Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 32
Date Signed Up:1/12/2011
Comment Ranking:#10214
Highest Content Rank:#7244
Highest Comment Rank:#5247
Content Thumbs: 208 total,  264 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 1806 total,  2048 ,  242
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 20 Content: Peasant → Level 21 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 44% (44/100)
Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:3197
Times Content Favorited:14 times
Total Comments Made:363
FJ Points:1748

Text Posts

  • Views: 6160
    Thumbs Up 180 Thumbs Down 35 Total: +145
    Comments: 22
    Favorites: 10
    Uploaded: 01/16/11
    A FunnyJunk Story A FunnyJunk Story
  • Views: 1067
    Thumbs Up 25 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +21
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 01/13/11
    Miss TSA 2010 Miss TSA 2010
  • Views: 798
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +13
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/12/11
    Poopchucks Poopchucks
  • Views: 673
    Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +10
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/06/11
    Manny Memes Manny Memes
  • Views: 663
    Thumbs Up 9 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +8
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/15/11
    Why Evil Masterminds are alone Why Evil Masterminds are alone
  • Views: 531
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 8 Total: -5
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/27/11
    Dumb ICP Dumb ICP
  • Views: 1508
    Thumbs Up 12 Thumbs Down 0 Total: +12
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 01/12/11
    Horn of Gondor Horn of Gondor

latest user's comments

#12 - Here's the rundown for those asking First, there are …  [+] (5 replies) 09/20/2016 on Nyskrsx Zoodoo Snaposx +30
User avatar
#36 - dangler (09/20/2016) [-]
8/7 central can mean 8 Eastern, 7 central, 6 MW, 5 pacific, however. Especially if it is a live event, more so if a sporting event. Though it can often say "8pm/5 pacific" or something like that as well.
User avatar
#17 - obviousxplains (09/20/2016) [-]
And its interesting how different things deal with it. For example, if a game gets released digitally at midnight, it's usually midnight eastern, meaning Pacific people get it at their 9pm. But movie releases are often at midnight according to local time. So a midnight premier in new york could be finished over an hour before it starts in LA.
#20 - anon (09/20/2016) [-]
i live in california and depending on the movie it often releases all at once since movie piracy is all but inevitable and instead of losing money on ticket sales they release it in Pacific at like 9
#15 - kromeknight (09/20/2016) [-]
You forgot a time...
User avatar
#28 - kromeknight (09/20/2016) [-]
Well i thought it was funny, and as long as I'm laughing that all that matters.
#44 - Was there ever a trial or any evidence presented? I remember …  [+] (2 replies) 09/11/2016 on Zach Braff +5
User avatar
#45 - Mortuus (09/11/2016) [-]
Honestly don't know, but I'm inclined to believe the accusations... There were a lot of women who came out and accused him as well. All pretty well-known as well.
#47 - bigscarygary (09/11/2016) [-]
I don't know, it's too easy to ruin someone's life with an accusation. Nobody goes to the police, or presents any kind of proof? I know rape cases typically don't have much evidence, but we should require more than tweets.
#26 - **bigscarygary used "*roll picture*"** **bigscarygary rolle…  [+] (25 replies) 08/23/2016 on Hillary News... +4
User avatar
#34 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
you think this email server is fort knox?
every email was read by the FBI, only wrong doing was lack of security for confidential materials, which comes under neglegence; she is an old politician and not a computer security analyst like me, it was a lack of oversight by governing bodies and her staff that should have stopped her from doing it in the first place

show me one piece of information that proves anything illegal in these emails

there is nothing
#67 - thewildgorocco (08/23/2016) [-]
Anyone who says she had no idea what she was doing because shes old is fucking full of shit. She spear headed the ESRB rating for video games. My grandma is much older than her and knows what someone means by "wiping a server". Shes full of shit, every word out of her mouth is a damn lie, and wants to put more money in her pockets by putting her fat fucking heel on the head of our citizens.
User avatar
#39 - arkis (08/23/2016) [-]
As a person that has had to hold a security clearance, something which no politician has to do despite some of them having access to classified information, I can tell you that it is very VERY illegal to have classified information or any NOFORN on or sent to an unsecured and or private system, short of specific military personnel ( and even then there are a huge list of conditions for such). The fact that she, as confirmed by the words of the rather publicly embarrassed FBI director, had such documents on a private server constitutes a potential danger to national security ( depending on the content there in) and the fact she has lied about it multiple times goes to show how much of security risk she is
#58 - anon (08/23/2016) [-]
The FBI already made quite clear that no crime was committed. Do you know more about the law than Director Comey?
User avatar
#81 - sherlockbatman (08/23/2016) [-]
actually, just the opposite
Comey very clearly said that she committed those crimes and that what she did was illegal and they have evidence that she did it for sure
He just went on to say that even though they have proof of guilt and what she did was a crime, they were not going to charge her
He definitely said she did it, and that they would and have charged less politically powerful people for the exact same crimes, but they decided not to press charges against her
#87 - anon (08/23/2016) [-]
That is absolutely not what he said. You are 100% completely lying. Not only did he say they found no criminal activity whatsoever, he also said that NO RATIONAL PROSECUTOR would look at Hillary's behavior and chose to bring charges.
User avatar
#90 - sherlockbatman (08/23/2016) [-]
A moment from the Comey's testimony hearing:

As he concluded his questioning, Chaffetz asked whether Clinton gave “non-cleared people access to classified information.”
“Yes,” Comey said, repeating, “Yes.”

#112 - anon (08/23/2016) [-]
Not a crime. You're happy to quote part of Comey's testimony, why don't you continue on and quote the part where he clears her of criminal wrongdoing?
#118 - heyyoutoo (08/23/2016) [-]
If that quote is true then there are no questions. None. What happens after is the result of politics and not law.
User avatar
#116 - sherlockbatman (08/23/2016) [-]
you're saying them not finding sufficient proof of "intent" clears her?
there's a popular quote among judges for situations like these
"ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it"
they said she did it, it doesn't matter if they think she meant to or not
accidentally killing someone is still murder or at least manslaughter
accidentally committing treason is still treason
User avatar
#43 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
how illegal then? give me some numbers, facts even
these arent fucking nuclear warhead codes

so would you concede releasing all of the emails with all the classified information is hella illegal, but every trump supporter and even trump himself is pumping their fist at the idea of it happening
User avatar
#45 - arkis (08/23/2016) [-]
I can not give you exact numbers on any such thing as it was never told to me in an exact nature, I was promptly told that such removal or classified information to an unsecured location (anywhere off location) would constitute loss of my job and certainly jail time if done deliberately, with the almost certain possibility of just loosing my job if not done deliberately, and with the possibility of being charged with treason depending on the circumstances. Even if the item(s) are considered to be just confidential it is still potentially damaging to national security, the FBI director himself, when forced to answer the question directly, said there was classified information on those servers, which means it was probably secret level or higher
User avatar
#56 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
yes there was confidential data in the emails, i already said thats the only thing hilary did wrong
But the servers were just as secure if not more secure than official government servers and the problem was just incorrect characterisation of confidential emails, which yes may lead to people receiving the email and not realising its confidential but is hardly that damaging to national security.
If there was some evidence that someone had managed to intercept this data because of the use of her private email server it would be more damaging to her campaign, but all she did was slightly increase the risk, while stupid and negligent, its nothing compared to releasing every email onto wikileaks that the FBI has already gone through meticulously.
User avatar
#63 - atusek (08/23/2016) [-]
The FBI noted that many of the private accounts with which Hillary was in constant contact with were hacked. It also noted that she sent and received emails while inside foreign states using their internet and their connections (opening up all data to be intercepted and hacked) and that it was probably and likely that her email server was hacked. Private government servers are behind armed guard, lock and key, heavily encrypted, inaccessible, and IN THE US. no, her security was not as secure as the government's security, and no she was in no way safe or careful or free from hacking.
User avatar
#66 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
I dont know what you're on about tbh, I work in cyber security and can assure you there is very little difference in the security of each server

Both servers used the same 256bit encyption algorithm which is standard practice
if the goverment email servers are "inaccessible" i dont blame her for trying her server, how else would she communicate with her team
her servers were in the US as well, and even though armed guards dont mean shit over the internet im sure her servers had guards too.
having access to an email account doesnt enable you to read emails you were never sent, goverment email accounts get hacked ALL the time aswell. there is no evidence to suggest the email server was hacked.
#121 - heyyoutoo (08/23/2016) [-]
What kind of 256 bit encryption algorithm. What was encrypted? Who had access to keys?
User avatar
#131 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
AES obviously, considering thats the only standard other than RGB the us government characterises as secure, who knows who had access but you are missing the point as no one would have intercepted them during transmission anyway and there is no evidence to suggest that they did
#201 - heyyoutoo (08/24/2016) [-]
How do you know that? Where are the sources that Hillary used AES with 256-bit key?
#85 - sherlockbatman (08/23/2016) [-]
**sherlockbatman used "*roll picture*"**
**sherlockbatman rolled image**
working for CTR isn't cybersecurity, I can't believe they told you that
fucking hilarious
User avatar
#100 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
dont even know what ctr is, stop replying to my posts talking about completely unrelated trumpjunk
User avatar
#75 - atusek (08/23/2016) [-]
Despite the fbi saying it's very likely? Okey dokey. Defend her all you want, that doesn't change the fact she knowingly and repeatedly broke the law, exposed and mishandled classified information, and lied about the fact. Anyone else would be in prison
User avatar
#105 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
its very easy to tell if an email server had been hacked, very likely means no evidence otherwise it would say it had definitely been hacked

so many government employees mishandle information every day, from leaving memory sticks on buses to selling old laptops without properly destroying hard-drisks, people dont get locked up for it.
User avatar
#123 - atusek (08/23/2016) [-]
Actually events such as those you are talking about are very, very uncommon. And people lose their security clearances and get fined and do indeed get jail time for it. Not to mention you can't hold high offices with that in your record. Also none of these people were the SECRETARY OF STATE who should be very careful with information. And then to want to become the president with a history of mishandling classified information is absurd. It's amazing how brainwashed Hillary supporters are when their arguments become "well other people do it so there!!!"
User avatar
#129 - cowisbeast (08/23/2016) [-]
i dont support hillary, my point is there is no evidence she did anything other than act negligent
#189 - anon (08/24/2016) [-]

“felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.” According to the investigation, Clinton stored classified information on several private servers, and as a result, she and her colleagues at the State Department “were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

You dumb piece of fake cyber security employee shit.
#14 - Here's a good secret to start with baby steps. If you don't h…  [+] (1 reply) 06/10/2016 on Weight transformation gif +8
User avatar
#32 - deadantman (06/10/2016) [-]
bigscarygary, people like you make the world a better place Also, crispybomb, I believe in you. You can do it