Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:12/21/2009
Last Login:10/22/2016
Content Thumbs: 31 total,  87 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 745 total,  1132 ,  387
Content Level Progress: 59.32% (35/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 175 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Content Views:185
Total Comments Made:468
FJ Points:797

  • Views: 1150
    Thumbs Up 34 Thumbs Down 20 Total: +14
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/11/11
    Hey guys Hey guys

latest user's comments

#96 - however a case could be argued that because the act was delive…  [+] (7 replies) 07/09/2014 on (untitled) +1
User avatar
#109 - sciencexplain (07/09/2014) [-]
There is no argument:

RSA 645:2, I, provides: “A person
is guilty of a misdemeanor if the person: . . . (f) Pays, agrees to pay, or offers to
pay another person
to engage in sexual contact as defined in RSA 632-A:1, IV
or sexual penetration as defined in RSA 632-A:1, V, with the payor or with
another person.” RSA 632-A:1, IV defines “sexual contact” as “the intentional
touching whether directly, through clothing, or otherwise, of the victim’s or
actor’s sexual or intimate parts, including breasts and buttocks. Sexual
contact includes only that aforementioned conduct which can be reasonably
construed as being for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification.”

You are absolutely correct and my other half made a slight blunder I'm afraid.

User avatar
#131 - sciencexplain (07/09/2014) [-]
Did I make a blunder? I was going on the legal ruling in the UK, which I believe is slightly different to that of the UK. Still, I don't know. I never want to study law. It's too complex.

User avatar
#134 - bioexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
I believe in this case it may be the same. It certainly was years ago I'm not sure if that has changed.
User avatar
#135 - sciencexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
I can't be bothered to go and check...

User avatar
#136 - bioexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
Not that important. Not like you plan on doing such a thing. That would be devious.
User avatar
#137 - sciencexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
I have morals. It's also been a tradition in our family to save ourselves until marriage, more for risk prevention and moral beliefs than a religious thing, really.

#107 - shadowgandalf (07/09/2014) [-]
...You mean a date?
#176 - you have a gap between your dick and the edge of the toilet se…  [+] (1 reply) 01/31/2014 on Tumblr comp (3) +5
User avatar
#187 - jimydark (01/31/2014) [-]
who the fuck drop the toilet paper
#96 - irony actually has a very broad definition. no one really know…  [+] (1 reply) 09/30/2013 on Textbook definition of Irony +2
User avatar
#108 - articulate (09/30/2013) [-]
Being surrounded by worms actually sounds like it would feel good.
#46 - actually we see faces on walls and in patterns of wood because…  [+] (1 reply) 06/25/2013 on World 10 enigmas +9
#51 - anon (06/25/2013) [-]