Upload
Login or register

adrilazzaro

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/05/2012
Location:Argentina
Stats
Comment Ranking:#13713
Highest Content Rank:#3884
Highest Comment Rank:#4621
Content Thumbs: 418 total,  504 ,  86
Comment Thumbs: 3364 total,  4841 ,  1477
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 32 Content: Peasant → Level 33 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:3
Content Views:30471
Times Content Favorited:24 times
Total Comments Made:2628
FJ Points:3834

latest user's comments

#33 - what's this from?  [+] (10 replies) 06/14/2015 on Water parks have stepped... 0
User avatar
#149 - gowge (06/14/2015) [-]
If you appreciate cinematography give it a watch. If your favorite film is expendables 2, don't bother.
User avatar
#34 - akanbe (06/14/2015) [-]
2001: A Space Odyssey
It could be either the best of the worst sci-fi movie you'll ever see.
User avatar
#143 - infinitereaper (06/14/2015) [-]
For me the best was Interstellar
User avatar
#76 - phanact (06/14/2015) [-]
I still haven't watched it
User avatar
#114 - deathchain (06/14/2015) [-]
It's a mindfuck, with even Kubrick himself saying that maybe he went a bit overboard on it.
User avatar
#86 - germanblood (06/14/2015) [-]
How could have not watched it?

Surely you have seen 2010?

Both some of the best Sci-Fi ever made!
User avatar
#75 - phanact (06/14/2015) [-]
lol
#72 - anon (06/14/2015) [-]
way too much exposition
almost no dialogue
but it amplifies the vacuum of space
User avatar
#70 - blandbland (06/14/2015) [-]
The USSR braking up has to be the worst thing in history because now we give no ships about science and she run rampant in the streets telling people that can't do anything without it being offensive (if the space race still existed we would be on Mars by now assuming it's possible)
#49 - vakranov (06/14/2015) [-]
The most accurate description of that movie I have ever read
#54 - What the **** is wrong with you man  [+] (2 replies) 06/10/2015 on I'm Not a Racist - RE:... +3
User avatar
#66 - iloveburzum (06/11/2015) [-]
Too much internet.

Thats a total beat down though, no stats, no facts, no calling me racist... just..

"the fuck is wrong with you"

User avatar
#88 - adrilazzaro (06/11/2015) [-]
"i fully support cops kicking the fuck out out of nig nogs"-you
It's pretty terrible that you're not being sarcastic, yeah offensive jokes are fine but flat out "lol fuck niggers" is just fucked up
#18 - thought you guys had a real bad case of sjw infestation? like …  [+] (15 replies) 06/10/2015 on Living in the UK +27
User avatar
#136 - thetoxicketchup (06/11/2015) [-]
Yeah but thankfully that shit sticks to universities and doesn't really spread.
#119 - anon (06/11/2015) [-]
I never really saw any during my time in college. But I did go to a STEM school, so that's probably why.
User avatar
#113 - fukkentyranitar (06/11/2015) [-]
And they are taken seriously by literally no one.
User avatar
#150 - fukkentyranitar (06/15/2015) [-]
Lol, no one gives a fat fuck about Quebec. They can have it.
User avatar
#151 - fuckingtrolls (06/16/2015) [-]
But it's not gonna stop there. I'm telling you by 2016 we'll be under a new regime
User avatar
#152 - fukkentyranitar (06/16/2015) [-]
lol k. Quebec is a given. People who live in Quebec don't care about Quebec.
User avatar
#134 - fuckingtrolls (06/11/2015) [-]
That's how it started in America. We have to make sure we don't make the same mistakes
User avatar
#89 - timmywankenobi (06/10/2015) [-]
we do but out side of humanities deparments everyone laughs at them for being retards.
#66 - anon (06/10/2015) [-]
Canada is just sort of a melting pot of everything. Almost every situation is next to an isolated incident.

One day an incomprehensive chinaman hits your car. another day someone was mugged by some nigger.
There are enough sensible people around that if you tell an SJW to fuck right off you will get more support than hate.
User avatar
#24 - nykis (06/10/2015) [-]
Oh right we have hipsters, fuck I forgot
User avatar
#23 - nykis (06/10/2015) [-]
I live in a town with a university and we just have a ton of asians, don't know too much about SJWs though. Best part about them is they scare away the black people, as Uni is the natural habitat of the asians.
User avatar
#102 - pocketstooheavy (06/10/2015) [-]
Which university?
#101 - pocketstooheavy has deleted their comment.
#20 - anon (06/10/2015) [-]
There is still enough smart people on campuses to laugh alongside you at the SJW's.
#98 - It's not that they're not sharing their source. It's that they…  [+] (1 reply) 06/08/2015 on (untitled) 0
User avatar
#99 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Nvidia does not ban developers from working with AMD. They ban developers from sharing their GameWorks source code with people who do not have a license (AMD).

Take the amazing Witcher 3 for example. Turn off GameWorks and the game runs perfectly fine on my AMD card, because AMD was working with CDPR the entire time they were creating the game, despite the company using Nvidia's GameWorks. AMD gets access to everything except Nvidia's property (unless the developers are just assholes) meaning they optimize what they can, but obviously they can not optimize for GameWorks because they don't have access to it's codes. Which is a perfectly legal thing to do.

Would it be better for PC gaming overall if they did share? Of course.
Is it a smart business move? No
Is Nvidia a business? Yes. So why the fuck would they do that.

You can read this if you want. From back in 2014 when AMD was still complaining about access rights.
#95 - So you actually support the manipulation of a market? By all…  [+] (3 replies) 06/07/2015 on (untitled) 0
User avatar
#97 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Of course it's a bad thing. I hope I don't have to explain to you why companies that offer their products to be used under contract aren't obligated to share their products with competitors.

Do you see Apple sharing phone specs with Microsoft?
Does Home Depot share their sales plans with Lowe's?
Does Chevrolet design new vehicles and then send the blueprints to Ford?

No, so why do you feel that Nvidia is obligated to share their source code with AMD. You just want what I wanted when I bought my 6GB FTW Edition 7990. An amazing and comparable card for cheaper than Nvidia's usually high price point.
User avatar
#98 - adrilazzaro (06/08/2015) [-]
It's not that they're not sharing their source. It's that they're making developers (and its also the developers fault) sign contracts in which they're not allowed to work with AMD. At all, that's the nasty part about it.
Check this run down of it www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/367qav/mark_my_word_if_we_dont_stop_the_nvidia_gameworks/
User avatar
#99 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Nvidia does not ban developers from working with AMD. They ban developers from sharing their GameWorks source code with people who do not have a license (AMD).

Take the amazing Witcher 3 for example. Turn off GameWorks and the game runs perfectly fine on my AMD card, because AMD was working with CDPR the entire time they were creating the game, despite the company using Nvidia's GameWorks. AMD gets access to everything except Nvidia's property (unless the developers are just assholes) meaning they optimize what they can, but obviously they can not optimize for GameWorks because they don't have access to it's codes. Which is a perfectly legal thing to do.

Would it be better for PC gaming overall if they did share? Of course.
Is it a smart business move? No
Is Nvidia a business? Yes. So why the fuck would they do that.

You can read this if you want. From back in 2014 when AMD was still complaining about access rights.
#58 - It's also Nvidia using dirty anticompetitive tactics such as …  [+] (19 replies) 06/07/2015 on (untitled) -1
User avatar
#86 - kibuza (06/07/2015) [-]
You mean people like to make their games with the best resources available at the time? And companies aren't obligated to share their hard earned work (and code) with other companies just because these other companies are behind the curve and spending less and less in R&D each year?

Fascinating. I think I've seen this before. Oh yea, it's called business.
User avatar
#95 - adrilazzaro (06/07/2015) [-]
So you actually support the manipulation of a market? By allowing Nvidia to do this you're pretty much giving them the go ahead for them to have a monopoly on the GPU market. I hope i dont have to explain why that's a bad thing.
User avatar
#97 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Of course it's a bad thing. I hope I don't have to explain to you why companies that offer their products to be used under contract aren't obligated to share their products with competitors.

Do you see Apple sharing phone specs with Microsoft?
Does Home Depot share their sales plans with Lowe's?
Does Chevrolet design new vehicles and then send the blueprints to Ford?

No, so why do you feel that Nvidia is obligated to share their source code with AMD. You just want what I wanted when I bought my 6GB FTW Edition 7990. An amazing and comparable card for cheaper than Nvidia's usually high price point.
User avatar
#98 - adrilazzaro (06/08/2015) [-]
It's not that they're not sharing their source. It's that they're making developers (and its also the developers fault) sign contracts in which they're not allowed to work with AMD. At all, that's the nasty part about it.
Check this run down of it www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/367qav/mark_my_word_if_we_dont_stop_the_nvidia_gameworks/
User avatar
#99 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Nvidia does not ban developers from working with AMD. They ban developers from sharing their GameWorks source code with people who do not have a license (AMD).

Take the amazing Witcher 3 for example. Turn off GameWorks and the game runs perfectly fine on my AMD card, because AMD was working with CDPR the entire time they were creating the game, despite the company using Nvidia's GameWorks. AMD gets access to everything except Nvidia's property (unless the developers are just assholes) meaning they optimize what they can, but obviously they can not optimize for GameWorks because they don't have access to it's codes. Which is a perfectly legal thing to do.

Would it be better for PC gaming overall if they did share? Of course.
Is it a smart business move? No
Is Nvidia a business? Yes. So why the fuck would they do that.

You can read this if you want. From back in 2014 when AMD was still complaining about access rights.
User avatar
#66 - ilcecchino (06/07/2015) [-]
Advid AMD fanboy here. and you basically hit the nail on the head.
User avatar
#91 - kibuza (06/07/2015) [-]
You mean they made it using Nvidia's source code, and Nvidia forbids people from sharing their intellectual and physical property with a competing company? Good god, those assholes.

They should be more like every other business. Every other business definitely shares equal coding / resources / property. I mean look at Samsung and Apple, they definitely don't try to one-up the competition by making superior products and not sharing specs and codes.
User avatar
#111 - ilcecchino (06/08/2015) [-]
except. blackmailing, threatening, bribing among other thigns. that's not competative. that's not "may the best product win" that's underhanded and dirty shit that they have been doing for years to achieve the global market over amd. intel has done the same and there has even been a lawsuit over it. before intel took over the global market for reasons mentioned. amd was far and above everyone else
User avatar
#112 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Got any evidence or are you just shitting out of your mouth?

Also, the fact that there was a lawsuit means nothing. What was the verdict on this lawsuit? You're just depressed that a company worth about 3B and spending less and less on R&D each year is somehow losing to a company worth 12B+ which is spending more on R&D each year.

In summary, you are a fucking idiot. Feel free to continue buying your inferior products.
User avatar
#113 - ilcecchino (06/08/2015) [-]
losing? lol no. im not depressed. im impressed. amd is keeping up with that handicap. that shows a company that knows what the fuck they are doing

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Micro_Devices,_Inc._v._Intel_Corp.

just one instance against intel. there are more cases that never made it to court.

www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/12/11/amd-exec-says-physx-will-die/1
only skimmed this article but it looks like the one i read awhile ago, saying how physx is basically just a scam for people to want to buy nvidia products and that cpu based physics are much more efficient and better.

along side the many other unessecary things nvidia puts into their cards that can be done in a universal way. just so that they can bribe companies into optimising for thier cards so they only seem superior. when infact, they are not. atleast that was the case before they got such a huge lead that they can just shit money out untill something works
User avatar
#114 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
>Company value steadily decreasing year after year
>Competitors value steadily increasing year after year
>Not losing

Nigga you understand how businesses work right?

AMD vs Intel is not AMD vs Nvidia. Nice job pulling that gem out of your ass. Also, accusations which never make it to court are fucking worthless. "ILCECCHINO rapes dolphins". I guess it must be true because it's been said but never proven in court.

Also, if the CPU run PhysX and GameWorks can be run so much nicer on a CPU why would developers pay for a license to use them and limit their customer base.

Use your fucking head.
User avatar
#115 - ilcecchino (06/08/2015) [-]
We literally just said this. nvidia will literally pay companies to optimize games for their cards. that includes physx and gameworks. and grats? i know amd vs intel is not amd vs nvidia. im stating points and facts about amd. amd lost the global market to intel while they were just processors back in like 05. ati was losing out to nvidia and gets picked up by amd. they create cards and chips. but because they had lost the global market already. intel and nvidia already had their names out. i've asked a shitload of my friends who are kinda iffy on computer products. cause it's not their hobby. ALL of them knew intel's name. none even know AMD existed. they were iffy on graphics cards nvidia only came up because some of their games have their logo on the start. it's like going to the market and looking for soup. you know cambells chicken noodle soup(intel/nvidia). you've seen a commercial. you buy it. even though there are other brands(amd/ati) that you never heard of that could possibly have superior soup. that's basically what happened to amd for years and years to the point where we are now, where sure. they're making slightly better products. but with as much of a lead as they have in terms of money, amd shouldn't even be able to hold as much as a candle to them. yet they can, and do. proudly. amd is a company that has always been about the product, the games. the tech. nvidia is a company that only cares about milking their consumer base for as much money they can. much like apple. we all know apple does. that doesnt mean they make bad stuff. but their goal is the money, not to make the best product they can. if AMD had the budget that nvidia had. the gaming world would be in a much, much better place. and for that reason i will support amd till the day they claim bankruptcy, knock on wood. i've been with AMD since i learned to build a computer when i was 10. never had any problems and only have great things to say about their products.
User avatar
#116 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Hit the enter key once in awhile. Look at that block of bullshit.

Man your points are so easy to disprove, conversation was about nvidia vs amd until you brought up Intel our of nowhere.

Developers buy the license from Nvidia to use Gameworks and other features. Still waiting on some proof that Nvidia pays companies to use their tech, or did you conveniently forget to post proof?

>Nvidia not caring about technology and just wanting money
>Nvidia spending more on R&D developing NEW technology
>AMD using the same shit for the last 5 years.

Yea, it's Nvidia milking it for money.

Also your last sentence and it pretty much makes your opinion on AMD vs Nvidia worthless. You've only used AMD. You have no reference data.

I currently have a 6gb dual FTW Edition 7990. And not only does Xfire not work with nearly every game in existence, it barely runs better than my old GTX680.

Next card I get will be an Nvidia, and maybe AMD will turn their shit around but as it stands now they are inferior to Nvidia cards. It's just a fact.
User avatar
#117 - ilcecchino (06/08/2015) [-]
i said i've been with. not that I've specifically only used. how can you side with nvidia if you've never used an amd chip/card. oh, you have? look at that. you used both sides and you're still with nvidia.

i have a 7970. fx-8350 black edition. only this year have i started running into gpu bottlenecking and i will be getting an r9 390x as soon as it releases. my 8350 is running perfectly fine. i have friends who are nvidia fans and even they say that SLI causes more problems than it mitigates. it's just not something developers really put time behind because there's not too many people who have dual gpu rigs. nor is it really needed.

and what "new" technologies. PhysX when we've had havok for the longest time? Gameworks? which as we see with UE4 can all be done inside the engines. Nvidia hairworks. which is basically just TressFx

wccftech.com/tressfx-hair-20-detailed-improved-visuals-performance-multiplatform-support/

which is not only faster than hairwoks. AMD makes it available to everyone (seeing as it runs faster, atleast in this example on nvidia cards than even hairworks)
User avatar
#118 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
Bro, you obviously don't fact check your shit before it dribbles out of your mouth. Gameworks was in use before UE4 was even released you idiot.

Yea, Havok is definitely as good as PhysX. That's why we see it less and less and more companies opt for PhysX.

SLI is usually more hassle than it's worth, you're right. But AMD Xfire is fucking useless. 80% of games I have to go into AMD control panel and disable Xfire.

My friend (since apparently we can bring our friends in now) runs SLI 680s, and they are amazing. Even when they don't work to full capacity at least he doesn't need to go in to a separate control panel and manually disable them.
User avatar
#119 - ilcecchino (06/08/2015) [-]
no shit gameworks was in use before UE4. all it was an example. everything gameworks did could be done in-engine. it's nothing new.

Havok is just as good. i've never played a game where i was like "oh my god these physics" while i had my nvidia card. the literal only game where i've even seen physx be remotely visible is borderlands. and even then it's just the grenades, flags, and banners that i noticed a difference in
User avatar
#120 - kibuza (06/08/2015) [-]
>Everything could have be done in Engine.
>Engine which uses same effects created in late 2014

Yup, it's old tech.

Your arguments pretty weak bro.

Also you just admitted that PhysX was better, even if in a small portion.
User avatar
#84 - sniffythebird (06/07/2015) [-]
Really, it's not optimization so that game performance is biased. This is what a lot of people think, and from that I can safely say they haven't used a high end Nvidia card with games like that cranked all the way up.

Proprietary shit like Gameworks just butchers performance when used, with little more than a few gimmicky graphical effects. Stuff like HBAO+ and TXAA look like crap and tank framerates to a ridiculous level, it's just not worth using. Far Cry 4 for example was praised to the skies by Nvidia, yet it runs like shit on dual 980's.

But it goes both ways. Thief and Battlefield 4 were supposed to have vastly superior performance with Mantle; and they partnered with AMD, except it's actually worse than DX11 in most cases.
#59 - sniffythebird (06/07/2015) [-]
Optimization is a very vague term.

I've ran plenty of games with Nvidia gameworks or just in general the geforce.com site praising the game's graphics and optimization, yet it runs like moose shit.

It is pretty nasty advertising though, I agree. A lot of gameworks features are just gimmicks that ruin performance more than they add to the visual experience. What I like Nvidia for now though is they have a much more efficient GPU architecture, and G-Sync being out earlier than FreeSync. Plus it seems like they're learning a bit and not doing as much rebranding and/or sticking with old technology for too long.

For instance, look at this crappy CPU utilization and how it's bottlenecking GPU usage.