Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

bumpin    

Rank #15288 on Comments
bumpin Avatar Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower
Online
Send mail to bumpin Block bumpin Invite bumpin to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Interests: tits and vaginas
Date Signed Up:4/08/2011
Last Login:7/23/2014
Location:your moms house
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#15288
Highest Content Rank:#3435
Highest Comment Rank:#4333
Content Thumbs: 3493 total,  4563 ,  1070
Comment Thumbs: 2894 total,  3343 ,  449
Content Level Progress: 92% (92/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 76% (76/100)
Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:134780
Times Content Favorited:205 times
Total Comments Made:805
FJ Points:6377
tits or gtfo

latest user's comments

#177 - so many grammatical errors...  [+] (1 new reply) 01/21/2013 on FJ, stop being so gullible +1
User avatar #219 - jzwangpk (01/21/2013) [-]
And spelling. OP even managed to misspell 'Aladdin'. On a post about Aladdin.
#230 - Can someone explain this to me? I dont get it... sorry  [+] (5 new replies) 01/21/2013 on I can see this happening. +5
User avatar #243 - zhooker (01/21/2013) [-]
It's from katawa shoujo
User avatar #241 - zhooker (01/21/2013) [-]
It's from some Japanese "game" that's just a story with the occasional decision. I forgot the name of it.
User avatar #245 - tylosaurus (01/21/2013) [-]
I believe it's from 4chan so I wouldn't call it japanese.
#248 - devout feminist (01/21/2013) [-]
4chan is a Japanese based board
User avatar #252 - tylosaurus (01/21/2013) [-]
>japanese based.

No. It was inspired by an imageboard that was japanese. It's not japanese-based. There are boards for talking about japan specifically called /jp/ or something like that.

I'm pretty sure it was developed by anons on /a/ and /v/. Anime and videogame board.
#52 - Picture 01/21/2013 on Remember Pepperidge farm? +2
#93 - its so accurate 01/19/2013 on Hipster McFly -2
#763 - I completely agree! You sir are a gentlemen and a scholar. Mos… 01/19/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#708 - Really? Not even one logical argument? How about the fact that…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#757 - knuckleheaded (01/19/2013) [-]
I should've clarified; by logical, I did not mean the second amendment. If that is the only defense a gun owner can come up with for owning a so called "assault weapon", then I think it's questionable they deserve to buy any at all. We need to have smarter reasons for owning guns than the fact that a piece of paper from 220 years ago says we can, and so far, it's the only one I've heard given by the conservative bigot side of the media. You make a great argument for it, and I honestly have to applaud you for that. Thank you!
My point with bringing up the NRA was that, though they don't speak for all, they are a key voice in defending gun rights, but instead of using logical, sound arguments such as you posited, they went for misdirection first thing. It's disappointing when the one organization for defending a right can't even do it well.
There's so much more discussion that needs to be had on this issue, and not enough people who know what they're talking about to have it.
User avatar #763 - bumpin (01/19/2013) [-]
I completely agree! You sir are a gentlemen and a scholar. Most people would just bash me for being a gun nut, but at least you had the decency to help me understand where you're coming from. I think the term "assault rifle" needs clarification. Usually, people who hunt like to have things like shotguns or rifles because they can increase the chances of hitting the target. But I digress. I agree, the NRA is going about this the wrong way and it only convinces me more that we may need a third party in America to come and work for THE PEOPLE and not for themselves. But that's just my opinion. I really hope we have more discussions like this in the future, you are actually intelligent and informed when it comes to these issues lol XD
#578 - The only problem I have with this whole gun control issue is t…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#632 - knuckleheaded (01/18/2013) [-]
Frankly I haven't heard a single logical defense on the republican side for why we shouldnt have stricter gun laws, unless you count the "fight the government"/doomsday preppers BS. Also the largely Repub funded NRA decided to blame violent video games, of all things, when studies the world over have shown there are no ties between violent media and violent reality. I just mowed down four freight trucks in a driveby on sleeping dogs with a submachinegun, does that mean I'll leave my house and go do it in real life too? No. At least the prez is doing something. Not to mention the heavier penalties for a gun related crime and more background checks for gun purchases. Those are proposals that might actually make a difference.
User avatar #708 - bumpin (01/18/2013) [-]
Really? Not even one logical argument? How about the fact that its in the Constitution for one. The reason the founders put the right to bear arms in the Constitution was so that the people could protect themselves not from each other, but from the government. Disarmament is the precursor to Tyranny. People like Chavez and Fidel Castro made disarmament their first priority after taking power. Its much easier to control an unarmed population. I'm not saying that our government is that way, but by the way things have been going, its safe to assume that something fishy is going on. Secondly, the NRA doesn't speak for all Republicans or gun owners. Most people who want more gun control have probably never used a gun in their life. Some people make a living selling and using guns. Making it harder to own guns will only weaken our economy even more. Lastly, I'd like to point out that I'm not a Republican and I do believe things like background checks are a good idea. But I believe it is very Unconstitutional to "ban" any type of weapon, and the fact that Obama is using executive orders to do so is, in my opinion, tyrannical.
#757 - knuckleheaded (01/19/2013) [-]
I should've clarified; by logical, I did not mean the second amendment. If that is the only defense a gun owner can come up with for owning a so called "assault weapon", then I think it's questionable they deserve to buy any at all. We need to have smarter reasons for owning guns than the fact that a piece of paper from 220 years ago says we can, and so far, it's the only one I've heard given by the conservative bigot side of the media. You make a great argument for it, and I honestly have to applaud you for that. Thank you!
My point with bringing up the NRA was that, though they don't speak for all, they are a key voice in defending gun rights, but instead of using logical, sound arguments such as you posited, they went for misdirection first thing. It's disappointing when the one organization for defending a right can't even do it well.
There's so much more discussion that needs to be had on this issue, and not enough people who know what they're talking about to have it.
User avatar #763 - bumpin (01/19/2013) [-]
I completely agree! You sir are a gentlemen and a scholar. Most people would just bash me for being a gun nut, but at least you had the decency to help me understand where you're coming from. I think the term "assault rifle" needs clarification. Usually, people who hunt like to have things like shotguns or rifles because they can increase the chances of hitting the target. But I digress. I agree, the NRA is going about this the wrong way and it only convinces me more that we may need a third party in America to come and work for THE PEOPLE and not for themselves. But that's just my opinion. I really hope we have more discussions like this in the future, you are actually intelligent and informed when it comes to these issues lol XD
#597 - thepenname (01/18/2013) [-]
Different networks often have their own political slants. Like the anon said, Fox is very conservative, whereas other networks more liberal and a few aim toward bipartisanship, but often fall short.
#592 - devout feminist (01/18/2013) [-]
watch fox and you will see the conservative bigot view.
#441 - Picture 01/18/2013 on The Greatest Gift -1
#148 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 01/18/2013 on How to save a suicidal man +7
#150 - tonkkax (01/18/2013) [-]
#212 - wut 01/18/2013 on Talk about bad timing +1
#178 - Picture 01/15/2013 on shrek +1
#421 - Posts like this are dumb. There are Christians who also believ… 01/15/2013 on Evolution -2
#363 - Comment deleted 01/14/2013 on :( 0
#820 - So much feel... 01/10/2013 on Legend of Zelda feels. 0
#81 - WHAT I LEARNED ABOUT PICKING UP CHICKS TODAY IS... 01/05/2013 on Women love bad boys +1
#322 - WTF 01/05/2013 on what the fuck +1
#205 - MFW that will never happen to me 01/03/2013 on Ted quote +3
#165 - MOAR 01/02/2013 on Going Swimming +2
#148 - MFW 01/02/2013 on Why are you here? 0
#138 - MFW people don't like my content 01/02/2013 on Mfw people don't like my... 0
#250 - Almost 400 thumbs... for dubs 01/01/2013 on Destroyer of stars +14
#350 - Picture 01/01/2013 on Korra +3
#1 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 12/31/2012 on canada +1
#9 - lolwatthe Comment deleted by bumpin
#228 - Picture 12/31/2012 on Wat +9
#341 - Picture 12/30/2012 on The past -1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2400

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #10 - soundofwinter (06/25/2014) [-]
fuck you
User avatar #8 - idunnolol (08/07/2013) [-]
What the fuck is wrong with you, you jewish cunt
User avatar #9 to #8 - bumpin ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
lol wut
#3 - AnFour (05/19/2012) [-]
Thanks a lot faggot
User avatar #4 to #4 - bumpin ONLINE (05/19/2012) [-]
Don't blame me. I posted it cause it was funny. Fj took it seriously. Blaming me is like sueing McDonalds because it made you fat. FJ put it on front page, not me
User avatar #1 - commontroll (05/19/2012) [-]
I have a feeling you're the same person who tried forcing that fucking meme two or three weeks ago.
User avatar #2 to #1 - bumpin ONLINE (05/19/2012) [-]
lol nope. The only reason I posted that was because I understand the sarcasm and figured fj would realize its meaning
User avatar #5 to #3 - commontroll (05/19/2012) [-]
Ah, there was some guy who posted about 30 pictures of "New Meme" over and over in like, thirty minutes.
User avatar #6 to #6 - bumpin ONLINE (05/20/2012) [-]
well i can honestly say it wasnt me. In fact, this is the first time I've ever gotten front page. I don't force memes and I only use this account when browsing FJ. I didn't think the FJ community would be so fucking stupid. Altough, I think people won't be using new meme on anything else except that thread
User avatar #7 to #7 - commontroll (05/20/2012) [-]
Probably not.
 Friends (0)