decide to interpret it, I've just found that there seems to be a difference in severity for the terms, doing evil tends to imply the individual is evil whereas everyone does wrong from time to time.
#135 - I'm sure the aliens will be able to sympathize with genocide. … 02/21/2015 on (0_0) Oh god WTF?! -1
#521 - No evidence for what?  [+] (1 new reply) 02/21/2015 on Perspective -1
#528 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
There's no evidence that he had pieces of the 'the true cross'.
#12 - You know...aliens are gonna watch this. This stuff is…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/21/2015 on (0_0) Oh god WTF?! +14
#65 - kulamia (02/21/2015) [-]
You think that Adolf Hitler making a speech about exterminating a people because they believe something that is the minority of what people believe(1st ever worldwide broadcast that made it into space) is more fucked up? Nah, a video which hints heavily at sheep fucking is the line that cant be crossed?
User avatar #135 - captainfuckitall (02/21/2015) [-]
I'm sure the aliens will be able to sympathize with genocide. But they just wouldn't understand if, say, Hitler was dressed like a Butterfly while he did it.
#4 - What great people. I wish everyone could learn this, …  [+] (22 new replies) 02/21/2015 on Mosque burns +134
User avatar #44 - cadencee (02/21/2015) [-]
Good and Evil are both relativistic terms. Hence why many people say that God is the epitome of all good. Everything he commands you to do is objectively good as he sets the standard for what is right and what is wrong.

So basically if God says 'though shalt kill' finding a way around it, from this perspective is just as bad as the 'evil' person finding a way around 'thou shalt not kill'.

Perhaps I should elaborate on the whole good and evil being relative thing. Basically, you need to consider the basis for good and evil, what do we use to determine right from wrong? Is there anything that can be considered objectively wrong irrespective of the circumstances?

For example, murder is wrong however killing a person in times of war is not considered murder, or executing a prisoner is still rather common and more or less accepted in some parts of the western world.

Rape is wrong, but why is rape wrong? What makes it wrong? Rape is abundant in nature, would you punish a dolphin for merely doing what it is biologically programmed to do? Is it consciousness and empathy that sets us apart? Is it consciousness that makes us liable for our actions? Where do we go from there? What about those of us who suffer from mental illnesses and do horrific things not for the pleasure but due to prior trauma or chemical and hormonal imbalances? If a sociopath is incapable of empathy, should they also be exempt from this rule?

We are but animals, animals which for the most part care about the wellbeing of others and possess the intelligence to act upon those emotions. Good and evil, these are idealistic terms which I find have very little place in reality. In the end it all comes down to priorities and how those with differing priorities judge each other. Seemingly good people do horrific things all the time, and criminals are more than capable of doing great things also.

tl;dr - Good and Evil are childish terms and are used to generalise and also to create a distinction between those who do horrible things, and those who don't as to distance oneself from them, i.E saying "Hitler was just a crazy psychopath, and the Nazi's were evil, no sane person would have committed such atrocities".
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (02/21/2015) [-]
I'm well aware of that, however, it's very hard to describe things as right or wrong without bringing terms of good and evil into it, that's all.

Personally I agree with you, that there is no such thing as good or evil (though I do believe in right and wrong).
User avatar #50 - cadencee (02/21/2015) [-]
I understand where you are coming from however I find the terms good and evil to be rather vague, they're terms which aren't really all that great for describing anything as they seem to imply a sense of objectivity. Right and wrong however are very easy to describe as they are inherently subjective and the conditions are determined by the individual.

For example, it is wrong to steal, however it would be understandable for a poor man to steal food to survive and keep those he cared about alive as well, given that the man was impoverished not of his own volition or as a result of prior, unjustified criminal actions. Applying right and wrong to this, from a good or evil standpoint would inevitably end in condemning the mans theft as it leaves no room for desperation.

I suppose good and evil and right and wrong could be synonymous if that is how you decide to interpret it, I've just found that there seems to be a difference in severity for the terms, doing evil tends to imply the individual is evil whereas everyone does wrong from time to time.
User avatar #28 - aerosol (02/21/2015) [-]
"Love your neighbor as yourself"

From what I've learned, it seems like a lot of religions have a similar golden rule. I wsih more people would follow it.
User avatar #17 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
"if someone commanded "Thou shalt kill" a good person would do the opposite and find a way NOT to."


Gotta say it it.
Abraham.
He was totally going to do it.
#72 - mehmus (02/21/2015) [-]
I thought you meant Lincoln for a second and was very confused.
User avatar #31 - shieeetposter (02/21/2015) [-]
If this is about religion, it is okay to sin as long as you are sincerely regretful of it or something. I think.

In other terms, a good person isn't necessarily clean of murder, I guess it's someone who would do anything for the greater benefit of the people. Murder isn't exactly justified, but I guess it's a medium to convey someone's moral standing; cold-blooded murder is plain evil, but I am sure there are good intents in murder.
User avatar #113 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
This is not one of those.
At all.
There was nothing to be gained or prevented by killing his own son.
User avatar #124 - shieeetposter (02/21/2015) [-]
I thought you were talking about Lincoln.
User avatar #125 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
So did mehmus
User avatar #26 - needsauceadmisblan (02/21/2015) [-]
well yea that was fucking GOD himself man, i mean like shit man. what what do you do in that position. i mean he already knew that it was god and not some crazy voice so i mean thats like a catch 22 damned if you do damned if you dont.
User avatar #30 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
You recognize that after he goes "no, I was just seeing if you'd really do it" that he's kind of a huge dick and not worth worshiping at all?
User avatar #106 - Ruspanic (02/21/2015) [-]
I used to think that way, and in fact I'd make a similar argument that the God of ISIS or al-Qaeda is not worthy of human worship, even if he were real, because he is evil. But having thought about it, it doesn't make sense: If God is the objective source of morality, as he is of the physical laws of nature, by what standards are you judging that what he tells you is wrong? God's actions and teachings are in this case the only true metric of "right" and it is a logical contradiction to call them morally wrong.

It's really only possible to make that argument of a polytheistic religion, where it's assumed that there are multiple real gods to choose from, each of whom may not be the objective or infallible source of morality. With an Abrahamic religion, one can only make that argument as a non-believer, by denying that the fanatics' beliefs about their God are true.
User avatar #112 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
But he's not.
Many cultures and religions developed morality without Christianity.
Starting at an assumption and working your way out from there will of course net you results that agree with it.
User avatar #114 - Ruspanic (02/21/2015) [-]
"You recognize that [...] he's kind of a huge dick and not worth worshiping at all", as you said, implies that the decision to worship God should depend on whether the God is good and not whether he is real. I'm arguing that this is unreasonable. People who already believe that God is real cannot refuse to worship him on moral grounds, because God is moral by definition and any judgment that he is immoral or "kind of a huge dick" must be objectively wrong.
User avatar #115 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
"should depend on whether the God is good and not whether he is real. I'm arguing that this is unreasonable."

No. A creator is not worthy of worship if he is a huge asshole. I would not worship Hades if he was the only god. If he is immoral by our standards, then he is immoral. There is no "get out of jail free card" because "oh our human understanding of morality is so flawed" bullshit that always gets peddled.

If a creator gave us this sense of morality, then it's his own damn fault that he looks like a monster when compared to it.
User avatar #119 - Ruspanic (02/21/2015) [-]
My argument is not about what is and isn't moral, it's about logical coherence. If we hold that morality is as objective as natural laws because both come from the Creator, and that standards of morality are based upon the Creator, then it is tautologically impossible for the Creator to be immoral. To make an analogy, if you (re)define "tasty" to mean "resembling the flavor of pizza", then it is impossible to conceive of a pizza that would not be tasty, regardless of how much you actually enjoy the flavor.

I am neither a theist nor a moral relativist. I think that that morality should be based on values of empathy and justified with reasoning, and that sound morals should be applied across cultures and religions. I in no way mean to excuse the actions of people who commit atrocities in the name of religion, because I consider those actions to be universally wrong - and since God doesn't constantly just whisper instructions in people's ears, I suspect that such actions are driven in no small part by the malice and evil character of the perpetrators, so they do have personal responsibility. However: while those who are raised in a religion with horrible beliefs and practices might be led by their consciences to reconsider those beliefs (like Ayaan Hirsi Ali), it does not make sense to reject the religion while continuing to believe it is true.

Perhaps the difference is too subtle to be significant, but I thought it was a point worth making.
User avatar #123 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
The only way to suggest that morality COULD be objective would be to first irrevocably prove the existence of a particular deity. Then, and only then, could you begin to attribute anything to them, much less morality.
User avatar #130 - Ruspanic (02/21/2015) [-]
This is what Abrahamic monotheists believe. The fact that they don't have irrevocable proof is a given, but the fact that they believe in a God that teaches morals is also a given. In considering things from their point of view, you must take the existence of God as a premise for your arguments.

Anyway, that's not terribly relevant to the point I was making.

With regard to your other comment: yes, morality is subjective because it requires a subjective observer to judge it, and distinguish morality from immorality. This does not mean it is okay to be a moral relativist and think morality is simply each person's individual opinion, and no morality is more correct than others - you don't seem to believe that, since you raised a moral objection to worshiping a violent and devious God. The implication of your earlier argument is that not only do you consider your morality to be better than the morality of Abraham and others who worship his God, but you even consider your morality to be above that of God himself, if he disagreed with you.

This means your moral principles are very strong indeed. Surely you have some basis for them, and would like them to be applied universally? So I'm confused why you brought up that morality is subjective.
User avatar #132 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
"This is what Abrahamic monotheists believe. The fact that they don't have irrevocable proof is a given, but the fact that they believe in a God that teaches morals is also a given. In considering things from their point of view, you must take the existence of God as a premise for your arguments."

Then their arguments are shit from the start, and doomed to be entirely useless because they rely on a fallacy. If they MUST use that, then they are incapable of understanding actual morality. This abdication of personal responsibility is a poisoning of society. Religions that teach that forgiveness is freely granted by speaking to yourself behind closed doors, rather than through actions, are a detriment to the concept of morality.

"This does not mean it is okay to be a moral relativist"

Yes, that is perfectly fine, because morality IS relative. EVERYONE uses a relative standard for morality. How else is execution for showing your face in public an acceptable punishment in Islam? They don't think it is evil. There is no one standard for morality. My particular definition relies on not harming others, so mine disagrees with theirs. Plenty of people disagree with my definition, though.

One truth that can be used in guiding principles of morality is the golden rule, and I've tried to take that into account for all circumstances. The golden rule is generally a very useful tool if you are a human being capable of thinking in the 3rd person perspective, which should be most people.

If more people based their morality on that, and spent some actual time considering it, rather than assuming it is objectively written in some book and carried out the atrocities deemed acceptable in that book, then there would be less conflict, and much of my distaste for religion would be abated.
User avatar #122 - YllekNayr (02/21/2015) [-]
Morality is subjective.
It always has been.
It always will be.
Observation of human beings throughout the ages should be enough to show that.
User avatar #116 - compared (02/21/2015) [-]
Thanks for using a comparison, hope you are well.
#15 - Will we get to watch him **** a dolphin? 02/21/2015 on Stargate was better than GoT -2
#296 - There were many reasons. Under the leadership of Saladin, he D…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/21/2015 on Perspective -1
#504 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
True cross you say? How is it that there is no evidence for this?
User avatar #521 - captainfuckitall (02/21/2015) [-]
No evidence for what?
#528 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
There's no evidence that he had pieces of the 'the true cross'.
#49 - No it doesn't. EVERYONE is 'Ethnic'. In this context, the whit… 02/21/2015 on Rashida Jones -1

user's channels

Join Subscribe morbid-channel

Comments(507):

[ 507 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 507 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)