Upload
Login or register

bokkos

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:4/04/2011
Last Login:6/27/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#11604
Highest Content Rank:#6551
Highest Comment Rank:#456
Content Thumbs: 522 total,  635 ,  113
Comment Thumbs: 16348 total,  19177 ,  2829
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 51 Content: Sammich eater → Level 52 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 58.3% (583/1000)
Level 315 Comments: Wizard → Level 316 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:1
Content Views:37300
Times Content Favorited:44 times
Total Comments Made:3295
FJ Points:16508
Favorite Tags: a (2) | my (2)
Who the fuck writes in these things?

latest user's comments

#114 - There's a difference between being a world leader and getting … 03/22/2016 on John Oliver's hypocrisy on... +1
#61 - > I knew I smelled a rat; **** that stupid website. 03/20/2016 on kinda neat, i think 0
#39 - The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and a… 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +2
#21 - Do you really believe that a billionaire who has outsourced hi…  [+] (8 new replies) 03/15/2016 on FJ recently +11
#237 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
>>#64

I am talking about lotengo...
User avatar
#240 - lotengo (03/15/2016) [-]
When did i do that? admit that i'm a populist.
User avatar
#244 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
Just to be clear, I do fully believe you hold your own values.
User avatar
#243 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
Maybe I misinterpreted then. It was in a discussion where you were discussing what to post to FJ and how they respond to it.

I am not scorning you for it though, not at all. A few populists in an entertainment zone is actually a good thing.
User avatar
#246 - lotengo (03/15/2016) [-]
Well, i do try to post content that induces discussion, because the site needs more comments, it has lost commentors compared to few years back. Admin gave me the numbers.
Its working out pretty good so far.

But people must also not forget that i post way more than just political stuff
#249 - dorg (03/15/2016) [-]
**dorg used "*roll picture*"**
**dorg rolled image**

Keep it up is all I can say I also remember a few years back when there were always a shitload of comments. I have been here since 2011 on a daily basis.
User avatar
#64 - containlettersonly (03/15/2016) [-]
Beleive you haven't done enough research if you think the Trump university thing holds any water








More Untruth About Donald Trump
User avatar
#512 - bokkos (03/23/2016) [-]
>citing Peter Molyneux as a legitimate source

How about you come back with something more compelling than the myriad lawsuits, emails, and confessions by the Trump University instructors themselves (a few of which were, in fact, convicted con artists). Why did Trump dump the university if it wasn't legitimate? What about the multiple reports of poor classroom etiquette and borderline absent content?
Yes I am late to the party; yes your head does exist in an echo chamber
#34 - I'd look up the "Trail of Tears" if I were you; that…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +5
#36 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Yes. I know all about the Trail of Tears. Again, displacement. Not genocide. The US military could have just rounded them all up and killed them. What happened to them was awful, and inexcusable, but not fitting the definition of genocide.
User avatar
#39 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and abolish the communities (and by extension, the culture); any action undertaken to bring about the removal of an ethnic group by means of preventing births, active killing or displacing/diluting the population is still genocide as defined in the original UN Convention in 1951. It was a genocide, plain and simple; it destroyed an entire ethnic group of defined ethnic character and history, from an established territory. I should add, that assimilation was never an option like in the Mongol or Persian empires.
#38 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Just like the ottomans "displaced" all those greeks and armenians
#31 - A) The Native American war resulted in a genocide, so you can …  [+] (6 new replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +2
#32 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
A. Not really. Genocide of the Natives was more of a Spanish thing. Sure theye killed a lot of them, but they didn't begin a purposeful, and systematic extermination of Native Populations. Mostly they just displaced the natives to get them out of the way and massacred a few villages here and there.
B. Fair enough.

It was the British that burned down the White House. Not the Canadians. Plus though the war ended in a draw, the US absolutely got the better deal with the treaty that ended the war. It allowed the US to expand westward for muh Manifest Destiny and all that shit.
User avatar
#34 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
I'd look up the "Trail of Tears" if I were you; that was only one part of a targeted genocide against the Natives by the US. Canada did much the same thing, but we finally have a PM who's attempting to address the rift those actions caused.
#36 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Yes. I know all about the Trail of Tears. Again, displacement. Not genocide. The US military could have just rounded them all up and killed them. What happened to them was awful, and inexcusable, but not fitting the definition of genocide.
User avatar
#39 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and abolish the communities (and by extension, the culture); any action undertaken to bring about the removal of an ethnic group by means of preventing births, active killing or displacing/diluting the population is still genocide as defined in the original UN Convention in 1951. It was a genocide, plain and simple; it destroyed an entire ethnic group of defined ethnic character and history, from an established territory. I should add, that assimilation was never an option like in the Mongol or Persian empires.
#38 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Just like the ottomans "displaced" all those greeks and armenians
#33 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
*The US killed...
#26 - That would be right, hence the hideous embarrassments that wer…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +1
User avatar
#120 - vishnarg (03/15/2016) [-]
The current state of Iraq and Syria is due to border reconstruction and artificial implementation of economic sanctions put in place by Allied European powers after World War II. When imperialism crumbled worldwide after the end of WWII, Britain basically gave the holy land to the Israelis, which obviously pissed a lot of people off and made the region violent and unstable ever since, so don't blame the US for the Middle East. We fucked up shit in Chile, El Salvador, and of course Vietnam, but Syria and Iraq have nothing to do with us cause wise.
#127 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** it will be relevant to the topic. I believe in admin.
#27 - iamchicken (03/15/2016) [-]
If we're great at anything.

It's ruining everything for everyone else.
#16 - Well they won a war by themselves, something the USA has yet t…  [+] (18 new replies) 03/15/2016 on Sisu perkele! +10
#132 - gerfox (03/15/2016) [-]
You know that the Finns lost that war, right?
#86 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Spanish American war much?
#35 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Hey, at least we have yet to lose a war. Korea is still going, and vietnam was never an actual war. All the "Wars" in the middle east we have won. Its just that they lead to another conflict. We killed saddam hussain? Fucking Taliban and al quida shows up. Beat them? ISIS.
#30 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Mexican-American War.
Indian wars.
Civil War Joke
Spanish-American War.
Now name some wars your country has won by itself.
User avatar
#31 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
A) The Native American war resulted in a genocide, so you can call that a win if your morality has completely degraded.
B) Yeah the Spanish and Mexican wars technically were, although the Phillipines was an "ally" in the former

Canada doesn't pride itself on military prowess (although we do have the highest number of confirmed militant officer kills), but the 2 times America came up to "liberate" us from the British, we won and burned the White House down on the second incursion. That was before we were a nation though, so it may not count.
#32 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
A. Not really. Genocide of the Natives was more of a Spanish thing. Sure theye killed a lot of them, but they didn't begin a purposeful, and systematic extermination of Native Populations. Mostly they just displaced the natives to get them out of the way and massacred a few villages here and there.
B. Fair enough.

It was the British that burned down the White House. Not the Canadians. Plus though the war ended in a draw, the US absolutely got the better deal with the treaty that ended the war. It allowed the US to expand westward for muh Manifest Destiny and all that shit.
User avatar
#34 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
I'd look up the "Trail of Tears" if I were you; that was only one part of a targeted genocide against the Natives by the US. Canada did much the same thing, but we finally have a PM who's attempting to address the rift those actions caused.
#36 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
Yes. I know all about the Trail of Tears. Again, displacement. Not genocide. The US military could have just rounded them all up and killed them. What happened to them was awful, and inexcusable, but not fitting the definition of genocide.
User avatar
#39 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
The displacement tactics were performed to take the land and abolish the communities (and by extension, the culture); any action undertaken to bring about the removal of an ethnic group by means of preventing births, active killing or displacing/diluting the population is still genocide as defined in the original UN Convention in 1951. It was a genocide, plain and simple; it destroyed an entire ethnic group of defined ethnic character and history, from an established territory. I should add, that assimilation was never an option like in the Mongol or Persian empires.
#38 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Just like the ottomans "displaced" all those greeks and armenians
#33 - mrmcput (03/15/2016) [-]
*The US killed...
User avatar
#25 - iamchicken (03/15/2016) [-]
Why would we not make use of allies though?

Going 1v1 solo bruh sounds like a terrible idea.
User avatar
#26 - bokkos (03/15/2016) [-]
That would be right, hence the hideous embarrassments that were the Korean and Vietnam wars, and the current embarrassment that is Iraq and Syria. I'll applaud the Americans on one thing though; they sure generate a power vacuum like nobody else.
User avatar
#120 - vishnarg (03/15/2016) [-]
The current state of Iraq and Syria is due to border reconstruction and artificial implementation of economic sanctions put in place by Allied European powers after World War II. When imperialism crumbled worldwide after the end of WWII, Britain basically gave the holy land to the Israelis, which obviously pissed a lot of people off and made the region violent and unstable ever since, so don't blame the US for the Middle East. We fucked up shit in Chile, El Salvador, and of course Vietnam, but Syria and Iraq have nothing to do with us cause wise.
#127 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** it will be relevant to the topic. I believe in admin.
#27 - iamchicken (03/15/2016) [-]
If we're great at anything.

It's ruining everything for everyone else.
User avatar
#24 - lulzdealer (03/15/2016) [-]
Nigga the Winter War ended in a Russian victory. A pyhrric victory, but a victory.
User avatar
#17 - Ruspanic (03/15/2016) [-]
hey hey hey
we won the Civil War by ourselves
:^)
#46 - Yeah, you fell for the "Sanders supporter Nazi salute&quo… 03/15/2016 on How the Globalist Oligarchy... -3
#45 - Stray into the comments at your own risk; OP is a lying sack o…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/15/2016 on How the Globalist Oligarchy... -5
#47 - anon (03/15/2016) [-]
Wow, you take this so seriously.