x
Click to expand

adolfoliverbush

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 18
Date Signed Up:3/21/2011
Last Login:7/04/2015
Location:middleofnowhere
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2391
Comment Ranking:#32679
Highest Content Rank:#2396
Highest Comment Rank:#5175
Content Thumbs: 1705 total,  2156 ,  451
Comment Thumbs: 1483 total,  2827 ,  1344
Content Level Progress: 18% (18/100)
Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 25% (25/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:8
Content Views:96863
Times Content Favorited:161 times
Total Comments Made:1329
FJ Points:3058
Favorite Tags: Love (3) | i (2)
I'm allergic to cats

latest user's comments

#8 - can confirm it glitches out alot, and only changes it about 50… 06/30/2015 on Rekt +1
#30 - I don't have any 06/28/2015 on Sailors jump from the HMS... +3
#15 - I went to the dentist, nobody was there, they took me in, extr…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/28/2015 on Clean your teeth +5
#54 - kilickateth has deleted their comment.
#3 - I recently got a thing unstuck from between my teeth.... it wa… 06/28/2015 on Your dick is small, but... 0
#10 - I got a tooth extraction without an appointment  [+] (3 new replies) 06/28/2015 on Clean your teeth +1
User avatar #14 - bagguhsleep (06/28/2015) [-]
it just sounds like you got in a fistfight

did you forget to tell them it was a prank?
User avatar #15 - adolfoliverbush (06/28/2015) [-]
I went to the dentist, nobody was there, they took me in, extracted my tooth, and now my jaw hurts
#54 - kilickateth has deleted their comment.
#7 - this was more than 70 years ago? how is it too soon?.... I want one  [+] (5 new replies) 06/28/2015 on Sailors jump from the HMS... +15
#26 - John Cena (06/28/2015) [-]
In that case can I get some Holocaust themed Abandon Threads?
I mean it was 70 years ago so we're good.
User avatar #31 - aldothenazi (06/29/2015) [-]
Holohoax never happend dude.
User avatar #55 - trojanmannn (06/29/2015) [-]
b8
User avatar #97 - aldothenazi (06/29/2015) [-]
Truth axully.
User avatar #30 - adolfoliverbush (06/28/2015) [-]
I don't have any
#6 - saw them all, everyone should when they got in … 06/27/2015 on In celebration of June 26th +14
#12 - I think he deserved it personally.... same with anyone who par… 06/27/2015 on When you park in a handicap... +1
#689 - Comment deleted 06/27/2015 on This is your new husband 0
#48 - I really liked the first one.... alot … 06/27/2015 on Human centipad 3 poster -1
#260 - I completely agree with you, but for real the first two season… 06/23/2015 on Our next 44 Presidents 0
#258 - but also, what's wrong with MLP? it was good for the …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/23/2015 on Our next 44 Presidents 0
User avatar #259 - drachma (06/23/2015) [-]
I can't stand the fans. Not just talking cring comps you see online. Never saw the show, nothing against the show, legit can't stand the fans IRL. A flock of them invaded the local card store with their pens, backpacks, and weird mannerism and wont shut the hell up about that show.

Long story short it was so annoying I had to just stop going to MTG tournies that were really fun because the crowd got toxic as hell.
User avatar #260 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
I completely agree with you, but for real the first two seasons were pretty good, but it's not everybody's cup of tea
#256 - this is such an honor, -127 thumbs, I love all of you people <3  [+] (4 new replies) 06/23/2015 on Our next 44 Presidents 0
#257 - drachma (06/23/2015) [-]
I didn't even thumb down. when a post gets this negative it's like poking a dead body.
User avatar #258 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
but also, what's wrong with MLP?

it was good for the first two seasons, after that, basically unwatchable
User avatar #259 - drachma (06/23/2015) [-]
I can't stand the fans. Not just talking cring comps you see online. Never saw the show, nothing against the show, legit can't stand the fans IRL. A flock of them invaded the local card store with their pens, backpacks, and weird mannerism and wont shut the hell up about that show.

Long story short it was so annoying I had to just stop going to MTG tournies that were really fun because the crowd got toxic as hell.
User avatar #260 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
I completely agree with you, but for real the first two seasons were pretty good, but it's not everybody's cup of tea
#15 - Useless is better than negative...  [+] (8 new replies) 06/23/2015 on Our next 44 Presidents -27
User avatar #29 - bossmanholms (06/23/2015) [-]
Nah, I would rather have a leader doing something wrong than nothing at all. Effort matters because they might end up doing something right eventually.
#124 - gerfox (06/23/2015) [-]
I don't really follow that logic. The Greeks choose leaders who wanted to "do something" meaning increased pensions, fewer work hours and earlier retirement ages . It fucked them up. Id much rather have a leader who do something sensible and sustainable, and not to ambitious rather than someone who has "Messiah syndrome".
User avatar #145 - bossmanholms (06/23/2015) [-]
Well I rather have someone sensible also but that wasn't one of the options.
#264 - gerfox (06/24/2015) [-]
When a new government do a lot theres a significant risk that something they do will fuck up shit. If they do less, the shit they do wrong can be corrected by the next government - but if the shit they do is extensive, then its much harder to correct. I've seen that a lot of Americans are dissatisfied with Obamacare, and think that was a mistake. I've also seen Republicans saying they want to abolish it. Obamacare is extensive, and will take a lot of time to remove - and the repercussions of it will be seen in US healthcare for decades.

TLR ambitious governments tend to fuck up a lot, while not-so-ambitious government tend to fuck up a lot less. The clean-up jobs are thereafter.
User avatar #265 - bossmanholms (06/24/2015) [-]
Yes but now we have actual evidence of what works and what doesn't and why. Sometimes people think something won't work or will work and it does or doesn't because theory and practice are two different things.
#266 - gerfox (06/24/2015) [-]
No, not really. We are as clueless as we've always been. Take liberalistic and socialistic economic policies for instance. In the US up until the end of the cold war liberalist economic policies, and the minimum state worked like a charm. Now it's a mess to some extent. Meanwhile socalist economic policies have worked well in countries like Norway, Sweden, Denmark and New Zealand for instance. It all depends.
#86 - paddypancake (06/23/2015) [-]
Damm right you are
User avatar #20 - mychaelmoar (06/23/2015) [-]
Bruh, we need someone who can stand up and tell people they're right or wrong based on the merits of their decisions.

That's only the entire reasoning for the existence of our executive branch. If he/she/it/pyrofox can't look at issues from at least a centered position with only slight hints of bias, they shouldn't lead. And I say that recognizing that this blankets a majority of our previous leaders - they were shitty and didn't know what they were really doing, and usually rode on the coattails of others' efforts.

Sound like someone we're hearing about in the media? (If Bush, Cruz, Hilary, or Christie don't ring a bell, then get the fuck out of here and onto the mainstream news sites where the circlejerk is taking place and then you'll understand).
#8 - your point?  [+] (2 new replies) 06/22/2015 on Our next 44 Presidents -10
#31 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
Fucking russia is gonna have fucking uranium fucking weopons and will fuck the usa in it's asshole. You stupid bitch. Putin is gonna become the next hitler and he's gonna do nothing wrong.
#81 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
He's already become that, it's just a matter of when somebody's going to try and stand up to him.
#16 - I don't like cowboy bebop 06/22/2015 on ACTUALLY good anime 0
#5 - I plan on voting for hillary because I think she won't be a t…  [+] (66 new replies) 06/22/2015 on Our next 44 Presidents -127
#139 - drachma (06/23/2015) [-]
This is why 18 year old bronies shouldn't be aloud to vote
User avatar #256 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
this is such an honor, -127 thumbs, I love all of you people <3
#257 - drachma (06/23/2015) [-]
I didn't even thumb down. when a post gets this negative it's like poking a dead body.
User avatar #258 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
but also, what's wrong with MLP?

it was good for the first two seasons, after that, basically unwatchable
User avatar #259 - drachma (06/23/2015) [-]
I can't stand the fans. Not just talking cring comps you see online. Never saw the show, nothing against the show, legit can't stand the fans IRL. A flock of them invaded the local card store with their pens, backpacks, and weird mannerism and wont shut the hell up about that show.

Long story short it was so annoying I had to just stop going to MTG tournies that were really fun because the crowd got toxic as hell.
User avatar #260 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
I completely agree with you, but for real the first two seasons were pretty good, but it's not everybody's cup of tea
#126 - omegez (06/23/2015) [-]
wtf is wrong with you?
User avatar #122 - jamesten (06/23/2015) [-]
rand paul will listen to the constitution
User avatar #119 - whitie (06/23/2015) [-]
Hillary is just republican lite, you might as well just vote for a real republican, if you want a real liberal try Bernie Sanders
#108 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
Or how about you get real democracy. Every so called democracy is more like a dictatorship. You can only vote on who you disslike the least. After you vote someone in you have nothing to say about anything. they can lie before they get voted in. After that they can do whatever they want. And you cant do anything aboutit. And trying to overthrow that goverment is treason. And it's life in prission or death. That's a wierd mix of dictatorship and democacy. And it does not mix well. go full out with one side. or nothing. I live in sweden. And i would love it to be a real dictatorship. Sence what we have now if close to it. If you vote someone in that the other partys dont like everyone votes agains them. Not to do something good or bad. Just to be against them. I wand real democacy. i want everyone to be able to vote on every law. Not vote someone in that can do something you dont want. That's not democracy. It's a dictator that you vote in. And all you can do. Is hope that they dont go against everything they say. You need to hope that they dont fuck you in the ASS!
#80 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
That's what they said about Obama, and look where that took us?

Oh, and this is coming from a registered Democrat that VOTED for the son of a bitch in 2012. You bet your ass I was pissed when he kept fucking up after his reelection I only gave him the benefit of the doubt regarding his first term because almost nothing got done due to Congress dicking around, but in his second term he finally accomplished some things, and they were failures.
User avatar #63 - platinumaltaria (06/23/2015) [-]
And you're horribly, horribly wrong. Have you even listened to her?
User avatar #59 - commontroll (06/23/2015) [-]
She couldn't even stop herself from sending highly sensitive information via her personal email. Why the fuck wouldn't she be a fuck up if she couldn't even handle that?
User avatar #50 - SteyrAUG (06/23/2015) [-]
Ah yes, Benghazi and the thing where she deleted 30,000 emails because "having two email accounts is too much of a hassle" really showed that she's a person worth trusting.

Do you even watch the news? I mean, Jon Stewart covered it and his bread and butter is making fun of republicans.
User avatar #21 - greyhoundfd (06/23/2015) [-]
Have you even heard Hillary give a speech? Is this actually the person you expect to not fuck up the country. Vote for Sanders in the primary, an actual firebrand who wants to get shit done.
User avatar #60 - SteyrAUG (06/23/2015) [-]
Just curious, why is it that the democratic candidates i've heard about are all old as dirt when one if the major things they had against john mccain in 2008 was that he was too old?
User avatar #62 - greyhoundfd (06/23/2015) [-]
Hell if I know. The truth is that when you have a semi-viable candidate (and McCain was viable, at least until he chose Palin as a VP) you use whatever ammo is left to take them down. With Obama, it was that "He wasn't born in America, amirite?", and with McCain it was his age.
#82 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
He didn't CHOOSE Palin as a VP, the Republican Party chose for him to try and appeal to the female vote. Of course there were WAY better options that they could've chosen than Palin.
User avatar #9 - dwarfman (06/23/2015) [-]
Fuck Hillary and her useless political career. Give me Warren, she's gets shit done and done right.
#32 - failtotheepicpower (06/23/2015) [-]
well Bernie sanders is the closest thing we've got to elizabeth warren seriously have no idea why people don't want him way more, he's the only candidate not run by big banks
#136 - rundas (06/23/2015) [-]
Why
WHY
the fuck would you vote for Bernie Sanders?
Seriously, voting for someone just because they're the "underdog" or an "outsider" or whatever even though he's been in Washington for 6gorillion years or "something new" or shit like that is just as bad as voting for Hillary because she's a woman.
#262 - failtotheepicpower (06/23/2015) [-]
or i could be voting for him because we agree on 99% of the issues isidewith.com

User avatar #102 - captnnorway (06/23/2015) [-]
He wont win because he's too far left. The more moderate democrats wont vote for him, and the republicans will hate him. Still ... I hope he wins, I like him.
#263 - failtotheepicpower (06/23/2015) [-]
I doubt they'd hate him nearly as much as they hate hillary currently. The real reason he won't win is a lack of publicity and because he gets so few minority votes, which you really need to win the primary.
User avatar #61 - StewieGGriffin (06/23/2015) [-]
He sounds great if you're a socialist.
#143 - dimppa (06/23/2015) [-]
MFW its 2015 and 'Mericans are still butthurt about socialism.
User avatar #181 - cabbagemayhem (06/23/2015) [-]
Socialism is still a problem for many western nations. Why would we suddenly stop caring about an ongoing problem? Socialism, in one form or another, has really been a problem throughout all of history. I don't see either side giving up until the truth is revealed and the beast is caged once and for all.
User avatar #187 - dimppa (06/23/2015) [-]
I agree, free healthcare, security in job sector and generally better life offered by the nation sucks..

FFS Socialism =/= Communism.

Check the nordic countries and their relation to socialism and lecture me again.
User avatar #198 - cabbagemayhem (06/23/2015) [-]
I'm referring specifically to socialism, not just communism. There's no such thing as free healthcare, it's a misnomer. There is only socialized healthcare. Job security is a false cause too. Furthermore, saying socialism can't be bad because it has free healthcare and job security is like saying Hitler can't be bad because he funded research and respected women. There is a price for your perceived benefits.
User avatar #208 - dimppa (06/23/2015) [-]
in short you just decided to go around this "...Check the nordic countries and their relation to socialism and lecture me again..."

By just lecturing me more, since your so stuck up with "evil socialism"
User avatar #210 - cabbagemayhem (06/23/2015) [-]
I'm familiar with socialism in the Nordic countries. It doesn't change anything. Close examination of them makes them less of an exception than people like to tout.
User avatar #211 - dimppa (06/23/2015) [-]
well it seems you have some kind of personal vendetta against it, best of luck with it.
User avatar #212 - cabbagemayhem (06/23/2015) [-]
I don't have anything personal against it. I just know that its nature is to subvert its citizens and it can become personal when it starts to prevent you from peacefully living your life in some way that you want to live it.
User avatar #166 - lean (06/23/2015) [-]
Because at the core of socialism is some sense of duty towards those who do not deserve it by any other means than their existence. I refute that. I do not need people who do not work. Society doesn't need people who do not work, because all they do is take. By what morality is it acceptable to take from someone (by force) what they have earned and give to someone who has not earned?
User avatar #178 - joshwontwon (06/23/2015) [-]
because if it's completely impossible, either from a mental or physical defect, and a person can't fend for themselves, why should we just abandon them. Do they deserve less because of something they couldn't help? I know there's people who abuse the system, but what morality is there to take (by force) any chance of these people living a decent life because of a few bad eggs.
User avatar #184 - lean (06/23/2015) [-]
The number of functionally disabled people who are physically or mentally incapable of work is nowhere near the 35.4% of Americans who receive government subsidies currently. When you do that math, you suddenly realize that 105,682,000 Americans have full time jobs. Of those, 16,685,000 are government workers. That means that 88,997,000 people support the rest. And people like you think we don't do enough. I'll say it again, we don't need you. You need us.
User avatar #193 - joshwontwon (06/23/2015) [-]
Funny, I don't remember being on government assistance. There's actually over 105 million people working full time in America out of 144 million workers total. There are 109 million people on welfare at it's absolute broadest term. The funny thing is this includes children (Who can't work) and the elderly (who have already worked and retired).But nah, they don't deserve it since they aren't working now right?
User avatar #201 - StewieGGriffin (06/23/2015) [-]
60% of those 109 million people receiving welfare are able body workers. Some of those people receive more money than some people working minimum wage jobs, but do they deserve it? People who are on welfare need a better reason to work, but socialism would be more benefitial to them than the people who are working those minimum wage jobs making less money than people who are at home sitting on their couch and collecting those checks.
User avatar #204 - joshwontwon (06/23/2015) [-]
Just because you're receiving government aid does not mean you are not working. According to the U.S. Census Bureau data in 2012, roughly 23% of households with at least one working adult received well-means benefits. For medicaid alone, 28% between the ages of 16 and 64 were working and another 15% worked part time. That's 43% of medicaid recipients. Roughly 60 percent of food stamp recipients who were of working age and weren’t disabled were employed while receiving benefits, according to a Census Bureau sample calculated by the liberal Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. And yeah, I would damn well hope people are receiving more than minimum wage for government assistance, because minimum wage cannot support anyone let alone an entire family. When you're on these programs, it's assumed you do not have a job and you need to support your family or yourself with shelter, food, water, and other necessities until you can find a job. You are literally implying that all people on welfare do not want a job, that they do not work, that they are all lazy, and that's not even close to true.
#146 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
Is it surprising though? Russia has the same relationship to Capitalism.
User avatar #98 - davin (06/23/2015) [-]
>Implying socialism is a bad thing
User avatar #127 - lean (06/23/2015) [-]
>implying public ownership of the means of production, cooperatives and economic planning aren't infringements on personal liberties
User avatar #152 - davin (06/23/2015) [-]
Yeah, the US is such a great place to live if you're rich
User avatar #140 - rawesome (06/23/2015) [-]
>implying socialism and communism is the same thing
User avatar #156 - lean (06/23/2015) [-]
Not even close to implying that. Look up the definition of socialism once, and stop confusing it with social welfare.
User avatar #195 - rawesome (06/23/2015) [-]
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

It has nothing to do with governments taking over the business's or letting freeloaders freeload Good luck getting that welfare check unless you're physically unable to do ANYTHING in a communist state , it's about helping those who are unable to help themselves and minimizing the gap between the rich and the poor.

I can see from your reply in #166 though that you don't believe that people who can't fend for the self deserve any help, which I can't help but interpret as you not really caring about anyone but yourself and your closest - Which is fine, you're entitled to that opinion.
Just keep in mind that crime rates correlates directly to the gap between the rich and the poor and that every revolution in history has occurred when this gap became too big.
User avatar #200 - lean (06/23/2015) [-]
I'll raise your Karl Marx by Paul the apostle "he who does not work, neither shall he eat"

I flat out refuse the theory of "each according to his ability/ need". I don't care. Zero.
Reality is an absolute, and the reality is I don't need people who damn money as evil then ask me to borrow some. Anyone who damns money has come by it dishonorably, anyone who values it has earned it. You know what the hallmark is of mediocrity? Someone who looks at anothers' achievements with resentment. These naysayers who claim we need to pay our "fair share" when we are the only one producing anything worth sharing. Those who claim it greed to want to keep what you earn. I don't need or care for the acceptance or appreciation of people whom I don't respect and don't respect me. Guilt is a rope that wears thin
User avatar #191 - dimppa (06/23/2015) [-]
Social welfare was and is the most important thing for many european countries, without socialist movement europe might be in the same shape as US is.
User avatar #144 - marinepenguin (06/23/2015) [-]
Socialism is only one step to the right of communism.
User avatar #150 - rawesome (06/23/2015) [-]
Patriotism is just one step to the left from nationalism which is just one step away from being a nazi, see I just godwin'd the shit out of your argument
User avatar #182 - marinepenguin (06/23/2015) [-]
I meant more in terms of government size and power. Both communism and fascism have total control of all industry and every facet of the economy. Socialism is just one step below that, with the government being heavily involved in the economy and industry, but doesn't directly control it.

I'm a supporter of smaller government, so any of those options I'd prefer to avoid.

And for the record, no form of government is inherently bad. Specific forms of government, usually attract certain times of individuals, and creates certain types of common issues.
User avatar #162 - lean (06/23/2015) [-]
Having pride in where you come from is not the same thing as believing your government to be 100% infallible no matter what they do. It is the duty of a patriot to protect his country from his government. That being said, communism got it sorta right; America is not divided by economic class warfare where the majority work and the elites rule, America is divided by class warfare where the working people are struggling against the non working class, who are being funded by the elites. That is why we are against socialism. We live in a society that increasingly rewards non work and increasingly penalizes work.
#147 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
well you don't have to take many steps the other way to be a capitalism
User avatar #15 - adolfoliverbush (06/23/2015) [-]
Useless is better than negative...
User avatar #29 - bossmanholms (06/23/2015) [-]
Nah, I would rather have a leader doing something wrong than nothing at all. Effort matters because they might end up doing something right eventually.
#124 - gerfox (06/23/2015) [-]
I don't really follow that logic. The Greeks choose leaders who wanted to "do something" meaning increased pensions, fewer work hours and earlier retirement ages . It fucked them up. Id much rather have a leader who do something sensible and sustainable, and not to ambitious rather than someone who has "Messiah syndrome".
User avatar #145 - bossmanholms (06/23/2015) [-]
Well I rather have someone sensible also but that wasn't one of the options.
#264 - gerfox (06/24/2015) [-]
When a new government do a lot theres a significant risk that something they do will fuck up shit. If they do less, the shit they do wrong can be corrected by the next government - but if the shit they do is extensive, then its much harder to correct. I've seen that a lot of Americans are dissatisfied with Obamacare, and think that was a mistake. I've also seen Republicans saying they want to abolish it. Obamacare is extensive, and will take a lot of time to remove - and the repercussions of it will be seen in US healthcare for decades.

TLR ambitious governments tend to fuck up a lot, while not-so-ambitious government tend to fuck up a lot less. The clean-up jobs are thereafter.
User avatar #265 - bossmanholms (06/24/2015) [-]
Yes but now we have actual evidence of what works and what doesn't and why. Sometimes people think something won't work or will work and it does or doesn't because theory and practice are two different things.
#266 - gerfox (06/24/2015) [-]
No, not really. We are as clueless as we've always been. Take liberalistic and socialistic economic policies for instance. In the US up until the end of the cold war liberalist economic policies, and the minimum state worked like a charm. Now it's a mess to some extent. Meanwhile socalist economic policies have worked well in countries like Norway, Sweden, Denmark and New Zealand for instance. It all depends.
#86 - paddypancake (06/23/2015) [-]
Damm right you are
User avatar #20 - mychaelmoar (06/23/2015) [-]
Bruh, we need someone who can stand up and tell people they're right or wrong based on the merits of their decisions.

That's only the entire reasoning for the existence of our executive branch. If he/she/it/pyrofox can't look at issues from at least a centered position with only slight hints of bias, they shouldn't lead. And I say that recognizing that this blankets a majority of our previous leaders - they were shitty and didn't know what they were really doing, and usually rode on the coattails of others' efforts.

Sound like someone we're hearing about in the media? (If Bush, Cruz, Hilary, or Christie don't ring a bell, then get the fuck out of here and onto the mainstream news sites where the circlejerk is taking place and then you'll understand).
#7 - John Cena (06/22/2015) [-]
She's fucking selling uranium to russia.
User avatar #8 - adolfoliverbush (06/22/2015) [-]
your point?
#31 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
Fucking russia is gonna have fucking uranium fucking weopons and will fuck the usa in it's asshole. You stupid bitch. Putin is gonna become the next hitler and he's gonna do nothing wrong.
#81 - John Cena (06/23/2015) [-]
He's already become that, it's just a matter of when somebody's going to try and stand up to him.
#5 - My friend's dad actually lost a bet, so he had to pierce his n… 06/22/2015 on Nipple Rings +1
#61 - I am 06/19/2015 on Luna Lovegood 0
#2 - Picture 06/19/2015 on The more you know +3
#15 - B-Be gentle senpai  [+] (8 new replies) 06/19/2015 on Kid freezing in Norway... 0
User avatar #18 - heartlessrobot (06/19/2015) [-]
Nah
#107 - thegreentornado (06/19/2015) [-]
User avatar #183 - heartlessrobot (06/22/2015) [-]
You're not allowed to object.
User avatar #184 - thegreentornado (06/24/2015) [-]
What did you say, you heartless robot?
User avatar #185 - heartlessrobot (06/24/2015) [-]
You're not the one getting booty-rekt yet, so you have to wait until it's your turn for the booty reking to object.
User avatar #186 - thegreentornado (06/24/2015) [-]
Oh. WELP, my work here is done. Goodbye!
User avatar #187 - heartlessrobot (06/24/2015) [-]
What, don't you want to wait for your turn?
#188 - thegreentornado (06/24/2015) [-]
PFFFFT! NAAAAHH! I ain't gonna put myself in that situation. F***k that!
Now, excuse me while I - HEUGH!
#6 - what about touchmybutt?  [+] (10 new replies) 06/19/2015 on Kid freezing in Norway... 0
User avatar #13 - heartlessrobot (06/19/2015) [-]
Well, if you insist...
User avatar #15 - adolfoliverbush (06/19/2015) [-]
B-Be gentle senpai
User avatar #18 - heartlessrobot (06/19/2015) [-]
Nah
#107 - thegreentornado (06/19/2015) [-]
User avatar #183 - heartlessrobot (06/22/2015) [-]
You're not allowed to object.
User avatar #184 - thegreentornado (06/24/2015) [-]
What did you say, you heartless robot?
User avatar #185 - heartlessrobot (06/24/2015) [-]
You're not the one getting booty-rekt yet, so you have to wait until it's your turn for the booty reking to object.
User avatar #186 - thegreentornado (06/24/2015) [-]
Oh. WELP, my work here is done. Goodbye!
User avatar #187 - heartlessrobot (06/24/2015) [-]
What, don't you want to wait for your turn?
#188 - thegreentornado (06/24/2015) [-]
PFFFFT! NAAAAHH! I ain't gonna put myself in that situation. F***k that!
Now, excuse me while I - HEUGH!
#25 - you gotta go fetch her badonkadonk bro, whats wrong with seemi… 06/18/2015 on Do Actors get Boners? +1
#23 - what's wrong with that? as a male I primarily give my…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/18/2015 on Do Actors get Boners? +2
User avatar #24 - spookywasted (06/18/2015) [-]
Besides the fact that makes you seem like a faggot? The fact that its a Borderlands 2 reference.
User avatar #25 - adolfoliverbush (06/18/2015) [-]
you gotta go fetch her badonkadonk bro, whats wrong with seeming like a faggot?
#103 - I think it's more that he lied about it 06/14/2015 on 4chan height detectives +1

items

Total unique items point value: 1323 / Total items point value: 3232
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #22 - Anonymis (05/20/2015) [-]
Lets have gay oral sex.
User avatar #23 to #22 - adolfoliverbush (05/20/2015) [-]
<.< maybe >.>
User avatar #24 to #23 - Anonymis (05/20/2015) [-]
maybe?
More like
Mayes I'll have gay oral sex with you anonymis
 Friends (0)