Upload
Login or register

angrytoilet

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:9/25/2010
Last Login:9/02/2015
Stats
Content Thumbs: 3284 total,  3836 ,  552
Comment Thumbs: 2050 total,  2332 ,  282
Content Level Progress: 80% (80/100)
Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 133 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 88% (88/100)
Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:6
Content Views:119080
Times Content Favorited:340 times
Total Comments Made:822
FJ Points:5275
Favorite Tags: awkward (35) | lack (35) | tags (35) | meaningful (34) | of (34) | OC (8) | i (3) | lied (3) | theyre (3) | epiphany (2)

latest user's comments

#14 - A lot of times these types of people will shout very hurtful t…  [+] (2 replies) 02/13/2014 on Trolling hardcore Christians +1
User avatar
#17 - greenwithenvy (02/13/2014) [-]
then just shout something back, don't fall into their game of taking a photo that looks out of context.
User avatar
#32 - JuliusC (02/13/2014) [-]
when i was on campus i found it best to just ignore them and laugh at the idiots who went up to go argue
how does theyre opinion or words affect my life in anyway? exactly
#20 - Gay men and lesbians are notorious for not getting along. Gay …  [+] (1 reply) 02/04/2014 on Being gay aint easy 0
#21 - anon (02/04/2014) [-]
true. lesbians are even censored on here.
#81 - Many opponents of the legalization of same-sex marriage cite t…  [+] (2 replies) 01/21/2014 on Looking for a shitstorm?... +1
User avatar
#90 - Lloydles (01/21/2014) [-]
Oh. That was a remarkably well constructed response from such an angry toilet.
User avatar
#215 - angrytoilet (01/21/2014) [-]
The greatest depths of emotion can come only from the greatest heights of sagacity. Thus, the angriest toilet may also be the wisest.
#180 - Sickle-cell was merely an example. Tay-Sachs disease is entire…  [+] (1 reply) 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. 0
User avatar
#186 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Bad recessive genes are why incestuous relations are frowned upon, but they are regularly eliminated in evolution theory, and have a much lower rate of expression than diseases like sickle-cell anemia. Genetic mutation and recessive expressions do account for many deformities, but have a much lower probability of occurring than we have homosexuals. I doubt most of us will ever meet a genetically homosexual person, even if such genes are prominent in deformity standards.
#168 - And homosexuality, in its property of not creating new individ…  [+] (2 replies) 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. 0
User avatar
#169 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I meant homosexuality.
User avatar
#171 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Ah. Very well then.
#164 - There are no evolutionary advantages to having sickle-cell ane…  [+] (7 replies) 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. 0
User avatar
#175 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Actually, there is. Sickle-cell anemia is a recessive gene. You can only get it if you received it from both of your parents. If you only have one sickle cell gene, then you're just a carrier, and carriers are less likely to develop malaria, which is often fatal.
creation.com/sickle-cell-anemia-does-not-prove-evolution
User avatar
#180 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Sickle-cell was merely an example. Tay-Sachs disease is entirely genetic and yet it causes children to die before the age of 7 (this is before they reach sexual maturity), thus it has no evolutionary advantage. There are countless genetic disorders and conditions and properties that are entirely genetic and lack significant evolutionary advantage.
User avatar
#186 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Bad recessive genes are why incestuous relations are frowned upon, but they are regularly eliminated in evolution theory, and have a much lower rate of expression than diseases like sickle-cell anemia. Genetic mutation and recessive expressions do account for many deformities, but have a much lower probability of occurring than we have homosexuals. I doubt most of us will ever meet a genetically homosexual person, even if such genes are prominent in deformity standards.
User avatar
#166 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I see it as an evolutionary failsafe to help stave off over population.
User avatar
#168 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
And homosexuality, in its property of not creating new individuals, does not do the same?
User avatar
#169 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I meant homosexuality.
User avatar
#171 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Ah. Very well then.
#161 - What makes you say that?  [+] (9 replies) 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. +1
User avatar
#163 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
There are no evolutionary advantages to being homosexual-proper.
User avatar
#164 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
There are no evolutionary advantages to having sickle-cell anemia, and yet its cause is entirely genetic.
User avatar
#175 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Actually, there is. Sickle-cell anemia is a recessive gene. You can only get it if you received it from both of your parents. If you only have one sickle cell gene, then you're just a carrier, and carriers are less likely to develop malaria, which is often fatal.
creation.com/sickle-cell-anemia-does-not-prove-evolution
User avatar
#180 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Sickle-cell was merely an example. Tay-Sachs disease is entirely genetic and yet it causes children to die before the age of 7 (this is before they reach sexual maturity), thus it has no evolutionary advantage. There are countless genetic disorders and conditions and properties that are entirely genetic and lack significant evolutionary advantage.
User avatar
#186 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Bad recessive genes are why incestuous relations are frowned upon, but they are regularly eliminated in evolution theory, and have a much lower rate of expression than diseases like sickle-cell anemia. Genetic mutation and recessive expressions do account for many deformities, but have a much lower probability of occurring than we have homosexuals. I doubt most of us will ever meet a genetically homosexual person, even if such genes are prominent in deformity standards.
User avatar
#166 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I see it as an evolutionary failsafe to help stave off over population.
User avatar
#168 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
And homosexuality, in its property of not creating new individuals, does not do the same?
User avatar
#169 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I meant homosexuality.
User avatar
#171 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Ah. Very well then.
#158 - I didn't reference evolutionary biology. I'm saying, cause and…  [+] (11 replies) 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. +1
User avatar
#160 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
There's definitely something that goes into it. I'm just saying it's not genetic.
User avatar
#161 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
What makes you say that?
User avatar
#163 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
There are no evolutionary advantages to being homosexual-proper.
User avatar
#164 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
There are no evolutionary advantages to having sickle-cell anemia, and yet its cause is entirely genetic.
User avatar
#175 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Actually, there is. Sickle-cell anemia is a recessive gene. You can only get it if you received it from both of your parents. If you only have one sickle cell gene, then you're just a carrier, and carriers are less likely to develop malaria, which is often fatal.
creation.com/sickle-cell-anemia-does-not-prove-evolution
User avatar
#180 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Sickle-cell was merely an example. Tay-Sachs disease is entirely genetic and yet it causes children to die before the age of 7 (this is before they reach sexual maturity), thus it has no evolutionary advantage. There are countless genetic disorders and conditions and properties that are entirely genetic and lack significant evolutionary advantage.
User avatar
#186 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Bad recessive genes are why incestuous relations are frowned upon, but they are regularly eliminated in evolution theory, and have a much lower rate of expression than diseases like sickle-cell anemia. Genetic mutation and recessive expressions do account for many deformities, but have a much lower probability of occurring than we have homosexuals. I doubt most of us will ever meet a genetically homosexual person, even if such genes are prominent in deformity standards.
User avatar
#166 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I see it as an evolutionary failsafe to help stave off over population.
User avatar
#168 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
And homosexuality, in its property of not creating new individuals, does not do the same?
User avatar
#169 - vortexrain (12/04/2013) [-]
I meant homosexuality.
User avatar
#171 - angrytoilet (12/04/2013) [-]
Ah. Very well then.