Upload
Login or register

atoma

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/12/2013
Stats
Content Thumbs: 180 total,  246 ,  66
Comment Thumbs: 1485 total,  2672 ,  1187
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 18 Content: New Here → Level 19 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 25% (25/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:32123
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:1050
FJ Points:1621

latest user's comments

#22 - Comment deleted 02/16/2016 on ICES +4
#48 - I'm too afraid to google it  [+] (1 reply) 02/13/2016 on "You can take only one... +2
#51 - gymzim (02/13/2016) [-]
basically, bigger/older woman, small/young boy. Also often known as ss or straight shota because without the clarification lots of gay shota.
#45 - Whose obviously sexualized as much as loli's are I meant  [+] (8 replies) 02/13/2016 on "You can take only one... +3
User avatar
#47 - brahdin (02/13/2016) [-]
as a label for a genre or niche fetish, its focus more on the women i suppouse for 3/4. sorta a wierd self insert ya dig dog.
#58 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
The fact that you like prepubescent children in sexual content labels you as a pedophile. It doesn't matter who you are focused on, or what the camera/drawings themselves focus on. It doesn't matter if you put yourself in that child's position. No child should participate in pornography, no human being who looks like a child should participate in pornography. Even if it's suggestive.

Age of consent in Japan is 13, with some areas being 17. This complicates the issue, and I would much prefer that you do not label this content as SS as it gives the title to the content that may not even be a shota at all. Many styles are drawn in a cute attractive way and this makes the characters look younger than they really are. I've seen people put milf-teen boy in the SS channel and it upsets me that people are putting that image with pedophilia. It's like calling amazon women pedophilia, don't do it.

tl;dr: Ban SS. Replace it with something else. We're all interested in the woman anyways, SS won't be missed.
#161 - brahdin has deleted their comment.
#115 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
You might have legal permission to fuck, but if you are 13 yo you are still a child.
So /ss/ it is.
And it's glorious.
#82 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
You might be labelling it as if it's very black-and-white. The law for children not to participate in pornography is about giving kids the lawful advantage in case anything at all happens, because adults (usually) know better, so the court will be against them if they act on anything. This is purely about protecting young teens from being exploited into making porn for others' profits. SS, however, plays on the fantasy most boys had when they were between 13-16, when they could only dream about interacting with someone sexually and just daydreamed. It doesn't have any kid actually being exploited, and the main focus is to imagine oneself as the young teen who's about to live his dream moment in middle school or whatever.

I don't like how young some protagonists are portrayed in SS (some being barely in their teens), but sometimes they're like 15-16, which is the age of consent in plenty of countries, and is usually considered a pretty ripe age for kids to interact sexually.
#116 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
This anon, on the other hand, knows his shit.
User avatar
#48 - atoma (02/13/2016) [-]
I'm too afraid to google it
#51 - gymzim (02/13/2016) [-]
basically, bigger/older woman, small/young boy. Also often known as ss or straight shota because without the clarification lots of gay shota.
#40 - A ***** is a "cute boy" right?  [+] (10 replies) 02/13/2016 on "You can take only one... +1
#44 - brahdin (02/13/2016) [-]
ohhh, my sweet summer child.
User avatar
#45 - atoma (02/13/2016) [-]
Whose obviously sexualized as much as loli's are I meant
User avatar
#47 - brahdin (02/13/2016) [-]
as a label for a genre or niche fetish, its focus more on the women i suppouse for 3/4. sorta a wierd self insert ya dig dog.
#58 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
The fact that you like prepubescent children in sexual content labels you as a pedophile. It doesn't matter who you are focused on, or what the camera/drawings themselves focus on. It doesn't matter if you put yourself in that child's position. No child should participate in pornography, no human being who looks like a child should participate in pornography. Even if it's suggestive.

Age of consent in Japan is 13, with some areas being 17. This complicates the issue, and I would much prefer that you do not label this content as SS as it gives the title to the content that may not even be a shota at all. Many styles are drawn in a cute attractive way and this makes the characters look younger than they really are. I've seen people put milf-teen boy in the SS channel and it upsets me that people are putting that image with pedophilia. It's like calling amazon women pedophilia, don't do it.

tl;dr: Ban SS. Replace it with something else. We're all interested in the woman anyways, SS won't be missed.
#161 - brahdin has deleted their comment.
#115 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
You might have legal permission to fuck, but if you are 13 yo you are still a child.
So /ss/ it is.
And it's glorious.
#82 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
You might be labelling it as if it's very black-and-white. The law for children not to participate in pornography is about giving kids the lawful advantage in case anything at all happens, because adults (usually) know better, so the court will be against them if they act on anything. This is purely about protecting young teens from being exploited into making porn for others' profits. SS, however, plays on the fantasy most boys had when they were between 13-16, when they could only dream about interacting with someone sexually and just daydreamed. It doesn't have any kid actually being exploited, and the main focus is to imagine oneself as the young teen who's about to live his dream moment in middle school or whatever.

I don't like how young some protagonists are portrayed in SS (some being barely in their teens), but sometimes they're like 15-16, which is the age of consent in plenty of countries, and is usually considered a pretty ripe age for kids to interact sexually.
#116 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
This anon, on the other hand, knows his shit.
User avatar
#48 - atoma (02/13/2016) [-]
I'm too afraid to google it
#51 - gymzim (02/13/2016) [-]
basically, bigger/older woman, small/young boy. Also often known as ss or straight shota because without the clarification lots of gay shota.
#31 - Well what do you expect? The kid hasn't even hit puberty, he's…  [+] (13 replies) 02/13/2016 on "You can take only one... +30
User avatar
#54 - thatguyontheright (02/13/2016) [-]
Well in Gen V, the characters are all 14-15 years old in B/W...so he'd have a sex drive or just an idiot.
User avatar
#36 - zomaru (02/13/2016) [-]
You obviously don't know what a Shota is.
User avatar
#40 - atoma (02/13/2016) [-]
A shota is a "cute boy" right?
#44 - brahdin (02/13/2016) [-]
ohhh, my sweet summer child.
User avatar
#45 - atoma (02/13/2016) [-]
Whose obviously sexualized as much as loli's are I meant
User avatar
#47 - brahdin (02/13/2016) [-]
as a label for a genre or niche fetish, its focus more on the women i suppouse for 3/4. sorta a wierd self insert ya dig dog.
#58 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
The fact that you like prepubescent children in sexual content labels you as a pedophile. It doesn't matter who you are focused on, or what the camera/drawings themselves focus on. It doesn't matter if you put yourself in that child's position. No child should participate in pornography, no human being who looks like a child should participate in pornography. Even if it's suggestive.

Age of consent in Japan is 13, with some areas being 17. This complicates the issue, and I would much prefer that you do not label this content as SS as it gives the title to the content that may not even be a shota at all. Many styles are drawn in a cute attractive way and this makes the characters look younger than they really are. I've seen people put milf-teen boy in the SS channel and it upsets me that people are putting that image with pedophilia. It's like calling amazon women pedophilia, don't do it.

tl;dr: Ban SS. Replace it with something else. We're all interested in the woman anyways, SS won't be missed.
#161 - brahdin has deleted their comment.
#115 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
You might have legal permission to fuck, but if you are 13 yo you are still a child.
So /ss/ it is.
And it's glorious.
#82 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
You might be labelling it as if it's very black-and-white. The law for children not to participate in pornography is about giving kids the lawful advantage in case anything at all happens, because adults (usually) know better, so the court will be against them if they act on anything. This is purely about protecting young teens from being exploited into making porn for others' profits. SS, however, plays on the fantasy most boys had when they were between 13-16, when they could only dream about interacting with someone sexually and just daydreamed. It doesn't have any kid actually being exploited, and the main focus is to imagine oneself as the young teen who's about to live his dream moment in middle school or whatever.

I don't like how young some protagonists are portrayed in SS (some being barely in their teens), but sometimes they're like 15-16, which is the age of consent in plenty of countries, and is usually considered a pretty ripe age for kids to interact sexually.
#116 - anon (02/13/2016) [-]
This anon, on the other hand, knows his shit.
User avatar
#48 - atoma (02/13/2016) [-]
I'm too afraid to google it
#51 - gymzim (02/13/2016) [-]
basically, bigger/older woman, small/young boy. Also often known as ss or straight shota because without the clarification lots of gay shota.
#38 - I mostly agree with you but if I get a son I won't tell him &q…  [+] (4 replies) 02/07/2016 on #TRIGGERED #PTSD +1
User avatar
#51 - platinumaltaria (02/07/2016) [-]
Good job not being a retard.
User avatar
#95 - atoma (02/07/2016) [-]
I'm not sure how I should respond to this
#62 - anon (02/07/2016) [-]
You don't think parents should pick out what their small children wear?
Playing dress up is fine, but if you can't be bothered to dress your kid appropriately when you leave the house, you probably shouldn't breed.

Seriously, given the option, a little boy would choose to leave with nothing but sharpie scribbles on his balls. This is the kind of mentality you'd be dealing with.
User avatar
#73 - platinumaltaria (02/07/2016) [-]
No that would be retarded. And I never indicated anything to that effect.
Remember kids, this anon is the standard of human morality!

Yes, because a child's head is filled with soup, a brain only appears when you're an adult. Or we could not resign ourselves to insanity.

Next time try reading what is said instead of constructing a... wait a minute this isn't even a strawman, it's not even close to what I said.
[ 1042 Total ]