Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

angrytoilet    

Rank #10536 on Subscribers
angrytoilet Avatar Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to angrytoilet Block angrytoilet Invite angrytoilet to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/25/2010
Last Login:8/20/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 3281 total,  3832 ,  551
Comment Thumbs: 2049 total,  2330 ,  281
Content Level Progress: 80% (80/100)
Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 133 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 88% (88/100)
Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:6
Content Views:113875
Times Content Favorited:343 times
Total Comments Made:821
FJ Points:5275
Favorite Tags: awkward (35) | lack (35) | tags (35) | meaningful (34) | of (34) | OC (8) | i (3) | lied (3) | theyre (3) | epiphany (2)

latest user's comments

#140 - "They". You have evidence that ONE tumblr user is ag…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/24/2014 on A little part of me died... 0
User avatar #141 - dehnoobshow (03/24/2014) [-]
Well, the rest of the herd didn't jump on her throat, I'm assuming bring against abortion isn't shunned upon in their hive mind community.
#31 - Ok sweetie enjoy the 8th grade, and when you drop out of high …  [+] (1 new reply) 03/20/2014 on Bomb-Yo-Mama 0
#32 - thismustbeseen (03/21/2014) [-]
I come back much later to find someone else has argued all of my points for me. Thanks. Well... all of the points that I would have brought up.

Yes, my point was just that - risking everyone's lives just for the pride of a few is.. stupid. Monumentally stupid, in fact. Fortunately I don't actually think the world operates that way. Even though it might seem that Putin is grabbing Chrimea like a maniac, I'm pretty sure it was an exact, calculated move that is actually very rare.

Even if he annexed all of the Ukraine (which won't happen), there is no chance of war. Developed powers are far too interdependent and put far too much value on human life for that to happen. There is a risk of course, since the US has a military which seems to exist for the sake of it, and which would not have much use if not in combat with someone...

Anyway.. if you keep seeing the world as just "us" and "them", then you'll never outgrow the tendency toward war.
#29 - You have a very short-sighted view. I'm advocating the protect…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Bomb-Yo-Mama 0
#30 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Not the pride, the life of a few people.
Your "greater good" can go fuck itself, if it means that you should live a life in fear and dishonor for abandoning your comrades.

User avatar #31 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
Ok sweetie enjoy the 8th grade, and when you drop out of high school I recommend you enlist so you can experience first-hand what happens when those in power sacrifice the needs of the many for the needs of the few.
#32 - thismustbeseen (03/21/2014) [-]
I come back much later to find someone else has argued all of my points for me. Thanks. Well... all of the points that I would have brought up.

Yes, my point was just that - risking everyone's lives just for the pride of a few is.. stupid. Monumentally stupid, in fact. Fortunately I don't actually think the world operates that way. Even though it might seem that Putin is grabbing Chrimea like a maniac, I'm pretty sure it was an exact, calculated move that is actually very rare.

Even if he annexed all of the Ukraine (which won't happen), there is no chance of war. Developed powers are far too interdependent and put far too much value on human life for that to happen. There is a risk of course, since the US has a military which seems to exist for the sake of it, and which would not have much use if not in combat with someone...

Anyway.. if you keep seeing the world as just "us" and "them", then you'll never outgrow the tendency toward war.
#21 - That's too hypothetical, because there is almost never a situa…  [+] (5 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Bomb-Yo-Mama +1
#22 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Then in my eyes, you are the worst trash in the world.
Even Adolf Hitler cared about his people.
User avatar #29 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
You have a very short-sighted view. I'm advocating the protection of the greater good, while you're advocating risking everyone's life for the pride of a few people.
#30 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Not the pride, the life of a few people.
Your "greater good" can go fuck itself, if it means that you should live a life in fear and dishonor for abandoning your comrades.

User avatar #31 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
Ok sweetie enjoy the 8th grade, and when you drop out of high school I recommend you enlist so you can experience first-hand what happens when those in power sacrifice the needs of the many for the needs of the few.
#32 - thismustbeseen (03/21/2014) [-]
I come back much later to find someone else has argued all of my points for me. Thanks. Well... all of the points that I would have brought up.

Yes, my point was just that - risking everyone's lives just for the pride of a few is.. stupid. Monumentally stupid, in fact. Fortunately I don't actually think the world operates that way. Even though it might seem that Putin is grabbing Chrimea like a maniac, I'm pretty sure it was an exact, calculated move that is actually very rare.

Even if he annexed all of the Ukraine (which won't happen), there is no chance of war. Developed powers are far too interdependent and put far too much value on human life for that to happen. There is a risk of course, since the US has a military which seems to exist for the sake of it, and which would not have much use if not in combat with someone...

Anyway.. if you keep seeing the world as just "us" and "them", then you'll never outgrow the tendency toward war.
#18 - This is not a black and white issue. There are other options. …  [+] (7 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Bomb-Yo-Mama +1
#19 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Thats not what this ithread is about. Thismustbeseen is saying that IF war was the only way to stop Russia from taking over Ukraine, then he would sacrafice Ukraine.
User avatar #21 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
That's too hypothetical, because there is almost never a situation wherein war is the only option. However, if I had to choose between a very small population of people being annexed by a tyrant or WWIII in which millions of people would die, I'd choose the former.
#22 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Then in my eyes, you are the worst trash in the world.
Even Adolf Hitler cared about his people.
User avatar #29 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
You have a very short-sighted view. I'm advocating the protection of the greater good, while you're advocating risking everyone's life for the pride of a few people.
#30 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Not the pride, the life of a few people.
Your "greater good" can go fuck itself, if it means that you should live a life in fear and dishonor for abandoning your comrades.

User avatar #31 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
Ok sweetie enjoy the 8th grade, and when you drop out of high school I recommend you enlist so you can experience first-hand what happens when those in power sacrifice the needs of the many for the needs of the few.
#32 - thismustbeseen (03/21/2014) [-]
I come back much later to find someone else has argued all of my points for me. Thanks. Well... all of the points that I would have brought up.

Yes, my point was just that - risking everyone's lives just for the pride of a few is.. stupid. Monumentally stupid, in fact. Fortunately I don't actually think the world operates that way. Even though it might seem that Putin is grabbing Chrimea like a maniac, I'm pretty sure it was an exact, calculated move that is actually very rare.

Even if he annexed all of the Ukraine (which won't happen), there is no chance of war. Developed powers are far too interdependent and put far too much value on human life for that to happen. There is a risk of course, since the US has a military which seems to exist for the sake of it, and which would not have much use if not in combat with someone...

Anyway.. if you keep seeing the world as just "us" and "them", then you'll never outgrow the tendency toward war.
#15 - If both myself and my bully had fists that could cause a chain…  [+] (9 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Bomb-Yo-Mama +1
#17 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
So, you just refuse to help your comrades who are weaker than you?
User avatar #18 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
This is not a black and white issue. There are other options. "Helping" them doesn't have to mean charging in, guns blazing.
#19 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Thats not what this ithread is about. Thismustbeseen is saying that IF war was the only way to stop Russia from taking over Ukraine, then he would sacrafice Ukraine.
User avatar #21 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
That's too hypothetical, because there is almost never a situation wherein war is the only option. However, if I had to choose between a very small population of people being annexed by a tyrant or WWIII in which millions of people would die, I'd choose the former.
#22 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Then in my eyes, you are the worst trash in the world.
Even Adolf Hitler cared about his people.
User avatar #29 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
You have a very short-sighted view. I'm advocating the protection of the greater good, while you're advocating risking everyone's life for the pride of a few people.
#30 - shadowgandalf (03/20/2014) [-]
Not the pride, the life of a few people.
Your "greater good" can go fuck itself, if it means that you should live a life in fear and dishonor for abandoning your comrades.

User avatar #31 - angrytoilet (03/20/2014) [-]
Ok sweetie enjoy the 8th grade, and when you drop out of high school I recommend you enlist so you can experience first-hand what happens when those in power sacrifice the needs of the many for the needs of the few.
#32 - thismustbeseen (03/21/2014) [-]
I come back much later to find someone else has argued all of my points for me. Thanks. Well... all of the points that I would have brought up.

Yes, my point was just that - risking everyone's lives just for the pride of a few is.. stupid. Monumentally stupid, in fact. Fortunately I don't actually think the world operates that way. Even though it might seem that Putin is grabbing Chrimea like a maniac, I'm pretty sure it was an exact, calculated move that is actually very rare.

Even if he annexed all of the Ukraine (which won't happen), there is no chance of war. Developed powers are far too interdependent and put far too much value on human life for that to happen. There is a risk of course, since the US has a military which seems to exist for the sake of it, and which would not have much use if not in combat with someone...

Anyway.. if you keep seeing the world as just "us" and "them", then you'll never outgrow the tendency toward war.
#24 - What the Orthodox priest did to Putin was actually a very subt…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/12/2014 on In Russia Man Does Not Kiss... +110
User avatar #41 - propanex (03/12/2014) [-]
The balls on that priest. He might be dead right now for his actions...

Putin dont put up wit that shit
#35 - kanali (03/12/2014) [-]
Or maybe the priest is such a fan of Putin, he thinks he should be the Tsar, and is already acting like he is.
#33 - Live and learn, love. 03/11/2014 on Ow, My Hurt Brainy 0
#31 - Also, your sentence became past-tense when you used "Didn…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/11/2014 on Ow, My Hurt Brainy +2
User avatar #32 - guiguito (03/11/2014) [-]
I see.
User avatar #33 - angrytoilet (03/11/2014) [-]
Live and learn, love.
#122 - Things would be too easy if everything made sense 03/06/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... 0
#116 - It sounds like circular logic because it kind of is. Unfortuna…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/05/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... 0
User avatar #121 - jokeface (03/06/2014) [-]
I can understand that premise, but the problem I have with it is that the association is stemming from a minority, not a majority. Take tattoos for example. Most people with tattoos are generally decent human beings. But some of them are criminals. The internet doesn't wage a hate war on tattoos though, because they know that's absurd and ignorant.

I'm not looking to change the status quo. I know that's a lost cause. People are always gonna hate. I just wish their hate made more sense.
User avatar #122 - angrytoilet (03/06/2014) [-]
Things would be too easy if everything made sense
#114 - You are misunderstanding. What is fashionable is defined by th…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/05/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... 0
User avatar #115 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Sounds like circular logic to me. Baseball caps are fashionable because nobody makes fun of them, because they are fashionable.

It had to start somewhere. Something about trilbies and fedoras bothers the internet, and I'd like to know what it is. What was it that designated them as being mockable, that started the apparent mass-unpopularity?
User avatar #116 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
It sounds like circular logic because it kind of is. Unfortunately, that's how people work. That's not how a PERSON works. A person makes decisions based on facts. PEOPLE make decisions based on what other people are doing. It is a sort of mob mentality.

Fedoras and trilbies began receiving their latest series of flak when a zealous atheist posted a picture of himself in poor fashion, topped off with a fedora (or trilby, I don't remember). The picture was captioned with something about being euphoric for his intelligence and not being a sheeple and blah blah blah. What's important is that he violated social standards by being far too loud and far too vehement about being an atheist. People didn't like this, and began associating that bad social behavior with what he was wearing. The perfect symbol for this bad social behavior was found - his hat. After a while, a few other bad social behaviors were tacked onto this image - obese/overweight neckbeards, bronies, "The Friendzone", etc. Now, fedoras/trilbies are associated with these things in internet and pop culture. Just as fashion-forward and risky styles can be associated with good social behavior through the use of attractive models, so too can fedoras/trilbies be associated with bad social behavior.

In essence, there is nothing inherently wrong with the fedora or the trilby. But, mainstream fashion deems it unfashionable because many people don't like it. Many people don't like it because it is often associated with bad social behaviors.
User avatar #121 - jokeface (03/06/2014) [-]
I can understand that premise, but the problem I have with it is that the association is stemming from a minority, not a majority. Take tattoos for example. Most people with tattoos are generally decent human beings. But some of them are criminals. The internet doesn't wage a hate war on tattoos though, because they know that's absurd and ignorant.

I'm not looking to change the status quo. I know that's a lost cause. People are always gonna hate. I just wish their hate made more sense.
User avatar #122 - angrytoilet (03/06/2014) [-]
Things would be too easy if everything made sense
#112 - Baseball caps are accepted items of mainstream fashion, sweeti…  [+] (6 new replies) 03/05/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... 0
User avatar #113 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Trilbies have a cult following, which seems to be unimpeded by the internet's mockery of them. They are immune to the approval/disapproval of the vox populi. With that in mind, surely baseball caps are equally immune. So your statement holds very little weight.
User avatar #114 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
You are misunderstanding. What is fashionable is defined by the majority of a population.

If we designate the population to be the internet (now at this point I'm going to redefine "the internet" as most social media websites with connections to internet culture and pop culture, e.g., facebook(barely), FJ, tumblr, reddit, etc), then what the majority of the internet deems acceptable can be termed "fashionable". As the majority of the internet takes part in making fun of fedoras and trilbies, then these items would not be considered "fashionable". The fact that their following can be described as a "cult following" only proves that it is not mainstream and therefore not "fashonable".

The original question above^ was "How come you don't make fun of people who wear baseball caps?". The reason is simple. Baseball caps are ubiquitous in modern culture and fashion. Because of this, nobody makes fun of them.

It's sad that this is how fashion and society work, but if you want to not be made fun of, you must fall within social standards. Unless you're incredibly attractive. This group of people have huge leeway when it comes to fashion, because their own attractiveness can be used to enhance the attractiveness of the clothing. This is why advertisements for clothing companies almost always include an attractive model.
User avatar #115 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Sounds like circular logic to me. Baseball caps are fashionable because nobody makes fun of them, because they are fashionable.

It had to start somewhere. Something about trilbies and fedoras bothers the internet, and I'd like to know what it is. What was it that designated them as being mockable, that started the apparent mass-unpopularity?
User avatar #116 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
It sounds like circular logic because it kind of is. Unfortunately, that's how people work. That's not how a PERSON works. A person makes decisions based on facts. PEOPLE make decisions based on what other people are doing. It is a sort of mob mentality.

Fedoras and trilbies began receiving their latest series of flak when a zealous atheist posted a picture of himself in poor fashion, topped off with a fedora (or trilby, I don't remember). The picture was captioned with something about being euphoric for his intelligence and not being a sheeple and blah blah blah. What's important is that he violated social standards by being far too loud and far too vehement about being an atheist. People didn't like this, and began associating that bad social behavior with what he was wearing. The perfect symbol for this bad social behavior was found - his hat. After a while, a few other bad social behaviors were tacked onto this image - obese/overweight neckbeards, bronies, "The Friendzone", etc. Now, fedoras/trilbies are associated with these things in internet and pop culture. Just as fashion-forward and risky styles can be associated with good social behavior through the use of attractive models, so too can fedoras/trilbies be associated with bad social behavior.

In essence, there is nothing inherently wrong with the fedora or the trilby. But, mainstream fashion deems it unfashionable because many people don't like it. Many people don't like it because it is often associated with bad social behaviors.
User avatar #121 - jokeface (03/06/2014) [-]
I can understand that premise, but the problem I have with it is that the association is stemming from a minority, not a majority. Take tattoos for example. Most people with tattoos are generally decent human beings. But some of them are criminals. The internet doesn't wage a hate war on tattoos though, because they know that's absurd and ignorant.

I'm not looking to change the status quo. I know that's a lost cause. People are always gonna hate. I just wish their hate made more sense.
User avatar #122 - angrytoilet (03/06/2014) [-]
Things would be too easy if everything made sense
#110 - That works too.  [+] (8 new replies) 03/05/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... 0
User avatar #111 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
How come you don't make fun of people who wear baseball caps?
User avatar #112 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
Baseball caps are accepted items of mainstream fashion, sweetie. The fact that we don't make fun of them means that they are fashionable. Fashion is amorphous and strange, but it is entirely defined by social standards. Obviously, you have a few oddballs, but it is the majority that defines the trend, much like statistical analysis.
User avatar #113 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Trilbies have a cult following, which seems to be unimpeded by the internet's mockery of them. They are immune to the approval/disapproval of the vox populi. With that in mind, surely baseball caps are equally immune. So your statement holds very little weight.
User avatar #114 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
You are misunderstanding. What is fashionable is defined by the majority of a population.

If we designate the population to be the internet (now at this point I'm going to redefine "the internet" as most social media websites with connections to internet culture and pop culture, e.g., facebook(barely), FJ, tumblr, reddit, etc), then what the majority of the internet deems acceptable can be termed "fashionable". As the majority of the internet takes part in making fun of fedoras and trilbies, then these items would not be considered "fashionable". The fact that their following can be described as a "cult following" only proves that it is not mainstream and therefore not "fashonable".

The original question above^ was "How come you don't make fun of people who wear baseball caps?". The reason is simple. Baseball caps are ubiquitous in modern culture and fashion. Because of this, nobody makes fun of them.

It's sad that this is how fashion and society work, but if you want to not be made fun of, you must fall within social standards. Unless you're incredibly attractive. This group of people have huge leeway when it comes to fashion, because their own attractiveness can be used to enhance the attractiveness of the clothing. This is why advertisements for clothing companies almost always include an attractive model.
User avatar #115 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Sounds like circular logic to me. Baseball caps are fashionable because nobody makes fun of them, because they are fashionable.

It had to start somewhere. Something about trilbies and fedoras bothers the internet, and I'd like to know what it is. What was it that designated them as being mockable, that started the apparent mass-unpopularity?
User avatar #116 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
It sounds like circular logic because it kind of is. Unfortunately, that's how people work. That's not how a PERSON works. A person makes decisions based on facts. PEOPLE make decisions based on what other people are doing. It is a sort of mob mentality.

Fedoras and trilbies began receiving their latest series of flak when a zealous atheist posted a picture of himself in poor fashion, topped off with a fedora (or trilby, I don't remember). The picture was captioned with something about being euphoric for his intelligence and not being a sheeple and blah blah blah. What's important is that he violated social standards by being far too loud and far too vehement about being an atheist. People didn't like this, and began associating that bad social behavior with what he was wearing. The perfect symbol for this bad social behavior was found - his hat. After a while, a few other bad social behaviors were tacked onto this image - obese/overweight neckbeards, bronies, "The Friendzone", etc. Now, fedoras/trilbies are associated with these things in internet and pop culture. Just as fashion-forward and risky styles can be associated with good social behavior through the use of attractive models, so too can fedoras/trilbies be associated with bad social behavior.

In essence, there is nothing inherently wrong with the fedora or the trilby. But, mainstream fashion deems it unfashionable because many people don't like it. Many people don't like it because it is often associated with bad social behaviors.
User avatar #121 - jokeface (03/06/2014) [-]
I can understand that premise, but the problem I have with it is that the association is stemming from a minority, not a majority. Take tattoos for example. Most people with tattoos are generally decent human beings. But some of them are criminals. The internet doesn't wage a hate war on tattoos though, because they know that's absurd and ignorant.

I'm not looking to change the status quo. I know that's a lost cause. People are always gonna hate. I just wish their hate made more sense.
User avatar #122 - angrytoilet (03/06/2014) [-]
Things would be too easy if everything made sense
#108 - The people that defend fedoras against trilbies are generally …  [+] (10 new replies) 03/05/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... -1
User avatar #109 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
I thought the people you're making fun of were people who wear either one.
User avatar #110 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
That works too.
User avatar #111 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
How come you don't make fun of people who wear baseball caps?
User avatar #112 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
Baseball caps are accepted items of mainstream fashion, sweetie. The fact that we don't make fun of them means that they are fashionable. Fashion is amorphous and strange, but it is entirely defined by social standards. Obviously, you have a few oddballs, but it is the majority that defines the trend, much like statistical analysis.
User avatar #113 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Trilbies have a cult following, which seems to be unimpeded by the internet's mockery of them. They are immune to the approval/disapproval of the vox populi. With that in mind, surely baseball caps are equally immune. So your statement holds very little weight.
User avatar #114 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
You are misunderstanding. What is fashionable is defined by the majority of a population.

If we designate the population to be the internet (now at this point I'm going to redefine "the internet" as most social media websites with connections to internet culture and pop culture, e.g., facebook(barely), FJ, tumblr, reddit, etc), then what the majority of the internet deems acceptable can be termed "fashionable". As the majority of the internet takes part in making fun of fedoras and trilbies, then these items would not be considered "fashionable". The fact that their following can be described as a "cult following" only proves that it is not mainstream and therefore not "fashonable".

The original question above^ was "How come you don't make fun of people who wear baseball caps?". The reason is simple. Baseball caps are ubiquitous in modern culture and fashion. Because of this, nobody makes fun of them.

It's sad that this is how fashion and society work, but if you want to not be made fun of, you must fall within social standards. Unless you're incredibly attractive. This group of people have huge leeway when it comes to fashion, because their own attractiveness can be used to enhance the attractiveness of the clothing. This is why advertisements for clothing companies almost always include an attractive model.
User avatar #115 - jokeface (03/05/2014) [-]
Sounds like circular logic to me. Baseball caps are fashionable because nobody makes fun of them, because they are fashionable.

It had to start somewhere. Something about trilbies and fedoras bothers the internet, and I'd like to know what it is. What was it that designated them as being mockable, that started the apparent mass-unpopularity?
User avatar #116 - angrytoilet (03/05/2014) [-]
It sounds like circular logic because it kind of is. Unfortunately, that's how people work. That's not how a PERSON works. A person makes decisions based on facts. PEOPLE make decisions based on what other people are doing. It is a sort of mob mentality.

Fedoras and trilbies began receiving their latest series of flak when a zealous atheist posted a picture of himself in poor fashion, topped off with a fedora (or trilby, I don't remember). The picture was captioned with something about being euphoric for his intelligence and not being a sheeple and blah blah blah. What's important is that he violated social standards by being far too loud and far too vehement about being an atheist. People didn't like this, and began associating that bad social behavior with what he was wearing. The perfect symbol for this bad social behavior was found - his hat. After a while, a few other bad social behaviors were tacked onto this image - obese/overweight neckbeards, bronies, "The Friendzone", etc. Now, fedoras/trilbies are associated with these things in internet and pop culture. Just as fashion-forward and risky styles can be associated with good social behavior through the use of attractive models, so too can fedoras/trilbies be associated with bad social behavior.

In essence, there is nothing inherently wrong with the fedora or the trilby. But, mainstream fashion deems it unfashionable because many people don't like it. Many people don't like it because it is often associated with bad social behaviors.
User avatar #121 - jokeface (03/06/2014) [-]
I can understand that premise, but the problem I have with it is that the association is stemming from a minority, not a majority. Take tattoos for example. Most people with tattoos are generally decent human beings. But some of them are criminals. The internet doesn't wage a hate war on tattoos though, because they know that's absurd and ignorant.

I'm not looking to change the status quo. I know that's a lost cause. People are always gonna hate. I just wish their hate made more sense.
User avatar #122 - angrytoilet (03/06/2014) [-]
Things would be too easy if everything made sense
#107 - It probably worked for those men because they were inherently … 03/05/2014 on Neckbeards, bow to your... 0
#10 - The actor playing the father is the same actor who played Math…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/27/2014 on Oh god! WHY YOU DO DIS?! +80
User avatar #34 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/28/2014) [-]
Holy shit you are right...
User avatar #30 - faithrider (02/27/2014) [-]
"mum"
#19 - wimwam (02/27/2014) [-]
Good catch- I didn't even notice
User avatar #35 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/28/2014) [-]
Guy was the best character in that whole movie.
#27 - Forwards from grandma. 02/27/2014 on I wonder where the vegans are? 0
#119 - He would make a fine homosexual. Let's hope he's a homosexual.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/19/2014 on MOST BETA MAN ALIVE +1
#148 - sanguinesolitude (02/19/2014) [-]
dat gif... fuckin saved.
#14 - A lot of times these types of people will shout very hurtful t…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Trolling hardcore Christians +1
#17 - greenwithenvy (02/13/2014) [-]
then just shout something back, don't fall into their game of taking a photo that looks out of context.
User avatar #32 - JuliusC (02/13/2014) [-]
when i was on campus i found it best to just ignore them and laugh at the idiots who went up to go argue
how does theyre opinion or words affect my life in anyway? exactly
#20 - Gay men and lesbians are notorious for not getting along. Gay …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/04/2014 on Being gay aint easy 0
#21 - anonymous (02/04/2014) [-]
true. lesbians are even censored on here.
#215 - The greatest depths of emotion can come only from the greatest… 01/21/2014 on Looking for a shitstorm?... +1
#81 - Many opponents of the legalization of same-sex marriage cite t…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/21/2014 on Looking for a shitstorm?... +1
User avatar #90 - Lloydles (01/21/2014) [-]
Oh. That was a remarkably well constructed response from such an angry toilet.
User avatar #215 - angrytoilet (01/21/2014) [-]
The greatest depths of emotion can come only from the greatest heights of sagacity. Thus, the angriest toilet may also be the wisest.
#180 - Sickle-cell was merely an example. Tay-Sachs disease is entire…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. 0
#186 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2013) [-]
Bad recessive genes are why incestuous relations are frowned upon, but they are regularly eliminated in evolution theory, and have a much lower rate of expression than diseases like sickle-cell anemia. Genetic mutation and recessive expressions do account for many deformities, but have a much lower probability of occurring than we have homosexuals. I doubt most of us will ever meet a genetically homosexual person, even if such genes are prominent in deformity standards.
#171 - Ah. Very well then. 12/04/2013 on Being Gay. 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - anonymous (05/13/2013) [-]
what's your obsession with camels?
User avatar #7 to #6 - angrytoilet (05/13/2013) [-]
Not an obsession. An existence. I AM camel.
User avatar #3 - thatoldhorse ONLINE (04/30/2013) [-]
name your cat moon moon
User avatar #5 to #3 - thatoldhorse ONLINE (04/30/2013) [-]
wow, did i type that? i should start going to bed earlier. anyway i hope you get that scholarship Mr.angrytoilet
User avatar #1 - iMJesus (03/01/2011) [-]
LOL!
Nice post, I thumbed, can you thumb this for me?

http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1740003/DO+WANT+POKEBALLS/
User avatar #2 to #1 - angrytoilet (03/01/2011) [-]
i did so
 Friends (0)