Upload
Login or register

bokkos

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:4/04/2011
Last Login:9/18/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#29974
Highest Content Rank:#6551
Highest Comment Rank:#456
Content Thumbs: 522 total,  635 ,  113
Comment Thumbs: 16339 total,  19220 ,  2881
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 51 Content: Sammich eater → Level 52 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 57.4% (574/1000)
Level 315 Comments: Wizard → Level 316 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:1
Content Views:37357
Times Content Favorited:44 times
Total Comments Made:3307
FJ Points:16505
Favorite Tags: a (2) | my (2)
Who the fuck writes in these things?

latest user's comments

#28 - Collective punishment you mean? If only I could think of a few…  [+] (18 replies) 03/23/2016 on The truth +7
#91 - anon (03/23/2016) [-]
So we should just keep letting Muslims come into Europe and make it worse? Good thinking there. Let's ruin our own countries, don't want to do anything to protect our land or people because that could make us look bad. No thanks.
User avatar
#71 - ishallsmiteyou (03/23/2016) [-]
What robuntu said.
#44 - robuntu (03/23/2016) [-]
I agree with you 100%.

I'm a member of the KKK and I'm so sick of people saying the KKK is bad. Most members of the KKK never did anything wrong. The KKK stands for family values (just read our website).

A *few* KKK members get carried away and commit crimes. That doesn't reflect on the rest of us. I hate that I can't wear my KKK gear without be verbally assaulted.

You can't judge an entire group based on the actions of the few. The KKK is totally cool. Muslims in the EU are totally cool. You've nailed it bro.
User avatar
#42 - bakinboy (03/23/2016) [-]
easy to say when you dont have to live in it.
There is a difference between right leaning muslims and right leaning christians,
the christians arent the ones blowing themselves up or executing stadiums full of people.
that being said i think all religion is poison as it is always eventually used as an excuse for senseless violence against innocent people.
The difference between the attacks by "Caucasian, right wing Christians" and those by islamic terrorists is that none of those attacks by "Caucasian, right wing Christians" was ever declared to be in the name of religious warfare(they were just psychopathic assholes with guns), or sponsored by an organization who's express goal is killing anyone who does not believe in their specific version of a religion that was created by a pedophile polygamist murderer who claimed writing a fucking book was somehow a miracle.
Yea, the FBI assembled a task force for monitoring soverign citizens under the Patriot Act, and though it monitored citizens its purpose was to intercept communication between ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.
Considering that literally every major organized terrorist attack around the world has been expressly done in the name of Islam i think its fucking safe to say that Islam is a goddamn cancer on humanity.
Do you think terrorists dont know how to think? It seems like a pretty fucking obvious idea (that has been well documented as Fact) for these extremists to follow this massive wave of unchecked refugees as an opportunity to get themselves, weapons, and explosives Europe without raising suspicion. It is also easy for them to turn these refugees into terrorists since literally a quarter of all Muslims support the enforcement of sharia law on the general population. Do you not think the terrorists know this? It is much easier to convince a desperate person, such as one who's fled their country and living on welfare, to become a religious extremist.
It is not intentional, but the fact is that these refugees do nothing but bring the terrorism they try to escape from with them. Even if they are not religious extremists, if they stay they will try to impose their backwards religious views on Europe.

It is no coincidence that since the influx began, Sweden (a country run by cucks obsessed with political correctness and tolerance) is now the rape capital of europe,
with a 1,400% increase in rapes. By who? take a wild fucking guess.
These refugees do not speak the languages of most of Europe. Most can only manage broken english, which is why they all want to get into the UK. Most cannot get into the UK, so they are stuck in a country where they dont speak the language and (voluntarily or not) can do nothing but live off the welfare system. It is not economically possible to sustain these people.
They need to go back to their countries and fight to take them back from the jihadists. If they stay here they will do nothing but condemn Europe to the same fate as the middle east.
so BTFO and go back to having an Imam face fuck you behind his lectern while he rants on evils of homosexuality and western civilization you fucking ignorant cuck.
#29 - anon (03/23/2016) [-]
Okay, kick out all cultists, not sure what the issue is?
User avatar
#32 - bokkos (03/23/2016) [-]
How do you identify them? What process do you use? It's very easy to say "kick out all the X", but the second you're pressed on logistics I doubt you have much to say. Can you just deport American citizens? Doesn't the Constitution and the Amendments have something to say on the matter?
But I forgot; the Constitution no longer counts when it becomes inconvenient. How does a Canadian know more about your country than you do? RIP 4th + 8th Amendment
#43 - vvthegreats (03/23/2016) [-]
You, sir, I like. Keep living. This world could use more people like you.
User avatar
#37 - elvoz (03/23/2016) [-]
Alternative to kicking out Muslims would be banning more from entering. It is more or less proven that the existing Muslim population is not extremist and doesn't pose a threat but letting in more people of a dangerous ideology who you have absolutely no background knowledge of is a different beast. Preventing them from coming in is reasonable. The Muslims that are not extremists will be upset, surely. But if it doesn't make them upset enough to solve their internal problems to gain access to the utopia that is America then that would show something else of the Islamic religion.

But what do I know. I hate the idea of religion so I'm coming into this with a bias. If people want to believe in retarded shit then they should be subject to the consequences of denying the world at large.
#93 - anon (03/23/2016) [-]
They don't belong in Europe, they get out of Europe. Once their countries are better then they should be rounded up and sent back there.
#81 - selongb (03/23/2016) [-]
Heres the problem, whats stopping Hakim from saying, "oh no, I'm not a Muslim, I'm a Christian"

Test of faiths fail when it comes to extremism, these are people who have already gone against the religion that they claim to follow, you don't think they will lie to get what they want?
#129 - anon (03/23/2016) [-]
The answer is saying, hey, a cults a cult and kicking him out to a theocracy.
User avatar
#130 - selongb (03/23/2016) [-]
I'm sorry could you rephrase that?
User avatar
#122 - nimba (03/23/2016) [-]
It's easy enough to do horrendous shit while reading from holy books, you just choose the page that agrees with what you already wanted to do
User avatar
#123 - selongb (03/23/2016) [-]
and in this case, ignore the pages that real it back in.
User avatar
#125 - nimba (03/23/2016) [-]
Better yet, just think about it yourself
User avatar
#103 - vladhellsing (03/23/2016) [-]
The Quran is full of contradictions, just like the bible. For every verse/sura that says love thy neighbour, there's at least three that say behead thy neighbour.
User avatar
#105 - selongb (03/23/2016) [-]
Islam is sort of different in the sense that we just have a lot of red tape around killing, but once you navigate said red tape, you can have a field day with murder.
User avatar
#109 - vladhellsing (03/23/2016) [-]
Same with the bible when it comes to slavery (there's even a loophole for enslaving your fellow Jew for life). Makes me wonder why people bother with these books in the first place when the answers to morality lie within us.
#21 - Do you really believe that a billionaire who has outsourced hi…  [+] (8 replies) 03/15/2016 on FJ recently +11
#237 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
>>#64

I am talking about lotengo...
User avatar
#240 - lotengo (03/15/2016) [-]
When did i do that? admit that i'm a populist.
User avatar
#244 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
Just to be clear, I do fully believe you hold your own values.
User avatar
#243 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
Maybe I misinterpreted then. It was in a discussion where you were discussing what to post to FJ and how they respond to it.

I am not scorning you for it though, not at all. A few populists in an entertainment zone is actually a good thing.
User avatar
#246 - lotengo (03/15/2016) [-]
Well, i do try to post content that induces discussion, because the site needs more comments, it has lost commentors compared to few years back. Admin gave me the numbers.
Its working out pretty good so far.

But people must also not forget that i post way more than just political stuff
#249 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
**dorg used "*roll picture*"**
**dorg rolled image**

Keep it up is all I can say I also remember a few years back when there were always a shitload of comments. I have been here since 2011 on a daily basis.
User avatar
#64 - containlettersonly (03/15/2016) [-]
Beleive you haven't done enough research if you think the Trump university thing holds any water








More Untruth About Donald Trump
User avatar
#512 - bokkos (03/23/2016) [-]
>citing Peter Molyneux as a legitimate source

How about you come back with something more compelling than the myriad lawsuits, emails, and confessions by the Trump University instructors themselves (a few of which were, in fact, convicted con artists). Why did Trump dump the university if it wasn't legitimate? What about the multiple reports of poor classroom etiquette and borderline absent content?
Yes I am late to the party; yes your head does exist in an echo chamber
#34 - I'd look up the "Trail of Tears" if I were you; that…  [+] (3 replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +5
#36 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Yes. I know all about the Trail of Tears. Again, displacement. Not genocide. The US military could have just rounded them all up and killed them. What happened to them was awful, and inexcusable, but not fitting the definition of genocide.
User avatar
#39 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and abolish the communities (and by extension, the culture); any action undertaken to bring about the removal of an ethnic group by means of preventing births, active killing or displacing/diluting the population is still genocide as defined in the original UN Convention in 1951. It was a genocide, plain and simple; it destroyed an entire ethnic group of defined ethnic character and history, from an established territory. I should add, that assimilation was never an option like in the Mongol or Persian empires.
#38 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Just like the ottomans "displaced" all those greeks and armenians
#31 - A) The Native American war resulted in a genocide, so you can …  [+] (6 replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +2
#32 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
A. Not really. Genocide of the Natives was more of a Spanish thing. Sure theye killed a lot of them, but they didn't begin a purposeful, and systematic extermination of Native Populations. Mostly they just displaced the natives to get them out of the way and massacred a few villages here and there.
B. Fair enough.

It was the British that burned down the White House. Not the Canadians. Plus though the war ended in a draw, the US absolutely got the better deal with the treaty that ended the war. It allowed the US to expand westward for muh Manifest Destiny and all that shit.
User avatar
#34 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
I'd look up the "Trail of Tears" if I were you; that was only one part of a targeted genocide against the Natives by the US. Canada did much the same thing, but we finally have a PM who's attempting to address the rift those actions caused.
#36 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Yes. I know all about the Trail of Tears. Again, displacement. Not genocide. The US military could have just rounded them all up and killed them. What happened to them was awful, and inexcusable, but not fitting the definition of genocide.
User avatar
#39 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and abolish the communities (and by extension, the culture); any action undertaken to bring about the removal of an ethnic group by means of preventing births, active killing or displacing/diluting the population is still genocide as defined in the original UN Convention in 1951. It was a genocide, plain and simple; it destroyed an entire ethnic group of defined ethnic character and history, from an established territory. I should add, that assimilation was never an option like in the Mongol or Persian empires.
#38 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Just like the ottomans "displaced" all those greeks and armenians
#33 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
*The US killed...
#26 - That would be right, hence the hideous embarrassments that wer…  [+] (3 replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +1
User avatar
#120 - vishnarg (03/15/2016) [-]
The current state of Iraq and Syria is due to border reconstruction and artificial implementation of economic sanctions put in place by Allied European powers after World War II. When imperialism crumbled worldwide after the end of WWII, Britain basically gave the holy land to the Israelis, which obviously pissed a lot of people off and made the region violent and unstable ever since, so don't blame the US for the Middle East. We fucked up shit in Chile, El Salvador, and of course Vietnam, but Syria and Iraq have nothing to do with us cause wise.
#127 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** it will be relevant to the topic. I believe in admin.
#27 - iamchicken (03/15/2016) [-]
If we're great at anything.

It's ruining everything for everyone else.
#16 - Well they won a war by themselves, something the USA has yet t…  [+] (18 replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +10
#132 - gerfox (03/15/2016) [-]
You know that the Finns lost that war, right?
#86 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Spanish American war much?
#35 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Hey, at least we have yet to lose a war. Korea is still going, and vietnam was never an actual war. All the "Wars" in the middle east we have won. Its just that they lead to another conflict. We killed saddam hussain? Fucking Taliban and al quida shows up. Beat them? ISIS.
#30 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Mexican-American War.
Indian wars.
Civil War Joke
Spanish-American War.
Now name some wars your country has won by itself.
User avatar
#31 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
A) The Native American war resulted in a genocide, so you can call that a win if your morality has completely degraded.
B) Yeah the Spanish and Mexican wars technically were, although the Phillipines was an "ally" in the former

Canada doesn't pride itself on military prowess (although we do have the highest number of confirmed militant officer kills), but the 2 times America came up to "liberate" us from the British, we won and burned the White House down on the second incursion. That was before we were a nation though, so it may not count.
#32 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
A. Not really. Genocide of the Natives was more of a Spanish thing. Sure theye killed a lot of them, but they didn't begin a purposeful, and systematic extermination of Native Populations. Mostly they just displaced the natives to get them out of the way and massacred a few villages here and there.
B. Fair enough.

It was the British that burned down the White House. Not the Canadians. Plus though the war ended in a draw, the US absolutely got the better deal with the treaty that ended the war. It allowed the US to expand westward for muh Manifest Destiny and all that shit.
User avatar
#34 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
I'd look up the "Trail of Tears" if I were you; that was only one part of a targeted genocide against the Natives by the US. Canada did much the same thing, but we finally have a PM who's attempting to address the rift those actions caused.
#36 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Yes. I know all about the Trail of Tears. Again, displacement. Not genocide. The US military could have just rounded them all up and killed them. What happened to them was awful, and inexcusable, but not fitting the definition of genocide.
User avatar
#39 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and abolish the communities (and by extension, the culture); any action undertaken to bring about the removal of an ethnic group by means of preventing births, active killing or displacing/diluting the population is still genocide as defined in the original UN Convention in 1951. It was a genocide, plain and simple; it destroyed an entire ethnic group of defined ethnic character and history, from an established territory. I should add, that assimilation was never an option like in the Mongol or Persian empires.
#38 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Just like the ottomans "displaced" all those greeks and armenians
#33 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
*The US killed...
User avatar
#25 - iamchicken (03/15/2016) [-]
Why would we not make use of allies though?

Going 1v1 solo bruh sounds like a terrible idea.
User avatar
#26 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
That would be right, hence the hideous embarrassments that were the Korean and Vietnam wars, and the current embarrassment that is Iraq and Syria. I'll applaud the Americans on one thing though; they sure generate a power vacuum like nobody else.
User avatar
#120 - vishnarg (03/15/2016) [-]
The current state of Iraq and Syria is due to border reconstruction and artificial implementation of economic sanctions put in place by Allied European powers after World War II. When imperialism crumbled worldwide after the end of WWII, Britain basically gave the holy land to the Israelis, which obviously pissed a lot of people off and made the region violent and unstable ever since, so don't blame the US for the Middle East. We fucked up shit in Chile, El Salvador, and of course Vietnam, but Syria and Iraq have nothing to do with us cause wise.
#127 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** it will be relevant to the topic. I believe in admin.
#27 - iamchicken (03/15/2016) [-]
If we're great at anything.

It's ruining everything for everyone else.
User avatar
#24 - lulzdealer (03/15/2016) [-]
Nigga the Winter War ended in a Russian victory. A pyhrric victory, but a victory.
User avatar
#17 - Ruspanic (03/15/2016) [-]
hey hey hey
we won the Civil War by ourselves
:^)