Upload
Login or register

bothemastaofall

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:3/14/2012
Last Login:9/27/2016
Stats
Content Ranking:#3342
Comment Ranking:#2537
Highest Content Rank:#3085
Highest Comment Rank:#698
Content Thumbs: 1514 total,  1777 ,  263
Comment Thumbs: 15141 total,  18785 ,  3644
Content Level Progress: 63% (63/100)
Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 63.1% (631/1000)
Level 313 Comments: Wizard → Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:0
Content Views:125596
Times Content Favorited:106 times
Total Comments Made:4466
FJ Points:14957
Favorite Tags: funny (6) | paper mario (2) | pun (2)

latest user's comments

#114 - They already are depending on state.  [+] (1 reply) 09/16/2015 on Trump 2016 0
User avatar
#115 - theism (09/16/2015) [-]
Then the logical extension of gun control would be to make that the law everywhere.
#11 - While I like Trump there's a few things I'm pretty su…  [+] (12 replies) 09/15/2015 on Trump 2016 +5
User avatar
#47 - valintina (09/15/2015) [-]
Eh, Trump's sons (I think he has two) are huge on guns and hunting. So Trump evolved from his AWB position in the early 2000s to being rather Pro-Gun. He even owns a H&K 45 ACP handgun that he loves.
User avatar
#21 - jzwangpk (09/15/2015) [-]
What's wrong with gun control? Unless you mean like seriously making it stupid hard to buy guns to the point of pretty much prohibiting them. Otherwise I don't see how more regulation could hurt.

Pretty sure you're right about the other two though.
#69 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Yea, I think there is a big difference in regulation and banning.

I'm fine with background checks and whatnot (which states like New York and (I believe) Connecticut already have.), but as I'm a firm supporter of individual rights I can't agree with any outright ban on firearms.
#50 - pebar (09/15/2015) [-]
it's entirely based on misinformation and fear
User avatar
#65 - jzwangpk (09/15/2015) [-]
So you're against his reasoning then? If so, then I would agree. I support gun control (not prohibition, but regulation - it's my right, but it's also something that can be very dangerous), but gun control based on absolutely ridiculous criteria like 'assault weapons' and 'thirty magazine clip in half a second' shit is top-tier retarded. If you're gonna do something, do it right, don't just use rampant fear-mongering.
User avatar
#66 - pebar (09/15/2015) [-]
name one regulation that we america, I assume don't already have that you want
User avatar
#84 - theism (09/15/2015) [-]
Private sellers in many areas can bypass essentially all regulations on sales, what people mean when they bring up the 'gunshow loophole'. Unless I'm mistaken.
#98 - anon (09/16/2015) [-]
What would the punishment be for someone who sells his rifle to a neighbor?
User avatar
#97 - pebar (09/16/2015) [-]
How could you possibly enforce any law against that?
private transactions are, by definition, private

the government has absolutely no way of knowing when a transfer occurs
User avatar
#101 - theism (09/16/2015) [-]
You could register guns the same way we register cars. That way if someone was found with a gun that was not legally transfered to them both that person and the seller could be held accountable.
User avatar
#114 - bothemastaofall (09/16/2015) [-]
They already are depending on state.
User avatar
#115 - theism (09/16/2015) [-]
Then the logical extension of gun control would be to make that the law everywhere.
#296 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 reply) 09/12/2015 on Free things! 0
#298 - bothemastaofall Comment deleted by
#295 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 replies) 09/12/2015 on Free things! 0
#296 - bothemastaofall Comment deleted by
#298 - bothemastaofall Comment deleted by