Upload
Login or register

bokkos

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:4/04/2011
Last Login:7/01/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#11419
Highest Content Rank:#6551
Highest Comment Rank:#456
Content Thumbs: 522 total,  635 ,  113
Comment Thumbs: 16348 total,  19177 ,  2829
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 51 Content: Sammich eater → Level 52 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 58.3% (583/1000)
Level 315 Comments: Wizard → Level 316 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:1
Content Views:37300
Times Content Favorited:44 times
Total Comments Made:3295
FJ Points:16508
Favorite Tags: a (2) | my (2)
Who the fuck writes in these things?

latest user's comments

#17 - Well, if you honestly think ISIS had a role in planning or per…  [+] (11 new replies) 06/16/2016 on Omama -1
#24 - legendarysnarf (06/16/2016) [-]
"that allow their benefactors to sell guns, including to this shooter. If the NRA lobbying didn't exist, he might have never gotten the gun in the first place. " Maybe if islam didnt exist in the first place he wouldnt of had a reason to buy a gun and shoot up a place.
User avatar
#25 - bokkos (06/16/2016) [-]
Too many non-Muslims commit shootings (both mass and otherwise) in the USA for that point to stand up on it's own. Reread what I said, then try again.
#27 - legendarysnarf (06/16/2016) [-]
thats all im going to say on this because clearly you a so far left you are up your own ass and cant even see past the political agendas that your side creates. blocked for ignorance
#29 - anon (06/16/2016) [-]
If you have to block me to win, you're not doing a very good job of supporting your argument, are you?
#31 - legendarysnarf (06/17/2016) [-]
it wasnt an arguement and i wasnt trying to win, but hooooo god damn man i cant stop laughing at that last comment, i REALLY hope you dont live in america b.c if you get that tattoo, people are going to think you are ISIS and no we arent ignorant, we dont know fucking arabic god damn man, i bet you wear fadoras and have a neck beard dont you. Guns save lives, if the person weilding it knows what they are doing, why not instead of looking at mass shootings, look at how many cases there were, where a man or woman with a gun saved peoples lives because of them carrying a weapon and being trained to use it, but again i blocked you because i really dont want to see your ignorant, stupid ass comments anymore, THATS why i blocked you.

Snarf out.
snarf snarf
#26 - legendarysnarf (06/16/2016) [-]
The USA isnt the only country they have attacked. what about paris? brussels? the countless rapes they have commited, the number of homosexuals that have been executed because they are homos. There have been murders and physcopaths since the beggining of time the more people on earth, the more murders, its simple statistics, the thing is, the ones who kill people, MOST OF THEM DONT CLAIM TO BE DOING IT IN THE NAME OF A FALSE GOD. see this is the point you are missing, ISLAM wants you dead, they want you dead so bad. your policitcal correctness is blinding you to the fact that muslims hate you and want you dead because you dont agree with the, murders just kill to kill.
#95 - anon (06/17/2016) [-]
replace islam with deadbeat people and now think at the revolts of French colored people are few years before, same bruessel

the shit what happens here and murica has absolutely nothing to do with religious orientation, religion is just a disguise like always..

things will change, someone has to pay
#28 - anon (06/16/2016) [-]
Dude. Did I somehow infer that there is not a global Islamic insurgency? Did I say there are zero attacks where the perpetrators killed in the name of Islam? Did I once defend the words written in the Quran, or the Hadith? I was only referring to the Orlando attack that occurred recently, not Charlie Hebdo, not the Rushdie Fatwa, not Sharia.

All gods are false. If you're looking for a pissing match, you've come to the wrong thread.

Pic related: this is a picture of a tattoo I'm getting next month. It says "kafir", basically it means infidel. I'm getting it as a point of proof that Islam is violent, and that the word is dangerous. Fuck right off.
Additionally, I'd say most psychopaths and murderers throughout history did so with the name of a god on their lips, maybe even your god?
User avatar
#30 - bokkos (06/16/2016) [-]
Also; "Islamic" should be more accurately written as "Jihadist"
User avatar
#52 - Onemanretardpack (06/17/2016) [-]
No, Islamic is good. Stop trying to make excuses for them, if all gun owners are responsible for this, then Islam should take responsibility for the actions of their members too
User avatar
#19 - bokkos (06/16/2016) [-]
prayforpeace, this is for you, you dickhead.
#99 - You're a true kool-aid drinker man.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2016 on Hope 2.0 0
#100 - thermobil (06/08/2016) [-]
Don´t know what that means.
#47 - You don't follow the news much do you? COUGH COUGH TR…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/07/2016 on Hope 2.0 +7
#89 - thermobil (06/07/2016) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnytS5Sp3XM
Starts around 20:00 (it´s a lie that he didn´t donate money to the vets)
Also Trump university has has on file positive reviews and recomendations from the people that are trying to sue him, so he is taking them to court.
User avatar
#99 - bokkos (06/08/2016) [-]
You're a true kool-aid drinker man.
#100 - thermobil (06/08/2016) [-]
Don´t know what that means.
#13 - This animation is frequently shown in molecular biology classe…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2016 on THIS MAKES ME HAPPY +8
User avatar
#14 - aizeinstein (06/03/2016) [-]
Yep, and turns out that wasn't an actin filament either. It's a microtubule which is made of tubulin proteins. And that motor protein wasn't myosin, but kinesin.
#54 - Well, if you were to call Hitler Or Mao, or Pol Pot, or …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2016 on SJW comp: Brexit save the... +1
User avatar
#55 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Hitler had a big welfare state, enviormental freak, animal rights its not all bad, but they are all very liberal stances corporate taxes where sky high in nazi Germany
#52 - I'm Canadian; and I know what you mean by the multiple dimensi…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/03/2016 on SJW comp: Brexit save the... +2
User avatar
#53 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Are you stating that facism is a right wing thing or conservative thing? Because its not.
Hitler was a liberal actually. And Mao, Staling, Pol Pot, Jong-Un are as left as it gets.

I do think there needs to be balance between the traditional 'left and right' but the west in general has gone a whole lot to the left since 1970. We could use a whole lot of 'right' right now to balance it out.
You might think I'm just shitposting but its true do
true do
trudeau
great example of just being to progressive liberal.
User avatar
#54 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
Well, if you were to call Hitler Or Mao, or Pol Pot, or for god's sake Kim Jong-Un a liberal, I'd definitely say you're shitposting. Fascism is the authoritarian right; it seems similar to communism authoritarian left due to the excessive amount of top-down control from the government, but it is solidly a right-wing ideology. If it wasn't, why weren't Nazi Germany and Stalinist USSR natural allies Requiring a non-aggression treaty that was summarily ignored , but Italy (fascist) and Japan (theocratic fascist) were?
Hitler was 100% a fascist; the Party may have been called the National Socialist German Workers' Party, but it did not meet any of the criteria for being socialist.
I'm kind of disappointed actually; I thought this might be a quality exchange but it crashed and burned pretty quickly
User avatar
#55 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Hitler had a big welfare state, enviormental freak, animal rights its not all bad, but they are all very liberal stances corporate taxes where sky high in nazi Germany
#49 - I don't think you're really clear on what you're talking about… 06/03/2016 on SJW comp: Brexit save the... +1
#45 - Right, but if you'd identify as a Catholic, yet don't go to ma…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2016 on SJW comp: Brexit save the... +6
#212 - ruderoody (06/04/2016) [-]
I mean I'm left leaning but I feel like Freedom of speech isn't really a liberal or leftist value but more a moderate value, too far either direction and you get people who start fighting against basic human liberties because they know the majority of people would disagree with their "vision" of the world.
#44 - Sure, but you're just passing the buck. Is everyone to the lef…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/03/2016 on SJW comp: Brexit save the... +6
User avatar
#48 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
It could get lost in transltion because what we in the Netherlands consider our most rightwinged party is probably in between Hillary and Hernie.

Right used to mean low taxes and a small welfare state, and left the oposite, wanting change and sticking up for the working class. But that has switched in many ways, the 1% vote liberal as the left has abandoned the working class.

In the terms we use you can be considered a conservative liberal, but we need to redefine the terms or come with new ones. Because they are losing meaning.

But yea, conservative liberal is probably what you are. Its a multidimentional thing. Not just left and right, and thats the downside of the US system, you can only vote in 1 dimention. This is assuming you are American
#52 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
I'm Canadian; and I know what you mean by the multiple dimensions of the political spectrum. I like the political compass visualization personally, as I think it accommodates most political philosophies. I'd say I'm in the bottom left quadrant, although I treat social and economic issues differently (full libertarian for social; regulated free enterprise for economic).

I guess my point is this: both of us have noticed there are elements of the left wing that are becoming toxic to society, in the way right wing elements have been for a while now. I realize there are a lot of historical leftist groups that were problematic, but I'm referring to the last 20 years generally I've even stopped referring myself to a progressive, and used the term liberal more to denote I'm further "right" than some of these assholes.

But my question is this: We absolutely need conservatives to help denounce and destroy these elements, the same way conservatives need the left to rid them of their fascist elements; why not cooperate and call out the Regressives by their new title? Because I guarantee you and I agree on policy more than I would with them.
User avatar
#53 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Are you stating that facism is a right wing thing or conservative thing? Because its not.
Hitler was a liberal actually. And Mao, Staling, Pol Pot, Jong-Un are as left as it gets.

I do think there needs to be balance between the traditional 'left and right' but the west in general has gone a whole lot to the left since 1970. We could use a whole lot of 'right' right now to balance it out.
You might think I'm just shitposting but its true do
true do
trudeau
great example of just being to progressive liberal.
User avatar
#54 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
Well, if you were to call Hitler Or Mao, or Pol Pot, or for god's sake Kim Jong-Un a liberal, I'd definitely say you're shitposting. Fascism is the authoritarian right; it seems similar to communism authoritarian left due to the excessive amount of top-down control from the government, but it is solidly a right-wing ideology. If it wasn't, why weren't Nazi Germany and Stalinist USSR natural allies Requiring a non-aggression treaty that was summarily ignored , but Italy (fascist) and Japan (theocratic fascist) were?
Hitler was 100% a fascist; the Party may have been called the National Socialist German Workers' Party, but it did not meet any of the criteria for being socialist.
I'm kind of disappointed actually; I thought this might be a quality exchange but it crashed and burned pretty quickly
User avatar
#55 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Hitler had a big welfare state, enviormental freak, animal rights its not all bad, but they are all very liberal stances corporate taxes where sky high in nazi Germany
#46 - anon (06/03/2016) [-]
Actual libertarians are good.

"Liberals" who have hijacked the term, or "progressive liberals" as he put it are the actual problem being referred to.
User avatar
#49 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
I don't think you're really clear on what you're talking about; liberals didn't "hijack" the term, and classical liberalism was very lessaiz-faire in terms of social and economic issues. As it evolved through the 19th and 20th centuries, it came to coalesce around human rights as described by Enlightenment thinkers, and so became the ideology it is today. In fact, modern Conservatism has in many ways "plagiarized" early liberal thought, such as individual freedom and freedom of speech; although today, organizations like the Republican party ultimately strive to do the exact opposite.
#33 - >"liberal logic" >Couldn't even define a v…  [+] (12 new replies) 06/03/2016 on SJW comp: Brexit save the... +6
#38 - anon (06/03/2016) [-]
>an overwhelming amount of people subscribing to this ideology refer to themselves as liberals

>"Stop calling them liberals!"

Stop playing dumb dude.
User avatar
#45 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
Right, but if you'd identify as a Catholic, yet don't go to mass or utilize a rosary, you're further from the definition of a Catholic than someone who does. A true liberal should stand for liberal values 100% of the time (such as free speech); a lot of these people don't, so I can comfortably claim they are using the term incorrectly.
Personally, I refer to them as regressives or authoritarian leftists, and in my eyes they are equally as horrid as their reciprocal far right ideologies.
#212 - ruderoody (06/04/2016) [-]
I mean I'm left leaning but I feel like Freedom of speech isn't really a liberal or leftist value but more a moderate value, too far either direction and you get people who start fighting against basic human liberties because they know the majority of people would disagree with their "vision" of the world.
User avatar
#37 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
progressive liberalism, whatever
User avatar
#44 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
Sure, but you're just passing the buck. Is everyone to the left of you simply a "liberal" or a progressive" one at that? Furthermore, you are aware that the term iiberal is really only a perjorative in the USA; in the rest of the developed world, liberal is a pretty extensive and broad political ideology.

For eg.: I suppose I'd classify myself as a liberal minded person, verging on socialism. But I think the far left's smearing of people as "Islamophobes", racists, and "misogynists" is overdone and usually fictitious. Do I fall into your hated category of "them liberals"?
User avatar
#48 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
It could get lost in transltion because what we in the Netherlands consider our most rightwinged party is probably in between Hillary and Hernie.

Right used to mean low taxes and a small welfare state, and left the oposite, wanting change and sticking up for the working class. But that has switched in many ways, the 1% vote liberal as the left has abandoned the working class.

In the terms we use you can be considered a conservative liberal, but we need to redefine the terms or come with new ones. Because they are losing meaning.

But yea, conservative liberal is probably what you are. Its a multidimentional thing. Not just left and right, and thats the downside of the US system, you can only vote in 1 dimention. This is assuming you are American
#52 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
I'm Canadian; and I know what you mean by the multiple dimensions of the political spectrum. I like the political compass visualization personally, as I think it accommodates most political philosophies. I'd say I'm in the bottom left quadrant, although I treat social and economic issues differently (full libertarian for social; regulated free enterprise for economic).

I guess my point is this: both of us have noticed there are elements of the left wing that are becoming toxic to society, in the way right wing elements have been for a while now. I realize there are a lot of historical leftist groups that were problematic, but I'm referring to the last 20 years generally I've even stopped referring myself to a progressive, and used the term liberal more to denote I'm further "right" than some of these assholes.

But my question is this: We absolutely need conservatives to help denounce and destroy these elements, the same way conservatives need the left to rid them of their fascist elements; why not cooperate and call out the Regressives by their new title? Because I guarantee you and I agree on policy more than I would with them.
User avatar
#53 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Are you stating that facism is a right wing thing or conservative thing? Because its not.
Hitler was a liberal actually. And Mao, Staling, Pol Pot, Jong-Un are as left as it gets.

I do think there needs to be balance between the traditional 'left and right' but the west in general has gone a whole lot to the left since 1970. We could use a whole lot of 'right' right now to balance it out.
You might think I'm just shitposting but its true do
true do
trudeau
great example of just being to progressive liberal.
User avatar
#54 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
Well, if you were to call Hitler Or Mao, or Pol Pot, or for god's sake Kim Jong-Un a liberal, I'd definitely say you're shitposting. Fascism is the authoritarian right; it seems similar to communism authoritarian left due to the excessive amount of top-down control from the government, but it is solidly a right-wing ideology. If it wasn't, why weren't Nazi Germany and Stalinist USSR natural allies Requiring a non-aggression treaty that was summarily ignored , but Italy (fascist) and Japan (theocratic fascist) were?
Hitler was 100% a fascist; the Party may have been called the National Socialist German Workers' Party, but it did not meet any of the criteria for being socialist.
I'm kind of disappointed actually; I thought this might be a quality exchange but it crashed and burned pretty quickly
User avatar
#55 - lotengo (06/03/2016) [-]
Hitler had a big welfare state, enviormental freak, animal rights its not all bad, but they are all very liberal stances corporate taxes where sky high in nazi Germany
#46 - anon (06/03/2016) [-]
Actual libertarians are good.

"Liberals" who have hijacked the term, or "progressive liberals" as he put it are the actual problem being referred to.
User avatar
#49 - bokkos (06/03/2016) [-]
I don't think you're really clear on what you're talking about; liberals didn't "hijack" the term, and classical liberalism was very lessaiz-faire in terms of social and economic issues. As it evolved through the 19th and 20th centuries, it came to coalesce around human rights as described by Enlightenment thinkers, and so became the ideology it is today. In fact, modern Conservatism has in many ways "plagiarized" early liberal thought, such as individual freedom and freedom of speech; although today, organizations like the Republican party ultimately strive to do the exact opposite.