Upload
Login or register

benjaminbutton

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:7/31/2011
Last Login:9/27/2016
Location:Baltimore
Stats
Comment Ranking:#12081
Highest Content Rank:#16108
Highest Comment Rank:#574
Content Thumbs: 1 total,  19 ,  18
Comment Thumbs: 9292 total,  11030 ,  1738
Content Level Progress: 8.47% (5/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 98% (98/100)
Level 290 Comments: Post Master → Level 291 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1782
Total Comments Made:1972
FJ Points:9192
Dicks

Check out my blog motherfuckers:

http://www.wanderingwithinsanity.com/

  • Views: 622
    Thumbs Up 16 Thumbs Down 11 Total: +5
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 10/24/11
    Stretching Stretching

latest user's comments

#248 - Yea, I don't really agree with Islam, but if it's one thing FJ…  [+] (2 replies) 09/24/2016 on Fat Shaming 14 Idk anymore +1
#250 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
I think it is wrong that any should be singled out.

I have studied in Masjid for years and lived in Muslim countries and find them to be cool people.

When I was younger we loved Muslims and hated the Commies.

In a few years we will love Muslims again and hate someone else.

I hate all religions equally.

Except Asatru.

All hail Odin, the All-Father!

lol
User avatar
#251 - benjaminbutton (09/24/2016) [-]
Indeed, hate the idea, not the person. Well said.
#246 - Yea, I really don't follow those posts that much. I come here …  [+] (4 replies) 09/24/2016 on Fat Shaming 14 Idk anymore +1
User avatar
#247 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
Good for you, neither do I...
User avatar
#248 - benjaminbutton (09/24/2016) [-]
Yea, I don't really agree with Islam, but if it's one thing FJ is good at doing is bandwagoning.
#250 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
I think it is wrong that any should be singled out.

I have studied in Masjid for years and lived in Muslim countries and find them to be cool people.

When I was younger we loved Muslims and hated the Commies.

In a few years we will love Muslims again and hate someone else.

I hate all religions equally.

Except Asatru.

All hail Odin, the All-Father!

lol
User avatar
#251 - benjaminbutton (09/24/2016) [-]
Indeed, hate the idea, not the person. Well said.
#200 - So I had to look up Vitriolage was, **** that ****. Completely…  [+] (13 replies) 09/24/2016 on Fat Shaming 14 Idk anymore +2
User avatar
#239 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
You just learned what that was on anti-Muslim FJ?


Not really a Muslim thing...
User avatar
#246 - benjaminbutton (09/24/2016) [-]
Yea, I really don't follow those posts that much. I come here to laugh mostly.
User avatar
#247 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
Good for you, neither do I...
User avatar
#248 - benjaminbutton (09/24/2016) [-]
Yea, I don't really agree with Islam, but if it's one thing FJ is good at doing is bandwagoning.
#250 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
I think it is wrong that any should be singled out.

I have studied in Masjid for years and lived in Muslim countries and find them to be cool people.

When I was younger we loved Muslims and hated the Commies.

In a few years we will love Muslims again and hate someone else.

I hate all religions equally.

Except Asatru.

All hail Odin, the All-Father!

lol
User avatar
#251 - benjaminbutton (09/24/2016) [-]
Indeed, hate the idea, not the person. Well said.
User avatar
#230 - scowler (09/24/2016) [-]
Muslims are completely unacceptable.
User avatar
#240 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
I agree.

Only Christian should burn people with acid!
User avatar
#269 - scowler (09/24/2016) [-]
But they don't do that.
#271 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
Everyone does that.

Most acts of terror in America have been committed by Christians, yet we say Islam is bad?

Out of all the terrorism in the USA, only 4% were committed by Muslims.

This idea that Islam is more violent is silly...

Puerto Ricans have committed 26% of the terror attacks in America.

Why is no one trying to ban the Puerto Ricans?
User avatar
#273 - scowler (09/24/2016) [-]
Can we focus on now, please? Most of those fuckers you're talking about are DEAD. They were sloppy, they were not trusted, and as-such they got CAUGHT.

That said, I DO approve of shooting Abortionists. Globalist agents. Every single one. Whatever happened to "Do No Harm."?
User avatar
#278 - deutschblut (09/24/2016) [-]
Well, if you are being serious, we can agree on something...
User avatar
#279 - scowler (09/24/2016) [-]
I'm simply saying that Muslims and Globalists are the only terrorists around now.
#52 - I am a hige DC fan, brave and the bold is good? I never watche…  [+] (2 replies) 09/19/2016 on Fries 0
User avatar
#54 - comicfun (09/19/2016) [-]
its a great salute to the golden age of comics, we see many of the villains from the Adam West era of Batman
the witty one liners
great voice acting all around
some surprisingly good songs (there's only like 4-5 throughout entire series but they catchy)
a revisit to some of the classic Batman stories from the golden, and silver age. not to mention some of the more modern stories, all with the classic Batman twist
We get Aquaman with his "what Ho, face my fist of justice villain" personality but he doesn't suck, hes still an ass kicker
meet plenty of other heroes as well

Honestly its a fun series that isn't dark and gritty, like most DC stuff is trying to be these days, a great salute to the classic Batman and DC stuff and has some of the best one liners ever.
check it out at kisscartoon.me/Cartoon/Batman-The-Brave-and-the-Bold
#63 - Aquaman (09/24/2016) [-]
#221 - No my argument revolves around advantage and stun. Nothing more.  [+] (1 reply) 08/30/2016 on "Realistic Weapon Damage" 0
#222 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Well cool. We're both huge fags then.
#216 - Even then, there is still a chance for the bullet to penetrate…  [+] (5 replies) 08/30/2016 on "Realistic Weapon Damage" 0
#218 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
**pctwannabe used "*roll picture*"**
**pctwannabe rolled image** The chance is infinitesimally small if you're wearing armor rated for that caliber.
I agreed with you in my first reply, I'm not the one who started the fire. My argument was against linkeron who seems to labor under the idea that bullets will severely injure you through body armor.
User avatar
#224 - linkeron (08/30/2016) [-]
Sorry, was in a rush because of work and didn't really hit all the points I wanted to. Yes, 7.62x45 striking a level 3 rated plate is something you seriously can just shrug off, not arguing that. The point that I forgot to bring up entirely is that in the universe of Fallout, especially 200 years after bombs drop, you're never going to find military grade armor ( I'm talking about the grand scale of things for the average Joe). Level 3 rated plates stopped being produced, if they ever were produced in the first place a LONG time ago (Alternate universe with an obvious indifferent attitude toward loss of life, maybe the Combat Armor isn't really that effective, etc.). People in the first few decades would find good armor, wear it, get shot to hell, now the armor wouldn't stop a flicked booger.

As an alternative, you have to throw together your own armor from whatever's just lying around and hope it's good enough; With little, if any, thought towards the science of stopping a bullet. Most people don't even wear armor, and anyone with good armor is part of some military. Even then, there's little reason to believe that people who were unconcerned about driving a nuclear car would implement some measure of quality control in whatever fledgling development of body armor that results in the combat armor 200 years after the world fucking ended.

Talking about real world shit, yes you're fine with 3-3a armor. Mostly. The overall topic of conversation, however, is realistic damage models in a game where the world ended. That's what I was trying to get at before i started getting calls.
User avatar
#227 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Fair. I'm not one to argue video game lore. An ill designed or under-rated plate/pad (the kind of stuff you might have to make do with in a post-apocalyptic future) can definitely injure you. A IIIA vest will easily stop a 12 gauge slug, but it'll still leave a sizable dent in your chest.
User avatar
#221 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
No my argument revolves around advantage and stun. Nothing more.
#222 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Well cool. We're both huge fags then.
#212 - By mindset to be shot, they know they are in dangerous territo…  [+] (8 replies) 08/30/2016 on "Realistic Weapon Damage" 0
User avatar
#214 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
I don't know what the fuck you're even talking about. It'd be pretty fucking counterproductive if a gun blew your own head off when you were trying to kill somebody. I thought I made my point clear.
The recoil you feel is the same amount of energy being transmitted to the target. Because the gun weighs hundreds of times more than the bullet and has a larger surface area, it does not maim you. Duh. HOWEVER, a level IV AR500 steel plate weighs MORE than a gun, and has MORE surface area. The energy of the bullet is redistributed upon impact with the plate negating most potential injury.
I never said anything about a gun not being advantageous to killing somebody, or whatever you're trying to argue.
User avatar
#216 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
Even then, there is still a chance for the bullet to penetrate the armor. Armor, just makes it more likely that the target stays alive
#218 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
**pctwannabe used "*roll picture*"**
**pctwannabe rolled image** The chance is infinitesimally small if you're wearing armor rated for that caliber.
I agreed with you in my first reply, I'm not the one who started the fire. My argument was against linkeron who seems to labor under the idea that bullets will severely injure you through body armor.
User avatar
#224 - linkeron (08/30/2016) [-]
Sorry, was in a rush because of work and didn't really hit all the points I wanted to. Yes, 7.62x45 striking a level 3 rated plate is something you seriously can just shrug off, not arguing that. The point that I forgot to bring up entirely is that in the universe of Fallout, especially 200 years after bombs drop, you're never going to find military grade armor ( I'm talking about the grand scale of things for the average Joe). Level 3 rated plates stopped being produced, if they ever were produced in the first place a LONG time ago (Alternate universe with an obvious indifferent attitude toward loss of life, maybe the Combat Armor isn't really that effective, etc.). People in the first few decades would find good armor, wear it, get shot to hell, now the armor wouldn't stop a flicked booger.

As an alternative, you have to throw together your own armor from whatever's just lying around and hope it's good enough; With little, if any, thought towards the science of stopping a bullet. Most people don't even wear armor, and anyone with good armor is part of some military. Even then, there's little reason to believe that people who were unconcerned about driving a nuclear car would implement some measure of quality control in whatever fledgling development of body armor that results in the combat armor 200 years after the world fucking ended.

Talking about real world shit, yes you're fine with 3-3a armor. Mostly. The overall topic of conversation, however, is realistic damage models in a game where the world ended. That's what I was trying to get at before i started getting calls.
User avatar
#227 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Fair. I'm not one to argue video game lore. An ill designed or under-rated plate/pad (the kind of stuff you might have to make do with in a post-apocalyptic future) can definitely injure you. A IIIA vest will easily stop a 12 gauge slug, but it'll still leave a sizable dent in your chest.
User avatar
#221 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
No my argument revolves around advantage and stun. Nothing more.
#222 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Well cool. We're both huge fags then.
User avatar
#215 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
Then I have literally no idea why you even started arguing. A bullet, EVEN WITH A VEST ON, will do more damage to the target than the shooter, even if it just a bruise or a welt. Just because it redistributes the damage doesn't mean it doesn't fucking hurt enough to temporarily stun a person. I agree with you that the energy put out in the recoil going back and the bullet going forward is the same, but the target will suffer more.
#209 - I understand that, but the fact of the matter is he still fell…  [+] (10 replies) 08/30/2016 on "Realistic Weapon Damage" 0
User avatar
#211 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
He was totally caught by surprise. He wasn't in the mindset to be shot, or braced for it.
For reference, here is a video of somebody who DID brace for it. www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x59iN4KMz4
Literally anybody can go online and buy "military grade" armor for a few hundred bucks. My original point was that bullets don't have the momentum of a truck, they won't kill or stop you through adequate body armor. You are arguing something completely different.
User avatar
#212 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
By mindset to be shot, they know they are in dangerous territory, not that he knew that he was going to get shot right then and there, but could be shot at during any given time. He is not a civilian, he is a soldier. He goes down, if his enemy weren't incompetent twats then the fire would have continued. If fired correctly, any gun will produce less damage to the shooter than the target. THe people who shot the guy were hunkered down, fine, and the guy fell. That's still an advantage, is it not?
User avatar
#214 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
I don't know what the fuck you're even talking about. It'd be pretty fucking counterproductive if a gun blew your own head off when you were trying to kill somebody. I thought I made my point clear.
The recoil you feel is the same amount of energy being transmitted to the target. Because the gun weighs hundreds of times more than the bullet and has a larger surface area, it does not maim you. Duh. HOWEVER, a level IV AR500 steel plate weighs MORE than a gun, and has MORE surface area. The energy of the bullet is redistributed upon impact with the plate negating most potential injury.
I never said anything about a gun not being advantageous to killing somebody, or whatever you're trying to argue.
User avatar
#216 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
Even then, there is still a chance for the bullet to penetrate the armor. Armor, just makes it more likely that the target stays alive
#218 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
**pctwannabe used "*roll picture*"**
**pctwannabe rolled image** The chance is infinitesimally small if you're wearing armor rated for that caliber.
I agreed with you in my first reply, I'm not the one who started the fire. My argument was against linkeron who seems to labor under the idea that bullets will severely injure you through body armor.
User avatar
#224 - linkeron (08/30/2016) [-]
Sorry, was in a rush because of work and didn't really hit all the points I wanted to. Yes, 7.62x45 striking a level 3 rated plate is something you seriously can just shrug off, not arguing that. The point that I forgot to bring up entirely is that in the universe of Fallout, especially 200 years after bombs drop, you're never going to find military grade armor ( I'm talking about the grand scale of things for the average Joe). Level 3 rated plates stopped being produced, if they ever were produced in the first place a LONG time ago (Alternate universe with an obvious indifferent attitude toward loss of life, maybe the Combat Armor isn't really that effective, etc.). People in the first few decades would find good armor, wear it, get shot to hell, now the armor wouldn't stop a flicked booger.

As an alternative, you have to throw together your own armor from whatever's just lying around and hope it's good enough; With little, if any, thought towards the science of stopping a bullet. Most people don't even wear armor, and anyone with good armor is part of some military. Even then, there's little reason to believe that people who were unconcerned about driving a nuclear car would implement some measure of quality control in whatever fledgling development of body armor that results in the combat armor 200 years after the world fucking ended.

Talking about real world shit, yes you're fine with 3-3a armor. Mostly. The overall topic of conversation, however, is realistic damage models in a game where the world ended. That's what I was trying to get at before i started getting calls.
User avatar
#227 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Fair. I'm not one to argue video game lore. An ill designed or under-rated plate/pad (the kind of stuff you might have to make do with in a post-apocalyptic future) can definitely injure you. A IIIA vest will easily stop a 12 gauge slug, but it'll still leave a sizable dent in your chest.
User avatar
#221 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
No my argument revolves around advantage and stun. Nothing more.
#222 - pctwannabe (08/30/2016) [-]
Well cool. We're both huge fags then.
User avatar
#215 - benjaminbutton (08/30/2016) [-]
Then I have literally no idea why you even started arguing. A bullet, EVEN WITH A VEST ON, will do more damage to the target than the shooter, even if it just a bruise or a welt. Just because it redistributes the damage doesn't mean it doesn't fucking hurt enough to temporarily stun a person. I agree with you that the energy put out in the recoil going back and the bullet going forward is the same, but the target will suffer more.