Rank #536 on CommentsLevel 348 Comments: Sold Soul
OfflineSend mail to auryn Block auryn Invite auryn to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||3/17/2012|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#14558|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#46|
|Content Thumbs:||96 total, 176 , 80|
|Comment Thumbs:||61496 total, 71941 , 10445|
|Content Level Progress:|| 80% (4/5) |
Level 8 Content: New Here → Level 9 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 12.9% (129/1000) |
Level 348 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 349 Comments: Sold Soul
|Times Content Favorited:||14 times|
|Total Comments Made:||10330|
latest user's comments
|#7 - I'm not gonna lie. If I could, I would. Even though I… [+] (5 new replies)||06/20/2016 on Beards||-2|
#24 - anon (06/21/2016) [-]
I can sense the sweaty virgin through this post
#29 - anon (06/21/2016) [-]
sorry I said this
#26 - anon (06/21/2016) [-]
XDDD FUNNY JOKE XDDD
WE GOT A COMEDIAN OVER HERE XDDDDDDDD
"I AM HOT"
X D D D X D D D D D D D X dddddd
|#44 - I'd never expected them to actually call it the 1080 though. … [+] (2 new replies)||06/20/2016 on Pascal - GTX 1080 & GTX 1070||+12|
|#42 - >founders edition Defintely going for the high-end…||06/20/2016 on Pascal - GTX 1080 & GTX 1070||0|
|#2 - Paradox. If he actually fixed it, there wouldn't be a… [+] (5 new replies)||06/20/2016 on Time||+19|
#3 - wiseagain (06/20/2016) [-]
>Man discovers his time machine is broken
>walks into house
>posts about it on Facebook
>goes back to garage
>goes back in time to when his alternate self was discovering his time machine was broken
>posts that he had fixed the problem on Facebook
>returns to native time
And I know he'd probably see that message, but if he did see it, maybe he deduced that he would post about his time machine being broken due to the phrasing of the first post?
|#6 - Life||06/20/2016 on cringy||+4|
|#5 - ******* mimics..||06/20/2016 on how to make a clock||+2|
|#3 - 'Tis but a scratch.||06/20/2016 on noot noot motherfucker||0|
|#14 - On my first try of the Nameless King I only needed to hit him …||06/20/2016 on Namless king one hit||+5|
|#19 - You're making one of the worst and most horrible mistakes in s…||06/20/2016 on My favorite quote||+2|
|#17 - By the way, I'm not saying it is certain there is life. I was … [+] (3 new replies)||06/20/2016 on My favorite quote||+1|
#18 - platinumaltaria (06/20/2016) [-]
You're more than welcome to believe whatever you want to without evidence, however it is not scientifically accurate. There is no indication that life exists anywhere beyond earth, and so believing that no life exists beyond earth is the logical conclusion. Believing that life does exist beyond earth is baseless, as there is a complete lack of evidence towards that claim.
In fact, as one can observe with the fermi paradox, the conspicuous lack of evidence is actually evidence of absence, at least within the realm of sentient life.
#29 - therealtjthemedic (06/21/2016) [-]
There's a difference between 'scientifically accurate' and empirically accurate.
We've never seen another star up close.
All our assumptions about the rest of the universe are from observing our own local area.
The probability of getting a signal from another sapient lifeform is so incredibly low, since for anyone to receive our signals, they'd have to be within about 100 light-years of us. In the scale of the entire universe, that is indescribably small.
#19 - auryn (06/20/2016) [-]
You're making one of the worst and most horrible mistakes in science, and even logic as a whole.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The only logical conclusion is that we don't know.
But we do know that life happened here. And out of the billions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions, and bilions of other solar systems with countless oforbiting planets, why would it only be possible here?
I don't know where you base your opinion on, because we know next to nothing about anything beyond our own solar system. And our methods of gathering information for what's beyond is rather limited and inconsequential.
And we certainly have not "tested" even the tiniest speck of a significant number, in relation to the total number, of planets for life.
And that's even besides, questioning the validity of the interpretation of data and our conception of life.