no avatar Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Send mail to bassdinosaur Block bassdinosaur Invite bassdinosaur to be your friend
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:12/21/2009
Last Login:2/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 31 total,  87 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 745 total,  1132 ,  387
Content Level Progress: 59.32% (35/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 175 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Content Views:180
Total Comments Made:467
FJ Points:797

Sort by:

funny pictures

  • Views: 1145
    Thumbs Up 34 Thumbs Down 20 Total: +14
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/11/11
    Hey guys Hey guys
Sort by:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#96 - however a case could be argued that because the act was delive…  [+] (7 new replies) 07/09/2014 on (untitled) +1
User avatar #109 - sciencexplain (07/09/2014) [-]
There is no argument:

RSA 645:2, I, provides: “A person
is guilty of a misdemeanor if the person: . . . (f) Pays, agrees to pay, or offers to
pay another person
to engage in sexual contact as defined in RSA 632-A:1, IV
or sexual penetration as defined in RSA 632-A:1, V, with the payor or with
another person.” RSA 632-A:1, IV defines “sexual contact” as “the intentional
touching whether directly, through clothing, or otherwise, of the victim’s or
actor’s sexual or intimate parts, including breasts and buttocks. Sexual
contact includes only that aforementioned conduct which can be reasonably
construed as being for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification.”

You are absolutely correct and my other half made a slight blunder I'm afraid.

User avatar #131 - sciencexplain (07/09/2014) [-]
Did I make a blunder? I was going on the legal ruling in the UK, which I believe is slightly different to that of the UK. Still, I don't know. I never want to study law. It's too complex.

User avatar #134 - bioexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
I believe in this case it may be the same. It certainly was years ago I'm not sure if that has changed.
User avatar #135 - sciencexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
I can't be bothered to go and check...

User avatar #136 - bioexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
Not that important. Not like you plan on doing such a thing. That would be devious.
User avatar #137 - sciencexplain (07/10/2014) [-]
I have morals. It's also been a tradition in our family to save ourselves until marriage, more for risk prevention and moral beliefs than a religious thing, really.

#107 - shadowgandalf (07/09/2014) [-]
...You mean a date?
#205 - Picture 06/16/2014 on Do you even lift? +1
#46 - actually biodegradable cups only degrade in compost. 04/30/2014 on Because Earth Matters 0
#120 - "LOOK at it though" oh **** thanks tumb… 03/28/2014 on platypuss +1
#176 - you have a gap between your dick and the edge of the toilet se…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/31/2014 on Tumblr comp (3) +5
User avatar #187 - jimydark (01/31/2014) [-]
who the fuck drop the toilet paper
#41 - no double standards. if you disagree with dumping a girl due t… 10/03/2013 on Carlos 0
#96 - irony actually has a very broad definition. no one really know…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/30/2013 on Textbook definition of Irony +2
User avatar #108 - articulate (09/30/2013) [-]
Being surrounded by worms actually sounds like it would feel good.
#864 - **bassdinosaur rolls 229** 08/24/2013 on Damned Skyrim 0
#46 - actually we see faces on walls and in patterns of wood because…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/25/2013 on World 10 enigmas +9
#51 - anonymous (06/25/2013) [-]
#151 - 'licence' is spelt 'licence' in every other english speaking c…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/11/2013 on I found this and laughed 0
#164 - anonymous (06/11/2013) [-]
not in america?
then strange.
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)