Upload
Login or register

aaronjzc

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:8/29/2010
Last Login:1/18/2014
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 22268 total,  24222 ,  1954
Comment Thumbs: 5407 total,  6362 ,  955
Content Level Progress: 26.2% (262/1000)
Level 222 Content: Mind Blower → Level 223 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 6% (6/100)
Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:44
Content Views:38117
Times Content Favorited:2285 times
Total Comments Made:1181
FJ Points:27930

latest user's comments

#244 - **aaronjzc rolled a random image posted in comment #87 at … 05/17/2012 on Forever a Whale -3
#65 - that was actually an awesome movie 05/17/2012 on like a sir 0
#149 - i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming t… 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#145 - it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many re… 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#140 - one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang hav…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar
#149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar
#148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#132 - so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been  [+] (9 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar
#143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar
#155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar
#140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar
#149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar
#148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#129 - you mean your claim that god exists?  [+] (11 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar
#132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar
#143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar
#155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar
#140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar
#149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar
#148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#127 - that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who beli…  [+] (27 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar
#135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar
#166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar
#173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar
#186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar
#154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar
#168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar
#146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar
#129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar
#132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar
#143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar
#155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar
#140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar
#149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar
#148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#123 - i never said anything of the sort. what is your outlook on it?  [+] (31 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#133 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry this guy is being an asshole religious guy. Most of us aren't like him.
User avatar
#145 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many religious people who respect my beliefs, as i respect theirs. thank you for being considerate.
#126 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I believe I exist because humanity was created by God.
But if there was no cause, there was no effect. Anyone who claims the Big Bang was a cause effectively claims their own nonexistence.
User avatar
#127 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who believes in the big bang theory effectively claims that as the origin of their existence.
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar
#135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar
#166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar
#173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar
#186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar
#154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar
#168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar
#146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar
#129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar
#132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar
#143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar
#155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar
#140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar
#149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar
#148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#119 - now there's a completely different argument right there. are w…  [+] (33 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#120 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, so you don't think you exist?
User avatar
#123 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i never said anything of the sort. what is your outlook on it?
#133 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry this guy is being an asshole religious guy. Most of us aren't like him.
User avatar
#145 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many religious people who respect my beliefs, as i respect theirs. thank you for being considerate.
#126 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I believe I exist because humanity was created by God.
But if there was no cause, there was no effect. Anyone who claims the Big Bang was a cause effectively claims their own nonexistence.
User avatar
#127 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who believes in the big bang theory effectively claims that as the origin of their existence.
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar
#135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar
#166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar
#173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar
#186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar
#154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar
#168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar
#146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar
#129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar
#132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar
#143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar
#155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar
#140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anon (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar
#149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar
#148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.