Upload
Login or register

bluedodger

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:2/03/2012
Last Login:9/15/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#12785
Highest Content Rank:#2540
Highest Comment Rank:#8852
Content Thumbs: 4514 total,  5862 ,  1348
Comment Thumbs: 730 total,  906 ,  176
Content Level Progress: 54% (54/100)
Level 144 Content: Faptastic → Level 145 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 167 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 168 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:3
Content Views:195062
Times Content Favorited:373 times
Total Comments Made:314
FJ Points:5146
Favorite Tags: backseat (6) | Gamers (6) | funny (5) | Awesome (4) | Charles (4) | kids (4) | penn (4) | the (4) | hot (3) | of (3) | bhut (2) | chillie (2) | ends (2) | fail (2) | Guns (2) | hilarious (2) | jd (2) | jolokia (2) | kickstarter (2) | Matrix (2)

latest user's comments

#174 - That happened in this movie, quite heavily  [+] (1 reply) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +1
User avatar
#180 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
yes like i said every ghostbuster will have to face that that part of the whole movies construct but where in the original they knew and understood the need to fight through it with seriousness and science the parody make the cast look like a joke to the point you wouldnt believe them until a ghost was in your face
#172 - I mean yeah sure man, if you say so.... you brought it up  [+] (1 reply) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +1
User avatar
#175 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
it's been brought up before just because people dont like it doesnt mean we should ignore it
#161 - I never made the claim you said the all female cast was bad, w…  [+] (3 replies) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +2
User avatar
#166 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
i was making a point about how sony defended the movie by saying all those makeing negative comments are misogynist but yet all the evidence i pointed out none of it had to do with the all female cast the only sexism in this movie is against males when in the first and second movie all were equal it seems like a step back for me
User avatar
#172 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
I mean yeah sure man, if you say so....you brought it up
User avatar
#175 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
it's been brought up before just because people dont like it doesnt mean we should ignore it
#158 - The Ghostbusters are washed up after defending the city of New…  [+] (3 replies) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +3
User avatar
#164 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
only difference is the timeline the people forgot why the ghostbusters were important to them and they have no way to force ghost to come attack the city so unless something major is drawing them near the same thing will happen at the end of ever movie cause there are always non believers who will claim them frauds even in the first movie they were seen as frauds until the ending it's the very prejudice they must face
User avatar
#174 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
That happened in this movie, quite heavily
User avatar
#180 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
yes like i said every ghostbuster will have to face that that part of the whole movies construct but where in the original they knew and understood the need to fight through it with seriousness and science the parody make the cast look like a joke to the point you wouldnt believe them until a ghost was in your face
#157 - I'll defend anything I think is being attacked for the wrong r…  [+] (5 replies) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +2
User avatar
#160 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
and i'm pointing out how those arguments dont work the narrative is shot, the comedy is all over the place, the side cast has been made pointless and useless (until they overshadow the secretary he was pointless to the movie in general along with the Chinese delivery man), they ignore the heart of the first 2 movies, and when it doesnt work they claim the fan are misogynist

not once have i made a claim that all female cast is bad but the narrative doesnt work
User avatar
#161 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
I never made the claim you said the all female cast was bad, where are you getting that from, you don't need to make this about sexism?
User avatar
#166 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
i was making a point about how sony defended the movie by saying all those makeing negative comments are misogynist but yet all the evidence i pointed out none of it had to do with the all female cast the only sexism in this movie is against males when in the first and second movie all were equal it seems like a step back for me
User avatar
#172 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
I mean yeah sure man, if you say so....you brought it up
User avatar
#175 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
it's been brought up before just because people dont like it doesnt mean we should ignore it
#153 - That is literally the beginning to Ghostbusters 2  [+] (10 replies) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +2
User avatar
#156 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
um no this is the continuation of the second movie using the same narrative opening as the second to show cohesion between the movies and the time line for the movie much better then the parody which destroyed it's own narrative in 30 seconds
User avatar
#199 - cronos (07/17/2016) [-]
Hmmm... Green thumbs.
User avatar
#200 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
ty for the thumbs but i must ask what got me the red thumb to begin with?
User avatar
#204 - cronos (07/17/2016) [-]
Honestly, I had just woken up a few minutes ago and misread your comments entirely as an attack on the series, instead I see you were just offering decent suggesting for a future sequel and also raised a few solid points regarding the most recent film.
User avatar
#217 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
thank you the movie had many chances to be something great but the wouldnt break away from the slapstick and in your face comedy enough to work on any of the problems like the design of the ghost i mean most of them look the same where in the originals there were ghost of all shapes sizes and looks but in this we had 2 original style ghost the rest were humanoid
User avatar
#191 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
cronos i summon you here, you seem to disagree with my statement care to weigh in with your thoughts i'm open to discussion
User avatar
#158 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
The Ghostbusters are washed up after defending the city of New York from ghosts, called frauds and hacks and need to get back together to defend new york again from ghosts thanks to a resurgence of ghost activity?
User avatar
#164 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
only difference is the timeline the people forgot why the ghostbusters were important to them and they have no way to force ghost to come attack the city so unless something major is drawing them near the same thing will happen at the end of ever movie cause there are always non believers who will claim them frauds even in the first movie they were seen as frauds until the ending it's the very prejudice they must face
User avatar
#174 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
That happened in this movie, quite heavily
User avatar
#180 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
yes like i said every ghostbuster will have to face that that part of the whole movies construct but where in the original they knew and understood the need to fight through it with seriousness and science the parody make the cast look like a joke to the point you wouldnt believe them until a ghost was in your face
#151 - I never said it shouldn't actually, I literally told you in my…  [+] (7 replies) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... +2
User avatar
#154 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
so you claim it to be a bad scene but your defending it cause i mentioned it here after you yourself proclaimed it a bad scene?
as for hatred for the film i dont hate it so much as i feel it's destroying the basis of good movie making

the movie doesnt add anything to the world of ghostbuster and doesnt improve upon the basis the original had it just throws bridesmaids on top of ghostbusters
User avatar
#157 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
I'll defend anything I think is being attacked for the wrong reasons, and you replied to my comment I'm just sending you one back
User avatar
#160 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
and i'm pointing out how those arguments dont work the narrative is shot, the comedy is all over the place, the side cast has been made pointless and useless (until they overshadow the secretary he was pointless to the movie in general along with the Chinese delivery man), they ignore the heart of the first 2 movies, and when it doesnt work they claim the fan are misogynist

not once have i made a claim that all female cast is bad but the narrative doesnt work
User avatar
#161 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
I never made the claim you said the all female cast was bad, where are you getting that from, you don't need to make this about sexism?
User avatar
#166 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
i was making a point about how sony defended the movie by saying all those makeing negative comments are misogynist but yet all the evidence i pointed out none of it had to do with the all female cast the only sexism in this movie is against males when in the first and second movie all were equal it seems like a step back for me
User avatar
#172 - bluedodger (07/17/2016) [-]
I mean yeah sure man, if you say so....you brought it up
User avatar
#175 - dracory (07/17/2016) [-]
it's been brought up before just because people dont like it doesnt mean we should ignore it
#129 - I'm not saying that it's the greatest film of our time, but te…  [+] (1 reply) 07/17/2016 on Sending A Message With Your... -3
User avatar
#136 - killjoyus (07/17/2016) [-]
yes. it would. because they could say "Well at least its just a clone of the originals"

90% of all the glowingly positive reviews are framed around the false idea that the movie was attacked by misogyny, not the quality of the movie. Like we all know how corrupt and manipulating main stream reviews are, its not a new concept or a secret. Hell the entire Cast was forced to sign strict NDA's that only let them say good things about the movie.

i mean for a 4/10 i guess it rocks that 4 well, but if you look into the production history, the legally and morally dubious shit Pascal did to reach this reboot.The literal name calling by Paul fieg. What could have been with Reitman at the helm. Look at all of that and tell me this movie is deserving of any credit. I will say this, and i will stand by it.

Any movie that Strongarms cast members and forces them to be a part of it is a 0/10, no matter the quality. like fuck Fieg for forcing murray to be in this movie