Level 91 Comments: Srs Business
OfflineSend mail to caitseviltouch Block caitseviltouch Invite caitseviltouch to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||3/06/2012|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Content Thumbs:||1 total, 1 , 2|
|Comment Thumbs:||141 total, 153 , 12|
|Content Level Progress:|| 5.08% (3/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 0% (0/1) |
Level 91 Comments: Srs Business → Level 92 Comments: Srs Business
|Total Comments Made:||32|
latest user's comments
|#235 - Sorry to hear that. On my last birthday, no one really even ac…||07/04/2013 on Cheers (Read Description)||+2|
|#24 - Not a movie. Awesome old show called "Quantum Leap."||06/15/2013 on Well this is awkward||+1|
|#229 - Where the hell are all these giants? I am 5'10" and barel… [+] (1 new reply)||04/21/2013 on everyday issues of being 6'10"||+2|
|#551 - Soo... Why didn't he just tell her he wasn't interested in the…||09/09/2012 on Overly attached girl||+14|
|#573 - You're welcome, op! Also, can I ask that when you get… [+] (1 new reply)||06/23/2012 on Ill be back!||0|
|#57 - I thought the myth about the cats and babies was different. …||06/23/2012 on Animal myths (rp)||0|
|#257 - Scariest **** ever...||06/23/2012 on Ragefaces 3D||+1|
|#498 - Well, ****. Good luck, op! [+] (3 new replies)||06/23/2012 on Ill be back!||+2|
|#26 - Oh, ****! She fancy!||06/03/2012 on marked||0|
|#386 - Let me clarify, I meant that adults who are dating and having … [+] (1 new reply)||05/20/2012 on LOVE||0|
#422 - anon (05/20/2012) [-]
That's the thing, you are however (in some places) immediately suspected of processing child pornography, which is illegal. Often the locals will berate the police into acting, to the extent of faking witness accounts; it's ridiculous, but sadly true.
It's effectively the Salem Witch Hunts all over again, only in the 21st century.
"But if they are viewing child pornography..."
Of course, there's no debating that, but that's still child exploitation; the point I was making is that they can be mutually exclusive.
And that's the thing, it's hard to suppress and such I strong urge, which is why I do sympathise with them to some degree.
At the end of the day, they have no outlet, they either "become normal" or go to prison.
To be honest, I genuinely don't know one can help their predicament, of course a child cannot consent. Legalising the viewing of child pornography would just encourage a larger demand, but at the same time it encourages the person to "try something" with the child.
In some cases, it'd be safer to molest the child, I'm not even joking; the justice system in action.
I remember a case (I cannot find it for the life of me) where a man possessed around 18 images of child pornography, he received 11 years for each item, totalling 198 years in prison.
If he had physically molested that child, he would've received 30 - 40 years.
Here's a different example, but it shows that this kind of thing does happen:
www [.] nytimes [.] com/2011/11/05/us/life-sentence-for-possession-of-child-pornography-spurs-debate .html
He got more than you would receive for first-degree murder. Is possessing child pornography really worse than murder?
At the end of the day, my point is that too often are paedophiles treated the same as Child rapists.
Every Child rapist is a paedophile, but not every paedophile is a child rapist. Like you said, adults have the capacity to judge, and although they judge not to harm children, they are treated the same as those who do.