Upload
Login or register

anomolous

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:12/30/2012
Last Login:10/29/2013
Stats
Comment Thumbs: 87 total,  233 ,  146
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 37 Comments: Peasant → Level 38 Comments: Peasant
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:137
FJ Points:87

latest user's comments

#66 - We weren't talking about radical feminism. We were talking ab…  [+] (3 replies) 04/06/2013 on She is clearly resisting hard -1
User avatar
#74 - monkee (04/07/2013) [-]
Radical feminism is feminism you idiot. same as Liberal feminism and Marxist feminism. They all branch under the same name.
Applying evolution to societal functions is called anthropology. So yeah, it should be considered. I never once even used the 'evolution'. I used the term biology, which also explains PMT and the rise in murder rates when women experience it. But that's too one sided an analysis yeah?
I hope you're a troll, because if you really are a feminist you've made my entire gender look idiotic.
#77 - anomolous (04/07/2013) [-]
I might add that even Richard Dawkings ("the evolution guy") agrees that it would be retarded to base the norms and laws of society off of evolution.

And your argument of "it's called anthropology... so yes it should be considered" is just sad. It has a fancy name... therefore it's an intelligent practice? Genocide is kind of a fancy name too...
#76 - anomolous (04/07/2013) [-]
Radical feminism is feminism, but feminism is not radical feminism. In order not to insult all of feminism, it's important to state the difference.

What I mean when I say "applying evolution to societal ethics," is justifying unethical behavior by blaming it on biology (and while you didn't specifically say, "evolution", when you said that men are inclined to look at breasts, you are referring to an action reinforced by millions of years of evolution). I guess I could take your route and state "evolution is biology hurrr durrr" because it's apprently that simple. I understand that biology plays a part in peoples behaviors, but it should not be used as justification (meaning, "it's okay, because evolution"). If it were, society would fall apart.

Anyways, I'm not a feminist. I just don't like slander.

If I am truly an idiot, it would be unwise for anyone to associate my behavior with a range of people who share one thing in common with me.

If you really don't mind guys gawking at your tits (I realize now that you're female), may I inquire how trashy your background is, exactly?
#7 - yyyyyyyyyyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyy now if only the…  [+] (3 replies) 04/06/2013 on anomolous's profile 0
User avatar
#9 - revorce (04/06/2013) [-]
Oh boy, sorry about the red thumbs. I deleted my comment already but somebody just commented the exact same again.
#10 - anomolous (04/06/2013) [-]
Eh, it can't be helped. To be fair, my comments were kind of asking for it. lol.
But I won't delete them, I'm foolishly reveling in the shitstorm.
And then when I'm done and bored with it I won't have the desire to argue with anons on the internet, ever again (hopefully).
#8 - revorce (04/06/2013) [-]
[ 137 Total ]