Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #4214 on Comments
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Send mail to awwwwhellnah
Invite awwwwhellnah to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 151 Content: Faptastic → Level 152 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress:
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
What people say about awwwwhellnah
That's What I Use It For
Why did Railgun get a Second...
Trainer Blue challenges you
latest user's comments
- My guess is they left the window open a crack
Camera Obscura Effect
- I just watched this last night
- Only pizza place that was ever worth a damn to me was a place …
Their Crust Is Too Thin
- In LOTR BFME II i would build new castles in random spots on t…
age of empires
- You mean to say the app for random hookups is used by people l…
Girls and double standards...
There's always the classical "not looking for ons" and "just looking to meet new people, not hook up" people. I don't know if they mean it or not, but I stay away just in case. I am looking for something else after all.
- I see where you are coming from and i dont mean the ones who w…
Just US Healthcare things
- I work at a convenience store and people with Food stamps will…
Just US Healthcare things
regardless of how you feel about it its that persons choice to eat what they want with their EBT, and what do you know about them, maybe they like to have a bag of chips and a coke once a week. and besides that so what, its not your choice, its theirs. i mean if they have food stamps there's clearly a reason they're on it, they don't get it because why not, sure they aren't being smart about the spending, im not debating you there, but in most cases it does much more good in the end, compared to the low number of leeches in the system.
its not really your place to judge people whom choices barely effect you at all, if at all.
a slightly biased, but informative read for anyone who wants to reply to me, as im sure plenty of people feel differently than i do on the subject. oh, also bring on the red pinkies
I see where you are coming from and i dont mean the ones who want some junk every now and then but i see a quite a few who come in daily and buy a bunch of junk
If we are PAYING ENTIRELY for black Welfare leeches, then yes we do have a say ENTIRELY in that regard.
I say cut them off and let them eat earthworms. No more.
We all must say, "NO MORE!"
but thats the thing
sure collectively the money had to come from somewhere, but on an individual level the amount of money going to them from you is INSANELY small
Blacks as a group receive $897 billion per year in social transfer payments, 13 times their net contribution to GDP.
($897 / 13 = $69 billion tax contributed)
Blacks are over-represented in crime by four fold, being 55% of murderers even though they're only 12% of the population.
White men must work 42 days each year JUST to earn the money that pays JUST the taxes which fund JUST the welfare paid JUST to American Blacks.
Crimes committed by blacks destroy entire societies.
69% of the entire USA blacks are using welfare. Only 5.1% of the entire USA White population is on Welfare.
66% of the entire non-White population is on Welfare.
Total number of Americans receiving welfare government assistance =
White Non-Hispanic Population on Welfare = 16.8 % = 11,405,000
(Whites on Welfare) / (USA White Pop)
11,405,000 / 223,553,265 =
0.05101692431 (x100) = 5.1% (Mostly White Unmarried Females with children 67%)
67,891,000 - 11,405,000 = 56,486,000
(Non-White Population on Welfare)
USA POPULATION (2016) = 308,745,538
WHITE (Non-Hispanic) POP = 223,553,265
Non-White Population =
308,745,538 - 223,553,265 = 85,192,273
(Non-White Welfare Pop / Non-White US POP)
56,486,000 / 85,192,273 =
0.66304135352 (x100) = 66% Non-White Population on Welfare.
"The Real Cost of Keeping Niggers" dis gonna b gud
so a website with the name "the real cost of keeping niggers" makes insane claims, and the proceeds to have no valid links to censuses that can prove the point... i guess this really caused strife in the government and society, and they had to quickly rush to expunge these censuses..
this alone makes your whole thing bullshit, not including the fact that that your links from statisticbrain dont actually state anywhere how they came to the conclusions they came too, here honey, heres some real links with credible sources from actual censuses, i guess with stats like these white people are over a trillion per year in social transfer payments!!!! me oh my!!!!
i just enjoyed this one, since most states that are conservative( to be clear im not conservative or liberal) dont house the majority of black people
come back with some actual evidence your racist piece of shit
What is the spending on Welfare?
In FY 2017 total US government spending on welfare — federal, state, and local — is “guesstimated” to be $1,127 billion, including $646 billion for Medicaid, and $481 billion in other welfare.
Welfare In America: A $1 Trillion Tab And Rising
Feb 13th, 2014
In 2011, the latest year for which we have complete spending data, federal outlays on all means-tested welfare programs targeted for the poor hit $746 billion, according to an analysis by the Congressional Research Service.
But this doesn't include two of the fastest-growing taxpayer-funded cash subsidies: unemployment insurance and disability, which are not based on one's income level, so are not considered anti-poverty programs. That's another $250 billion a year. All told, federal income transfer programs (not including Social Security and Medicare) have hit $1 trillion.
Adding state spending, the Senate Budget Committee found another $257 billion spent each year. The welfare state is now larger than the GDP of 175 of the 190 wealthiest countries.
Astoundingly, if all this spending were simply sent in the form of a check to every household in America living below the poverty level, we could raise each of these family's incomes not just above the poverty line, but double that level, according to Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation. Every poor family of four could have a cash income of $44,000 a year — which in most countries would be princely.
Most Americans probably have no idea how expansive the welfare state is. That's because the cost is disguised by more than 80 separate means-tested programs counted by the CRS, including cash benefits, health care, social services, food, child care, training, and housing and utility subsidies. They often have overlapping and uncoordinated missions. This explains the vast duplication of effort, with at least 12 programs offering food and nutrition, 18 offering housing assistance, nine offering vocational training, and so on.
If you are paying for your own shit, then you can eat what you want. If not, you are beholden to what you are told to eat. Good ole michelle wants to tax the shit out of soda and stuff, but people who are on government benefits get to buy whatever they want? Nah dawg. Thats why the WIC program is so good. You get a set list of items, a few gallons of milk, a few loaves of whole grain bread, some cereal, etc, AND its geared towards children, not their whore mothers. I don't mine some of my taxes going to help the innocent victims of their mothers selfish need for cock over financial stability.
Yes, i agree, every mother that needs food stamps to help feed her children are whores barely worthy of life.
"your allowed privileges only because i agree with them"
"AND its geared towards children, not their whore mothers. I don't mine some of my taxes going to help the innocent victims of their mothers selfish need for cock over financial stability. "
you know, you had a reasonable argument untill this, i can get over someone not liking someone elses choices and feeling the need to regulate them, and in a way its fine as long as its done conservatively (not the political meaning, I shouldn't have to say this but... you would be surprised at the stupidity of some people) but you completely threw out your points by putting something so meaningless, while also adding nothing to the conversation other than pure misguided hatred, for no apparent reason either. but hey, if you refuse to accept that the amount of your taxes going to food stamps specifically is extremely low, and the good far outweighs the bad, then your free to keep on hatin my dude
Per capita contribution to GDP:
• The net contribution to GDP of each American black is a negative $23,764, which is 39 times the positive contribution of African blacks to Africa's GDP.
• For every dollar blacks contribute to GDP, they receive $16 in social transfer payments.
• The net contribution to GDP of each Hispanic is a negative $5,128, which is equivalent to the positive contribution of Mexicans to Mexico's GDP.
• The net contribution to GDP of each American Caucasian is a positive $13,527 ($43,287/family divided by 3.2 members per family).
• The net contribution to GDP of each American Asian is a positive $15,200 ($48,614/family divided by 3.2 members per family).
Here are some stats: In 2011, 57% of single mothers had no high school diploma. 45.5% live in poverty, with 23.9% making less than 10,000 a year. About half of these births were not the mother's first child, and of single mother households, 41.5% had more than one child. This is NOT OKAY. Acting like this is all hunky dory and going "well yes but see it is their decision" IS NOT OKAY. Having multiple children while living below the poverty level is and should legally be CHILD ABUSE. Tell me, if the mothers of these children don't have a high school education, do you think they will be likely to encourage their children to graduate high school? Fuck no! The cycle will repeat itself and these children will eventually become, for all intents and purposes, wards of the state, just like their lovely mothers. You are upset i referred to them as whores and cock thirsty selfish cunts when you should actually be upset over what they are doing to their children and our society as a whole.
you misunderstand, im not debating that there are or not idiotic single mothers, whom are whores, this is completely true, but doesn't need to said, as it brings nothing to the table, especially when my point had nothing to do with single mothers on WIC, i get you were making a point, but you went to far with your point about WIC being good, i know what WIC is, but you ,instead of stating that WIC is good, and should be used as an example, go on to say shit that is pretty fuckin rude for no apparent reason.
look, i haven't slept in 26 hours, and i was going to write up a whole thing about how little single mothers, especially mothers whom are idiotic whores, take up of your taxes, i had government census
ready and all to do math,but im much to tired, instead all i can do is go to bed and really hope you get my point, that it made no sense to bash a group of people for no reason, it only makes your argument look bad, especially when that group of people are an extremely small portion of the population
originally my argument was that the good that comes from food stamps far outweighs the bad, because there is no "wellfare queen" the vast majority of people on food-stamps rely on them, they are a supplement, not a fix all, it ends up coming out to like covering a dollar fifty per meal, they are not this magical thing that lets you fatten up, and take any unreasonable amount of money from the system, with that being said if you have EBT (food stamps) your generally supposed to, you DID qualify for them, and as long as your not starving your kids, so fuckin what if you like to get a bag of chips after work, its technically your money, meant FOR food, regardless of whether your choice of food is optimal or not
but i suppose everything i have to say will go over your head, and your going to stick to your belief that "wellfare" is whats causing your taxes to go up, and totally noting related to government corruption at all
Spoken like someone who's never seen the system up close and personal.
ive fuckin lived it
Then you're just naive.
Being/having a single mother is the number one indicator that you will be poor. How is having multiple children by multiple men, something EXTREMELY common in welfare cities like Milwaukee where I grew up, not selfish and whorish? The fathers aren't any better to be sure, but they don't benefits close to the level of their baby mamas. And no, I don't think they deserve privileges for making idiotic life choices, but since my way is not going to happen, then the next best thing is forcing them to eat healthy so our taxes don't pay for their food AND health issues.
Maybe I used harsher than necessary language, but single motherhood is the leading cause of poverty in America and it should be taboo, not praised. Having a bunch of kids for no reason that your own irresponsibility with no means to take care of them is nothing but child abuse. I mean hell, condoms are like 20 cents a piece. There is no excuse for the level of single motherhood in urban areas except a gargunatuan thirst for dick/pussy and blatant disregard for consequences.
That's how monster got so popular. They went on a big campaign and jumped through a dozen hoops to be allowed to be purchased with food stamps. So for a long time that was the only energy drink quite a few people bought because you could buy it with stamps
Upsiassuns Urempi Yssade
- **awwwwhellnah roll picture searched best user ** A master …
- **awwwwhellnah used "*roll picture*"** **awwwwhellnah rolle…
Show Comments (3)