Upload
Login or register

belikea

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:11/28/2010
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#3892
Highest Comment Rank:#3214
Comment Thumbs: 2768 total,  3158 ,  390
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 93% (93/100)
Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:739
FJ Points:2164

latest user's comments

#81 - There's a difference between acknowledging that African Americ… 08/22/2016 on CNN Is Racist -1
#43 - You missed the part where in the same speech he seemed to gene…  [+] (7 new replies) 08/21/2016 on CNN Is Racist +5
User avatar
#55 - wrpen (08/21/2016) [-]
But they are. The vast majority of the impoverished and uneducated are black. The vast majority of crimes involve blacks. Both perpetrators and victims are more often black than any other race. In a random selection, it can be very safely assumed that any single black person is poor, unintelligent, or a criminal.

Think about it. Go to any high school in the nation, you'll see four times as many blacks in on-level courses than in honors or AP courses. On-level courses that don't teach any kind of work ethic or useful skills. Most blacks in public schools are set up to be poor, and not knowing any better, they turn to crime because it's easier than actually trying to get a job on their education. That's their choice, too. No one forces them to take the easier course, they simply do it because they don't want to take on the harder one.
User avatar
#93 - BobbyMcFerrin (08/22/2016) [-]
You're going to need to support those claims with data, mate. That's absolutely not true as stated. There is a higher rate of poverty and crime (where there's smoke there's fire) amongst the black community. Even then, it's not the 'vast majority'. If tumblr can't just make shit up to serve their own agenda neither can you.
User avatar
#98 - wrpen (08/22/2016) [-]
www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr11-17.pdf

"By race, the highest national poverty rates were for American Indians and Alaska Natives (27.0 percent) and Blacks or African Americans (25.8 percent)."

federalsafetynet.com/us-poverty-statistics.html (2014)

"While the poverty rate for the population as a whole is 14.8% the rate varies greatly by race. Blacks have the highest poverty rate at 26.2% and Non-Hispanic whites the lowest at 10.1%." (I concede that they may not be the most impoverished, but they do make up a large percentage)

www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p20-578.pdf

(Similarly, hispanics are less likely to complete highschool, by a much more significant margin, but blacks are still extremely undereducated compared to whites and asians)

2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Color-Of-Crime-2016.pdf

"There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates, followed by whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates. This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups."
"In 2015, a black person was 2.45 times more likely than a white person to be shot and killed by the police. A Hispanic person was 1.21 times more likely. These figures are well within what would be expected given race differences in crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest."

So there is simply a lower rate of education and a higher rate of poverty among blacks, but the crime rate is in fact a vast majority, by most definitions of vast.

User avatar
#101 - BobbyMcFerrin (08/22/2016) [-]
> "vast majority"
> 25.8%
> most definitions of vast

lol wut?

majority = >50%
vast majority = >>#50%
User avatar
#104 - wrpen (08/22/2016) [-]
Okay, read this time.

"So there is simply a lower rate of education and a higher rate of poverty among blacks, but the crime rate is in fact a vast majority, by most definitions of vast."
User avatar
#81 - belikea (08/22/2016) [-]
There's a difference between acknowledging that African Americans are more likely to be impoverished and saying that they all are, which is more what Trump said. One is a statement, while the other is a borderline racist (and at least heavily generalizing) statement.
User avatar
#46 - khally (08/21/2016) [-]
I've only seen the part they showed, I'm going to check it all out tommorow
#49 - Well, I respect your taste, but I personally really don't like… 08/17/2016 on BAYBAY, THIS IS WHATCHU... +6
#14 - Yes, I can look up both sites. But I can't go back in time and…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/14/2016 on Clinton News Network +4
#16 - toraxon (08/14/2016) [-]
I think you really do not understand what the issue is. CA Technologies is a member of the Clinton Foundation which is obviously owned by Hillary Clinton. There is an extreme personal interest of CA Technologies to show the polls as Hillary Clinton winning which is shown on many mainstream polls. This doesn't even need following the money trail like other suspicious polls, this just needs a Google search to find some suspicion within the polls that are being presented.
#44 - anon (08/15/2016) [-]
its not exactly time-stamped evidence
the numbers in the first one could have even been switched pretty fuckin easily with paint..

Any fuck with paint could do this, little easier to believe than the rigging of a poll where they didn't even try to make it a subtle switch, but just flipped the numbers while people are watching the live tally

you people need to start using you'r brain.

I HATE HILLARY, but this site is becoming conspiracy nuts
#10 - Imperium. From what I've come to understand, the Warhammer 40k… 08/14/2016 on Debate: Reapers vs Imperium... +5
#9 - Which is why I must point out this could be just as easily fak…  [+] (10 new replies) 08/14/2016 on Clinton News Network +9
#13 - toraxon (08/14/2016) [-]
You can look up both sites yourself to see the evidence.

www.cnn.com/specials/politics/cnn-politics-live-vote

www.ca.com/us/csr/memberships.aspx?intcmp=searchresultclick&resultnum=1

Does it mean Hillary Clinton is using CA Technologies to rig polls? It is likely, but just as likely Hillary Clinton is using thousands of bot accounts on this poll sites to vote in her favor. We have seen her campaign use bots many times to spread propaganda on Twitter. Even so, the poll might have been rigged from the start from CNN who is extremely biased and reveres Hillary Clinton.
#41 - anon (08/15/2016) [-]
so the first photo's numbers couldn't have been switched? thats far from proof this wasn't faked..
User avatar
#29 - Ruspanic (08/15/2016) [-]
The most dubious/most incriminating part about this is the times, though. This shows that the poll numbers changed dramatically in just 4 minutes, which normally wouldn't be possible unless the poll had just opened and the 14:26 results reflected the input of just a small handful of early respondents.

Is there any way to verify that the times in the image are accurate?
User avatar
#42 - vinskinator (08/15/2016) [-]
the times that are just typed over a screencap?

its not exactly time-stamped evidence dude. use your brain.
the numbers in the first one could have even been switched pretty fuckin easily with paint..

occam's razor would say any fuck with paint could do this, little easier to believe than the rigging of a poll where they didn't even try to make it a subtle switch, but just flipped the numbers while people are watching the live tally

you people need to start using you'r brains
User avatar
#19 - thegamepixel (08/14/2016) [-]
Can you send me a link to the the bot twitter thing?
#21 - toraxon (08/14/2016) [-]
www.washingtonexaminer.com/clintons-twitter-account-loaded-with-fake-followers/article/2575913

www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2015/11/09/audit-shows-hillary-clinton-fake-twitter-followers/

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3038621/More-2-MILLION-Hillary-Clinton-s-Twitter-followers-fake-never-tweet.html

www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/have-twitter-bots-infiltrated-the-2016-election/484964/

These numbers are being pulled from a service called TwitterAudit which many of the candidates have a lot of fakes following them. They may or may not have paid for them or been made under the campaign supervision. They can be made by supporters acting on their own interests and are unaffiliated with the campaign. Hillary Clinton however, has spent money on taking care of Social media, hiring people to go on the Internet and attack anti-Hillary sites. Which makes me more inclined to believe she is most likely to be purchasing twitter bot accounts.

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-hillary-clinton-paying-trolls-attack-people-online-article-1.2613980
User avatar
#22 - thegamepixel (08/14/2016) [-]
Thanks a lot for this.
User avatar
#14 - belikea (08/14/2016) [-]
Yes, I can look up both sites. But I can't go back in time and see the poll at "14:26" and compare it with the end results. Without someone else who was actually watching the poll to verify it, it is possible that the time points added on to the graphics are incorrect (i.e., rather than being 4 minutes separate, they're 20 hours, or even 4 minutes and multiple days separate), or it could even be that whatever image editing software that was used to add these time points on and crop the images was also used to alter the actual percentages.
#16 - toraxon (08/14/2016) [-]
I think you really do not understand what the issue is. CA Technologies is a member of the Clinton Foundation which is obviously owned by Hillary Clinton. There is an extreme personal interest of CA Technologies to show the polls as Hillary Clinton winning which is shown on many mainstream polls. This doesn't even need following the money trail like other suspicious polls, this just needs a Google search to find some suspicion within the polls that are being presented.
#44 - anon (08/15/2016) [-]
its not exactly time-stamped evidence
the numbers in the first one could have even been switched pretty fuckin easily with paint..

Any fuck with paint could do this, little easier to believe than the rigging of a poll where they didn't even try to make it a subtle switch, but just flipped the numbers while people are watching the live tally

you people need to start using you'r brain.

I HATE HILLARY, but this site is becoming conspiracy nuts
#5 - Ah, good old selection bias...if the term is applicable here. …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/12/2016 on KKK Worked For Democrats +4
User avatar
#8 - battletechmech (08/13/2016) [-]
Or that rotten tomatoes hates DC because two movies from DC rated poorly in the last few years.
#60 - Malcolm X was killed after changing his stance entirely and su… 08/12/2016 on Assassination +17
#7 - I guess that's something you have to work out for yourself, un… 08/07/2016 on I need some advice 0
#5 - Does having an illness that essentially requires modern medici…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/04/2016 on Monstergirl Anti-Waifu CYOA 0
User avatar
#8 - thylacine (08/04/2016) [-]
Hmmm, did not consider the whole pre-conditions which require modern medicine, I really should of considered that before creating the CYOA. I'll have to amend that.....

Yeah though, I purposefully made some of the drawbacks for some less drawbacky then the others (with Leleeth's being the worst).
#29 - anon (08/04/2016) [-]
Why not just make a small addition where terminal and the like conditions get cured or suspended for 5yrs with a average physique (incase left debilitated)