Click to expand
Rank #6784 on CommentsLevel 315 Comments: Wizard
OfflineSend mail to bokkos Block bokkos Invite bokkos to be your friend flag avatar
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||4/04/2011|
|Funnyjunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#7654|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#456|
|Content Thumbs:||523 total, 614 , 91|
|Comment Thumbs:||15640 total, 18030 , 2390|
|Content Level Progress:|| 30% (3/10) |
Level 52 Content: Sammich eater → Level 53 Content: Sammich eater
|Comment Level Progress:|| 8.4% (84/1000) |
Level 315 Comments: Wizard → Level 316 Comments: Wizard
|Times Content Favorited:||44 times|
|Total Comments Made:||2980|
|Favorite Tags:||a (2) | my (2)|
Who the fuck writes in these things?
latest user's comments
|#21 - You sound like a SWJ who can't take a joke for what it is. … [+] (2 new replies)||09/07/2014 on Black Sunshine||+2|
#22 - tonkkax (09/08/2014) [-]
And you look like a retard who uses avatars with Yahtzee in them to seem more intellectually superior. M'lady, have you ever done anything besides argue on the internet? Ever read a book? one of Shakespeare's classy classics that all classy classymen have read? I didn't think so.
|#11 - It's not an irrational fear if there's good reason to be wary of it. [+] (3 new replies)||09/06/2014 on christians||-1|
#28 - fefe (09/06/2014) [-]
It's also what rational people say when confronted with something that they should be wary of.
But I doubt you'd have any inclination to know about what rational people do/say, back to your dead kike on a stick.
|#81 - I'm a third year microbiology student, and I have to say; vacc…||09/04/2014 on Re-think vaccines||+2|
|#346 - And after more reading, its fake! **************…||08/31/2014 on JUSTICE IS SERVED||0|
|#345 - While he does deserve punishment for his stupid ******* … [+] (2 new replies)||08/31/2014 on JUSTICE IS SERVED||+3|
|#66 - ... Did anyone ask? [+] (1 new reply)||08/29/2014 on One Of The Funniest Scenes...||+1|
|#32 - Hey; come check the comments! Are you proud of what … [+] (1 new reply)||08/26/2014 on Brooklyn Nine Nine: Shots...||+2|
|#31 - Picture||08/26/2014 on Brooklyn Nine Nine: Shots...||+5|
|#65 - You managed to spout two lies at once! Seriously, at… [+] (1 new reply)||08/26/2014 on How to annoy Canadians||0|
|#63 - Picture||08/26/2014 on How to annoy Canadians||+10|
|#163 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||08/20/2014 on Effects of different drugs||0|
|#129 - Picture [+] (3 new replies)||08/19/2014 on Effects of different drugs||+1|
|#114 - Picture [+] (5 new replies)||08/19/2014 on Effects of different drugs||+2|
|#100 - Picture [+] (7 new replies)||08/19/2014 on Effects of different drugs||+2|
|#52 - .... I misread your first comment. Sorry||08/19/2014 on Selfie||+1|
|#94 - Picture [+] (9 new replies)||08/19/2014 on Effects of different drugs||+1|
|#46 - You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you? I'm my … [+] (2 new replies)||08/19/2014 on Selfie||0|
|#62 - fuk around n get rekt||08/19/2014 on Protect yourself from...||0|
|#249 - Herein lies the point; men and women are entirely equal in eve… [+] (1 new reply)||08/18/2014 on When you are reading this||0|
#256 - fefe (08/18/2014) [-]
Now correct me if I have misunderstood you but it seems to me that your response to my saying that your examples dont represent modern women is to simply brush aside changes in culture as irrelevant, stating that we are the same species that we were ten thousand years ago. The problem isnt with humans physically so stating that we are still physically the same is irrelevant. The problem has everything to do with culture and how it is changing. While I do understand that women that actually hold the mindset given in the OP represent only a small percent of women as a whole, from what I've seen and read that percent is on the rise. I think that that is a bad thing because if it is true then we could be looking at a steady decline in society. After reading some of schnizel's other posts I can firmly say that I dont agree with him on much, and I have no problems with womens rights, but I do believe the recent rise of "feminism" is a bad thing and should be spoken against.
|#200 - Difference being I'm learned of those arguments, and it'…||08/18/2014 on When you are reading this||0|
|#23 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||08/18/2014 on Bubble Soccer||+8|
|#8 - maybe||08/18/2014 on 0||0|
|#166 - You're invoking reductio ad absurdum, which would work had I s…||08/18/2014 on When you are reading this||+2|
|#6 - All women are the same. [+] (2 new replies)||08/18/2014 on 0||0|
|#157 - What I believe, and I claim to have observed it, that people (… [+] (7 new replies)||08/18/2014 on When you are reading this||+3|
#163 - peterdivine (08/18/2014) [-]
"this content would have us believe that women are only attractive so long as they can do things for men"
Okay, do me a favor, step back, think about this solitary statement, right here, and tell me how you see a relationship in which a woman who does NOTHING for her boyfriend is in any way attractive to anyone dating her in long-term, because you just described a woman who's selfish and self-absorbed and demanded men be attractive to her regardless. You're in for a shocker.
"Wouldn't having two working sides to a household boost household income?"
Take it from someone who had both parents working- that's really the only benefit anyone gets from having both parents work. It's a big one, but it comes with a lot of small setbacks.
" Wouldn't equal distribution of household duties reduce the stress of everyone involved, and increase efficiency?"
Funny thing about jobs is that they don't give a shit about your home schedule. Your employers want you working when you're scheduled, and anything less is used as fuel for your eventual firing. So if both Mom and Dad are working, I sure hope you know a carpool for the kids who get out of school at 4, because if you don't then they're sitting their ass on a curb until one of you gets out.
" Not to mention it brings up the uncomfortable notion that somehow men are incapable of fending for themselves in a household environment, requiring care like some sort of child"
Or being grateful that someone's there to pick up their slack? Heaven forbid.
#233 - hoponthefeelstrain (08/18/2014) [-]
so I'm getting from you that working women are hurting their families by not being stay at home moms. Why can't the dad stay home or they higher a nanny? Why does the wife have to completely give up on her dreams and ambitions and not the husband?
And no women shouldn't be selfish bitches but if taking care of her husband means being completely submissive than she doesn't need to be married to someone like that anyway.
#243 - peterdivine (08/18/2014) [-]
"Why can't the dad stay home or they hire a nanny?"
Well, SOMEone should, because they're your children and if you're hiring nannies to raise them then you're scarcely being their parents at all. I get that equal space in the workplace is a coveted thing, because the role of breadwinner also gives an unofficial "head of the family" role to the worker. The female will want it just to break her "traditional role" she doesn't agree with; the man will want it because it's expected of him. But when both parents are out, competing to "lead", who raises their children?
#166 - bokkos (08/18/2014) [-]
You're invoking reductio ad absurdum, which would work had I stretched my argument to any type of extreme. Of course every relationship is about give and take, but it should be from both sides equally, and I mean completely equally. I didn't say, or even infer, any of the additional claims you placed.
Note that my argument never brought up children, as that is a separate matter. One I'm happy to entertain, because it is important and related, but not my focus at this present moment.
Why can men not pick up the slack for the woman? As you said, what applies for men does for women and vice versa, with the exception of biology and in my opinion ludicrous specific aspects of culture.