Upload
Login or register

brobathehutt

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 114
Date Signed Up:8/09/2013
Location:Long ago in a galaxy far away
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#545
Highest Content Rank:#13750
Highest Comment Rank:#376
Content Thumbs: 0 total,  7 ,  7
Comment Thumbs: 12428 total,  14699 ,  2271
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 71% (71/100)
Level 295 Comments: Post Master → Level 296 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:0
Content Views:954
Total Comments Made:3730
FJ Points:9594

  • Views: 953
    Thumbs Up 7 Thumbs Down 7 Total: 0
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/05/13
    Brock Obama Brock Obama

latest user's comments

#102 - You're doing pretty well these days for someone who drowned. 2 hours ago on RACIST TEST: Spot the... +3
#2 - This whole show was weird but fun overall. It's a shame it did…  [+] (1 new reply) 14 hours ago on PSA from the Anti-Smoking... +3
User avatar
#7 - xitsukalong (9 hours ago) [-]
I can say this to alot of series....sadly..
#139 - No, the tranquilizer isn't immediate. With a gorilla there's a… 14 hours ago on My God... 0
#30 - No, part of being evil is being immoral. If you actually had a… 14 hours ago on Oknifta Figrudi Uglarse 0
#7 - I'm wondering what the right answer is myself. Even if you jus…  [+] (1 new reply) 14 hours ago on washington +6
#22 - godofhorizons (6 hours ago) [-]
My guess is that they were given a handout/study guide that had the exact phrase "Washington's army did not receive any support from _____" and that's the answer they were looking for. Poorly worded question/study guide, but at least more plausible.
#28 - Technically the house isn't evil by default, for instance Snap…  [+] (2 new replies) 15 hours ago on Oknifta Figrudi Uglarse +2
#29 - amuzen (14 hours ago) [-]
it's not redundant because being evil is both the reward and the price which is what I'm pointing out and thus stating that specific distinction brings more information to the table.
User avatar
#30 - brobathehutt (14 hours ago) [-]
No, part of being evil is being immoral. If you actually had a strong sense of morality and you were turned evil you would lose your sense of morality by definition of turning evil - being immoral is a requirement of being evil. On the other hand, you aren't born with morals and as I said before not everyone actually has a sense of morality to begin with (in fact most evil people do not have a sense of morality at any point in their lives, which is why its easy to describe them as evil).

If you want to say someone who is evil has thrown away their sense of morality for some reason and thus became evil you would have to specify one specific person because it is important to know whether or not that person was originally good if they were evil and just hid it. If you want to talk about an evil group you don't say they threw away their sense of morality because you don't know if all of the people did and again if the group is evil then it is implied that they are immoral anyway so you don't need to specify that information for the entire group.
#63 - Oh I see it was a form of highly advanced sarcasm.  [+] (1 new reply) 15 hours ago on Education 0
#64 - migueldecervantes (15 hours ago) [-]
Yups.
#18 - >Women >Ops house Nice try, guy, but we all know… 18 hours ago on Oknifta Figrudi Uglarse +6
#17 - "Evil at the cost of all basic human morale's" B…  [+] (4 new replies) 18 hours ago on Oknifta Figrudi Uglarse -1
#27 - amuzen (15 hours ago) [-]
yeah I mean being kind doesn't necessarily have to make you naive either, it's just the weakness that's attributed to that house. Throwing away their moral's just happens to be the thing they have to discard in order to be evil which TBH seems to be both Hilary's, and every important slytherin's goals.


Also the word I should've used is moral's not morality, please don't correct my English if you're not even going to make a point to try and be correct.
User avatar
#28 - brobathehutt (15 hours ago) [-]
Technically the house isn't evil by default, for instance Snape wasn't evil and he was in the house forever.
People don't throw away their morals to become evil that isn't how that shit works. If you can throw away your own morals then in reality you never had a strong sense of morality to begin with and just had not found any reason to be immoral (which is awfully inconvenient in society it turns out). Serial killers are immoral, but at some they followed the rules and adhered to a set of morals. They never actually gave a shit about those morals, they were following them to avoid getting in trouble. Thus they did not throw away their morals, they were always immoral and never developed a sense of morality, thus they never truly had any morals to through away.

The difference between moral and morality is really fucking minor by the way, they mean the same thing. If I want to be picky on your grammar instead of simply getting you to use the right word I would tell you to end the sentence at evil because the definition of evil is immoral and malevolent, thus your sentence is redundant no matter which word you use.
#29 - amuzen (14 hours ago) [-]
it's not redundant because being evil is both the reward and the price which is what I'm pointing out and thus stating that specific distinction brings more information to the table.
User avatar
#30 - brobathehutt (14 hours ago) [-]
No, part of being evil is being immoral. If you actually had a strong sense of morality and you were turned evil you would lose your sense of morality by definition of turning evil - being immoral is a requirement of being evil. On the other hand, you aren't born with morals and as I said before not everyone actually has a sense of morality to begin with (in fact most evil people do not have a sense of morality at any point in their lives, which is why its easy to describe them as evil).

If you want to say someone who is evil has thrown away their sense of morality for some reason and thus became evil you would have to specify one specific person because it is important to know whether or not that person was originally good if they were evil and just hid it. If you want to talk about an evil group you don't say they threw away their sense of morality because you don't know if all of the people did and again if the group is evil then it is implied that they are immoral anyway so you don't need to specify that information for the entire group.
#50 - The president can't bankrupt the country by himself, congress … 18 hours ago on Winning +2
brobathehutt has disabled anonymous comments.
Refresh Comments (5)
5 comments displayed.
#16 - gugek
(12/23/2015) [-]
hey have a good day today bro.
#17 to #16 - brobathehutt
(12/23/2015) [-]
<3
#18 to #17 - gugek
(12/23/2015) [-]
______________
#2 - brobathehutt
(08/11/2013) [-]
Not unless it's on someone's content - just to be THAT guy.
#1 - sidnineonefourtwo
(08/11/2013) [-]
Would you like a dbz dump?