|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #17850 on CommentsLevel 159 Comments: Faptastic
OfflineSend mail to blackhawksfan Block blackhawksfan Invite blackhawksfan to be your friend flag avatar
latest user's comments
|#124 - This did not cheer me up, it reminded me of that game... Arizo… [+] (1 new reply)||03/05/2014 on This will cheer you up||0|
|#134 - Our killhat was demoted to a Cpl the day after black Friday. S…||03/04/2014 on haha||+1|
|#249 - If you watch Prison Break the scene in season 4 where Mahone t…||02/26/2014 on Oh god why||0|
|#269 - I may be wrong but I believe if you have and PAY for a netflix… [+] (4 new replies)||02/26/2014 on FJ movie night||+1|
#317 - ivviism (02/27/2014) [-]
That netflix account is intended for the private use, and only private use by the individual who has their name on the account, in their own home. It is illegal for you to publicly exhibit it. Streaming from that paid account to a public website for anybody and everybody in the world to view for free is not legal.
#273 - dedaluminus (02/26/2014) [-]
You are absolutely wrong on both counts. As a matter of fact, under netflix's terms of service, you can't even let someone else in the same room watch your netflix unless they also pay. (that's not enforced at all but there it is) However, Netflix specifically mentions the redistribution of copyrighted material through the internet, either for profit or not for profit (since admin runs a for-profit site, by definition it would be for profit) and it is a federal offense. Sorry to pop your bubble, but any opportunity a corporation as big as netflix gets to screw people over, it will.
|#223 - IMO the worst torture device is the brazen bull. Something abo… [+] (5 new replies)||02/25/2014 on Oh god why||+9|
#240 - mutzaki (02/26/2014) [-]
It's really difficult to choose the worst of the worst, but I think repeated drowning and being buried alive are the worst for me. The bull gives a similar claustrophobic feel, with the added pain of the heat, but you die faster and you probably pass out from the pain before too long.
Stuff like bamboo torture, rat torture, genital mutilation and the Judas Cradle are also up there.
#271 - skyelinesunrise (02/26/2014) [-]
Personally I think Scaphism is about as bad as it can get. Surviving that for 17 days must have been a nightmare.
For those who don't know: In Scaphism, the victim would be stripped naked, covered in milk/honey, and locked between two canoes facing each other so they couldn't escape, with just the head sticking out. They would then be force fed a large amount of milk and honey, so they would be kept nourished/alive, and so they would have uncontrollable diarrhea all over themselves. Their face would also be coated in milk/honey.
After this, they would be floated out into the middle of a swamp, with the sun beating down on their face. Insects would be attracted to the milk/honey and swarm all over his face and body, climbing all over him and breeding in it, and all over his diarrhea coated body. He would slowly be eaten alive by these bugs, which would climb inside his flesh and lay eggs.
Every day, he would be pulled back in and re-fed, so that he wouldn't die prematurely, to prolong the torture as long as possible until he finally died from the bugs infesting his corpse.
The longest recorded instance of someone lasting is 17 days before death.
Other than that, any slow torture while subjecting someone to an opioid antagonist (naloxone/naltrexone) to prevent any endogenous opioids from numbing the pain at all, and epinephrine to prevent passing out from shock is a good candidate.
As long as those two drugs are administered, and they're nourished and hydrated so they don't die prematurely, just about anything will become horrific after an extended period. I prefer slow flaying/dicing methods, followed by immediately cauterizing the wound, so it hurts doubly and they don't bleed out. But honestly no matter how brutal a method I try to think up, Scaphism is probably worse.
|#86 - After a quick google image search I realized I am wrong. I use… [+] (1 new reply)||02/25/2014 on Maximum Overdrive||0|
#90 - worried (02/26/2014) [-]
most of them do... winglets dont provide any vital stabilization they only reduce fuel consumption.... i just thought it was a 787 because of the unique curvature of the wings. too big to be a 757 and the nose isnt right for it to be a 767... i take 737 over water all the time, most of our fleets fly from US to the Caribbean and south america and now since we have the 737-900 we can start weening ourselves off of those POS old 757... most of them still have a freaking analog flight deck
|#84 - You're right about the a380, but its not a 787, the 787's also…||02/25/2014 on Maximum Overdrive||0|
|#244 - Dickgun is best gun||02/22/2014 on Feeding the troops||0|
|#230 - the poppy seed pound cakes.... my god i loved when i got those…||02/22/2014 on Feeding the troops||0|
|#93 - Picture||02/22/2014 on Good job America||+2|