Upload
Login or register

battlesmurf

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:6/19/2011
Last Login:9/27/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#13732
Highest Content Rank:#7013
Highest Comment Rank:#2590
Content Thumbs: 700 total,  801 ,  101
Comment Thumbs: 1434 total,  1741 ,  307
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 70 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 71 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 34% (34/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:38682
Times Content Favorited:128 times
Total Comments Made:208
FJ Points:2146
Favorite Tags: comic (2)

  • Views: 23012
    Thumbs Up 737 Thumbs Down 75 Total: +662
    Comments: 229
    Favorites: 123
    Uploaded: 09/10/12
    how ro piss of your nerdy friens how ro piss of your nerdy friens
  • Views: 12459
    Thumbs Up 33 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +21
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 4
    Uploaded: 06/19/11
    uncle dolan uncle dolan
  • Views: 1017
    Thumbs Up 23 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +18
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 06/26/11
    Mustache Mustache

latest user's comments

#154 - I mean sure if you start ******* yourself up the ass with it i…  [+] (17 replies) 09/17/2016 on Guns And Dildos 0
User avatar
#159 - dorfdorfdorf (09/18/2016) [-]
you can use a rag to wash something in public

you can use a spatula to make food in public

you cannot use a dildo in public
User avatar
#172 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
Everyone agrees that it should not be used to fuck yourself or another in public. It is illigal to have one out in public, which is what is stupid.
User avatar
#173 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
how is it stupid? one is useful. the other isnt. i dont see why a sex toy should be more publicly allowed than a weapon
User avatar
#174 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
No one said more allowed, just allowed. You are allowed to carry a gun in Texas at 18yo but can't have alcohol until 21yo. You aren't allowed to drink until you're 21 because your mind is still growing and are underdeveloped, but here have a handgun.
User avatar
#175 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
you can also start driving at 16, but that's not related to dildos
User avatar
#176 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
Please tell me you see the irony of the logic of why they can't have dildos in public because they are immature, but here have a gun because immature people can still be very responsible. That's the joke, the sad joke.
User avatar
#177 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
i realize that that's what the joke of the content is but that hasn't been the subject of this argument at all. my point has forever been the acceptableness
User avatar
#178 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
The joke is the point that I have debating with you. How can we be OK with allowing undeveloped minds and immature individuals carry guns but make it unlawful to carry a dildo?
User avatar
#179 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
you can't jump into this argument and bring a completely different point. if i wanted to argue about the point the content presented i would do that, but that's not what i did.

also, shut the fuck up. no one is allowing undeveloped immature people carry guns. you cannot own a gun, you cannot get a concealed carry permit, and you cannot get an open carry permit without extensive training.

also, arming yourself is the 2nd amendment. it's literally one away from free speech. it's pretty important to have that right. waving sex toys around in public is not a right.
User avatar
#180 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
I wasn't jumping arguments, shit for brains. I was driving more points to the ridiculous laws that are made and the logic behind them. Also, fuck off dipshit. Next time do a fucking Google search on Texas gun laws. You will find that you are wrong, oh so very fucking wrong you asshat. Here let me help since you are clinically retarded and can't follow a conversation:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Texas
User avatar
#181 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
Licensed carry of a handgun requires a "shall-issue" license, and is subject to specific laws governing trespass while armed. People who are barred from licensing include those under age 21, felons, fugitives, people who are "chemically dependent" or "incapable of exercising sound judgment", and those in arrears for taxes or child support.
Effective January 1, 2016, individuals with a handgun carry license will be permitted to carry openly,
So aside from the owning, i was entirely correct. you need a license both to open carry and to concealed carry, and you cant carry on campus unless you have the license. so kiss my ass.
also, you're the one that got into an entirely different argument with unrelated points and supposedly I'M the one that can't follow a conversation?
User avatar
#182 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
Texas has no laws regarding possession of "long-barreled firearms" or "long guns" (shotguns, rifles and similar) by persons 18 years or older with valid identification. Perhaps you can't read a whole article page. It's under "Firearms purchase and possession". So no, you weren't correct. When should I pencil you in to suck my ass?
User avatar
#183 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
you never specified long guns and i never specified long guns. i was talking about hand guns, because that's what just got legalized on campuses. i wasn't talking about long guns, because that's an entirely separate issue which hasn't been changed recently.

so shut the fuck up.

also, you still haven't answered why it's stupid.

also, what the hell are you doing on 4-day-old content you spiteful prick.
#186 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
I can't seem to reply to your last comment, perhaps due to it being on mobile device.

How can we be OK with allowing undeveloped minds and immature individuals carry guns but make it unlawful to carry a dildo? I am against the logic of making dildos illigal, not people carrying guns. I'm saying to not make it illegal to carry a dildo in public.

The notification was from today.
#187 - dorfdorfdorf (09/23/2016) [-]
no you fucking clod.

you keep saying that, but it only applies to fucking rifles. for all handguns, you need to be licences, and "underdeveloped, immature people" do not get licenses. so quit fucking bringing it up. i am only talking about handguns, because that's the only thing that the new law changes.

why should dildos be legal? guns should be legal because it's a crucial right to protect yourself, and they're useful. but what purpose would dildos serve? serious question, why should they be legal to open carry?
User avatar
#184 - turdknocker (09/22/2016) [-]
Read "Firearms carry". I would also change my tune when presented with an undeniable point. The only reason I responded was because FJ notified me. It has nothing to do with time, but with allowing someone who is wrong go on about shit they are wrong about. I would not have targeted you if you had just attacked my points instead of insulting me. Talk shit, get tyrannosaurus rekt.
User avatar
#185 - dorfdorfdorf (09/22/2016) [-]
i presented you with two undeniable points that RELATED TO WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT and you still tried to talk shit about rifles. fuck off.

that's a fucking lie. my last comment was 4 days ago until you came back out of the blue tofuckingday.

also, you still haven't answered why it's stupid.
#46 - I'm a developer as well, and at my company (a fairly large one…  [+] (2 replies) 07/31/2016 on Dump +1
#92 - lalajlalaj (07/31/2016) [-]
If there are related areas, like in web development, it's impossible to be a back-end wiz and not know front-end as well. Thing is, as a specialist in 1 area, I get the good gigs and I get to pick, because there's few people who offer the same level of expertise.

Thing is, before specializing, I was an all around dev who did a bit of everything. Truth is that those people never do a really good job, because they always kinda know what to do. Kinda. They will come up with a solution, but it's rarely the one a real pro would come up with. I know this since I have been that guy for some time and also I've been hiring people to code directly under my lead and I can't stand guys who "kinda" know what they're doing. They know a bit of everything, but you can't give them anything to do on their own. It's all shit that I'll eventually have to refactor to be at the quality level I need it to be at. So I vowed never to work with amateurs or jack-of-all-trades kinda guys ever again.

Side note: If there's anything where one SHOULD be a jack of all trades, it's soft skills, which are underrated by most devs from my experience and for me, having great soft skills in pretty much every area has given me the edge over other guys in many situations.
User avatar
#57 - daentraya (07/31/2016) [-]
it all just depends on what someone needs; a set of highly specialised specialists or a single dude to do all the things. that's how it always is. i guess the statement made more sense back in time, before the industrial revolution or something
#26 - You can't be serious. It was a ******* hostage situation, no o…  [+] (5 replies) 07/19/2016 on [MORBID] Hostage situation... +5
User avatar
#118 - iridium (07/20/2016) [-]
According to my brother-in-law a good guy I might add, one who wouldn't knowingly lie about this , he had an acquaintance who worked as a police officer And for sake of bringing it up, both my brother-in-law and his friend are hispanic , who shot and killed a black man who was armed and ready to fire at police a few years back.

He was given several weeks of something akin to "mandatory vacation" immediately afterwards for his own protection, and the place he worked at received numerous angry letters and plenty of threats in the following weeks, in spite of the fact that there was evidence that the black man was very much an immediate danger to others.

Basically speaking, it doesn't matter the context, there's still going to be some outrage over any black man killed by police.
User avatar
#31 - citruslord (07/19/2016) [-]
You really haven't paid too much attention to those people then.
User avatar
#27 - PgFalcon (07/19/2016) [-]
No one will protest this guys death. If he was black, there'd be death threats made to the police for weeks.
User avatar
#37 - crazyllamax (07/20/2016) [-]
At this point Officers are actually being killed, this world fucking sucks.
User avatar
#105 - PgFalcon (07/20/2016) [-]
Honestly, if I was a cop, I'd probably use excessive force 99% of the time. Fuck criminals. They don't deserve to be treated like people.

Unless they surrender. Then they're cool.
#77 - Some forms of food (hotdogs, meat balls, burgers etc.) are jus…  [+] (1 reply) 07/03/2016 on Why are Vegans always tryna... 0
User avatar
#80 - batmanuel (07/03/2016) [-]
It's not that, it's just that it seems like an odd way to go about things to me. It would be like a muslim taking all their drinks in a beer stein. It's harmless, but it's definitely worth wondering about.
#75 - There are several vegan products (like soy milk etc.) with add…  [+] (1 reply) 07/03/2016 on Why are Vegans always tryna... -1
User avatar
#100 - ChewyConor (07/03/2016) [-]
None of them are dairy products.
#84 - Drogo was in no way a considerate lover (Dothraki aren't very …  [+] (2 replies) 06/12/2016 on Dank Thrones comp 6 0
#102 - anon (06/12/2016) [-]
Can't login for some reason, but I am sgtmajjohnson. Copy-pasted from the ASOIAF wiki:
"Finally Drogo leads Daenerys off to consummate the marriage. A thirteen-year-old girl who had been abused by her brother for most of her life and had been given no say in the marriage, Daenerys is terrified of her bridegroom and expects to be raped. Despite his fierce reputation, however, Drogo proves to be a surprisingly considerate lover. Although he and Dany share no common language, he establishes that he understood the word "no," then begins touching her gently. He does not begin to have intercourse with her until Dany expresses her consent and initiates it. This tender wedding night set the tone for their marriage, which becomes a remarkably happy one."

Also, she is not the rightful heir to shit. Targaryens ruled from right by conquest, which is exactly the same as the Baratheons. Also, the Council of 101A.C. already established that the Targaryen throne can never pass to a female.
User avatar
#110 - battlesmurf (06/16/2016) [-]
Have you even read the books? Yes, the wedding night was suprisingly non-terrifying for Dany, but the following nights most certainly were not. Here is a directs quote from the books instead of a biased one from a wiki:

""[...] Drogo would come to her tent and wake her in the dark, to ride her as relentlessly as he rode his stallion. He always took her from behind, Dothraki fashion, for which Dany was grateful; that way her lord husband could not see the tears that wet her face, and she could use her pillow to muffle her cires of pain. When he was done, he would close his eyes and begin to snore sofly and Dany would lie beside him, her body bruised and sore, hurting too much to sleep."

Now you tell me if that sounds like tender, consenting sex to you, because I really hope it does not. Their love life is described in a similar fashion for a while until Dany finally finds a way to stop the rape by using the tricks that Doreah taught her. It wasn't until after that that their marriage began to take a more "tender tone".

The Targaryens actually formed the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros in a way, since they were all independent before they conquested them and later on joined and solidified them as a single kingdom by marriage. So I'd say they have a pretty strong claim to the Iron Throne that they literally created themselves.
[ 208 Total ]